This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Semicontinuity of Gauss maps
and the Schottky problem

Giulio Codogni Dipartimento di Matematica, Università degli Studi Tor Vergata
    Via della ricerca scientifica 1, 00133 Roma (Italy)
codogni@mat.uniroma2.it
 and  Thomas Krämer Institut für Mathematik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
    Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin (Germany)
thomas.kraemer@math.hu-berlin.de
Abstract.

We show that the degree of Gauss maps on abelian varieties is semicontinuous in families, and we study its jump loci. As an application we obtain that in the case of theta divisors this degree answers the Schottky problem. Our proof computes the degree of Gauss maps by specialization of Lagrangian cycles on the cotangent bundle. We also get similar results for the intersection cohomology of varieties with a finite morphism to an abelian variety; it follows that many components of Andreotti-Mayer loci, including the Schottky locus, are part of the stratification of the moduli space of ppav’s defined by the topological type of the theta divisor.

Key words and phrases:
Gauss map, abelian variety, theta divisor, Schottky problem.
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 14K12; Secondary 14C17, 14F10, 14H42

1. Introduction

The Gauss map of a hypersurface in projective space is the rational map that sends any smooth point of the hypersurface to its normal direction in the dual projective space. The analogous notion of Gauss maps for subvarieties of abelian varieties appears already in Andreotti’s proof of the Torelli theorem [2]. In contrast to the case of projective hypersurfaces, the Gauss map for any ample divisor on an abelian variety is generically finite of degree >1>1, and its degree is related to the singularities of the divisor. We show that this degree is lower semicontinuous in families, and we study its jump loci. As an application we get that in the moduli space of principally polarized abelian varieties, the degree of the Gauss map refines the Andreotti-Mayer stratification and answers the Schottky problem as conjectured in [11]. We work over an algebraically closed field kk with char(k)=0\mathrm{char}(k)=0. In section 7 we obtain similar results for the intersection cohomology of complex varieties with a finite morphism to an abelian variety. In particular, many Andreotti-Mayer loci such as the Schottky locus are determined over the complex numbers already by the topological type of the theta divisor.

1.A. Gauss maps and their jump loci

Let AA be an abelian variety over kk. By translations we may identify its tangent spaces at all points, hence the cotangent bundle TA=A×VT^{\vee}A=A\times V is trivial with fiber V=H0(A,ΩA1)V=H^{0}(A,\Omega^{1}_{A}). The Gauss map of a reduced effective divisor DAD\subset A is the rational map

γD:DV\gamma_{D}:\quad D\;\dashrightarrow\;\mathbb{P}V

that sends a smooth point of the divisor to its conormal direction at that point; it coincides with the rational map given by the linear series V=|𝒪D(D)|\mathbb{P}V^{\vee}=|{\mathscr{O}}_{D}(D)|. For an irreducible divisor this is a generically finite dominant map iff the divisor is ample, which happens iff the divisor is not stable under translations by any positive dimensional abelian subvariety [32, cor. II.11, lem. II.9]. Even in the generically finite case the Gauss map can have positive dimensional fibers [4].

For algebraic families of generically finite maps the generic degree always defines a constructible stratification of the parameter space, but in general it can jump in both directions (see example 4.2). Our first semicontinuity result says that for Gauss maps on abelian varieties this does not happen:

Theorem 1.1.

Let ASA\to S be an abelian scheme over a variety SS, and let DAD\subset A be a relatively ample divisor which is flat over SS. Let DsAsD_{s}\subset A_{s} denote their fibers over sSs\in S, and let γDs\gamma_{D_{s}} be the corresponding Gauss map. Then for each dd\in{\mathbb{N}} the subsets

Sd={sSdeg(γDs)d}SS_{d}\;=\;\bigl{\{}s\in S\mid\deg(\gamma_{D_{s}})\leq d\bigr{\}}\;\subseteq\;S

are closed in the Zariski topology.

The above result does not show where the degree actually jumps. Let us say that an irreducible subvariety of an abelian variety is negligible if it is stable under translations by a positive dimensional abelian subvariety. Simple abelian varieties have no negligible subvarieties other than themselves. More generally, by [1, th. 3] an irreducible closed subvariety of an abelian variety is negligible iff it is not of general type. Our second result says that in the setting of theorem 1.1 the degree of the Gauss map jumps whenever a new component of general type appears in the singular locus Sing(Ds)\mathrm{Sing}(D_{s}). To make this precise we specify a curve along which we move inside the parameter space:

Theorem 1.2.

Let SSS^{\prime}\subset S be a curve, and fix a point 0S(k)0\in S^{\prime}(k). If Sing(D0)\mathrm{Sing}(D_{0}) has an irreducible component which is of general type and not contained in the Zariski closure of sS{0}Sing(Ds)\bigcup_{s\in S^{\prime}\setminus\{0\}}\mathrm{Sing}(D_{s}), then

deg(γD0)<deg(γDs)\deg(\gamma_{D_{0}})<\deg(\gamma_{D_{s}})

for all sS(k){0}s\in S^{\prime}(k)\setminus\{0\} in some Zariski open neighborhood of the point 0.

The above in particular applies if all components of the singular locus are of general type and dim(Sing(D0))>dim(Sing(Ds))\dim(\mathrm{Sing}(D_{0}))>\dim(\mathrm{Sing}(D_{s})) for all s0s\neq 0. This last condition is motivated by the case of theta divisors and the Schottky problem.

1.B. Application to the Schottky problem

Let 𝒜g{\mathscr{A}}_{g} be the moduli space of principally polarized abelian varieties of dimension gg. Inside it, consider for dd\in{\mathbb{N}} the Gauss loci

𝒢d={(A,Θ)𝒜gdeg(γΘ)d}{\mathscr{G}}_{d}\;=\;\{(A,\Theta)\in{\mathscr{A}}_{g}\mid\deg(\gamma_{\Theta})\leq d\}

as in [11, sect. 4] The above results show that these loci are closed (cor. 6.1) and refine the Andreotti-Mayer stratification (cor. 6.3). Thus the Gauss loci provide a solution for the Schottky problem to characterize the closure of the locus of Jacobians in the moduli space of principally polarized abelian varieties:

Corollary 1.3.

Inside 𝒜g{\mathscr{A}}_{g} we have:

(a) The locus of Jacobians is a component of 𝒢d{\mathscr{G}}_{d} for d=(2g2g1)d=\binom{2g-2}{g-1}.

(b) The locus of hyperelliptic Jacobians is a is a component of 𝒢d{\mathscr{G}}_{d} for d=2g1d=2^{g-1}.

The above corollary is shown in section 6 together with an analogous statement for Prym varieties. It confirms a conjecture by the first author, Grushevsky and Sernesi [11, conjecture 1.6] who verified it for g4g\leq 4 by an explicit description of the Gauss loci. As pointed out in loc. cit., this is only a weak solution to the Schottky problem: In general the Gauss loci in the above corollary have more than one irreducible component and the Jacobian locus is only one of them. The theory of 𝒟{\mathscr{D}}-modules allows to refine the degree of the Gauss map to representation theoretic invariants that might distinguish the Jacobian locus [26].

1.C. The degree of conormal varieties

For the proof of theorem 1.1 and 1.2 we interpret the degree of the Gauss map as an intersection number of Lagrangian cycles on the cotangent bundle of the abelian variety and apply specialization for such cycles [19, 34], which we can do because char(k)=0\mathrm{char}(k)=0. To explain how this works, let us forget about abelian varieties for a moment and fix any ambient smooth variety WW over kk. The conormal variety to a subvariety XWX\subset W is defined as the closure

ΛX={(x,ξ)xSm(X),ξTx(W),ξTx(X)}¯T(W)\Lambda_{X}\;=\;\overline{\{(x,\xi)\mid x\in\mathrm{Sm}(X),\;\xi\in T_{x}^{\vee}(W),\;\xi\perp T_{x}(X)\}}\;\subset\;T^{\vee}(W)\vskip 6.0pt plus 2.0pt minus 2.0pt

of the conormal bundle to the smooth locus Sm(X)\mathrm{Sm}(X), where the closure is taken in the total space of the cotangent bundle of the ambient smooth variety. This conormal variety always has pure dimension n=dim(W)n=\dim(W), in fact it is Lagrangian with respect to the natural symplectic structure on the cotangent bundle. It is also conic, i.e. stable under the natural action of the multiplicative group on the fibers of the cotangent bundle. Conversely, any closed conic Lagrangian subvariety of the cotangent bundle arises like this [23, lemma 3]. So the map XΛXX\mapsto\Lambda_{X} induces an isomorphism

𝒵(W)={cycles on W}(W)={conic Lagrangian cycles on TW},{\mathscr{Z}}(W)=\{\textnormal{cycles on $W$}\}\;\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\sim}}{{\longrightarrow}}\;{\mathscr{L}}(W)=\{\textnormal{conic Lagrangian cycles on $T^{\vee}W$}\},\vskip 6.0pt plus 2.0pt minus 2.0pt

where by a conic Lagrangian cycle we mean a {\mathbb{Z}}-linear combination of closed conic Lagrangian subvarieties. In the case of projective varieties we can talk about the degree of conormal varieties:

Definition 1.4.

If WW is projective, the degree homomorphism on conic Lagrangian cycles is the map

deg:(W)CHn(T(W))iCHn(W)\deg:\quad{\mathscr{L}}(W)\;\longrightarrow\;\mathrm{CH}^{n}(T^{\vee}(W))\;\stackrel{{\scriptstyle i^{*}}}{{\longrightarrow}}\;\mathrm{CH}^{n}(W)\;\twoheadrightarrow\;{\mathbb{Z}}

which is given by the intersection number with the zero section i:WT(W)i:W\hookrightarrow T^{\vee}(W).

Example 1.5.

Over the complex numbers the above degree can be computed as follows. For any constructible function F:WF:W\to{\mathbb{Z}} consider the topological Euler characteristic

χtop(W,F)=nnχtop(F1(n)),\chi_{\mathrm{top}}(W,F)\;=\;\sum_{n\in{\mathbb{Z}}}\,n\cdot\chi_{\mathrm{top}}(F^{-1}(n)),

where χtop(F1(n))\chi_{\mathrm{top}}(F^{-1}(n)) denotes the alternating sum of the Betti numbers of F1(n)F^{-1}(n). In the theory of characteristic classes of singular varieties this definition is applied to a particular constructible function EuX:W\mathrm{Eu}_{X}:W\to{\mathbb{Z}}, the local Euler obstruction of a subvariety XWX\subseteq W [29, sect. 3]. Outside of the singular locus Sing(X)X\mathrm{Sing}(X)\subseteq X it has the form

EuX(p)={0for pWX,1for pSm(X),\mathrm{Eu}_{X}(p)\;=\;\begin{cases}0&\textnormal{for $p\in W\setminus X$},\\ 1&\textnormal{for $p\in\mathrm{Sm}(X)$},\end{cases}

but its values on the singular locus depend on the singularities: For instance, if XX is a curve, EuX(p)\mathrm{Eu}_{X}(p) is the multiplicity of that curve at pp. In general, the degree of conormal varieties in definition 1.4 can be expressed as an Euler characteristic by the formula

deg(ΛX)=(1)dim(X)χtop(X,EuX),\deg(\Lambda_{X})\;=\;(-1)^{\dim(X)}\cdot\chi_{\mathrm{top}}(X,\mathrm{Eu}_{X}),\vskip 6.0pt plus 2.0pt minus 2.0pt

see [34, lemme 1.2.1] [17, prop. 6.1(b)]. The right hand side can be computed easily as soon as we know the local Euler obstruction. For a smooth rational curve XX we get deg(ΛX)=2\deg(\Lambda_{X})=-2 while a nodal or cuspidal cubic has deg(ΛX)=3\deg(\Lambda_{X})=-3. Note that a cuspidal cubic is homeomorphic to a smooth rational curve, so the degree of conormal varieties is not a topological invariant. Moreover, it can be negative.

1.D. Proof of the semicontinuity theorems

Of course there are no rational curves in abelian varieties, and in the case of abelian varieties the degree behaves much better. By [37, th. 1] we have the following result (see section 5):

Proposition 1.6.

If W=AW=A is an abelian variety, then

  • deg(ΛX)0\deg(\Lambda_{X})\geq 0 for any XAX\subset A,

  • deg(ΛX)>0\deg(\Lambda_{X})>0 if and only if XX is of general type,

  • deg(ΛX)=deg(γX)\deg(\Lambda_{X})=\deg(\gamma_{X}) for divisors XAX\subset A with Gauss map γX\gamma_{X}.

This easily implies theorem 1.1 when combined with the principle of Lagrangian specialization which we recall in section 2: For any flat family of subvarieties in a smooth ambient 1-parameter family, the limit of their conormal varieties is an effective conic Lagrangian cycle whose support contains the conormal variety to the central fiber as a component, and the total degree of the limit cycle equals the degree of a general fiber. The same argument shows that our semicontinuity result holds not only for divisors but for subvarieties of any codimension:

Theorem 1.7.

Let ASA\to S be an abelian scheme over a variety SS, and let XAX\subset A be an arbitrary family of subvarieties which is flat over SS. Then for each dd\in{\mathbb{N}} the subsets Sd={sSdeg(ΛXs)d}SS_{d}=\bigl{\{}s\in S\mid\deg(\Lambda_{X_{s}})\leq d\bigr{\}}\subseteq S are closed in the Zariski topology.

It remains to prove theorem 1.2. Given the interpretation for the degree of Gauss maps in prop. 1.6, the proof has nothing to do with abelian varieties: In section 3 we show that for any flat family of divisors on a smooth 1-parameter variety, the specialization of their conormal varieties contains an extra component whenever the singular locus of the fiber jumps. While the final criterion is phrased only for divisors, we formulate our arguments as far as possible for subvarieties in arbitrary codimension to get beyond theorem 1.2 (see example 3.6). This is important even if one only wants to study singularities of divisors: In the theory of Chern classes for singular varieties one attaches to any subvariety XAX\subset A a characteristic cycle of the form

Λ=ΛX+ZmZΛZ\Lambda\;=\;\Lambda_{X}+\sum_{Z}m_{Z}\Lambda_{Z}

where ZZ runs through certain strata in Sing(X)\mathrm{Sing}(X) [23, 34], and the topologically meaningful invariant that appears in generalizations of the Gauss-Bonnet index formula is the total degree deg(Λ)\deg(\Lambda) involving all the strata.

1.E. A topological view on jump loci

In section 7, which is not used in the rest of the paper, we deduce from our previous results a general semicontinuity theorem for the intersection cohomology of varieties over the complex numbers. Recall that for a complex variety XX, the intersection cohomology IH(X)\mathrm{IH}^{\bullet}(X) only depends on its homeomorphism type in the Euclidean topology; it coincides with Betti cohomology in the smooth case but is better behaved in general [6, 20, 21, 24, 30]. We denote by

χIC(X)=i0(1)i+dim(X)dimIHi(X)\chi_{\mathrm{IC}}(X)\;=\;\sum_{i\geq 0}\;(-1)^{i+\dim(X)}\dim\mathrm{IH}^{i}(X)

the Euler characteristic of the intersection cohomology. This Euler characteristic is usually not semicontinuous in families, it can jump in both directions. But for families of finite branched covers of subvarieties in complex abelian varieties this does not happen (see lemma 7.6 and corollary 7.7):

Theorem 1.8.

Let f:XSf:X\to S be a family of varieties such that each fiber XsX_{s} is generically reduced and admits a finite morphism to an abelian variety. Then for each d0d\in{\mathbb{N}}_{0} the loci

Sd:={sSχIC(Xs)d}SS_{d}\;:=\;\{s\in S\mid\chi_{\mathrm{IC}}(X_{s})\leq d\}\;\subseteq\;S

are closed in the Zariski topology.

This puts our results in a topological context, since the intersection cohomology of a complex variety only depends on its homeomorphism type. For instance, it follows from the above that a singular theta divisor cannot be homeomorphic to a smooth one (recall that there are examples of normal varieties which are singular but homemorphic to smooth varieties, such as those by Brieskorn [9, 10]). In corollary 7.9 we will see that the Jacobian locus appears in the stratification of 𝒜g{\mathscr{A}}_{g} by the intersection cohomology of the theta divisor, so we obtain:

Corollary 1.9.

The locus of Jacobian varieties in 𝒜g{\mathscr{A}}_{g} is an irreducible component of the closure of the locus of all ppav’s whose theta divisor is homeomorphic to a theta divisor on a Jacobian variety.

It seems an interesting problem to study the topology of theta divisors on abelian varieties in more detail.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Sam Grushevsky, Ariyan Javanpeykar, Constantin Podelski, Claude Sabbah, Edoardo Sernesi and the referee for helpful comments. G.C. is funded by the MIUR Excellence Department Project, awarded to the Department of Mathematics, University of Rome, Tor Vergata, CUP E83C18000100006, and PRIN 2017 Advances in Moduli Theory and Birational Classification. T.K. is supported by DFG Research Grant 430165651 Characteristic Cycles and Representation Theory.

2. Lagrangian specialization

For convenience we include in this section a self-contained review of some basic facts about the specialization of Lagrangian cycles, which was introduced in relation with Chern-MacPherson classes [34] and nearby cycles for 𝒟{\mathscr{D}}-modules and perverse sheaves [19]. We work in a relative setting over a smooth curve SS. The family of our ambient spaces is given by a smooth dominant morphism of varieties f:WSf:W\to S where dim(W)=n+1\dim(W)=n+1. Let XWX\subset W be a reduced closed subvariety. The relative smooth locus

Sm(X/S)={xSm(X)the restriction f|X:XS is smooth at x}\mathrm{Sm}(X/S)\;=\;\{\,x\in\mathrm{Sm}(X)\mid\;\textnormal{the restriction $f|_{X}:X\to S$ is smooth at $x$}\,\}

is nonempty iff dimf(X)>0\dim f(X)>0, in which case XSX\to S is flat and Sm(X/S)X\mathrm{Sm}(X/S)\subset X is an open dense subset because char(k)=0\mathrm{char}(k)=0. Any xSm(X/S)x\in\mathrm{Sm}(X/S) is a smooth point of the fiber Xs=f1(s)XX_{s}=f^{-1}(s)\cap X over the image point s=f(x)s=f(x). Hence inside the total space

T(W/S)=T(W)/f1T(S)T^{\vee}(W/S)\;=\;T^{\vee}(W)/f^{-1}T^{\vee}(S)

of the relative cotangent bundle, we define the relative conormal variety to XX as the closure

ΛX/S={(x,ξ)T(W/S)xSm(X/S),ξTxXf(x)}¯T(W/S).\Lambda_{X/S}=\overline{\{(x,\xi)\in T^{\vee}(W/S)\mid x\in\mathrm{Sm}(X/S),\;\xi\perp T_{x}X_{f(x)}\}}\;\subset\;T^{\vee}(W/S).\vskip 6.0pt plus 2.0pt minus 2.0pt
Remark 2.1.

In [8] the relative conormal variety is instead defined as the closure inside the absolute cotangent bundle. This notion of relative conormal variety is obtained from ours by base change via the quotient map T(W)T(W/S)T^{\vee}(W)\twoheadrightarrow T^{\vee}(W/S), i.e. we have

T(W)×T(W/S)ΛX/S={(x,ξ)T(W)xSm(X/S),ξTxXf(x)}¯.T^{\vee}(W)\times_{T^{\vee}(W/S)}\Lambda_{X/S}\;=\;\overline{\{(x,\xi)\in T^{\vee}(W)\mid x\in\mathrm{Sm}(X/S),\;\xi\perp T_{x}X_{f(x)}\}}.

Indeed, both sides are irreducible closed subvarieties of T(W)|XT^{\vee}(W)|_{X}. For the right hand side this holds by definition, for the left hand side it follows from the fact that ΛX/ST(X/S)\Lambda_{X/S}\subset T^{\vee}(X/S) is an irreducible closed subvariety and TWT(X/S)T^{\vee}W\to T^{\vee}(X/S) is a fibration with irreducible fibers. So it suffices to show that both sides agree over some open dense UXU\subset X. We can assume XX is flat over SS and take U=Sm(X/S)U=\mathrm{Sm}(X/S), in which case the claim becomes obvious.

Lemma 2.2.

If XX is flat and irreducible over SS, then so is ΛX/S\Lambda_{X/S}.

Proof.

ΛX/S\Lambda_{X/S} is defined as the schematic closure of a locally closed subscheme VV of the relative cotangent bundle T(A/S)T^{\vee}(A/S). The subscheme VV is the total space of a vector bundle over a smooth variety, so it is a smooth variety as well. Its schematic closure is integral, and a morphism from an integral scheme to a smooth curve is flat iff it is dominant [22, chapter III, prop. 9.7]. ∎

Relative conormal varieties can be seen as families of conormal varieties. In what follows we denote by

(W/S)=XWΛX/S{\mathscr{L}}(W/S)\;=\;\bigoplus_{X\subset W}{\mathbb{Z}}\cdot\Lambda_{X/S}

the free abelian group on relative conormal varieties to closed subvarieties XWX\subset W that are flat over SS. By the specialization of Λ(W/S)\Lambda\in{\mathscr{L}}(W/S) at sS(k)s\in S(k) we mean the cycle

sps(Λ)=[Λf1(s)]{\mathrm{sp}}_{s}(\Lambda)\;=\;\bigl{[}\Lambda\cdot f^{-1}(s)\bigr{]}

which underlies the schematic fiber of the morphism ΛX/SS\Lambda_{X/S}\to S at ss. This is again a conic Lagrangian cycle by the following classical result, see [18, prop. (a), p. 179] or in an analytic setup [28, sect. 1.2]:

Lemma 2.3 (Principle of Lagrangian specialization).

The specialization at ss gives a homomorphism

sps:(W/S)(Ws){\mathrm{sp}}_{s}:\quad{\mathscr{L}}(W/S)\;\longrightarrow\;{\mathscr{L}}(W_{s})\vskip 6.0pt plus 2.0pt minus 2.0pt

sending effective cycles to effective cycles. On Chow groups it induces the Gysin map in the bottom row of the following commutative diagram:

(W/S){{\mathscr{L}}(W/S)}(Ws){{\mathscr{L}}(W_{s})}CHn(T(W/S)){\mathrm{CH}^{n}(T^{\vee}(W/S))}CHn1(T(Ws)){\mathrm{CH}^{n-1}(T^{\vee}(W_{s}))}sps\scriptstyle{{\mathrm{sp}}_{s}}is\scriptstyle{i_{s}^{*}}

For any closed subvariety XWX\subset W which is flat over SS, there is a finite subset ΣS\Sigma\subset S such that

sps(ΛX/S)={ΛXsfor sSΣ,mXsΛXs+ZSing(Xs)mZΛZfor sΣ,{\mathrm{sp}}_{s}(\Lambda_{X/S})\;=\;\begin{cases}\Lambda_{X_{s}}&\textnormal{\em for $s\in S\setminus\Sigma$},\\ m_{X_{s}}\Lambda_{X_{s}}+\sum_{Z\subset\mathrm{Sing}(X_{s})}m_{Z}\Lambda_{Z}&\textnormal{\em for $s\in\Sigma$},\end{cases}\vskip 6.0pt plus 2.0pt minus 2.0pt

where mXs,mZ>0m_{X_{s}},m_{Z}>0 and the sum runs over finitely many subvarieties ZSing(Xs)Z\subset\mathrm{Sing}(X_{s}).

Proof.

Note that T(Ws)T^{\vee}(W_{s}) is an effective Cartier divisor in T(W)T^{\vee}(W). It intersects properly any relative conormal variety to a subvariety which is flat over SS. Hence it is clear that the specialization induces on Chow groups the Gysin map defined in [17, sect. 2.6] and sends effective cycles to effective cycles.

Now take an irreducible subvariety XWX\subset W which is flat over SS. By Lemma 2.2 the morphism ΛX/SS\Lambda_{X/S}\to S is flat and hence all its fibers are pure dimensional of the same dimension. Furthermore the action of the multiplicative group preserves the fibers of T(W/S)ST^{\vee}(W/S)\to S and so the fibers of ΛX/SS\Lambda_{X/S}\to S are unions of conic subvarieties. As the canonical relative symplectic form on T(W/S)T^{\vee}(W/S) restricts to the canonical symplectic form on T(Ws)T^{\vee}(W_{s}) for every ss, we conclude that the fibers of ΛX/SS\Lambda_{X/S}\to S are also Lagrangian and hence a union of conormal varieties, since the conic Lagrangian subvarieties of the cotangent bundle are precisely the conormal varieties [23, lemma 3]. The coefficients are non-negative as the specialization of effective cycles is effective. Hence sps(ΛX/S){\mathrm{sp}}_{s}(\Lambda_{X/S}) is a sum of conormal varieties, and since under the morphism T(As)AsT^{\vee}(A_{s})\to A_{s} its support surjects onto XsX_{s}, we conclude that one of the appearing components must be ΛXs\Lambda_{X_{s}}.

As ΛX/S\Lambda_{X/S} is irreducible and we work over a field of characteristic zero, there exists a Zariski open dense subset of SS over which the fibers of the morphism ΛX/SS\Lambda_{X/S}\to S are reduced and irreducible. We conclude that for ss in this Zariski open dense subset of SS we have sps(ΛX/S)=ΛXs{\mathrm{sp}}_{s}(\Lambda_{X/S})=\Lambda_{X_{s}}. Moreover, the specialization cannot have any further components over the relative smooth locus Sm(X/S)X\mathrm{Sm}(X/S)\subseteq X, since on that locus also the morphism ΛX/SS\Lambda_{X/S}\to S restricts to a smooth morphism. ∎

We have the following consequence of flatness:

Proposition 2.4.

Let XWX\subset W be a closed subvariety which is flat over SS, then the degree

d=deg(sps(ΛX/S))is independent of sS(k).d=\deg({\mathrm{sp}}_{s}(\Lambda_{X/S}))\quad\textnormal{\em is independent of $s\in S(k)$}.
Proof.

The cycle class of the specialization sps(ΛX/S){\mathrm{sp}}_{s}(\Lambda_{X/S}) is the image of [ΛX/S][\Lambda_{X/S}] under the Gysin map in lemma 2.3, and its degree is defined as the intersection number of this image with the zero section X=𝒳𝒲=T(W/S)X=\mathcal{X}\hookrightarrow\mathcal{W}=T^{\vee}(W/S). As 𝒳\mathcal{X} and 𝒲\mathcal{W} are flat over SS and 𝒳𝒲\mathcal{X}\hookrightarrow\mathcal{W} is a regular embedding, the degree is therefore constant by [17, th. 10.2] applied to the relative conormal variety 𝒱=ΛX/S\mathcal{V}=\Lambda_{X/S}. Note that 𝒱𝒲\mathcal{V}\hookrightarrow\mathcal{W} is not required to be a regular embedding; in order to apply loc. cit. we only need that its base change to 𝒳\mathcal{X} is proper over SS, which is true. ∎

Remark 2.5.

For char(k)>0\mathrm{char}(k)>0 the specialization of a family of conormal varieties need not be a sum of conormal varieties, see [25, p. 215]. Similarly, for char(k)=0\mathrm{char}(k)=0 we need dim(S)=1\dim(S)=1, otherwise we would have to restrict the class of morphisms as in [33]. For instance, for S=2s=(0,0)S={\mathbb{C}}^{2}\ni s=(0,0) we have is1(ΛX/S)=T(W/S)|Xsi_{s}^{-1}(\Lambda_{X/S})=T^{\vee}(W/S)|_{X_{s}} for the subvariety X={((x,y,z),(x2y2z,y))(x,y,z)3}W=3×S.X=\{((x,y,z),(x^{2}-y^{2}z,y))\mid(x,y,z)\in{\mathbb{C}}^{3}\}\subset W={\mathbb{C}}^{3}\times S.

3. Jump loci for the degree

Let f:WSf:W\to S be a smooth dominant morphism from a smooth variety to a smooth curve as above. For any SS-flat subvariety XWX\subset W and sS(k)s\in S(k) we have seen that sps(ΛX/S)ΛXs0,{\mathrm{sp}}_{s}(\Lambda_{X/S})-\Lambda_{X_{s}}\geq 0, where the inequality means that the cycle on the left hand side is effective or zero. It is natural to ask for which sS(k)s\in S(k) the above inequality is strict. In the notation of lemma 2.3 this happens iff mZ>0m_{Z}>0 for some ZSing(Xs)Z\subseteq\mathrm{Sing}(X_{s}). The following provides a sufficient criterion for this to happen for families of divisors:

Proposition 3.1.

Assume d=codim(X,W)=1d=\mathrm{codim}(X,W)=1. If Sing(X/S)\mathrm{Sing}(X/S) has an irreducible component which is contained in the fiber over some point sS(k)s\in S(k), then for this component ZXsZ\subset X_{s} we have

sps(ΛX/S)ΛXsΛZ.{\mathrm{sp}}_{s}(\Lambda_{X/S})-\Lambda_{X_{s}}\;\geq\;\Lambda_{Z}.

We divide the proof in several steps. Most of the argument works in arbitrary codimension dd, so for the moment we do not yet assume d=1d=1. It will be enough to prove the claim over some open dense subset of WW. Fixing a general point pZ(k)p\in Z(k) and working locally near that point, we can assume that

  • Z=Sing(X/S)Z=\mathrm{Sing}(X/S) (equality as a scheme),

  • T(W/S)W×VT^{\vee}(W/S)\simeq W\times V is the trivial bundle with fiber V=Tp(Ws)V=T^{\vee}_{p}(W_{s}),

  • XWX\subset W is cut out by a regular sequence f1,,fdH0(W,𝒪W)f_{1},\dots,f_{d}\in H^{0}(W,\mathcal{O}_{W}).

By the first item each x(XZ)(k)x\in(X\setminus Z)(k) is a smooth point of XtX_{t} for t=f(x)t=f(x). Fixing a trivialization as in the second item, we can furthermore identify the conormal space to XtWtX_{t}\subset W_{t} at xx with a subspace in V=Tx(Wt)V=T^{\vee}_{x}(W_{t}) of codimension dd. Consider the relative Gauss map

XZGr(d,V)X\setminus Z\;\longrightarrow\;\operatorname{Gr}(d,V)

which sends each point to the corresponding conormal space. This is a rational map whose locus of indeterminacy is precisely ZZ. Let γX:X^Gr(d,V)\gamma_{X}:\hat{X}\to\operatorname{Gr}(d,V) denote its resolution of indeterminacy which is obtained by blowing up the base locus ZXZ\subset X as in [17, sect. 4.4]:

X^{\hat{X}}X{X}Gr(d,V){\operatorname{Gr}(d,V)}πX\scriptstyle{\pi_{X}}γX\scriptstyle{\gamma_{X}}

We want to control the image of the exceptional divisor EX=πX1(Z)X^E_{X}=\pi_{X}^{-1}(Z)\subset\hat{X} under the map

αX=(πX,γX):X^X×Gr(d,V)W×Gr(d,V)=Gr(d,T(W/S)).\alpha_{X}\;=\;(\pi_{X},\gamma_{X}):\;\hat{X}\,\to\,X\times\operatorname{Gr}(d,V)\,\subset\,W\times\operatorname{Gr}(d,V)\;=\;\operatorname{Gr}(d,T^{\vee}(W/S)).
Lemma 3.2.

The morphism αX\alpha_{X} is a closed embedding.

Proof.

By assumption XWX\subset W is cut out by a regular sequence f1,,fdf_{1},\dots,f_{d}. The same then holds for each fiber XtWtX_{t}\subset W_{t}. Hence it follows that the relative singular locus Sing(X/S)\mathrm{Sing}(X/S) is cut out as a closed subscheme of WW by f1,,fdf_{1},\dots,f_{d} and by the d×dd\times d minors

J(i1,,id):=det(i1(f1)i1(fd)id(f1)id(fd))J(i_{1},\dots,i_{d})\;:=\;\det\begin{pmatrix}\partial_{i_{1}}(f_{1})&\cdots&\partial_{i_{1}}(f_{d})\\ \vdots&\ddots&\vdots\\ \partial_{i_{d}}(f_{1})&\cdots&\partial_{i_{d}}(f_{d})\end{pmatrix}

with 1i1<<idn1\leq i_{1}<\cdots<i_{d}\leq n, where we fix an arbitrary basis 1,,nV\partial_{1},\dots,\partial_{n}\in V^{\vee} for the fiber of the relative tangent bundle and regard the basis vectors as relative derivations for the smooth morphism WSW\to S.

Now let ι:X×Gr(d,V)X×(ΛdV)\iota:X\times\operatorname{Gr}(d,V)\hookrightarrow X\times\mathbb{P}(\Lambda^{d}V) be the Plücker embedding of the Grassmannian as a closed subvariety of projective space. We want to show that the composite

βX:=ιαX:X^X×Gr(d,V)X×(dV)\beta_{X}\;:=\;\iota\circ\alpha_{X}:\quad\hat{X}\;\longrightarrow\;X\times\operatorname{Gr}(d,V)\longrightarrow X\times\mathbb{P}(\textstyle\bigwedge^{d}V)

is a closed embedding. For this let I𝒪XI\unlhd\mathcal{O}_{X} be the ideal sheaf of ZXZ\subset X. Then we have

X^=ProjXRIfor the graded Rees algebraRI:=n0Intn𝒪X[t],\hat{X}\;=\;{\mathrm{Proj}}_{X}R_{I}\quad\textnormal{for the graded Rees algebra}\quad R_{I}\;:=\;\bigoplus_{n\geq 0}\;I^{n}\cdot t^{n}\;\subset\;{\mathscr{O}}_{X}[t],

where tt is a dummy variable to keep track of degrees. The homomorphism

βX:𝒪XSym(dV)RI=n0Intn\beta_{X}^{*}\colon\quad\mathcal{O}_{X}\otimes\mathrm{Sym}^{\bullet}\left(\bigwedge^{d}V^{\vee}\right)\;\longrightarrow\;\;R_{I}\;=\;\bigoplus_{n\geq 0}\;I^{n}\cdot t^{n}

of graded 𝒪X\mathcal{O}_{X}-algebras satisfies

βX(1(i1id))=J(i1,,id)|XtIt\beta_{X}^{*}(1\otimes(\partial_{i_{1}}\wedge\cdots\wedge\partial_{i_{d}}))\;=\;J(i_{1},\dots,i_{d})|_{X}\cdot t\;\in\;I\cdot t\vskip 6.0pt plus 2.0pt minus 2.0pt

for 1i1<<ikn1\leq i_{1}<\cdots<i_{k}\leq n. But we have seen above that the 𝒪X\mathcal{O}_{X}-module II is generated by the minors on the right hand side. Hence it follows that βX\beta_{X}^{*} is an epimorphism in all degrees and so βX\beta_{X} is a closed immersion. ∎

Remark 3.3.

If d=1d=1, then Gr(d,V)=V\operatorname{Gr}(d,V)=\mathbb{P}V and the closed embedding αX\alpha_{X} induces an isomorphism

αX:X^ΛX/S.\alpha_{X}:\quad\hat{X}\;\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\sim}}{{\longrightarrow}}\;\mathbb{P}\Lambda_{X/S}.\vskip 6.0pt plus 2.0pt minus 2.0pt

Indeed, the blowup X^\hat{X} is again reduced and irreducible by [22, II.7.16]. Via αX\alpha_{X} it is therefore an integral closed subscheme of W×VW\times\mathbb{P}V and as such it can be recovered as the Zariski closure of its restriction over the open dense subset S{s}SS\setminus\{s\}\subset S, where it coincides with ΛX/SW×V\mathbb{P}\Lambda_{X/S}\subset W\times\mathbb{P}V by definition.

In particular, one may look at the scheme-theoretic fiber of X^\hat{X} over sS(k)s\in S(k) to compute the multiplicities in sps(ΛX/S){\mathrm{sp}}_{s}(\Lambda_{X/S}). For d>1d>1 the situation becomes more complicated, so in what follows we restrict ourselves to set-theoretic arguments. To pass back to conormal varieties we look at the projection Fl(d,1,V)Gr(d,V)\operatorname{Fl}(d,1,V)\longrightarrow\operatorname{Gr}(d,V) from the partial flag variety. This projection is a smooth equidimensional morphism of relative dimension d1d-1. On the fiber product Y=X^×Gr(d,V)Fl(d,1,V)Y=\hat{X}\times_{\operatorname{Gr}(d,V)}\operatorname{Fl}(d,1,V) consider the morphism

αY=(πY,γY):YX×V\alpha_{Y}=(\pi_{Y},\gamma_{Y}):\quad Y\;\longrightarrow\;X\times\mathbb{P}V

where πY:YX^X\pi_{Y}:Y\to\hat{X}\to X and γY:YFl(d,1,V)V\gamma_{Y}:Y\to\operatorname{Fl}(d,1,V)\to\mathbb{P}V are the natural composite maps. Taking the preimage of the previous exceptional divisor EXX^E_{X}\subset\hat{X} we get the following lower bound on the specialization:

Lemma 3.4.

The preimage EY=πY1(Z)YE_{Y}=\pi_{Y}^{-1}(Z)\subset Y has dimension dim(EY)=n\dim(E_{Y})=n and satisfies

αY(EY)(Supp(sps(ΛX/S))).\alpha_{Y}(E_{Y})\;\subset\;\mathbb{P}(\mathrm{Supp}({\mathrm{sp}}_{s}(\Lambda_{X/S}))).
Proof.

The statement about the dimension holds because dim(Y)=n=dim(V)\dim(Y)=n=\dim(V) and since the subvariety EYYE_{Y}\subset Y is a divisor, being the preimage of the exceptional divisor EXX^E_{X}\subset\hat{X} under the fibration YX^Y\to\hat{X}. To understand why the image γY(EY)\gamma_{Y}(E_{Y}) is contained in the specialization, recall that f:XSf:X\to S is smooth over the open subset S=S{s}S^{*}=S\setminus\{s\}. The identifications

Y:=S×SYS×SΛX/SS×T(W/S)Y^{*}\;:=\;S^{*}\times_{S}Y\;\simeq\;S^{*}\times_{S}\mathbb{P}\Lambda_{X/S}\;\subset\;S^{*}\times\mathbb{P}T^{\vee}(W/S)

give the following Cartesian diagram where the vertical arrows are open embeddings and the top horizontal arrow is a closed immersion:

Y{Y^{*}}S×ST(W/S){S^{*}\times_{S}\mathbb{P}T^{\vee}(W/S)}Y{Y}T(W/S){\mathbb{P}T^{\vee}(W/S)}

Now X^\hat{X} is irreducible as a blowup of an irreducible variety. So YY is irreducible as well, hence equal to the Zariski closure of its nonempty open subset YYY^{*}\subset Y. But then

(sps(ΛX/S))\displaystyle{\mathbb{P}}({\mathrm{sp}}_{s}(\Lambda_{X/S})) =(closure ofS×SΛX/SinT(W/S))s\displaystyle\;=\;\bigl{(}\textnormal{closure of}\;S^{*}\times_{S}{\mathbb{P}}\Lambda_{X/S}\;\textnormal{in}\;\mathbb{P}T^{\vee}(W/S)\bigr{)}_{s}
=(closure of the image of Y in T(W/S))sαY(Ys)\displaystyle\;=\;\bigl{(}\textnormal{closure of the image of $Y^{*}$ in $\mathbb{P}T^{\vee}(W/S)$}\bigr{)}_{s}\;\supseteq\;\alpha_{Y}(Y_{s})

and we are done because by construction we have EYYsE_{Y}\subseteq Y_{s}. ∎

Corollary 3.5.

If αY:EYX×V\alpha_{Y}:E_{Y}\to X\times\mathbb{P}V is generically finite onto its image, then we have

ΛZSupp(sps(ΛX/S)).\Lambda_{Z}\;\subset\;\mathrm{Supp}({\mathrm{sp}}_{s}(\Lambda_{X/S})).
Proof.

Each irreducible component of (Supp(sps(ΛX/S)))\mathbb{P}(\mathrm{Supp}({\mathrm{sp}}_{s}(\Lambda_{X/S}))) is the projectivization of some conormal variety. Each of them has dimension n1n-1, so lemma 3.4 and our generic finiteness assumption imply that αY(EY)\alpha_{Y}(E_{Y}) must appear as one of the components. But then this component is ΛZ\Lambda_{Z} because it maps onto ZXZ\subset X. ∎

Note that by lemma 3.2 the morphism YX×Fl(d,1,V)Y\to X\times\operatorname{Fl}(d,1,V) is a closed immersion and hence generically finite onto its image. So corollary 3.5 finishes the proof of proposition 3.1 since for codimension d=1d=1 the morphism Fl(d,1,V)V\operatorname{Fl}(d,1,V)\to\mathbb{P}V is an isomorphism. This is the only point where we use d=1d=1. For higher codimension the morphism αY:EYX×V\alpha_{Y}:E_{Y}\to X\times\mathbb{P}V is not always a closed embedding, as the following example shows, but it may still be generically finite onto its image as needed for corollary 3.5:

Example 3.6.

Let W=Speck[x,y,z,s]S=Speck[s]W={\mathrm{Spec}}\,k[x,y,z,s]\to S={\mathrm{Spec}}\,k[s], and consider the family of subvarieties

X={f=g=0}Wfor{f=x2+y2+s,g=x2+z2s.X\;=\;\{f=g=0\}\subset W\quad\textnormal{for}\quad\begin{cases}f\;=\;x^{2}+y^{2}+s,\\ g\;=\;x^{2}+z^{2}-s.\end{cases}

Here Z=Sing(X/S)XZ=\mathrm{Sing}(X/S)\subset X is a fat point with ideal sheaf I=(xy,xz,yz)𝒪XI=(xy,xz,yz)\unlhd{\mathscr{O}}_{X} and looking at the minors of the Jacobian matrix we see that the relative Gauss map is given in Plücker coordinates on the Grassmannian Gr(2,V)=Projk[w1,w2,w3]\operatorname{Gr}(2,V)={\mathrm{Proj}}\,k[w_{1},w_{2},w_{3}] by

γX:XZGr(2,V)=2,(x,y,z,s)[w1:w2:w3]=[yz:xz:xy].\gamma_{X}:\quad X\setminus Z\;\longrightarrow\;\operatorname{Gr}(2,V)=\mathbb{P}^{2},\quad(x,y,z,s)\;\mapsto\;[w_{1}:w_{2}:w_{3}]=[yz:xz:-xy].

Note that the right hand side does not involve the parameter ss. Furthermore, we have (2x2+y2+z2)|X=(f+g)|X=0(2x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2})|_{X}=(f+g)|_{X}=0 and hence the relative Gauss map γX\gamma_{X} factors over

QX={2w22w32+w12w32+w22w32= 0}Gr(2,V).Q_{X}\;=\;\{2w_{2}^{2}w_{3}^{2}+w_{1}^{2}w_{3}^{2}+w_{2}^{2}w_{3}^{2}\;=\;0\}\;\subset\;\operatorname{Gr}(2,V).\vskip 6.0pt plus 2.0pt minus 2.0pt

Write V=Projk[v1,v2,v3]\mathbb{P}V={\mathrm{Proj}}\;k[v_{1},v_{2},v_{3}] for the dual coordinates viv_{i} where the flag variety is given by

Fl(2,1,V)={v1w1+v2w2+v3w3=0}Gr(2,V)×V\operatorname{Fl}(2,1,V)\;=\;\{v_{1}w_{1}+v_{2}w_{2}+v_{3}w_{3}=0\}\;\subset\;\operatorname{Gr}(2,V)\times\mathbb{P}V

then for

QY={2w22w32+w12w32+w22w32=v1w1+v2w2+v3w3=0}Gr(2,V)×V.Q_{Y}\;=\;\{2w_{2}^{2}w_{3}^{2}+w_{1}^{2}w_{3}^{2}+w_{2}^{2}w_{3}^{2}=v_{1}w_{1}+v_{2}w_{2}+v_{3}w_{3}=0\}\;\subset\;\operatorname{Gr}(2,V)\times\mathbb{P}V.

we get the following diagram where the squares are Cartesian and the hooked arrows are closed immersions:

EY{E_{Y}}Y{Y}X×QY{X\times Q_{Y}}X×Fl(2,1,V){X\times\operatorname{Fl}(2,1,V)}X×V{X\times\mathbb{P}V}EX{E_{X}}X^{\hat{X}}X×QX{X\times Q_{X}}X×Gr(2,V){X\times\operatorname{Gr}(2,V)}

The composite of the arrows in the top row is the morphism αY:EYX×V\alpha_{Y}:E_{Y}\to X\times\mathbb{P}V that we are interested in. The diagram shows that it is not a closed immersion, over Zred={0}XZ^{\mathrm{red}}=\{0\}\subset X we have the factorization

EYred{E_{Y}^{\mathrm{red}}}V{\mathbb{P}V}QY{Q_{Y}}αY\scriptstyle{\alpha_{Y}}4:1\scriptstyle{4:1}

where QYVQ_{Y}\to\mathbb{P}V is an irreducible cover of generic degree four! However, since the left diagonal arrow is a closed immersion and hence birational for dimension reasons, the morphism αY:EYX×V\alpha_{Y}:E_{Y}\to X\times\mathbb{P}V is generically finite over its image.

4. Generalities about families of rational maps

Before we apply the above to Gauss maps, let us recall some generalities about families of rational maps. Let f:XSf\colon X\to S be a faithfully flat morphism of varieties of relative dimension nn with irreducible fibers. Let 𝑃𝑖𝑐(X){\mathscr{L}}\in{\mathit{Pic}}(X) be a line bundle and 𝒱{\mathscr{V}} a rank n+1n+1 vector subbundle of ff_{*}{\mathscr{L}}. Then for each point sS(k)s\in S(k) we get a linear series 𝒱sH0(Xs,s){\mathscr{V}}_{s}\subset H^{0}(X_{s},{\mathscr{L}}_{s}) and we denote by ϕs:Xs𝒱s\phi_{s}\colon X_{s}\dashrightarrow\mathbb{P}{\mathscr{V}}_{s} the corresponding rational map. Note that since the source and the target of this map have the same dimension, the map is a generically finite cover iff it is dominant. So we consider the degree map

deg:S(k)0,sdeg(ϕs),\deg:\quad S(k)\;\longrightarrow\;{\mathbb{N}}_{0},\quad s\;\mapsto\;\deg(\phi_{s}),

where we put deg(ϕs)=0\deg(\phi_{s})=0 if ϕs\phi_{s} is not dominant.

Lemma 4.1.

The degree map deg\deg is constructible.

Proof.

By [17, prop. 4.4] we can compute the degree in terms of Segre and Chern classes as

deg(ϕs)=Xsc1(s)nBsc(s)ns(Bs,Xs)\deg(\phi_{s})\;=\;\int_{X_{s}}c_{1}({\mathscr{L}}_{s})^{n}-\int_{B_{s}}c({\mathscr{L}}_{s})^{n}\cap s(B_{s},X_{s})

where BsXsB_{s}\subset X_{s} denotes the base locus of the linear series 𝒱sH0(Xs,s)\mathcal{V}_{s}\subset H^{0}(X_{s},{\mathscr{L}}_{s}). We can put together all these fiberwise base loci into a relative base locus and consider the flattening stratification of this relative base locus. This is a stratification of SS such that on each stratum the above intersection number is constant, hence the function deg\deg is constructible. ∎

However, in general the degree is neither upper nor lower semi-continuous, as the following variation of [11, ex. 2.3] shows:

Example 4.2.

Let SS be a smooth affine curve with two marked points s±S(k)s_{\pm}\in S(k) and fix positive integers n±n<27n_{\pm}\leq n<27. Let pj:S3p_{j}:S\longrightarrow\mathbb{P}^{3} for j=1,,nj=1,\dots,n be such that

  • for ts±t\neq s_{\pm} the points pj(t)p_{j}(t) are in general position,

  • for t=s±t=s_{\pm} they consist of n±n_{\pm} general points on a given line \ell and nn±n-n_{\pm} points in general position not on that line.

For tS(k)t\in S(k) let ft:33f_{t}\colon\mathbb{P}^{3}\dashrightarrow\mathbb{P}^{3} be the generically finite rational map defined by a linear system of four generic cubics passing trough the pj(t)p_{j}(t). By loc. cit. its degree is

deg(ft)={27nfor ts±,20(nn±)for t=t± and n±4,\deg(f_{t})\;=\;\begin{cases}27-n&\textnormal{for $t\neq s_{\pm}$},\\ 20-(n-n_{\pm})&\textnormal{for $t=t_{\pm}$ and $n_{\pm}\geq 4$},\end{cases}

since in the second case the indeterminacy locus of f±f_{\pm} consists of the chosen line \ell together with the remaining nn±n-n_{\pm} points. So the degree is a constructible function as predicted by lemma 4.1. However, taking for example (n,n+,n)=(20,10,4)(n,n_{+},n_{-})=(20,10,4) we obtain an example where the generic value of the degree is seven, jumps up to ten at one point and down to four at another point. Hence in the same family the degree can both decrease and increase under specialization.

5. Gauss maps on abelian varieties

We now apply the above to an abelian scheme f:ASf:A\to S, so in this section we take W=AW=A. Let XAX\subset A be a closed subvariety which is flat over SS. For sS(k)s\in S(k) we have the Gauss map

γXs:ΛXsV\gamma_{X_{s}}:\quad{\mathbb{P}}\Lambda_{X_{s}}\;\longrightarrow\;{\mathbb{P}}V

where V=H0(As,ΩAs1)V=H^{0}(A_{s},\Omega_{A_{s}}^{1}). If this map is dominant, then for dimension reasons it is a generically finite cover and we denote by deg(γXs)\deg(\gamma_{X_{s}}) its generic degree. If the map is not dominant we put deg(γXs)=0\deg(\gamma_{X_{s}})=0; this happens iff the subvariety XsAsX_{s}\subset A_{s} arises by pull-back from some smaller dimensional abelian quotient variety [37, th. 1], which by [1, th. 3] happens iff XsX_{s} is not of general type. The degree of the above Gauss map is related to the degree of conormal varieties as follows:

Lemma 5.1.

We have deg(ΛXs)=deg(γXs)\deg(\Lambda_{X_{s}})=\deg(\gamma_{X_{s}}).

Proof.

The degree of our Gauss map γXs:ΛXsV\gamma_{X_{s}}:{\mathbb{P}}\Lambda_{X_{s}}\to{\mathbb{P}}V coincides with the degree considered by Franecki and Kapranov terms of tangent rather than cotangent spaces in [16, sect. 2]: Up to the duality Gr(d,V)Gr(gd,V)\operatorname{Gr}(d,V)\simeq\operatorname{Gr}(g-d,V^{\vee}) they study the map pqp\circ q defined by the diagram

X~s{\widetilde{X}_{s}}F(d,1,V){F(d,1,V)}G(1,V)=V{G(1,V)={\mathbb{P}}V}Sm(Xs){\mathrm{Sm}(X_{s})}G(d,V){G(d,V)}q\scriptstyle{q}p\scriptstyle{p}

where X~s=Sm(Xs)×G(d,V)F(d,g1,V)\widetilde{X}_{s}=\mathrm{Sm}(X_{s})\times_{G(d,V)}F(d,g-1,V). By construction X~sΛXs\widetilde{X}_{s}\subset{\mathbb{P}}\Lambda_{X_{s}} is an open subset of the conormal variety, and their map pqp\circ q is the restriction of our Gauss map to this open subset. Hence the claim follows from [16, prop. 2.2]. ∎

In particular deg(ΛXs)0\deg(\Lambda_{X_{s}})\geq 0. Together with the preservation of the total degree under Lagrangian specialization this leads to our first semicontinuity result:

Corollary 5.2.

The map S(k)0,sdeg(γXs)S(k)\to{\mathbb{N}}_{0},s\mapsto\deg(\gamma_{X_{s}}) is lower semicontinuous.

Proof.

By Lemma 4.1, we know that the map is constructible. We have to show that its values decreases under specialization. For this we may assume that SS is a curve, and after base change to its normalization we may assume this curve to be smooth. Let dd be the value from proposition 2.4. With notations as in lemma 2.3 then

deg(ΛXs)={dif sΣ,dδ(s)if sΣ,\deg(\Lambda_{X_{s}})\;=\;\begin{cases}d&\textnormal{if $s\notin\Sigma$},\\ d-\delta(s)&\textnormal{if $s\in\Sigma$},\end{cases}

where δ(s)=ZXsmZdeg(ΛZ)\delta(s)=\sum_{Z\subset X_{s}}m_{Z}\cdot\deg(\Lambda_{Z}) with multiplicities mZ0m_{Z}\geq 0. Now in the case of abelian varieties the occuring degrees coincide with the degrees of the corresponding Gauss maps by lemma 5.1. In particular, since the degrees of Gauss maps are obviously nonnegative, we have deg(γZ)0\deg(\gamma_{Z})\geq 0 and therefore δ(s)0\delta(s)\geq 0, which proves that the degree of the Gauss map is constant on an open dense subset and can only drop on the finitely many points of the complement. ∎

To see where the function in the previous corollary actually jumps, recall that a subvariety ZAsZ\subset A_{s} has Gauss degree deg(γZ)=0\deg(\gamma_{Z})=0 iff it is not of general type. Thus we obtain the following sufficient jumping criterion:

Corollary 5.3.

Suppose dim(S)=1\dim(S)=1. Let XAX\subset A be a divisor which is flat over SS and let 0S(k)0\in S(k) be a point such that Sing(X0)\mathrm{Sing}(X_{0}) has an irreducible component ZZ which is of general type and not contained in the closure of t0Sing(Xt)\bigcup_{t\neq 0}\mathrm{Sing}(X_{t}). Then there is an open dense subset USU\subset S such that

deg(γXt)deg(γX0)deg(γZ)> 0for alltU(k){0}.\deg(\gamma_{X_{t}})-\deg(\gamma_{X_{0}})\;\geq\;\deg(\gamma_{Z})\;>\;0\quad\textnormal{\em for all}\quad t\;\in\;U(k)\setminus\{0\}.
Proof.

The first inequality follows from prop. 3.1, the second from our assumption that the subvariety ZA0Z\subset A_{0} is of general type. ∎

6. Application to the Schottky problem

The moduli space 𝒜g{\mathscr{A}}_{g} of principally polarized abelian varieties of dimension gg over the field kk admits the finite filtration 𝒢d𝒢d1𝒢g!=𝒜g\cdots\subseteq{\mathscr{G}}_{d}\subseteq{\mathscr{G}}_{d-1}\subset\cdots\subseteq{\mathscr{G}}_{g!}={\mathscr{A}}_{g} by the Gauss loci

𝒢d:={(A,Θ)𝒜g|deg(γΘ)d}𝒜g.{\mathscr{G}}_{d}\;:=\;\{(A,\Theta)\in{\mathscr{A}}_{g}\,|\,\deg(\gamma_{\Theta})\leq d\}\;\subseteq\;{\mathscr{A}}_{g}.

Our semicontinuity result implies:

Corollary 6.1.

For any dd\in{\mathbb{N}} the Gauss loci 𝒢d{\mathscr{G}}_{d} are closed in 𝒜g{\mathscr{A}}_{g}.

Proof.

The moduli space 𝒜g{\mathscr{A}}_{g} has a finite cover by a smooth quasi-projective variety over which there exists universal theta divisor. On this cover the Gauss maps fit together in a family of rational maps as in the setting of section 4. The Gauss loci are the level sets of the degree map, and we have to show that this map is lower-semicontinuous. This follows from corollary 5.2. ∎

Using our sufficient criterion for jumps in the degree of Gauss maps, we can now show that the stratification by the Gauss loci refines the stratification by the Andreotti-Mayer loci

𝒩c={(A,Θ)𝒜gdimSing(Θ)c}{\mathscr{N}}_{c}\;=\;\{(A,\Theta)\in{\mathscr{A}}_{g}\mid\dim\mathrm{Sing}(\Theta)\geq c\}

from [3]. Some care is needed because the singular locus of the theta divisor may have components which are negligible, i.e. not of general type:

Remark 6.2.

There are indecomposable ppav’s (A,Θ)𝒜g(A,\Theta)\in{\mathscr{A}}_{g} with a theta divisor for which Sing(Θ)A\mathrm{Sing}(\Theta)\subset A is negligible. This even happens for generic ppav’s on certain irreducible components of Andreotti-Mayer loci: For instance, for g=5g=5 one can show that for a generic ppav on the component 5,1𝒩1{\mathscr{E}}_{5,1}\subset{\mathscr{N}}_{1} from [13, thm. 4.1(ii)] the singular locus Sing(Θ)\mathrm{Sing}(\Theta) is an elliptic curve.

A more detailed discussion will be given in a forthcoming work by Constantin Podelski. In any case negligible components can only appear on decomposable abelian varieties, hence the following corollary of our jumping criterion covers all Andreotti-Mayer strata whose general point is a simple abelian variety:

Corollary 6.3.

Let cc\in{\mathbb{N}}, and let 𝒩𝒩c{\mathscr{N}}\subset{\mathscr{N}}_{c} be an irreducible component whose general point is a ppav whose singular locus of the theta divisor has no negligible components. Then 𝒩{\mathscr{N}} is an irreducible component of 𝒢d{\mathscr{G}}_{d} for some dd\in{\mathbb{N}}.

Proof.

Let s𝒩(k)s\in{\mathscr{N}}(k) be a general point on the given component. Since the moduli space of ppav’s is a quasiprojective variety, we may pick an affine curve S𝒜gS\subset{\mathscr{A}}_{g} such that S𝒩c={s}S\cap{\mathscr{N}}_{c}=\{s\} and SS meets 𝒩{\mathscr{N}} transversely. After passing to a finite cover we may assume that there exists an abelian scheme f:ASf:A\to S and a universal theta divisor ΘA\Theta\subset A over this curve, and by our choice of the curve we have

dimSing(Θt)<dimSing(Θs)for all ts.\dim\mathrm{Sing}(\Theta_{t})\;<\;\dim\mathrm{Sing}(\Theta_{s})\quad\textnormal{for all $t\neq s$}.

Hence Sing(Θs)\mathrm{Sing}(\Theta_{s}) has an irreducible component not in the closure of tsSing(Θt)\bigcup_{t\neq s}\mathrm{Sing}(\Theta_{t}) and so

deg(γΘt)>deg(γΘs)for all ts\deg(\gamma_{\Theta_{t}})\;>\;\deg(\gamma_{\Theta_{s}})\quad\textnormal{for all $t\neq s$}

by corollary 5.3. Varying ss in an open subset of the component 𝒩{\mathscr{N}} and varying SS among all curves meeting this component transversely in the chosen point, we get that some nonempty open subset of 𝒩{\mathscr{N}} is also an open subset of a Gauss locus 𝒢d{\mathscr{G}}_{d} for some dd\in{\mathbb{N}}. Hence the result follows by passing the the closure, since both the Andreotti-Mayer loci and the Gauss loci are closed in 𝒜g{\mathscr{A}}_{g}. ∎

As an application we get that the stratification by the degree of the Gauss map gives a solution to the Schottky problem as conjectured in [11], where for the Prym version we denote by D(g)D(g) the degree of the varieties of quadrics in g1{\mathbb{P}}^{g-1} of rank at most three:

Corollary 6.4.

We have the following components of Gauss loci in 𝒜g{\mathscr{A}}_{g}:

(a) The locus of Jacobians is a component of 𝒢d{\mathscr{G}}_{d} for d=(2g2g1)d=\binom{2g-2}{g-1}.

(b) The locus of hyperelliptic Jacobians is a is a component of 𝒢d{\mathscr{G}}_{d} for d=2g1d=2^{g-1}.

(c) The locus of Prym varieties is a is a component of 𝒢d{\mathscr{G}}_{d} for d=D(g)+2g3d=D(g)+2^{g-3}.

Proof.

The locus of Jacobians is a component of an Andreotti-Mayer locus by [3], and by [31, Proposition 3.4] a general Jacobian variety is a simple abelian variety and thus in particular has no negligible subvarieties other than itself. Furthermore, it is well-known that the degree of the Gauss map of a Jacobian is d=(2g2g1)d=\binom{2g-2}{g-1}, see e.g. [2, proof of prop. 10]. Hence part (a) follows from corollary 6.3. If we replace Jacobians by hyperelliptic Jacobians, the above arguent works also in the hyperelliptic case, with the same references. For Prym varieties the argument is again the same but now one has to replace reference [3] with [14], and reference [2] with [36, Main Theorem]. In the last reference the reader can also find an explicit expression for the number D(g)D(g). ∎

7. A topological view on jump loci

In this section we work over the complex numbers with the Euclidean topology. Let WW be a smooth complex projective variety. For a closed subvariety XWX\subset W the singular locus Sing(X)\mathrm{Sing}(X) and the conormal degree deg(ΛX)\deg(\Lambda_{X}) are not topological invariants of the subvariety, as example 1.5 shows. But both are related to the intersection cohomology IH(X)\mathrm{IH}^{\bullet}(X) which only depends on the homeomorphism type of the subvariety in the Euclidean topology; see [6, 20, 21, 24, 30]. The Euler characteristic

χIC(X)=i0(1)i+dim(X)dimIHi(X)\chi_{\mathrm{IC}}(X)\;=\;\sum_{i\geq 0}\;(-1)^{i+\dim(X)}\dim\mathrm{IH}^{i}(X)

can be read off from a generalization of the Gauss-Bonnet theorem: The Kashiwara index formula [19, th. 9.1] writes it as a degree in the sense of definition 1.4. More precisely

χIC(X)=deg(CC(δX)),\chi_{\mathrm{IC}}(X)\;=\;\deg(\operatorname{CC}(\delta_{X})),

where δXPerv(W)\delta_{X}\in\mathrm{Perv}(W) denotes the perverse intersection complex of XWX\subseteq W [5, 12] and where the characteristic cycle CC(δX)(W)\operatorname{CC}(\delta_{X})\in{\mathscr{L}}(W) is an effective conic Lagrangian cycle which contains ΛX\Lambda_{X} as a component of multiplicity one but may also have as components the conormal varieties to certain ZSing(X)Z\subseteq\mathrm{Sing}(X). Passing from conormal varieties to characteristic cycles restores topological invariance of the degree:

Example 7.1.

In W=2W={\mathbb{P}}^{2} the conormal degree for a smooth rational curve differs from the one for a cuspical cubic, see example 1.5. But this is compensated by a difference in

CC(δX)={ΛXif X is a smooth rational curve,ΛX+Λ{p}if X is a cuspidal cubic with cusp p.\operatorname{CC}(\delta_{X})\;=\;\begin{cases}\Lambda_{X}&\textnormal{if $X$ is a smooth rational curve},\\ \Lambda_{X}+\Lambda_{\{p\}}&\textnormal{if $X$ is a cuspidal cubic with cusp $p$}.\end{cases}

which in both cases gives the total degree deg(CC(δX))=2\deg(\operatorname{CC}(\delta_{X}))=-2.

In what follows we want to understand how for a morphism XSX\to S of complex varieties the intersection cohomology Euler characteristic of the fibers varies. Basic stratification theory implies:

Lemma 7.2.

The map sχIC(Xs)s\mapsto\chi_{\mathrm{IC}}(X_{s}) is constructible.

Proof.

The homeomorphism invariance of intersection cohomology [21, th. 4.1] shows that for a topologically locally trivial fibration over a connected base, all fibers have the same intersection cohomology. Any morphism of complex algebraic varieties restricts to a topologically locally trivial fibration over a Zariski open dense subset of the target [35, cor. 5.1], so we are done by Noetherian induction. ∎

In general the map in this lemma is neither upper nor lower semicontinuous, the jumps may go in both directions:

Example 7.3.

Let Q3Q\subset{\mathbb{P}}^{3} be a quadric. Then by [30, ex. 2.3.21 and th. 2.4.6] we have

χIC(Q)={4if Q1×1 is smooth,3if Q is a cone over a smooth rational curve,6if Q is a union of two projective planes.\chi_{\mathrm{IC}}(Q)\;=\;\begin{cases}4&\textnormal{if $Q\simeq{\mathbb{P}}^{1}\times{\mathbb{P}}^{1}$ is smooth},\\ 3&\textnormal{if $Q$ is a cone over a smooth rational curve},\\ 6&\textnormal{if $Q$ is a union of two projective planes}.\end{cases}

So for a family of quadrics whose general member is smooth, the number χIC(Q)\chi_{\mathrm{IC}}(Q) jumps down on nodal quadrics but jumps up on reducible quadrics.

Note that here the size of the jumps is precisely the Euler characteristic of the singular locus. This fits with the following sheaf-theoretic version of the Lagrangian specialization principle:

Theorem 7.4.

Let f:WSf:W\to S be a smooth proper family over a curve SS, and let XWX\subset W be a closed subvariety such that the morphism f:XSf:X\to S is flat with generically reduced fibers. Then there exists dd\in{\mathbb{Z}} and a finite subset ΣS\Sigma\subset S such that

χIC(Xs)={dfor sSΣ,ddeg(Λ(s))for sΣ,\chi_{\mathrm{IC}}(X_{s})\;=\;\begin{cases}d&\textnormal{for $s\in S\setminus\Sigma$},\\ d-\deg(\Lambda(s))&\textnormal{for $s\in\Sigma$},\end{cases}\vskip 6.0pt plus 2.0pt minus 2.0pt

where Λ(s)=sps(CC(δX))CC(δXs)(Ws)\Lambda(s)={\mathrm{sp}}_{s}(\operatorname{CC}(\delta_{X}))-\operatorname{CC}(\delta_{X_{s}})\in{\mathscr{L}}(W_{s}) is an effective cycle.

Proof.

We interpret Lagrangian specialization via perverse sheaves. For sS()s\in S({\mathbb{C}}) one has the functor of nearby cycles Ψs:Perv(W)Perv(Ws)\Psi_{s}:\mathrm{Perv}(W)\to\mathrm{Perv}(W_{s}), which is an exact functor with

CC(Ψs(P))=sps(CC(P))for allPPerv(W)\operatorname{CC}(\Psi_{s}(P))\;=\;{\mathrm{sp}}_{s}(\operatorname{CC}(P))\quad\textnormal{for all}\quad P\;\in\;\mathrm{Perv}(W)

by [19, th. 5.5]. Here we abuse notation and view CC(P)\operatorname{CC}(P) as an element of the group of relative conic Lagrangian cycles (W/S){\mathscr{L}}(W/S) via remark 2.1, discarding any component that is not flat over SS. The last part of the specialization lemma 2.3 has a sheaf-theoretic version: For any closed SS-flat subvariety XWX\subset W such that the map f:XSf:X\to S has generically reduced fibers, there exists a finite subset ΣS\Sigma\subset S such that the semisimplification (Ψs(δX))ss(\Psi_{s}(\delta_{X}))^{\mathrm{ss}} of the perverse sheaf Ψs(δX)\Psi_{s}(\delta_{X}) has the form

(Ψs(δX))ss{δXsfor sSΣ,δXsP(s)for sΣ,(\Psi_{s}(\delta_{X}))^{\mathrm{ss}}\;\simeq\;\begin{cases}\delta_{X_{s}}&\textnormal{for $s\in S\setminus\Sigma$},\\ \delta_{X_{s}}\oplus P(s)&\textnormal{for $s\in\Sigma$},\end{cases}\vskip 6.0pt plus 2.0pt minus 2.0pt

where P(s)Perv(Xs)P(s)\in\mathrm{Perv}(X_{s}) is a perverse sheaf with support contained in Sing(Xs)\mathrm{Sing}(X_{s}). So we get

sps(CC(δX))=CC(Ψs(δX))={CC(δXs)for sSΣ,CC(δXs)+Λ(s)for sΣ,{\mathrm{sp}}_{s}(\operatorname{CC}(\delta_{X}))\;=\;\operatorname{CC}(\Psi_{s}(\delta_{X}))\;=\;\begin{cases}\operatorname{CC}(\delta_{X_{s}})&\textnormal{for $s\in S\setminus\Sigma$},\\ \operatorname{CC}(\delta_{X_{s}})+\Lambda(s)&\textnormal{for $s\in\Sigma$},\end{cases}\vskip 6.0pt plus 2.0pt minus 2.0pt

where Λ(s)=CC(P(s))(Ws)\Lambda(s)=\operatorname{CC}(P(s))\in{\mathscr{L}}(W_{s}) is effective, being the characteristic cycle of a perverse sheaf. Hence the result follows by noting that if f:WSf:W\to S is proper, then by proposition 2.4 the degree d=deg(sps(CC(δX)))d=\deg({\mathrm{sp}}_{s}(\operatorname{CC}(\delta_{X}))) is independent of ss. ∎

In the case of abelian varieties the positivity of conormal degrees then gives an analog of theorem 1.7. The same argument works for a much wider class of varieties, we only need the following positivity property:

Definition 7.5.

A variety XX satisfies the signed Euler characteristic property if we have

χ(X,P):=i(1)idimHi(X,P) 0for allPPerv(X).\chi(X,P)\;:=\;\sum_{i\in{\mathbb{Z}}}(-1)^{i}\dim\mathrm{H}^{i}(X,P)\;\geq\;0\quad\textnormal{for all}\quad P\;\in\;\mathrm{Perv}(X).

The terminology is borrowed from [15]. The above property holds for semiabelian varieties [16] and hence also for any finite cover of closed subvarieties of them:

Lemma 7.6.

If a variety AA has the signed Euler characteristic property, then so does any variety with a finite morphism to AA. In particular, any variety with a finite morphism to a semiabelian variety has the signed Euler characteristic property.

Proof.

If f:XAf:X\to A is a finite morphism, then for any perverse sheaf PPerv(X)P\in\mathrm{Perv}(X) the direct image is a perverse sheaf Rf(P)Perv(A)Rf_{*}(P)\in\mathrm{Perv}(A). If AA has the signed Euler characteristic property, which holds for instance for abelian varieties [16], then we get χ(A,P)=χ(A,Rf(P))0\chi(A,P)=\chi(A,Rf_{*}(P))\geq 0. ∎

The above theorem shows that for any family of such varieties the intersection cohomology Euler characteristic is semicontinuous:

Corollary 7.7.

Let f:WSf:W\to S be a smooth proper morphism to a variety SS, and let XWX\subset W be a closed subvariety such that f:XSf:X\to S is flat and all its fibers are generically reduced and have the signed Euler characteristic property. Then for each dd\in{\mathbb{N}} the subsets Sd={sSχIC(Xs)d}SS_{d}=\bigl{\{}s\in S\mid\chi_{\mathrm{IC}}(X_{s})\leq d\bigr{\}}\subseteq S are Zariski closed.

Proof.

We must show that χIC(Xs)\chi_{\mathrm{IC}}(X_{s}) cannot increase under specialization. For this we can assume SS is a smooth curve. Then theorem 7.4 applies, here χ(Xs,P(s))0\chi(X_{s},P(s))\geq 0 since XsX_{s} has the signed Euler characteristic property. ∎

In deciding where the Euler characteristic actually jumps, we need to be more careful. Proposition 3.1 gives a way to see extra components in sps(CC(δX)){\mathrm{sp}}_{s}(\operatorname{CC}(\delta_{X})) but does not guarantee that these enter in a new summand Λ(s)\Lambda(s), a priori they could also appear in CC(δXs)\operatorname{CC}(\delta_{X_{s}}); however, this second case can only happen if CC(δXs)\operatorname{CC}(\delta_{X_{s}}) is reducible, which one can often exclude by a direct computation.

Let us illustrate this again with theta divisors. Corollary 7.7 says that for dd\in{\mathbb{N}} the loci

𝒳d={(A,Θ)𝒜gχIC(Θ)d}𝒜g.{\mathscr{X}}_{d}\;=\;\{(A,\Theta)\in{\mathscr{A}}_{g}\mid\chi_{\mathrm{IC}}(\Theta)\leq d\}\;\subseteq\;{\mathscr{A}}_{g}.\vskip 6.0pt plus 2.0pt minus 2.0pt

are closed, and by the homeomorphism invariance of intersection cohomology they only depend on the topology of the theta divisor. This provides a topological view on Andreotti-Mayer loci, for instance:

Corollary 7.8.

Let 𝒩𝒩c{\mathscr{N}}\subset{\mathscr{N}}_{c} be an irreducible component of an Andreotti-Mayer locus such that a general point of this component is a ppav (A,Θ)(A,\Theta) with the property that

  • CC(δΘ)\operatorname{CC}(\delta_{\Theta}) is irreducible, and

  • Sing(Θ)\mathrm{Sing}(\Theta) has no negligible components.

Then 𝒩{\mathscr{N}} is also an irreducible component of 𝒳d{\mathscr{X}}_{d} for some dd\in{\mathbb{N}}.

Proof.

Use the same argument as in corollary 6.3, together with the remark after the proof of corollary 7.7. ∎

This in particular applies to the locus of Jacobians. In the following corollary we do not mention hyperelliptic Jacobians because for them CC(δΘ)\operatorname{CC}(\delta_{\Theta}) is reducible, and we haven’t checked what happens for a generic Prym variety. However, we include the Andreotti-Mayer locus 𝒩0𝒜g{\mathscr{N}}_{0}\subset{\mathscr{A}}_{g} of ppav’s with a singular theta divisor:

Corollary 7.9.

Inside the moduli space 𝒜g{\mathscr{A}}_{g} we have:

  1. (1)

    The locus 𝒩0{\mathscr{N}}_{0} is equal to 𝒳d{\mathscr{X}}_{d} for d={g!1if g is odd,g!2if g is even.d=\begin{cases}g!-1&\textnormal{\em if $g$ is odd},\\ g!-2&\textnormal{\em if $g$ is even}.\end{cases}

  2. (2)

    The locus of Jacobians is a component of 𝒳d{\mathscr{X}}_{d} for d=(2g2g1)d=\binom{2g-2}{g-1}.

Proof.

(1) By definition 𝒜g𝒩0{\mathscr{A}}_{g}\setminus{\mathscr{N}}_{0} consists of all ppav’s (A,Θ)(A,\Theta) with a smooth theta divisor and for those we know that χIC(Θ)=g!\chi_{\mathrm{IC}}(\Theta)=g! because for a smooth variety intersection cohomology equals Betti cohomology. But at a generic point (A,Θ)(A,\Theta) of each of the two components of 𝒩0{\mathscr{N}}_{0} the theta divisor has one respectively two nodes, and then

χIC(δΘ)={g!2kif g is even,g!kif g is odd,\chi_{\mathrm{IC}}(\delta_{\Theta})\;=\;\begin{cases}g!-2k&\textnormal{if $g$ is even},\\ g!-k&\textnormal{if $g$ is odd},\end{cases}

where k{1,2}k\in\{1,2\} denotes the number of nodes [27, proof of prop. 4.2(2)]. Hence the claim follows by corollary 7.7. Note that the degree of the classical Gauss map is deg(ΛΘ)=g!2k\deg(\Lambda_{\Theta})=g!-2k in both cases, but for odd gg the cycle CC(δΘ)=ΛΘ+ΛSing(Θ)\operatorname{CC}(\delta_{\Theta})=\Lambda_{\Theta}+\Lambda_{\mathrm{Sing}(\Theta)} is reducible and we cannot directly apply corollary 7.8.


(2) For Jacobians of nonhyperelliptic curves we know that CC(δΘ)=ΛΘ\operatorname{CC}(\delta_{\Theta})=\Lambda_{\Theta} is irreducible by [7, th. 3.3.1], so if we specialize to such a Jacobian, then any new component of the specialization must enter in Λ(s)\Lambda(s). So the same argument as in the proof of corollary 6.4 shows that the locus of Jacobians is a component of 𝒳d{\mathscr{X}}_{d} where d=χIC(Θ)=deg(CC(δΘ))=deg(ΛΘ)d=\chi_{\mathrm{IC}}(\Theta)=\deg(\operatorname{CC}(\delta_{\Theta}))=\deg(\Lambda_{\Theta}) is the degree of the Gauss map for the theta divisor on a general Jacobian variety as in corollary 6.4.∎

The above is still only a weak solution to the Schottky problem, though χIC(Θ)\chi_{\mathrm{IC}}(\Theta) also appears as the dimension of an irreducible representation of a certain reductive group which gives more information [26, sect. 4]. The following example for g=4g=4 illustrates the difference between the various numerical invariants:

Example 7.10.

Let (A,Θ)𝒜4(A,\Theta)\in{\mathscr{A}}_{4}.

  • If Sing(Θ)\mathrm{Sing}(\Theta) consists of 88 nodes, then deg(γΘ)=χIC(δΘ)=8\deg(\gamma_{\Theta})=\chi_{\mathrm{IC}}(\delta_{\Theta})=8.

  • If Sing(Θ)\mathrm{Sing}(\Theta) consists of 55 nodes, then deg(γΘ)=χIC(δΘ)=14\deg(\gamma_{\Theta})=\chi_{\mathrm{IC}}(\delta_{\Theta})=14.

  • If (A,Θ)(A,\Theta) is a hyperelliptic Jacobian, then deg(γΘ)=8\deg(\gamma_{\Theta})=8 and χIC(δΘ)=14\chi_{\mathrm{IC}}(\delta_{\Theta})=14.

So there are non-homeomorphic theta divisors whose Gauss maps have the same degree. Are there also homeomorphic theta divisors with different Gauss degrees?


References

  • [1] Abramovich, D., Subvarieties of semiabelian varieties, Compos. Math. 90 (1994), 37–52.
  • [2] Andreotti, A., On a theorem of Torelli, Amer. J. Math. 80 (1958), 801–828.
  • [3] Andreotti, A. and Mayer, A. L., On period relations for abelian integrals on algebraic curves, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. 21 (1967), 189–238.
  • [4] Auffarth, R. and Codogni, G., Theta divisors whose Gauss map has a fiber of positive dimension, Journal of Algebra 548 (2020), 153 – 161.
  • [5] Beilinson, A., Bernstein, J. and Deligne, P., Faisceaux Pervers, Astérisque 100 (1982).
  • [6] Borel, A. et al., Intersection Cohomology, Progress in Math., vol. 50, Birkhäuser, 1984.
  • [7] Bressler, P. and Brylinski, J.-L., On the singularities of theta divisors on jacobians, J. Algebraic Geom. 7 (1998), 781–796.
  • [8] Briançon, J., Maisonobe, P. and Merle, M., Localization de systèmes différentiels, stratifications de Whitney et conditions de Thom, Invent. Math. 117 (1994), 531–550.
  • [9] Brieskorn, E., Beispiele zur Differentialtopologie von Singularitäten, Invent. Math. 2 (1966), 1–14.
  • [10] by same author, Examples of singular normal complex spaces which are topological manifolds, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 55 (1966), 1395–1397.
  • [11] Codogni, G., Grushevsky, S. and Sernesi, E., The degree of the Gauss map of the theta divisor, Algebra & Number Theory 11 (2017), 983–1001.
  • [12] De Cataldo, M. and Migliorini, L., The decomposition theorem, perverse sheaves and the topology of algebraic maps, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 46 (2009), 535–633.
  • [13] Debarre, O., Sur les variétés abéliennes dont le diviseur theta est singulier en codimension 3, Duke Math. J. 57 (1988), 221–273.
  • [14] by same author, Variétés de Prym et ensembles d’Andreotti et Mayer, Duke Math. J. 60 (1990), no. 3, 599–630.
  • [15] Elduque, E., Geske, C. and Maxim, L., On the signed Euler characteristic property for subvarieties of abelian varieties, J. of Sing. 17 (2018), 368–387.
  • [16] Franecki, J. and Kapranov, M., The Gauss map and a noncompact Riemann-Roch formula for constructible sheaves on semiabelian varieties, Duke Math. J. 104 (2000), 171–180.
  • [17] Fulton, W., Intersection theory (second ed.), Springer Verlag, 1998.
  • [18] Fulton, W., Kleiman, S. and MacPherson, R., About the enumeration of contacts, Algebraic Geometry – Open Problems. Proceedings Ravello 1982 (Ciliberto, C., Ghione, F., and Orecchia, F., ed.), Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 997, Springer, 1983, pp. 156–196.
  • [19] Ginzburg, V., Characteristic varieties and vanishing cycles, Invent. Math. 84 (1986), 327–402.
  • [20] Goresky, M. and MacPherson, R., Intersection homology theory, Topology 19 (1980), 135–162.
  • [21] by same author, Intersection homology II, Invent. Math. 71 (1983), 77–129.
  • [22] Hartshorne, R., Algebraic geometry, Grad. Texts in Math., vol. 52, Springer Verlag, 1977.
  • [23] Kennedy, G., MacPherson’s chern classes of singular algebraic varieties, Communications in Alg. 18 (1990), 2821–2839.
  • [24] Kirwan, F. and Woolf, J., An introduction to Intersection Homology Theory (2nd ed), Chapman and Hall, 2006.
  • [25] Kleiman, S. L., Tangency and duality, Proceedings of the 1984 Vancouver conference in algebraic geometry, CMS Conference Proceedings, vol. 6, Amer. Math. Soc., 1986, pp. 163–226.
  • [26] Krämer, T., Characteristic cycles and the microlocal geometry of the Gauss map II, J. Reine Angew. Math. (to appear), arXiv:1807.01929.
  • [27] Krämer, T. and Weissauer, R., The Tannaka group of the theta divisor on a generic principally polarized abelian variety, Math. Z. 281 (2015), 723–745.
  • [28] Lê, D. T. and Teissier, B., Limites d’espaces tangents en géométrie analytique, Comment. Math. Helvetici 63 (1988), 540–578.
  • [29] MacPherson, R. D., Chern classes for singular algebraic varieties, Ann. of Math. 100 (1974), 423–432.
  • [30] Maxim, L., Intersection homology and perverse sheaves, Graduate Texts in Math., vol. 281, Springer Verlag, 2019.
  • [31] Pirola, P., Base number theorem for abelian varieties, Math. Ann. 282 (1988), 361–368.
  • [32] Ran, Z., On subvarieties of abelian varieties, Invent. Math. 62 (1980), 459–480.
  • [33] Sabbah, C., Morphismes analytiques stratifiés sans éclatement et cycles évanescents, Astérisque 101-102 (1983), 286–319.
  • [34] by same author, Quelques remarques sur la geometrie des espaces conormaux, Astérisque 130 (1985), 161–192.
  • [35] Verdier, J.-L., Stratifications de Whitney et théorème de Bertini-Sard, Invent. Math. 36 (1976), 195–312.
  • [36] Verra, A., The degree of the Gauss map for a general Prym theta-divisor, J. Algebraic Geom. 10 (2001), no. 2, 219–246.
  • [37] Weissauer, R., On subvarieties of abelian varieties with degenerate Gauss mapping, arXiv:1110.0095.