This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Representation dimension of some finite groups

Gurleen Kaur Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali, Knowledge City, Sector 81, Mohali 140 306, India gurleen@iisermohali.ac.in Amit Kulshrestha Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali, Knowledge City, Sector 81, Mohali 140 306, India amitk@iisermohali.ac.in  and  Anupam Singh Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune, Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pashan, Pune 411 008, India anupamk18@gmail.com
Abstract.

For a finite group GG, the representation dimension is the smallest integer realizable as the degree of a complex faithful representation of GG. In this article, we compute representation dimension for some pp-groups, their direct products, and groups with certain conditions on nonlinear irreducible characters. We also make similar computations for the smallest integer realizable as the degree of an irreducible complex faithful representation of GG, if one exists. In the appendix, we present GAP codes to compute these numbers.

Key words and phrases:
irreducible representations, faithful representations, characters, representation dimension
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification:
20D15, 20C15

1. Introduction

Throughout this paper, we restrict our attention to finite groups and complex representations. Let GG be a finite group. One of the classical and challenging problems in the representation theory of finite groups is to determine the smallest positive integer nn such that GG embeds into GL(n,)\operatorname{GL}(n,\mathbb{C}), i.e., GG is isomorphic to a linear group of degree nn. The study of the linear groups has been of natural interest with intensive development by O’Brien, Flannery, Green, James, Jansen, Lusztig, Martino, Steinberg, Tamburini, Tiep, and Zalesskii (see [11, 15, 17, 21, 23, 28, 35, 37]) to name a few. The representation dimension δ(G)\delta(G) of a finite group GG is defined as follows:

δ(G):=min{deg(ρ):ρ is a complex faithful representation of G},\delta(G):=\min\{\operatorname{deg}(\rho):\rho\text{ is a complex faithful representation of }G\},

where deg(ρ)\operatorname{deg}(\rho) denotes the degree of complex faithful representation ρ\rho of GG.

Representation dimension has been extensively studied for finite groups of Lie type (see for example Lubeck [27], Tiep and Zalesskii [37]), and for finite pp-groups (see for example Bardestani, Mallahi-Karai and Salmasian [1], Martino and Tamburuni [12], Karpenko and Merkurjev  [24]).

In literature, another related number δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G), as defined below, is studied.

δirr(G):=min{deg(ρ):ρ is an irreducible complex faithful representation  of G}.\delta_{irr}(G):={\rm min}\{\operatorname{deg}(\rho):\rho\text{ is an irreducible complex faithful representation }\text{ of }G\}.

We note that δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G) does not exist for all groups. However, when it exists, we have the inequality δ(G)δirr(G).\delta(G)\leq\delta_{irr}(G). Szechtman provided a brief history of determining δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G) in §2 of [36].

In this article, we begin with listing several examples in §2 and we prove in a series of theorems that δ(G)\delta(G) equals δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G) if GG is one of the following:

  • (i)

    direct product of simple groups with relatively coprime order;

  • (ii)

    direct product of monolithic groups with relatively coprime order;

  • (iii)

    finite nilpotent group with cyclic center;

  • (iv)

    nonabelian finite group whose all nonlinear irreducible characters have distinct degrees (in particular, finite group with unique nonlinear irreducible character);

  • (v)

    direct product of nonabelian groups of relatively coprime order, whose all nonlinear irreducible characters have distinct degrees.

We determine representation dimension for some finite pp-groups in Theorem 3.1, for certain direct products of finite groups in Theorem 4.1, for odd order groups with exactly two nonlinear irreducible characters of each degree in Theorem 5.1 (following the classification of same from [10]), for finite groups whose all nonlinear irreducible characters are of distinct degree in Theorem 6.1 (following the classification of the same in [5]). In Appendix A, we present GAP codes to compute δ(G)\delta(G) and δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G).

2. Preliminaries

We begin with some examples to understand the representation dimension, δ(G)\delta(G), of a finite group GG.

Example 2.1.

When GG is a cyclic group, δ(G)=δirr(G)=1\delta(G)=\delta_{irr}(G)=1. However, if G=C2×C2G=C_{2}\times C_{2}, then δ(G)\delta(G) equals 22 which shows that understanding the character table of a group is not enough to determine its representation dimension. It is evident that for a group GG, δ(G)=1\delta(G)=1 if, and only if, GG is cyclic. We note that δirr(C2×C2)\delta_{irr}(C_{2}\times C_{2}) does not exist.

Example 2.2.

If GG is a dihedral group, quaternion group, or Cn×CmC_{n}\times C_{m}, where mm is not coprime to nn, then δ(G)=2\delta(G)=2. Determining all finite groups with representation dimension 22 is equivalent to determining all the finite subgroups of GL(2,)\textup{GL}(2,\mathbb{C}). It is pertinent to mention that Brauer, Feit and their successors classified finite linear groups of degree upto 11 over \mathbb{C} (for more details, see the survey article [37] by Tiep and Zalesskii).

Example 2.3.

The representation dimension of a finite abelian group is the rank of the group (see Lemma 3.4 of [31]). Thus, the representation dimension δ(G)\delta(G) for finite groups GG may be arbitrarily large.

If a group GG has a faithful irreducible character χ\chi, then δ(G)deg(χ)\delta(G)\leq\operatorname{deg}(\chi), however δ(G)\delta(G) may be different from δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G).

Example 2.4.

For the group G=A4×D10G=A_{4}\times D_{10}, we have δ(A4×D10)=5\delta(A_{4}\times D_{10})=5 and δirr(A4×D10)=6\delta_{irr}(A_{4}\times D_{10})=6. This is a particular case of a more general result given in Theorem 4.1.

In the case of nonabelian finite simple groups, every nontrivial character is faithful. Hence, for these groups, the representation dimension is equal to the minimal degree of a nonlinear irreducible character.

Example 2.5.

From the character table of the alternating group A4A_{4}, we obtain that δ(A4)=3\delta(A_{4})=3. We remark that the representation dimension of 2.A42.A_{4}, the double cover of A4A_{4}, is 22. This is because it is a subgroup of SU(2){\rm SU}(2). Along similar lines, δ(A5)=3\delta(A_{5})=3, as A5A_{5} is a subgroup of SO(3){\rm SO}(3).

Based on the work of Bessenrodt-Tong-Viet-Zhang [6, Lemma 3.1], δ(An)=n1\delta(A_{n})=n-1, when n15n\geq 15. Using the GAP code given in Appendix A, we obtain that δ(An),\delta(A_{n}), for 6n146\leq n\leq 14, is n1n-1. Hence, the representation dimension of AnA_{n}, for n6n\geq 6, is n1n-1.

Example 2.6.

Due to Result 1 of [34], we have that δirr(Sn)=n1\delta_{irr}(S_{n})=n-1, when n5n\geq 5. Indeed, the standard character of SnS_{n} is faithful and has degree n1n-1. Consequently, δ(Sn)=n1\delta(S_{n})=n-1, for n5n\geq 5.

Example 2.7.

The minimal nonlinear faithful irreducible character degree of GL(2,q){\rm GL}(2,q), GL(3,q){\rm GL}(3,q) and GL(4,q){\rm GL}(4,q) is q1q-1, q2+qq^{2}+q and (q+1)(q2+1)(q+1)(q^{2}+1) respectively (see table II, V, IX in [35]). Since these are minimal nonlinear irreducible character degrees in the character table of their respective groups, these are also the representation dimensions.

Example 2.8.

We have that δ(SL(2,q))=q1\delta({\rm SL}(2,q))=q-1, when qq is even, and δ(SL(2,q))=q12\delta({\rm SL}(2,q))=\frac{q-1}{2}, when qq is odd (see [26]). The representation dimension for finite groups of Lie type is well studied, see [27, 37] for further details.

Example 2.9.

Let GG be a finite group with a non-normal Sylow pp-subgroup PP such that the intersection of two distinct conjugates of PP is trivial. Then, from [3, Theorem 3.2] , it follows that δ(G)>|P|1\delta(G)>\sqrt{|P|}-1.

Example 2.10.

If GG and HH are isoclinic groups with |G|=|H||G|=|H|, then δ(G)=δ(H)\delta(G)=\delta(H), due to [7, Theorem 2.2].

The essential dimension ed(G)\operatorname{ed}(G) of a finite group GG over \mathbb{C}, is also related to the representation dimension of GG. The notion of the essential dimension of GG was introduced by Buhler and Reichstein [8]. It has been proved in [15, Proposition 4.15] that ed(G)δ(G)\operatorname{ed}(G)\leq\delta(G). One is interested to see that when ed(G)\operatorname{ed}(G) coincides with δ(G)\delta(G).

Example 2.11.

In Theorem 4.1 of [24], Karpenko and Merkurjev proved that if GG is a finite pp-group, then ed(G)\operatorname{ed}(G) coincides with δ(G)\delta(G).

3. Representation dimension of pp-groups

Let GG be a finite group. Suppose it has a faithful irreducible character. This information can be read from the character table of GG. Then δ(G)δirr(G)\delta(G)\leq\delta_{irr}(G). One is interested in understanding when δ(G)\delta(G) and δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G) are equal. In the next theorem, we prove that for pp-groups whose center 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) is cyclic, δ(G)\delta(G) equals δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G). We also determine δ(G)\delta(G) for certain pp-groups in the following theorem. We note that for part (4) of the theorem, we depend on the classification of non abelian groups of order p5p^{5}, up to isoclinism, into classes Φ2,Φ3,,Φ10\Phi_{2},\Phi_{3},\cdots,\Phi_{10}, as given in [22].

Theorem 3.1.

The representation dimension δ(G)\delta(G) of certain pp-groups GG is as follows:

  • (1)

    δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G), if GG is a finite pp-group with 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) cyclic;

  • (2)

    pp, if GG is a nonabelian pp-group of order p3p^{3};

  • (3)

    pp, if GG is a nonabelian pp-group of order p4p^{4} with 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) cyclic, and is p+1p+1 otherwise;

  • (4)

    if GG is a nonabelian pp-group of order p5p^{5}, then the following cases arise, using the classification of groups via their isoclinism classes given in [22];

    • (i)

      pp, if GΦ2G\in\Phi_{2} and its center is cyclic, p+1p+1 if 𝒵(G)Cp2×Cp\mathcal{Z}(G)\cong C_{p^{2}}\times C_{p} and is p+2p+2 if 𝒵(G)Cp×Cp×Cp\mathcal{Z}(G)\cong C_{p}\times C_{p}\times C_{p};

    • (ii)

      p+1p+1, if GΦ3G\in\Phi_{3};

    • (iii)

      2p2p, if GΦ4G\in\Phi_{4};

    • (iv)

      p2p^{2}, if GΦ5G\in\Phi_{5};

    • (v)

      2p2p, if GΦ6G\in\Phi_{6};

    • (vi)

      p2p^{2}, if G{Φ7,Φ8}G\in\{\Phi_{7},~\Phi_{8}\};

    • (vii)

      pp, if GΦ9G\in\Phi_{9};

    • (viii)

      p2p^{2}, if GΦ10G\in\Phi_{10}.

  • (5)

    [G:𝒵(G)]\sqrt{[G:\mathcal{Z}(G)]}, if GG is a pp-group with 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) cyclic and |G|=p|G^{\prime}|=p;

  • (6)

    [G:𝒵(G)]\sqrt{[G:\mathcal{Z}(G)]}, if GG is isoclinic to semi-extraspecial pp-group with 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) cyclic (in particular, prp^{r}, if GG is an extraspecial pp-group of order p2r+1p^{2r+1});

  • (7)

    [G:A],[G:A], if GG is a (nonabelian) normally monomial pp-group with 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) cyclic, where AA is a normal abelian subgroup of maximal order (in particular, groups of order p5p^{5} with its center cyclic);

  • (8)

    [G:𝒵(G)]+δ(𝒵(G))1\sqrt{[G:\mathcal{Z}(G)]}+\delta(\mathcal{Z}(G))-1, if GG is a pp-group of nilpotency class 2 with its derived subgroup cyclic (in particular, [G:𝒵(G)]\sqrt{[G:\mathcal{Z}(G)]}, if GG is a pp-group of nilpotency class 2 with its center cyclic).

Proof.
  • (1)

    Let GG be a pp-group with cyclic center. Suppose χ\chi is a faithful character of minimal degree. Then, due to [1, Lemma 3.5], it follows that χ\chi can be written as a direct sum of exactly rr irreducible characters, where rr is the minimal number of generators of 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G). Since 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) is cyclic, it follows that r=1r=1. Consequently, χ\chi is an irreducible character of GG. Hence, δ(G)\delta(G) equals δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G).

  • (2)

    Suppose GG is a nonabelian pp-group of order p3p^{3}. Since GG is nonabelian, there exists an irreducible nonlinear character of GG. Further, no linear character of GG is faithful, otherwise, the group GG would be isomorphic to a finite subgroup of \mathbb{C}^{*} and is therefore cyclic. If the order of 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) is p2p^{2}, then GG is abelian. Hence, the order of 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) must be pp and is therefore cyclic. By [20, Theorem 2.32 ], GG has a faithful irreducible character. Also, in this case, δ(G)\delta(G) equals δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G). So, we need to determine δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G). As the quotient group G/𝒵(G)G/\mathcal{Z}(G) is abelian, we have that G𝒵(G)G^{\prime}\leq\mathcal{Z}(G). Since the order of 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) is pp, it follows that GG^{\prime} equals 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G). Due to [20, Corollary 2.30], it follows that the minimal faithful irreducible character degree, δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G), equals pp and hence δ(G)=p\delta(G)=p.

  • (3)

    Let GG be a nonabelian pp-group of order p4p^{4} and 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) be cyclic. Then [G:𝒵(G)]p3[G:\mathcal{Z}(G)]\leq p^{3}. Consequently, the degree of an arbitrary nonlinear irreducible character must be pp, due to [20, Corollary 2.30]. Since 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) is cyclic, δ(G)=δirr(G)\delta(G)=\delta_{irr}(G). Hence δ(G)=p\delta(G)=p.

    Suppose that 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) is non cyclic. Then the order of 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) is p2p^{2}. From [20, Theorem 2.32], the group GG does not have a faithful irreducible character. Also, any nonlinear irreducible character of GG must be of degree pp, due to Corollary 2.30 of [20]. Suppose χ\chi is a faithful character of GG. From [1, Lemma 3.5], it follows that χ\chi is a sum of two irreducible characters of GG. Consequently, the degree of χ\chi is either p+1p+1 or 2p2p. However, in view of Lemma 15 of [9], if pp is an odd prime, then the deg(χ)p+1\operatorname{deg}(\chi)\leq p+1; therefore, deg(χ)=p+1\operatorname{deg}(\chi)=p+1. For an arbitrary group GG of order 1616, one can verify from the character table of GG that δ(G)=p+1\delta(G)=p+1. Hence, the result follows.

  • (4)
    1. (i)

      If GΦ2G\in\Phi_{2}, then the set of all the irreducible character degrees of GG, i.e. cd(G)\operatorname{cd}(G), is {1,p}\{1,p\}. Also, |𝒵(G)|=p3|\mathcal{Z}(G)|=p^{3} and |G|=p|G^{\prime}|=p, due to Lemma 5.1 of [32]. Clearly δ(G)=p\delta(G)=p, if 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) is cyclic. Suppose 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) is non cyclic. Now, GG is pp-group of nilpotency class 22 and its derived subgroup is cyclic. Therefore, in view of Theorem 1.3 of [1], it follows that δ(G)=p+1\delta(G)=p+1, if 𝒵(G)Cp2×Cp\mathcal{Z}(G)\cong C_{p^{2}}\times C_{p} and δ(G)=p+2\delta(G)=p+2, if 𝒵(G)Cp×Cp×Cp\mathcal{Z}(G)\cong C_{p}\times C_{p}\times C_{p}.

    2. (ii)

      If GΦ3G\in\Phi_{3}, then |𝒵(G)|=p2|\mathcal{Z}(G)|=p^{2} and Ω1(𝒵(G))\Omega_{1}(\mathcal{Z}(G)) is not contained in GG^{\prime}, where Ω1(𝒵(G))\Omega_{1}(\mathcal{Z}(G)) is the subgroup generated by elements g𝒵(G)g\in\mathcal{Z}(G) such that gp=1g^{p}=1. From Lemma 14 of [9], it follows that δ(G)p+1\delta(G)\leq p+1. As 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) is non cyclic, the group GG does not have an irreducible faithful character. Consequently, δ(G)=p+1\delta(G)=p+1.

    3. (iii)

      Let GΦ4G\in\Phi_{4}. Lemma 3.5 of [1] yields that δ(G)\delta(G) is at most 2p2p. By the description of irreducible characters of GG given in Lemma 5.2 of [32], it follows that δ(G)=2p\delta(G)=2p.

    4. (iv)

      Let GΦ5G\in\Phi_{5}. Then GG is an extraspecial pp-group and hence δ(G)=p\delta(G)=p [25, Theorem 21.2.18].

    5. (v)

      If GΦ6G\in\Phi_{6}, then it follows from the description of irreducible characters given in Lemma 5.4 of [32] that δ(G)=p\delta(G)=p.

    6. (vi)

      If GΦ7G\in\Phi_{7}, then δirr(G)=p2\delta_{irr}(G)=p^{2} and hence δ(G)=p\delta(G)=p. Similar argument holds when GΦ8G\in\Phi_{8}.

    7. (vii)

      Let GΦ9G\in\Phi_{9}. Then 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) is cyclic and cd(G)={1,p}\rm{cd}(G)=\{1,p\}. Consequently, δ(G)=p\delta(G)=p.

    8. (viii)

      If GΦ10G\in\Phi_{10}, then δirr(G)=p2\delta_{irr}(G)=p^{2}, in view of Lemma 5.8 of [32]. Hence δ(G)=p2\delta(G)=p^{2}.

  • (5)

    Lemma 1 of [11] yields that all non linear irreducible characters of GG are faithful of degree [G:𝒵(G)]\sqrt{[G:\mathcal{Z}(G)]}. Hence, the result follows.

  • (6)

    Suppose GG is isoclinic to semi-extraspecial pp-group with cyclic center. It follows from [14, Theorem A] that the degree of any nonlinear irreducible character is [G:𝒵(G)]\sqrt{[G:\mathcal{Z}(G)]}. Since 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) is cyclic, GG has a faithful irreducible character. Therefore, δ(G)=[G:𝒵(G)]\delta(G)=\sqrt{[G:\mathcal{Z}(G)]}.

  • (7)

    The group GG has a faithful irreducible character χ\chi, since 𝒵(G)\mathcal{Z}(G) is cyclic. By [29, Lemma 4], δirr(G)=[G:A]\delta_{irr}(G)=[G:A], where AA is an abelian normal subgroup of GG of maximal order. Consequently, δ(G)=[G:A]\delta(G)=[G:A].

  • (8)

    This is a direct consequence of Theorem 1.3 of [1].

From the above theorem, we note that for pp-groups GG with cyclic center and order at most p5p^{5}, δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G) equals the maximum degree of all the irreducible characters of GG. Further, the pp-groups of order at most p5p^{5} are metabelian and hence normally monomial (see [2, 18] for the definition of normally monomial groups). This observation can also be obtained as a special case of the following:

Remark 3.2.

In view of [30, Proposition 3], if GG is a normally monomial group and δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G) exists, then δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G) equals the maximum degree of all the irreducible characters of GG.

Let GG be a finite pp-group. In the next theorem, we provide a connection between δ(G)\delta(G) and cd(G)\operatorname{cd}(G).

Theorem 3.3.

Let GG be a finite nonabelian pp-group with cyclic center.

  • (i)

    δ(G)=p\delta(G)=p if, and only if, cd(G)={1,p}\operatorname{cd}(G)=\{1,p\};

  • (ii)

    if for some integer a>1a>1, cd(G)={1,pa}\operatorname{cd}(G)=\{1,p^{a}\} or cd(G)={1,p,pa}\operatorname{cd}(G)=\{1,p,p^{a}\}, then δ(G)=pa\delta(G)=p^{a}.

Proof.
  • (i)

    Let δ(G)=p\delta(G)=p. In view of Theorem 3.1, δ(G)\delta(G) equals δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G). Consequently, δirr(G)=p\delta_{irr}(G)=p. Hence, the derived length of GG is at most 22, due to Theorem 22.25 of [4]. This implies that GG is a metabelian group. Since metabelian groups are normally monomial, it follows as a consequence of Remark 3.2 that the set of all possible irreducible character degrees is {1,p}\{1,p\}. Now, suppose that cd(G)={1,p}\operatorname{cd}(G)=\{1,p\}. Since GG is a finite pp-group with cyclic center, it follows from Theorem 3.1 that δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G) exists and δ(G)=δirr(G)\delta(G)=\delta_{irr}(G). Consequently, δ(G)=δirr(G)=p\delta(G)=\delta_{irr}(G)=p.

  • (ii)

    If cd(G)={1,pa}\operatorname{cd}(G)=\{1,p^{a}\}, then it follows from Theorem 3.1 that δ(G)=δirr(G)=p\delta(G)=\delta_{irr}(G)=p. If cd(G)={1,p,pa}\operatorname{cd}(G)=\{1,p,p^{a}\}, then it immediately follows from Lemma 21 of [33] that δ(G)=p\delta(G)=p.

4. Representation dimension of the direct product of groups

In section 3, we have proved that if GG is a pp-group with cyclic center, then δ(G)=δirr(G)\delta(G)=\delta_{irr}(G). For a nilpotent group, a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a faithful irreducible character is that its center is cyclic. Using the GAP codes given in Appendix A, we have checked that for all nilpotent groups with cyclic center and of order up to 100100, δ(G)=δirr(G)\delta(G)=\delta_{irr}(G). This raises a question: For a nilpotent group GG with cyclic center, do we necessarily have δ(G)=δirr(G)\delta(G)=\delta_{irr}(G)? In this section, we provide an affirmative answer to this question.

Theorem 4.1.

Let G1G_{1} and G2G_{2} be two finite nonabelian groups. Suppose one of the following holds:

  • (1)

    G1G_{1} and G2G_{2} are simple groups;

  • (2)

    G1G_{1} and G2G_{2} are pp-groups with cyclic center;

  • (3)

    G1G_{1} and G2G_{2} are monolithic groups, i.e., groups with a unique minimal normal subgroup;

  • (4)

    G1G_{1} and G2G_{2} have unique nonlinear irreducible character.

If 𝒵(G1)\mathcal{Z}(G_{1}) and 𝒵(G2)\mathcal{Z}(G_{2}) are of coprime order, then δ(G1×G2)δ(G1)+δ(G2)\delta(G_{1}\times G_{2})\leq\delta(G_{1})+\delta(G_{2}) and δirr(G1×G2)=δirr(G1)δirr(G2)\delta_{irr}(G_{1}\times G_{2})=\delta_{irr}(G_{1})\delta_{irr}(G_{2}). Further, if G1G_{1} and G2G_{2} are of coprime order, then δ(G1×G2)=δirr(G1×G2)=δirr(G1)δirr(G2)\delta(G_{1}\times G_{2})=\delta_{irr}(G_{1}\times G_{2})=\delta_{irr}(G_{1})\delta_{irr}(G_{2}).

Proof.

We first prove that in each of the following cases, δ(Gi)=δirr(Gi),\delta(G_{i})=\delta_{irr}(G_{i}), for i=1,2i=1,2.
Case (1). G1G_{1} and G2G_{2} are simple groups.
Since GiG_{i} is a simple group, for i=1,2i=1,2, we have that any nonlinear character must be faithful. Hence δ(Gi)=δirr(Gi).\delta(G_{i})=\delta_{irr}(G_{i}).
Case (2). G1G_{1} and G2G_{2} are pp-groups with cyclic center.
It immediately follows from Theorem 3.1(1) that δ(Gi)=δirr(Gi),\delta(G_{i})=\delta_{irr}(G_{i}), for i=1,2i=1,2.
Case (3). G1G_{1} and G2G_{2} are monolithic groups.
Let GG be a monolithic group and let χ\chi be a faithful character of GG with deg(χ)=δ(G)\deg(\chi)=\delta(G). We write χ=ηiψi\chi=\sum\eta_{i}\psi_{i}, where ψi\psi_{i} are irreducible characters of GG. Now, {1}=ker(χ)=ker(ψi),\{1\}=\operatorname{ker}(\chi)=\cap\operatorname{ker}(\psi_{i}), where ker(χ)\operatorname{ker}(\chi) denotes the kernel of the character χ\chi. We observe that ker(ψj)={1}\operatorname{ker}(\psi_{j})=\{1\} for some jj, else ker(χ)\operatorname{ker}(\chi) would contain the minimal normal subgroup of GG, contradicting that χ\chi is faithful. Thus, δ(G)deg(ψj)deg(χ)=δ(G).\delta(G)\leq\deg(\psi_{j})\leq\deg(\chi)=\delta(G). Hence, χ\chi must be a faithful irreducible character of GG. Consequently, δ(Gi)=δirr(Gi)\delta(G_{i})=\delta_{irr}(G_{i}), for i=1,2i=1,2.
Case (4). G1G_{1} and G2G_{2} have unique nonlinear irreducible character.
In view of Lemma 1.4 of [19], δ(Gi),\delta(G_{i}), for i=1,2i=1,2, is the degree of the unique nonlinear irreducible character and hence the result follows.

In all the above cases, it is proved that δ(Gi)=δirr(Gi),\delta(G_{i})=\delta_{irr}(G_{i}), for i=1,2i=1,2. Defining a representation on G1×G2G_{1}\times G_{2} by block diagonal matrices yields that δ(G1×G2)δ(G1)+δ(G2)\delta(G_{1}\times G_{2})\leq\delta(G_{1})+\delta(G_{2}). If the orders of 𝒵(G1)\mathcal{Z}(G_{1}) and 𝒵(G2)\mathcal{Z}(G_{2}) are relatively coprime, then δirr(G1×G2)=δirr(G1)δirr(G2)\delta_{irr}(G_{1}\times G_{2})=\delta_{irr}(G_{1})\delta_{irr}(G_{2}), due to Problem 4.3 of [20].

Suppose that G1G_{1} and G2G_{2} are of coprime order. If χ\chi is a minimal faithful character of G1×G2G_{1}\times G_{2}, then χ=χ1+χ2++χn\chi=\chi_{1}+\chi_{2}+\cdots+\chi_{n}, where χiIrr(G1×G2)\chi_{i}\in\operatorname{Irr}(G_{1}\times G_{2}), for 1in1\leq i\leq n. Let χi=τiψi\chi_{i}=\tau_{i}\psi_{i}, for 1in1\leq i\leq n, where τiIrr(G1)\tau_{i}\in\operatorname{Irr}(G_{1}) and ψiIrr(G2)\psi_{i}\in\operatorname{Irr}(G_{2}). Since G1G_{1} and G2G_{2} are of coprime order, (g1,g2)|g11inker(τi),g21inker(ψi)1inker(τiψi)=ker(χ)={1}\langle(g_{1},g_{2})~|~g_{1}\in\underset{1\leq i\leq n}{\cap}\operatorname{ker}(\tau_{i}),g_{2}\in\underset{1\leq i\leq n}{\cap}\operatorname{ker}(\psi_{i})\rangle\leq\underset{1\leq i\leq n}{\cap}\operatorname{ker}(\tau_{i}\psi_{i})=\operatorname{ker}(\chi)=\{1\}. This implies that (g1,g2)|g11inker(τi),g21inker(ψi)={1}\langle(g_{1},g_{2})~|~g_{1}\in\underset{1\leq i\leq n}{\cap}\operatorname{ker}(\tau_{i}),g_{2}\in\underset{1\leq i\leq n}{\cap}\operatorname{ker}(\psi_{i})\rangle=\{1\}. Hence τ1+τ2++τn\tau_{1}+\tau_{2}+\cdots+\tau_{n} is a faithful character of G1G_{1} and ψ1+ψ2++ψn\psi_{1}+\psi_{2}+\cdots+\psi_{n} is a faithful character of G2G_{2}. If τIrr(G1)\tau\in\operatorname{Irr}(G_{1}) and ψIrr(G2)\psi\in\operatorname{Irr}(G_{2}) such that deg(τ)=δirr(G1)=δ(G1)\operatorname{deg}(\tau)=\delta_{irr}(G_{1})=\delta(G_{1}) and deg(ψ)=δirr(G2)=δ(G2)\operatorname{deg}(\psi)=\delta_{irr}(G_{2})=\delta(G_{2}), then τψIrr(G1×G2)\tau\psi\in\operatorname{Irr}(G_{1}\times G_{2}) is a minimal faithful character of G1×G2G_{1}\times G_{2}. Therefore, δ(G1×G2)=δirr(G1)δirr(G2)\delta(G_{1}\times G_{2})=\delta_{irr}(G_{1})\delta_{irr}(G_{2}).∎

Corollary 4.2.

If GG is a finite nilpotent group with cyclic center, then δ(G)\delta(G) equals δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G).

Proof.

Since GG is a nilpotent group, it is a direct product of Sylow pp-subgroups. Due to Theorem 4.1, it follows that δ(G)=δirr(G)\delta(G)=\delta_{irr}(G). ∎

Remark 4.3.

In view of Theorem 4.1, it follows that δ(A4×S3)=5\delta(A_{4}\times S_{3})=5 and δirr(A4×S3)=6\delta_{irr}(A_{4}\times S_{3})=6. This is the smallest example of a finite group GG with cyclic center such that δ(G)δirr(G)\delta(G)\neq\delta_{irr}(G).

Let GG be a finite nilpotent group with cyclic center. We can write G=P1×P2××PnG=P_{1}\times P_{2}\times\cdots\times P_{n}, where PiP_{i}’s are Sylow subgroups of GG. Due to Theorem 4.1, δ(G)=δirr(P1)δirr(P2)δirr(Pn)\delta(G)=\delta_{irr}(P_{1})\delta_{irr}(P_{2})\cdots\delta_{irr}(P_{n}). Consequently, from Theorem 3.3, we have the following:

Theorem 4.4.

Let GG be a finite nilpotent group with cyclic center.

  • (i)

    δ(G)=p\delta(G)=p if and only if cd(G)={1,p}\operatorname{cd}(G)=\{1,p\}.

  • (ii)

    If for some integer a>1a>1, cd(G)={1,pa}\operatorname{cd}(G)=\{1,p^{a}\} or cd(G)={1,p,pa}\operatorname{cd}(G)=\{1,p,p^{a}\}, then δ(G)=pa\delta(G)=p^{a}.

5. representation dimension of groups with few irreducible characters

Chillag and Herzog [10] provided a complete classification of nonabelian groups of odd order having exactly two nonlinear irreducible characters of each degree. We can use this classification to determine their representation dimensions.

Theorem 5.1.

Let GG be a finite nonabelian group of odd order with exactly two nonlinear irreducible characters of each degree. Then,

  • (i)

    δ(G)=δirr(G)=3r\delta(G)=\delta_{irr}(G)=3^{r}, if GG is an extraspecial 33-group of order 32r+13^{2r+1}, for some integer r1r\geq 1.

  • (ii)

    δ(G)=δirr(G)=pn12\delta(G)=\delta_{irr}(G)=\frac{p^{n}-1}{2}, if GG is a Frobenius group of odd order (pn1)pn2\frac{(p^{n}-1)p^{n}}{2} for some odd prime pp and some integer nn, with cyclic kernel KK of order pnp^{n} and cyclic complement. In case, KK is abelian but non cyclic, then δ(G)=(pn1)2rank(K)\delta(G)=\frac{(p^{n}-1)}{2}\operatorname{rank}(K), whereas δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G) does not exist.

Proof.

From Theorem 1 of [10], a non abelian group GG of odd order which has exactly two non linear irreducible characters of each degree, is one of the following:

  • (i)

    an extraspecial 33-group of order 32r+13^{2r+1}, for some integer r1r\geq 1; or

  • (ii)

    a Frobenius group of odd order (pn1)pn2\frac{(p^{n}-1)p^{n}}{2} for some odd prime pp and some integer nn, with abelian Frobenius kernel KK of order pnp^{n} and cyclic Frobenius complement.

Clearly, (i) follows from Theorem 3.1(6). For (ii), first consider the case when the Frobenius kernel KK of the Frobenius group GG is cyclic, and so is its Frobenius complement. We denote the Frobenius complement by HH. It follows from Theorem 37.5.1 of [25] that the irreducible characters of GG are χ1G,χ2G,,χrG,λ1,λ2,,λs\chi_{1}^{G},~\chi_{2}^{G},\cdots,~\chi_{r}^{G},\lambda_{1},~\lambda_{2},\cdots,~\lambda_{s}, where {χ1,χ2,,χr}\{\chi_{1},\chi_{2},\cdots,\chi_{r}\} is a complete set of representatives of GG-conjugacy classes of non principal irreducible characters of KK, χiG\chi_{i}^{G} are their induced representations on GG, for 1in1\leq i\leq n, and λ1,λ2,,λs\lambda_{1},\lambda_{2},\cdots,\lambda_{s} are extensions of irreducible characters of HH to GG. Clearly, λi\lambda_{i}’s are linear non faithful characters, for 1is1\leq i\leq s. Note that the degree of each nonlinear irreducible character of GG is [G:K][G:K]. Since KK is cyclic, GG has a nonlinear irreducible character which is faithful of degree [G:K][G:K], i.e., pn12\frac{p^{n}-1}{2}. Since it is the minimal nonlinear irreducible character degree, it immediately follows that δ(G)=δirr(G)=pn12\delta(G)=\delta_{irr}(G)=\frac{p^{n}-1}{2}.

Now, suppose that the Frobenius kernel KK of GG is abelian but non cyclic and its complement HH is cyclic. Since KK is abelian, it is a direct product of cyclic groups. Hence, each subgroup of KK is normal in GG. Consequently, for 1in1\leq i\leq n, ker(χiG)=coreG(ker(χi))=ker(χi),\operatorname{ker}(\chi_{i}^{G})=\operatorname{core}_{G}(\operatorname{ker}(\chi_{i}))=\operatorname{ker}(\chi_{i}), where coreG(ker(χi))\operatorname{core}_{G}(\operatorname{ker}(\chi_{i})) denotes the largest normal subgroup of GG contained in ker(χi)\operatorname{ker}(\chi_{i}). As KK is non cyclic, the Frobenius kernel KK has no faithful irreducible character. Hence, the group GG does not have a faithful irreducible character. Further, Kker(λi)K\leq\operatorname{ker}(\lambda_{i}), for 1is1\leq i\leq s. Therefore, δ(G)=[G:K]δ(K)=(pn1)2rank(K)\delta(G)=[G:K]\delta(K)=\frac{(p^{n}-1)}{2}\operatorname{rank}(K). This completes the proof of the theorem. ∎

Theorem 2.3 of [13] provides the classification of finite metabelian groups (nonabelian) of odd order with the property that any two non-principal irreducible characters of the same degree are Galois conjugate. Once again, we can compute the representation dimension for such groups using this classification.

Theorem 5.2.

Let GG be a finite metabelian group of odd order with the property that any two non-principal irreducible characters of the same degree are Galois conjugate. Then,

  • (i)

    δ(G)=δirr(G)=p\delta(G)=\delta_{irr}(G)=p, where [G:K]=p[G:K]=p is a prime, if the group GG is a Frobenius group with Frobenius complement of order pp and Frobenius kernel KK is cyclic group of prime order qq, where qpq\neq p.

  • (ii)

    δ(G)=rank(K).p\delta(G)=\operatorname{rank}(K).p and δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G) does not exist, if GG is a Frobenius group with complement of prime order pp and the Frobenius kernel KK is an elementary abelian qq-group of order qbq^{b}, where qpq\neq p is a prime and bb is also a prime with p=qb1q1p=\frac{q^{b}-1}{q-1}.

6. representation dimension for groups in which the degrees of the nonlinear irreducible characters are distinct

Let GG be a finite group whose all nonlinear irreducible characters have distinct degrees. In this section, we compute the representation dimensions for such groups. These groups are classified by Berkovich, Chillag, and Herzog in ([5], pg.955) and the explicit description is as follows.

Theorem (Berkovich-Chillag-Herzog).

If GG is a nonabelian finite group whose all nonlinear irreducible characters have distinct degrees. Then, one of the following holds:

  • (1)

    GG is an extraspecial 22-group.

  • (2)

    GG is a Frobenius group of order pn(pn1)p^{n}(p^{n}-1) for some prime power pnp^{n} with an abelian Frobenius kernel of order pnp^{n} and a cyclic Frobenius complement.

  • (3)

    GG is a Frobenius group of order 7272 in which the Frobenius complement is isomorphic to the quaternion group of order 88.

Now, we have the following:

Theorem 6.1.

Let GG be a nonabelian finite group whose all non-linear irreducible characters have distinct degrees. Then, δ(G)=δirr(G)\delta(G)=\delta_{irr}(G), and it equals,

  • (i)

    2r2^{r}, if GG is an extraspecial 22-group of order 22r+12^{2r+1}, for some integer r1r\geq 1.

  • (ii)

    pn1p^{n}-1, if GG is a Frobenius group of order pn(pn1)p^{n}(p^{n}-1) for some prime power pnp^{n} with an abelian Frobenius kernel of order pnp^{n} and a cyclic Frobenius complement.

  • (iii)

    88, if GG is a Frobenius group of order 7272 in which the Frobenius complement is isomorphic to the quaternion group.

Proof.

Let GG be a nonabelian finite group whose all nonlinear irreducible characters have distinct degrees. Then, due to the above theorem, we can deal with such groups case by case.
Case 1. GG is an extraspecial 22-group.
In this case, δ(G)=δirr(G)=2r\delta(G)=\delta_{irr}(G)=2^{r}, in view of Theorem 3.1(6).
Case 2. GG is a Frobenius group of order pn(pn1)p^{n}(p^{n}-1) for some prime power pnp^{n} with an abelian Frobenius kernel KK of order pnp^{n} and a cyclic Frobenius complement HH.
It follows from Theorem 5.1 of [25] that all the irreducible characters of GG are obtained from the extensions of the irreducible characters of HH, and the rest irreducible characters of GG are induced from the representatives of GG-conjugacy classes of non principal irreducible characters of KK. As KK is abelian, the degree of each nonlinear irreducible character is [G:K][G:K]. By assumption, all non-linear irreducible characters of the group GG have distinct degrees. This yields that there is a unique non-linear irreducible character of degree [G:K][G:K], which is faithful, due to Lemma 1.4 of [19]. Consequently, δ(G)=δirr(G)=pn1\delta(G)=\delta_{irr}(G)=p^{n}-1.
Case 3. GG is a Frobenius group of order 7272 in which the Frobenius complement is isomorphic to the quaternion group.
From Lemma 1.4 of [19], it follows that GG has a unique nonlinear irreducible faithful character of degree 8. This completes the proof of the theorem. ∎

Iranmanesh and Saiedi [19, Lemma 1.4] proved that if GG is a finite group with a unique non-linear irreducible character, then it is faithful. In view of the above theorem, we have the following:

Corollary 6.2.

If GG is a finite group with unique non-linear irreducible character, then δ(G)=δirr(G)\delta(G)=\delta_{irr}(G) is

2r2^{r}, if GG is an extraspecial 22-group of order 22r+12^{2r+1}.

pn1p^{n}-1, if GG is a Frobenius group of order pn(pn1)p^{n}(p^{n}-1) for some prime power pnp^{n} with an abelian Frobenius kernel of order pnp^{n} and a cyclic Frobenius complement.

Using the same arguments as in Theorem 4.1, the following corollary arises:

Corollary 6.3.

The representation dimension of the direct product of finite groups GG of relatively coprime order with the property that all non-linear irreducible characters of GG have distinct degree equals the minimal faithful irreducible character degree.

Appendix A GAP code to compute δ(G)\delta(G) and δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G)

In this section, we present a GAP code [16] to determine the representation dimension and minimal faithful irreducible character degree.

Given a finite group GG, we have a GAP code in Algorithm 1 to compute δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G). The first step of the algorithm calls in the character table of GG and the number of conjugacy classes of GG. Denote by MM, the list of irreducible characters of GG with their values on conjugacy classes. In this list, for each irreducible character of GG, we compute its kernel KK and add [i,K][i,K] to the list LL. Initially, LL is taken to be [ ]. From LL, list those irreducible characters whose kernel is {e}\{e\} and denote the list by FF. Consider the list DD of degrees of irreducible characters in FF, i.e., the degrees of irreducible faithful characters of GG. If DD is empty, then output is 0, i.e., δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G) does not exist. If DD is nonempty, then the minimum of all the irreducible faithful character degrees δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G) is returned.

Data: A finite group GG.
cc:=CharacterTable(GG);
CCCC := ConjugacyClasses(GG);
ss := Size(CCCC);
MM := List(Irr(cc),ValuesOfClassFunction);
LL := [ ];
for ii in [1..s][1..s] do
 KK := [ ];
  for jj in [1..s][1..s] do
    if M[i][j]=M[i][1]M[i][j]~=~M[i][1] then
       Add(K,j)(K,j);
     end if
    
  end for
 Add(L,[i,K])(L,[i,K]);
 F:=Filtered(L,x>Length(x[2])=1)F:=\rm{Filtered}(L,x->\rm{Length}(x[2])=1);
  DD := [ ];
 dd := 0;
  for jj in FF do
    Add(D,M[j[1]][1])(D,M[j[1]][1]);
  end for
 if not(IsEmpty(DD)) then
    dd := Minimum(DD);
  end if
 return dd;
end for
Result: δirr(G)\delta_{irr}(G)
Algorithm 1 Minimal irreducible faithful character degree of GG

Next, we provide GAP code Algorithm 5 to determine the representation dimension of GG. For this, we first give Algorithm 2 to compute a list of kernels of all the irreducible complex characters of GG. In this algorithm, the first step is to call its character table which lists all the irreducible characters of GG with its values on conjugacy classes. Denote this list by MM. Suppose there are ss irreducible characters in the list, i.e., ss number of conjugacy classes. For the iith irreducible character M[i]M[i] mentioned in the list, look for that j[1s]j\in[1\cdots s] for which the value of M[i]M[i] on jthjth conjugacy class coincides with its degree, i.e., M[i][j]=M[i][1]M[i][j]=M[i][1]. The union of all these conjugacy classes is the kernel KK of M[i]M[i]. Repeat this process for each irreducible character. Suppose L=[]L=[~]. In the list LL, add [i,K][i,K] for each i[1s]i\in[1\cdots s]. The list LL is the desired one.

Data: A finite group GG.
ListKernelsListKernels:= function(MM);
ss := Size(MM);
LL := [ ];
for ii in [1..s][1..s] do
 KK := [ ];
  for jj in [1..s][1..s] do
    if M[i][j]=M[i][1]M[i][j]~=~M[i][1] then
       Add(K,j)(K,j);
     end if
    
  end for
 Add(L,[i,K]);
end for
return L;
Result: Returns a list consisting of [χ,ker(χ)\chi,\operatorname{ker}(\chi)], where χ\chi is an irreducible character of GG
Algorithm 2 List of all the irreducible characters of GG and their kernel

The next step is to provide Algorithm 3 for determining all the possible kernels of characters of GG and Algorithm 4 to determine the degree corresponding to each character of GG in the above list.

Data: A finite group GG.
KernelIntersection := function(LL,SS);
SS := Size(LL);
IntKer:= [1..S];
for ii in SS do
 IntKer := Intersection(IntKer, L[i][2]L[i][2]);
end for
 return IntKer;
Result: Returns the intersection of ker(χ)ker(\chi) of characters χ\chi, where ii lies in the set SS.
Algorithm 3 The set of all possible kernels of characters of a group GG
Data: A finite group GG.
DegreeSum := function(MM,SS);
dd := 0;
for ii in SS do
 d:=d+M[i][1];
end for
return d;
Result: Returns the sum of degrees of characters χi\chi_{i}, where ii lies in the set SS.
Algorithm 4 Degrees of all possible characters of group GG
Data: A finite group GG.
Representation dimension:= function(GG);
cc := CharacterTable(G)(G);
CCCC:= Conjugacy classes(G)(G);
ss:=Size(CCCC);
MM := List(Irr(cc),ValuesOfClassFunction);
LL := ListKernels(MM);
minDeg := Sum(TransposedMat(MM)[1]);
minK := [1..s][1..s];
rList := [1..s1][1..s-1];
r:=1r:=1;
while r \leq minDeg do
 rCombos := Combinations([1..s],r[1..s],~r);
 for x in rCombos do
    DegSumx := DegreeSum(M,xM,x);
    if DegSumx << minDeg and r << minDeg then
       if Length(KernelIntersection(L,x)) = 1 then
          minDeg := DegSumx;
          minK := x;
        end if
       
     end if
    
  end for
  r := r+1;
  Print(”Representation dimension is : ”);
 
end while
return minDeg;
Result: δ(G)\delta(G)
Algorithm 5 Representation dimension of GG

In the above algorithm, we use previous algorithms to determine the representation dimension of a group GG. Clearly, the representation dimension of group GG is less than or equal to the degree of the regular character of GG, denoted by MinDeg. Now, we look at the possible combination of irreducible characters which yield a faithful character whose degree is less than MinDeg. Suppose a given combination is providing a faithful character χ\chi with its degree being less than MinDeg. Then, repeat the process with MinDeg being replaced by deg(χ)\operatorname{deg}(\chi). This process will stop at a finite number of steps. Finally, the representation dimension of GG is determined.

Acknowledgment

We thank B. Sury for his feedback on this paper which helped us improve it. The first named author acknowledges the research support of the National Board for Higher Mathematics, Department of Atomic Energy, Govt. of India (NBHM Reference No.: 0204/16(7)/2022/R&D-II/ 11978). The third named author is funded by NBHM through 02011/23/2023/NBHM(RP)/RDII/5955 for this research.

References

  • [1] Mohammad Bardestani, Keivan Mallahi-Karai, and Hadi Salmasian, Minimal dimension of faithful representations for pp-groups, J. Group Theory 19 (2016), no. 4, 589–608. MR 3518394
  • [2] B. G. Basmaji, Monomial representations and metabelian groups, Nagoya Math. J. 35 (1969), 99–107. MR 244394
  • [3] T. R. Berger, P. Landrock, and G. O. Michler, Minimal degrees of faithful characters of finite groups with a T.I. Sylow pp-subgroup, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 99 (1987), no. 1, 15–21. MR 866421
  • [4] Yakov Berkovich, Groups of prime power order. Vol. 1, De Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics, vol. 46, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin, 2008, With a foreword by Zvonimir Janko. MR 2464640
  • [5] Yakov Berkovich, David Chillag, and Marcel Herzog, Finite groups in which the degrees of the nonlinear irreducible characters are distinct, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 115 (1992), no. 4, 955–959. MR 1088438
  • [6] Christine Bessenrodt, Hung P. Tong-Viet, and Jiping Zhang, Huppert’s conjecture for alternating groups, J. Algebra 470 (2017), 353–378. MR 3565438
  • [7] J. C. Bioch, On nn-isoclinic groups, Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser. A 79=Indag. Math. (1976), no. no. 5,, 400–407. MR 424937
  • [8] J. Buhler and Z. Reichstein, On the essential dimension of a finite group, Compositio Math. 106 (1997), no. 2, 159–179. MR 1457337
  • [9] Shane Cernele, Masoud Kamgarpour, and Zinovy Reichstein, Maximal representation dimension of finite pp-groups, J. Group Theory 14 (2011), no. 4, 637–647. MR 2818953
  • [10] David Chillag and Marcel Herzog, Finite groups with almost distinct character degrees, J. Algebra 319 (2008), no. 2, 716–729. MR 2381804
  • [11] L. Di Martino and M. C. Tamburini, Some remarks on the degrees of faithful irreducible representations of a finite pp-group, Geom. Dedicata 41 (1992), no. 2, 155–164. MR 1153979
  • [12] by same author, Some remarks on the degrees of faithful irreducible representations of a finite pp-group, Geom. Dedicata 41 (1992), no. 2, 155–164. MR 1153979
  • [13] Silvio Dolfi, Gabriel Navarro, and Pham Huu Tiep, Finite groups whose same degree characters are Galois conjugate, Israel J. Math. 198 (2013), no. 1, 283–331. MR 3096641
  • [14] Gustavo A. Fernández-Alcober and Alexander Moretó, Groups with two extreme character degrees and their normal subgroups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 353 (2001), no. 6, 2171–2192. MR 1814066
  • [15] D. L. Flannery and E. A. O’Brien, Linear groups of small degree over finite fields, Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 15 (2005), no. 3, 467–502. MR 2151423
  • [16] The GAP Group, Gap – groups, algorithms, and programming, version 4.12.2, 2022.
  • [17] J. A. Green, The characters of the finite general linear groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 80 (1955), 402–447. MR 72878
  • [18] Guan Aun How, Special classes of monomial groups. III, Chinese J. Math. 12 (1984), no. 3, 199–211. MR 764985
  • [19] Ali Iranmanesh and Amin Saeidi, Finite groups with a unique nonlinear nonfaithful irreducible character, Arch. Math. (Brno) 47 (2011), no. 2, 91–98. MR 2813535
  • [20] I. Martin Isaacs, Character theory of finite groups, Pure and Applied Mathematics, No. 69, Academic Press [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York-London, 1976. MR 0460423
  • [21] Gordon Douglas James, Representations of general linear groups, vol. 94, Cambridge University Press, 1984.
  • [22] Rodney James, The groups of order p6p^{6} (pp an odd prime), Math. Comp. 34 (1980), no. 150, 613–637. MR 559207
  • [23] Christoph Jansen, The minimal degrees of faithful representations of the sporadic simple groups and their covering groups, LMS J. Comput. Math. 8 (2005), 122–144. MR 2153793
  • [24] Nikita A. Karpenko and Alexander S. Merkurjev, Essential dimension of finite pp-groups, Invent. Math. 172 (2008), no. 3, 491–508. MR 2393078
  • [25] Gregory Karpilovsky, Group representations. Vol. 1. Part B, North-Holland Mathematics Studies, vol. 175, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1992, Introduction to group representations and characters. MR 1183468
  • [26] Gustav Isaac Lehrer, The characters of the finite special linear groups, J. Algebra 26 (1973), 564–583. MR 354889
  • [27] Frank Lübeck, Smallest degrees of representations of exceptional groups of Lie type, Comm. Algebra 29 (2001), no. 5, 2147–2169. MR 1837968
  • [28] G. Lusztig, Irreducible representations of finite classical groups, Invent. Math. 43 (1977), no. 2, 125–175. MR 463275
  • [29] Avinoam Mann, Minimal characters of pp-groups, J. Group Theory 2 (1999), no. 3, 225–250. MR 1696312
  • [30] by same author, Minimal characters of pp-groups, J. Group Theory 2 (1999), no. 3, 225–250. MR 1696312
  • [31] Alexander Moretó, On the minimal dimension of a faithful linear representation of a finite group, arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.01463 (2021).
  • [32] S. K. Prajapati, M. R. Darafsheh, and M. Ghorbani, Irreducible characters of pp-group of order p5\leq p^{5}, Algebr. Represent. Theory 20 (2017), no. 5, 1289–1303. MR 3707916
  • [33] Sunil Kumar Prajapati and Ayush Udeep, Minimal faithful quasi-permutation representation degree of p-groups with cyclic center, arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06257 (2023).
  • [34] Richard Rasala, On the minimal degrees of characters of SnS_{n}, J. Algebra 45 (1977), no. 1, 132–181. MR 427445
  • [35] Robert Steinberg, The representations of GL(3,q),GL(4,q),PGL(3,q){\rm GL}(3,q),{\rm GL}(4,q),{\rm PGL}(3,q), and PGL(4,q){\rm PGL}(4,q), Canad. J. Math. 3 (1951), 225–235. MR 41851
  • [36] Fernando Szechtman, Groups having a faithful irreducible representation, J. Algebra 454 (2016), 292–307. MR 3473429
  • [37] Pham Huu Tiep and Alexander E. Zalesskii, Minimal characters of the finite classical groups, Comm. Algebra 24 (1996), no. 6, 2093–2167. MR 1386030