This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

11institutetext: University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571, JAPAN

Recent progress on global and local polarization of hyperons in heavy-ion collisions

\firstnameTakafumi \lastnameNiida\fnsep 11 niida@bnl.gov
Abstract

Since the observation of Λ\Lambda global polarization at RHIC, indicating the most vortical fluid ever observed so far, many experimental and theoretical progresses have been made in understanding of vorticity and polarization phenomena in heavy-ion collisions. But there still exist open questions which are currently being studied. In these proceedings, recent experimental results on global and local polarization of hyperons in heavy-ion collisions are reviewed.

1 Introduction

A partial conversion of an orbital angular momentum carried by two colliding nuclei into spin angular momentum of produced particles is referred to as global polarization Liang:2004ph ; Voloshin:2004ha ; Becattini:2007sr . Observation of Λ\Lambda global polarization by STAR experiment STAR:2017ckg revealed the creation of most vortical fluid ever observed. It will also help to constrain the lifetime of the initial magnetic field created in the collisions as the direction of the magnetic field coincides with the orbital angular momentum direction. While the experimental results of average global polarization are well reproduced by theoretical models, most of which are based on local thermal equilibrium, there are open questions and some of differential measurements including local polarization are not yet fully understood. Study of the polarization phenomena in heavy-ion collisions is relatively new but rapidly growing in this field, providing new information on the initial condition, medium properties, and the collision dynamics. In these proceedings, recent results of hyperon polarization in heavy-ion collisions are reviewed.

2 Global polarization

Global polarization PHP_{H}, the polarization component along the initial orbital angular momentum carried by two colliding nuclei in heavy-ion collisions, was first observed using Λ\Lambda hyperons in Au+Au collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 7.7-200 GeV by STAR experiment STAR:2017ckg ; STAR:2018gyt where the polarization signal decreases with increasing the energy. There was also an attempt to measure it at the LHC energy but the result is consistent with zero as the expected signal is at the level of current precision. Theoretical models predict that the polarization increases starting from sNN\sqrt{s_{{}_{NN}}} 2mN\sim 2m_{N} and becomes a maximum around sNN\sqrt{s_{{}_{NN}}} = 3 GeV and the peak position could be different between Λ\Lambda and Λ¯\bar{\Lambda} Ayala:2021xrn .

Recently, the measurement has been extended to lower energies by STAR fixed-target mode and HADES experiment STAR:2021beb ; HADES:2022enx . Figure 1(left) shows a compilation of Λ\Lambda global polarization as a function of the collision energy. New results at 3 GeV from STAR and at 2.4 and 2.55 GeV from HADES still show an increasing trend of the global polarization, consistent with the calculation from the hydrodynamic model based on three-fluid dynamics Ivanov:2020udj . Note that the lower energy corresponds to the high baryon density region where the medium properties would be notably different. It should be also noted that the detector acceptance in rapidity and transverse momentum pTp_{T} affects the energy dependence since it covers only mid-rapidity at higher energies while it does a nearly whole distribution of produced particles at lower energies. Theoretical models predict differently in the rapidity dependence of global polarization although the current measurements do not show any significant dependence STAR:2018gyt ; STAR:2021beb ; HADES:2022enx . Difference between Λ\Lambda and Λ¯\bar{\Lambda}, as a measure of the initial magnetic field, is not significant with large uncertainties which will be improved in the beam energy scan phase-II at RHIC-STAR.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 1: (Left) Global polarization of Λ\Lambda and Λ¯\bar{\Lambda} hyperons as a function of the center-of-mass energy from STAR, ALICE, and HADES experiments qm2022:Joey . (Right) global polarization of Ξ\Xi and Ω\Omega hyperons compared to that of Λ\Lambda hyperons as a function of the collision energy STAR:2020xbm .

To confirm the vorticity and global polarization picture, it is important to have the measurements for different particle species, preferably with different spins, which provides new insights into the polarization mechanism in heavy-ion collisions. Recently, the measurements with multistrangeness, i.e. Ξ\Xi (spin-1/2) and Ω\Omega (spin-3/2), have been performed by STAR experiment STAR:2020xbm . Unlike for Λ\Lambda hyperons (αΛ=0.732\alpha_{\Lambda}=0.732), the magnitude of decay parameter is small for Ξ\Xi (αΞ=0.401\alpha_{\Xi}=-0.401) and is close to zero for Ω\Omega (αΩ=0.0157\alpha_{\Omega}=0.0157) which makes the polarization measurement difficult. One can use the measurement of daughter Λ\Lambda polarization to know its parent particle’s polarization: PΛ=CXΛPXP_{\rm\Lambda}^{\ast}=C_{\rm X\Lambda}P_{\rm X}^{\ast} where PXP_{\rm X}^{\ast} and PΛP_{\rm\Lambda}^{\ast} are polarizations of parent particle X and its daughter Λ\Lambda in parent rest frame, and CXΛC_{\rm X\Lambda} denotes polarization transfer factor. The factor CXΛC_{\rm X\Lambda} is +0.944 for the decay of ΞΛπ\Xi^{-}\rightarrow\Lambda\pi^{-} and could be either +1 or -0.6 for the decay of ΩΛK\Omega^{-}\rightarrow\Lambda K^{-} due to the uncertainty of decay parameter γΩ(±1)\gamma_{\Omega}(\approx\pm 1). Based on the vorticity picture, the sign of γΩ\gamma_{\Omega} can be determined by the measurement of Ω\Omega global polarization.

Figure 1(right) shows global polarization of Ξ\Xi and Ω\Omega hyperons comparing to Λ\Lambda global polarization as well as transport model calculations. The global polarization averaged over transverse momentum and rapidity for 20-80% Au+Au collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{{}_{NN}}} = 200 GeV is measured to be PΛ=0.24±0.03(stat)±0.03(stat)\langle P_{\Lambda}\rangle=0.24\pm 0.03({\rm stat})\pm 0.03({\rm stat})%, PΞ=0.47±0.10(stat)±0.23(stat)\langle P_{\Xi}\rangle=0.47\pm 0.10({\rm stat})\pm 0.23({\rm stat})%, and PΩ=1.11±0.87(stat)±1.97(stat)\langle P_{\Omega}\rangle=1.11\pm 0.87({\rm stat})\pm 1.97({\rm stat})%. Based on thermal model in the nonrelativistic limit Becattini:2016gvu , the polarization can be given by

𝑷=𝒔/s(s+1)𝝎/(3T),{\bm{P}}=\langle{\bm{s}}\rangle/s\approx(s+1){\bm{\omega}}/(3T), (1)

where ss is the spin of the particle, 𝝎{\bm{\omega}} is the local vorticity of the fluid, and TT is the temperature. There seems hierarchy in the measured PH\langle P_{\rm H}\rangle as expected from Eq. (1) although the uncertainty is still large to make definitive conclusion. The current measurement seems to favor the decay parameter γΩ\gamma_{\Omega} to be +1+1. More precise measurements in the future runs at RHIC and the LHC will help to shed light on the uncertainty of γΩ\gamma_{\Omega} as well as for better understanding of the polarization dependence on particle species.

3 Local polarization

In general, local velocity would depend on many other things, such as density fluctuations, the effect of jets passing through the medium, and collective flow. Thus vorticity could be created locally in heavy-ion collisions Pang:2016igs ; Betz:2007kg ; Xia:2018tes . Vorticity along the beam direction, therefore the polarization, is expected to be induced by elliptic flow, i.e. stronger expansion (more particle emission) in the reaction plane direction than in the out-of-plane direction Voloshin:2017kqp ; Becattini:2017gcx . Such a longitudinal polarization was first observed in Au+Au collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{{}_{NN}}} = 200 GeV by STAR experiment STAR:2019erd , and later in Pb+Pb collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{{}_{NN}}} = 5.02 TeV by ALICE experiment ALICE:2021pzu . There have been extensive theoretical studies to understand the data since the hydrodynamic and transport models fails to explain the sign of the observed signal, although they reasonably describe the data of the global polarization. New term of shear tensor proposed in Refs. Becattini:2021iol ; Fu:2021pok seems to be necessary to explain the data but further experimental inputs are needed for better understanding.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Longitudinal polarization of Λ\Lambda and Λ¯\bar{\Lambda} hyperons, cosθpPzαH/3\langle\cos\theta_{p}^{\ast}\rangle\approx P_{z}\alpha_{H}/3, as a function of azimuthal angle with respect to the second-order event plane Ψ2\Psi_{2} (left) and to the third order event plane Ψ3\Psi_{3} (right) in 20-60% isobar (Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr) collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{{}_{NN}}} = 200 GeV qm2022:Niida . The solid lines are fit functions as indicated in the figures.

Recent high statistics data in isobar collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{{}_{NN}}} = 200 GeV taken by STAR allows to study the polarization even with higher harmonic flow plane. Figure 2 shows raw signal of the longitudinal polarization as a function of hyperon’s azimuthal angle relative to the second-order (left) and third-order (right) event planes qm2022:Niida . Results with the second-order event plane show a clear sine modulation as seen in Au+Au collisions. Results with the third-order event plane also exhibit a similar sinusoidal pattern relative to the azimuthal angle, indicating that vorticity along the beam direction is induced by triangular flow as well as elliptic flow. Hydrodynamic model with the shear term Alzhrani:2022dpi qualitatively explain the data for both the second and third-orders in central-midcentral collisions (but not in peripheral collisions), showing sensitivity of the measurement to specific shear viscosity of quark-gluon plasma formed in the collisions.

4 Summary

In these proceedings, recent progress on the polarization measurements has been reviewed. Thanks to new experimental data at lower energies, energy dependence of global polarization has been studied in detail. Interestingly, the global polarization smoothly increases in lowering collision energy, with a possible maximum around sNN\sqrt{s_{{}_{NN}}} = 3 GeV, despite the change from partonic matter to hadronic matter in studied energy range. The uncertainty is still large but it can be improved in future analyses or experiments. Measurements with multistrangeness are of great interest and future improvements will provide critical information on spin dynamics in the collisions. New measurement on local polarization with the third-order event plane in isobar collisions indicates the creation of triangular-flow-driven vorticity along the beam direction, which shed light on the sign problem of the local polarization.  

Acknowledgment T. Niida is supportted by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP22K03648.

References

  • (1) Z.T. Liang, X.N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 102301 (2005), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 96, 039901 (2006)]
  • (2) S.A. Voloshin (2004), nucl-th/0410089
  • (3) F. Becattini, F. Piccinini, J. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. C 77, 024906 (2008)
  • (4) L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR), Nature 548, 62 (2017)
  • (5) J. Adam et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. C 98, 014910 (2018)
  • (6) A. Ayala, I. Domínguez, I. Maldonado, M.E. Tejeda-Yeomans, Phys. Rev. C 105, 034907 (2022)
  • (7) M.S. Abdallah et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. C 104, L061901 (2021)
  • (8) R. Abou Yassine et al. (HADES) (2022)
  • (9) Y.B. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. C 103, L031903 (2021)
  • (10) J. Adams (STAR), Quark Matter 2022
  • (11) J. Adam et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 162301 (2021)
  • (12) F. Becattini, I. Karpenko, M. Lisa, I. Upsal, S. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. C 95, 054902 (2017)
  • (13) L.G. Pang, H. Petersen, Q. Wang, X.N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 192301 (2016)
  • (14) B. Betz, M. Gyulassy, G. Torrieri, Phys. Rev. C 76, 044901 (2007)
  • (15) X.L. Xia, H. Li, Z.B. Tang, Q. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 98, 024905 (2018)
  • (16) S.A. Voloshin, EPJ Web Conf. 171, 07002 (2018)
  • (17) F. Becattini, I. Karpenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 012302 (2018)
  • (18) J. Adam et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 132301 (2019)
  • (19) S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 172005 (2022)
  • (20) F. Becattini, M. Buzzegoli, G. Inghirami, I. Karpenko, A. Palermo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 272302 (2021)
  • (21) B. Fu, S.Y.F. Liu, L. Pang, H. Song, Y. Yin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 142301 (2021)
  • (22) T. Niida (STAR), Quark Matter 2022
  • (23) S. Alzhrani, S. Ryu, C. Shen, Phys. Rev. C 106, 014905 (2022)