This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Quaternion-Valued Single-Phase Model for Three-Phase Power Systems

Xiaoming Gou, Zhiwen Liu, Wei Liu,  Yougen Xu, and Jiabin Wang This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61331019, 61490691).X. Gou, Z. Liu, Y. Xu are with the School of Information and Electronics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China (email: xmgou@bit.edu.cn, zwliu@bit.edu.cn, yougenxu@bit.edu.cn).W. Liu and J. Wang are with the Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, United Kingdom (email: w.liu@sheffield.ac.uk, j.b.wang@sheffield.ac.uk).
Abstract

In this work, a quaternion-valued model is proposed in lieu of the Clarke’s α\alpha, β\beta transformation to convert three-phase quantities to a hypercomplex single-phase signal. The concatenated signal can be used for harmonic distortion detection in three-phase power systems. In particular, the proposed model maps all the harmonic frequencies into frequencies in the quaternion domain, while the Clarke’s transformation-based methods will fail to detect the zero sequence voltages. Based on the quaternion-valued model, the Fourier transform, the minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) algorithm and the multiple signal classification (MUSIC) algorithm are presented as examples to detect harmonic distortion. Simulations are provided to demonstrate the potentials of this new modeling method.

Index Terms:
harmonics detection, Fourier transform, minimum variance distortionless response, multiple signal classification, quaternion, three-phase power system

I Introduction

Power quality control is one of the major concerns for power delivery systems to function reliably, and it requires measurements of voltage characteristics, among which the frequency measurement is a non-trivial task due to the presence of voltage sags and voltage harmonics mostly caused by nonlinear loads [1]. In the particular case of three-phase power systems, the Clarke’s α\alpha, β\beta transformation is widely used as the preprocessing method to create a complex-valued single-phase signal from the real-valued three-phase signals [2], so that traditional complex-valued spectrum estimation methods can be applied, such as the MVDR method or the recently proposed Iterative MVDR (I-MVDR) method [3, 4]. To improve the resolution, we can further apply the subspace methods and one representative example is the MUSIC method [5].

However, all the zero sequence voltages will be cancelled out in the complex-valued signal and hence can not be detected. Although these harmonic voltages would simply be blocked by a delta transformer, they will add up in the neutral, leading to overheating in the transformer and potential fire hazards [6]. To detect these harmonics, as well as harmonics of other orders, we propose a quaternion-valued model and all the traditional spectrum estimation methods can be extended to this domain, such as MVDR and MUSIC. We will show that harmonics of all orders will be reserved in the resulting quaternion-valued signal and will be detected by relevant estimation methods.

The rest of this paper is organised as follows. A brief review of the complex-valued model is presented in Section II. Our quaternion-valued model is proposed in Section III, together with the Fourier analysis and the MVDR and MUSIC-like estimation algorithms. Simulation results are provided in Section IV and conclusions are drawn in Section V.

II Complex-valued frequency estimation for three-phase power systems

II-A A brief review

We consider the following discrete-time balanced three-phase power system in the presence of H1H-1 harmonic distortions:

va(n)=h=1HVhcos(h(ΩnTs+ϕ))+ϵa(n),vb(n)=h=1HVhcos(h(ΩnTs+ϕ2π3))+ϵb(n),vc(n)=h=1HVhcos(h(ΩnTs+ϕ+2π3))+ϵc(n),\begin{split}v_{a}(n)&=\sum_{h=1}^{H}V_{h}\cos(h(\Omega nT_{s}+\phi))+\epsilon_{a}(n)\;,\\ v_{b}(n)&=\sum_{h=1}^{H}V_{h}\cos\Big{(}h\Big{(}\Omega nT_{s}+\phi-\frac{2\pi}{3}\Big{)}\Big{)}+\epsilon_{b}(n)\;,\\ v_{c}(n)&=\sum_{h=1}^{H}V_{h}\cos\Big{(}h\Big{(}\Omega nT_{s}+\phi+\frac{2\pi}{3}\Big{)}\Big{)}+\epsilon_{c}(n)\;,\end{split} (1)

where {Vh}h=1H\{V_{h}\}_{h=1}^{H} are the amplitudes of the harmonic signals, Ω\Omega is the fundamental (angular) frequency, TsT_{s} is the sampling interval, ϕ\phi is the signal phase, and ϵa(n),ϵb(n),ϵc(n)\epsilon_{a}(n),\epsilon_{b}(n),\epsilon_{c}(n) are the measurement noise.

Traditionally, the three-phase signals will be converted to a complex-valued single-phase signal via the Clarke’s α,β\alpha,\beta transformation. Firstly, the three-phase signals are mixed into two parts, namely vα(n)v_{\alpha}(n) and vβ(n)v_{\beta}(n), where

[vα(n)vβ(n)]=𝐓[va(n)vb(n)vc(n)],\begin{bmatrix}v_{\alpha}(n)\\ v_{\beta}(n)\end{bmatrix}=\mathbf{T}\begin{bmatrix}v_{a}(n)\\ v_{b}(n)\\ v_{c}(n)\end{bmatrix}\;, (2)
𝐓=23[1121203232].\mathbf{T}=\frac{2}{3}\begin{bmatrix}1&-\frac{1}{2}&-\frac{1}{2}\\ 0&\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}&-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\end{bmatrix}\;. (3)

Then these two parts will be merged as a complex-valued signal vcv(n)=vα(n)+ıvβ(n)v_{cv}(n)=v_{\alpha}(n)+\imath v_{\beta}(n).

With this complex-valued signal, we can exploit the MVDR spectrum to locate the frequencies, and it is given by:

SMVDR(Ω)=1𝐬H(Ω)𝐑1𝐬(Ω),S_{\mathrm{MVDR}}(\Omega)=\frac{1}{\mathbf{s}^{\mathrm{H}}(\Omega)\mathbf{R}^{-1}\mathbf{s}(\Omega)}\;, (4)

where ()H(\cdot)^{\mathrm{H}} is the Hermitian-transpose operation, 𝐑\mathbf{R} is the covariance matrix of dimension M×MM\times M, and

𝐬(Ω)=[1,eıΩTs,,eıΩTs(M1)]T\mathbf{s}(\Omega)=[1,e^{-\imath\Omega T_{s}},\cdots,e^{-\imath\Omega T_{s}(M-1)}]^{\mathrm{T}} (5)

is the frequency sweeping vector.

We can also use the MUSIC spectrum which is expressed as:

SMUSIC(Ω)=1𝐬H(Ω)𝐔N2,S_{\textrm{MUSIC}}(\Omega)=\frac{1}{||\mathbf{s}^{\mathrm{H}}(\Omega)\mathbf{U}_{N}||^{2}}\;, (6)

where ||||||\cdot|| denotes the Euclidean norm, 𝐔N\mathbf{U}_{N} represents the noise subspace and comprises the eigenvectors of the covariance matrix 𝐑\mathbf{R} which are corresponding to the M0M_{0} smallest eigenvalues, where M0M_{0} is assumed to be known or can be estimated using the information theory methods [8].

In practice, the covariance 𝐑\mathbf{R} needs to be updated and estimated from the average of samples,

𝐑^(n)=𝐕cv(n)𝐕cvH(n)/K,\hat{\mathbf{R}}(n)=\mathbf{V}_{cv}(n)\mathbf{V}_{cv}^{\mathrm{H}}(n)/K\;, (7)

where

𝐕cv(n)=[vcv(n)vcv(nK+1)vcv(nM+1)vcv(nKM+2)],\mathbf{V}_{cv}(n)=\!\begin{bmatrix}v_{cv}(n)&\cdots&v_{cv}(n-K+1)\\ \vdots&\ddots&\vdots\\ v_{cv}(n-M+1)&\cdots&v_{cv}(n-K-M+2)\end{bmatrix}\;, (8)

where KK is the number of observations.

II-B Missing harmonic signals in the complex-valued signal

In detail, vcv(n)v_{cv}(n) is composed of complex-domain harmonic signals that can be divided into two categories plus noise,

vcv(n)=vcv1(n)+vcv2(n)+ϵcv(n),v_{cv}(n)=v_{cv1}(n)+v_{cv2}(n)+\epsilon_{cv}(n)\;, (9)

where vcv1(n)v_{cv1}(n) is the summation of all positive sequence voltages,

vcv1(n)=p=1H+23V3p2eı(3p2)(ΩnTs+ϕ),v_{cv1}(n)=\sum_{p=1}^{\lfloor\frac{H+2}{3}\rfloor}V_{3p-2}e^{\imath(3p-2)(\Omega nT_{s}+\phi)}\;, (10)

and vcv2(n)v_{cv2}(n) is the summation of all negative sequence voltages,

vcv2(n)=p=1H+13V3p1eı(3p1)(ΩnTs+ϕ),v_{cv2}(n)=\sum_{p=1}^{\lfloor\frac{H+1}{3}\rfloor}V_{3p-1}e^{-\imath(3p-1)(\Omega nT_{s}+\phi)}\;, (11)

and x\lfloor x\rfloor denotes the largest integer not greater than xx. All the zero sequence voltages have been cancelled out. Zero sequence voltages of the same order are cophasial in the three voltage channels and will be eliminated since both rows of the transformation matrix 𝐓\mathbf{T} are zero-mean vectors.

To solve this problem, we propose our quaternion-valued approach in the next section.

III Quaternion-valued frequency estimation for three-phase power systems

We construct a quaternion-valued signal from the three-phase signals as

vqv(n)=ıva(n)+ȷvb(n)+kvc(n),v_{qv}(n)=\imath v_{a}(n)+\jmath v_{b}(n)+kv_{c}(n)\;, (12)

where ı,ȷ,k\imath,\jmath,k are the three imaginary units of the quaternion algebra which are constrained by [7]

ı2=ȷ2=k2=ıȷk=1,ıȷ=ȷı=k,ȷk=kȷ=ı,kı=ık=ȷ.\begin{split}\imath^{2}&=\jmath^{2}=k^{2}=\imath\jmath k=-1\;,\\ \imath\jmath&=-\jmath\imath=k\;,\\ \jmath k&=-k\jmath=\imath\;,\\ k\imath&=-\imath k=\jmath\;.\end{split} (13)

This quaternion-valued signal contains quaternion-domain harmonic signals that belong to three categories vqv1(n)v_{qv1}(n), vqv2(n)v_{qv2}(n), vqv3(n)v_{qv3}(n) plus noise,

vq(n)=ıva(n)+ȷvb(n)+kvc(n)=vqv1(n)+vqv2(n)+vqv3(n)+ϵqv(n),\begin{split}v_{q}(n)&=\imath v_{a}(n)+\jmath v_{b}(n)+kv_{c}(n)\\ &=v_{qv1}(n)+v_{qv2}(n)+v_{qv3}(n)+\epsilon_{qv}(n)\;,\end{split} (14)

where vqv1(n)v_{qv1}(n) is the summation of all the positive sequence voltages,

vqv1(n)=p=1H+232ıȷk2V3p2{cos[(3p2)(ΩnTs+ϕ)]ı+ȷ+k3sin[(3p2)(ΩnTs+ϕ)]}=p=1H+232ıȷk2V3p2eı+ȷ+k3(3p2)(ΩnTs+ϕ),\begin{split}v_{qv1}(n)&=\sum_{p=1}^{\lfloor\frac{H+2}{3}\rfloor}\frac{2\imath-\jmath-k}{2}V_{3p-2}\big{\{}\cos[(3p-2)(\Omega nT_{s}+\phi)]\\ &\quad-\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{\sqrt{3}}\sin[(3p-2)(\Omega nT_{s}+\phi)]\big{\}}\\ &=\sum_{p=1}^{\lfloor\frac{H+2}{3}\rfloor}\frac{2\imath-\jmath-k}{2}V_{3p-2}e^{-\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{\sqrt{3}}(3p-2)(\Omega nT_{s}+\phi)}\;,\end{split} (15)

vqv2(n)v_{qv2}(n) is the summation of all the negative sequence voltages,

vqv2(n)=p=1H+132ıȷk2V3p1{cos[(3p1)(ΩnTs+ϕ)]+ı+ȷ+k3sin[(3p1)(ΩnTs+ϕ)]}=p=1H+132ıȷk2V3p1eı+ȷ+k3(3p1)(ΩnTs+ϕ),\begin{split}v_{qv2}(n)&=\sum_{p=1}^{\lfloor\frac{H+1}{3}\rfloor}\frac{2\imath-\jmath-k}{2}V_{3p-1}\big{\{}\cos[(3p-1)(\Omega nT_{s}+\phi)]\\ &\quad+\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{\sqrt{3}}\sin[(3p-1)(\Omega nT_{s}+\phi)]\big{\}}\\ &=\sum_{p=1}^{\lfloor\frac{H+1}{3}\rfloor}\frac{2\imath-\jmath-k}{2}V_{3p-1}e^{\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{\sqrt{3}}(3p-1)(\Omega nT_{s}+\phi)}\;,\end{split} (16)

vqv3(n)v_{qv3}(n) is the summation of all the zero sequence voltages,

vqv3(n)=p=1H3V3p(ı+ȷ+k)cos[3p(ΩnTs+ϕ)]=p=1H3V3pı+ȷ+k2(eı+ȷ+k33p(ΩnTs+ϕ)+eı+ȷ+k33p(ΩnTs+ϕ)).\begin{split}v_{qv3}(n)&=\sum_{p=1}^{\lfloor\frac{H}{3}\rfloor}V_{3p}(\imath+\jmath+k)\cos[3p(\Omega nT_{s}+\phi)]\\ &=\sum_{p=1}^{\lfloor\frac{H}{3}\rfloor}V_{3p}\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{2}\Big{(}e^{\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{\sqrt{3}}3p(\Omega nT_{s}+\phi)}\\ &+e^{-\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{\sqrt{3}}3p(\Omega nT_{s}+\phi)}\Big{)}\;.\end{split} (17)

Hence all the harmonic signals will be reserved in the quaternion-valued signal. We may observe from (15)–(17) that the frequencies of the harmonic signals have been mapped into the frequencies of the quaternion-valued signal associated with the ı+ȷ+k3\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{\sqrt{3}} axis (see Fig. 1).

Refer to caption

Figure 1: Quaternion domain frequency associated with the ı+ȷ+k3\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{\sqrt{3}} axis

Refer to caption
Figure 2: MVDR and MUSIC spectra of quaternion- and complex-valued models

Then we can adopt the MVDR spectrum in (4) and the MUSIC spectrum 111Not to be confused with the Quaternion-MVDR (Q-MVDR) algorithm [10] for the adaptive beamforming with vector-sensor array beamforming or the Quaternion-MUSIC (Q-MUSIC) algorithm [11] for the direction-of-arrival estimation with vector-sensor arrays. Their steering vectors are complex-valued vectors multiplied by quaternion-valued scalars, which are conceptionally different from the quaternion-valued frequency sweeping vector defined in this paper. We marked our algorithms by QV-MVDR and QV-MUSIC for clarification. in (6) by substituting the frequency sweeping vector as

𝐬(Ω)=[1,e13(ı+ȷ+k)ΩTs,,eM13(ı+ȷ+k)ΩTs]T.\mathbf{s}(\Omega)=[1,e^{-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}(\imath+\jmath+k)\Omega T_{s}},\cdots,e^{-\frac{M-1}{\sqrt{3}}(\imath+\jmath+k)\Omega T_{s}}]^{\mathrm{T}}\;. (18)

The frequencies detected in the spectrum are either the original real-domain angular frequencies or their additive inverses, namely

  1. (1)

    If a peak is detected in the spectrum in the absence of its additive inverse, it corresponds to a positive or negative sequence voltage signal and this spectrum peak indicates its angular frequency or its additive inverse.

  2. (2)

    If two “mirrored” peaks are detected in the spectrum, they correspond to a zero sequence voltage signal and they indicate the signal’s angular frequency and its additive inverse, respectively.

Refer to caption

(a) Fundamental frequency

Refer to caption

(b) Second-order harmonic frequency

Refer to caption

(c) Third-order harmonic frequency

Figure 3: Averaged estimation errors of quaternion- and complex-valued algorithms

IV Simulations

In this section, we provide some numerical examples to illustrate the performance of the proposed quaternion model. In all experiments, the fundamental frequency is 50 Hz, the sampling frequency is fs=1/Ts=20f_{s}=1/T_{s}=20 KHz, the initial phase is ϕ=π/7\phi=\pi/7, and K=80K=80, M=32M=32. There exist a second-order and a third-order harmonic signals, both set to be 6% in amplitude.

In the first experiment, we test the capability of the two modelings. The MVDR and MUSIC spectra of the quaternion- and complex-valued models are plotted in Fig. 2, where SNR =40=40 dB. It can be observed that the proposed model is able to detect all the harmonic signals, namely 50 Hz (the fundamental frequency), 100-100 Hz (the second-order harmonic), and ±\pm150 Hz (the third-order harmonic), while the complex-valued model fails at the third-order harmonic frequency.

In the second experiment, we test the accuracy of relevant algorithms. The estimation errors (averaged via 300 Monte Carlo simulation runs) of the quaternion- and complex-valued MVDR and MUSIC algorithms are plotted in Fig. 3, where the SNR value varies from 25 to 45 dB. We can see that all the algorithms have similar estimation accuracy.

V Conclusion

We have presented a quaternion-valued model as an alternative preprocessing approach to convert the three-phase signals into a single-phase system. Compared with the Clarke’s transformation, the proposed model can additionally detect the zero sequence voltages. Simulated results show that the proposed model can detect all-order voltage harmonics effectively, while sharing similar estimation accuracy with the complex-valued model.

References

  • [1] M. Bollen, Understanding power quality problems: Voltage sags and interruptions. Wiley-IEEE Press, 2000.
  • [2] M. Akke, “Frequency estimation by demodulation of two complex signals,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 157–163, Jan. 1997.
  • [3] H. J. Jeon and T. G. Chang, “Iterative frequency estimation based on MVDR spectrum,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 621–630, Apr. 2010.
  • [4] Y. Xia and D. P. Mandic, “Augmented MVDR spectrum-based frequency estimation for unbalanced power systems,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 1917–1926, Jul. 2013.
  • [5] R. O. Schmidt, “Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 276–280, Mar. 1986.
  • [6] W. M. Grady and S. Santoso, “Understanding power system harmonics,” IEEE Power Engineering Review, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 8–11, Nov. 2001.
  • [7] J. P. Ward, Quaternions and Cayley numbers: Algebra and applications, Kluwer, Normwell, MA, 1997.
  • [8] M. Wax and T. Kailath, “Detection of signals by information theoretic criteria,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-33, no. 2, pp. 387–392, Apr. 1985.
  • [9] S. J. Sangwine, “Fourier transforms of colour images using quaternion or hypercomplex numbers,” Electronics Letters, vol. 32, no. 21, pp. 1979–1980, Oct. 1996.
  • [10] J. W. Tao, “Performance analysis for interference and noise canceller based on hypercomplex and spatio-temporal-polarisation processes,” IET Radar Sonar and Navigation, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 277–286, Mar. 2013.
  • [11] S. Miron, N. Le Bihan, J. I. Mars, “Quaternion-MUSIC for vector-sensor array processing,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1218–1229, Apr. 2006.