This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Signatures of room-temperature superconductivity emerging in two-dimensional domains within the new Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based ceramic cuprate superconductors at ambient pressure

S. Dzhumanov1 dzhumanov@inp.uz D.D. Gulamova2 Sh.S. Djumanov3 1Institute of Nuclear Physics, Uzbek Academy of Sciences, 100214, Ulugbek, Tashkent, Uzbekistan 2Institute of Material Science, Uzbekistan Physics-Sun Scientific Production Association, Uzbek Academy of Sciences, Tashkent, 100084, Uzbekistan 3Tashkent State Technical University, Tashkent 100095, Uzbekistan
Abstract

We predict the possibility of realizing room-temperature superconductivity in different two-dimensional (2D) domains within the ceramic high-TcT_{c} cuprate superconductors at ambient pressure and experimentally confirm this prediction of 2D room-temperature superconductivity in the newly derived Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based ceramic cuprate superconductors containing many grain boundaries, interfaces and multiplate blocks. We argue that, in these high-TcT_{c} materials, besides bulk superconductivity in three-dimensional (3D) domains there is also strongly enhanced 2D superconductivity emerging in the 3D-2D crossover region well above the superconducting transition temperature TcT_{c}. We study the possibility of the existence of distinct 3D and 2D superconducting phases in high-TcT_{c} ceramic cuprates, in which the unconventional (tightly-bound polaronic) Cooper pairs behave like bosons and condense below certain critical temperatures into 3D and 2D Bose superfluids in 3D and 2D domains. We show that the superconducting transition temperature in 2D domains is much higher than in 3D domains and can reach up to room temperature. We report signatures of room-temperature superconductivity occurring at different grain boundaries and 3D/2D interfaces and in multiplate blocks within the ceramic superconductors Bi1.7Pb0.3Sr2Can1CunOy\rm{Bi_{1.7}Pb_{0.3}Sr_{2}Ca_{n-1}Cu_{n}O_{y}} (where n=230n=2-30), synthesized by using the new melt technology in a large solar furnace (in Parkent). The samples of these materials synthesized under the influence of concentrated solar energy have the bulk TcT_{c} values ranging from 100 K to about 140 K and the more higher superconducting transition temperatures, possibly even as high as room temperature in the 3D-2D crossover region. The remnant 2D superconductivity in newly derived Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based ceramic cuprate superconductors is observed at temperatures T200300T\gtrsim 200-300 K well above the bulk TcT_{c} and the onset of room-temperature superconductivity is evidenced by the observations of a sharp step-like drop in the resistance and a well-detectable partial Meissner effect at around 300 K and ambient pressure.

keywords:
High-TcT_{c} cuprate superconductors , New Bi/Pb based ceramic cuprate superconductors , Grain boundaries and interfaces , Multiplate blocks , Bose-liquid superconductivity , Three- and two-dimensional superconducting phases , Room-temperature superconductivity
journal: arXiv

1 Introduction

Remarkable progress in condensed matter physics is often driven by discoveries of new superconducting materials and superfluid (Fermi or Bose) liquids. In particular, the discovery of La\rm{La}-based high-TcT_{c} cuprate superconductors [1, 2, 3] and then the dramatic increase of the critical temperature TcT_{c} of the superconducting transition in other discovered Y\rm{Y}-, Bi\rm{Bi}- and Hg\rm{Hg}-based cuprate superconductors to above 90 K [4], 110 K [5] and 130 [6] ushered in a new era of physics and technology. These important discoveries stimulated efforts to find new materials with even higher superconducting transition temperatures, possibly even close to room temperature. Various experiments showed [3, 7, 8] that the superconductivity is occurred in the bulk three-dimensional (3D) cuprate material rather than in the CuO2\rm{CuO_{2}} plane. Therefore, the above values of TcT_{c} observed in different high-TcT_{c} cuprates correspond to the bulk superconducting transition temperatures.

Starting from 1993, there has been considerable interest in the increase of TcT_{c} in some families of cuprate superconductors to a maximum value at different applied pressures [9, 10, 11] and the record values of Tc153164T_{c}\simeq 153-164 K reported for Hg\rm{Hg}-based cuprate superconductors are remained still unchanged. For a long time, despite intense research effors (see Refs.[12, 13, 14, 15, 16]), the increasing of TcT_{c} up to room temperature in various high-TcT_{c} cuprates was remained a difficult problem. So far, room-temperature superconductivity was not reported for high-TcT_{c} cuprate materials even under pressure.

Recently, there has been growing interest in the discovery of room-temperature superconductivity in other classes of materials and the new so-called high-TcT_{c} hydrides have been synthesized at very high pressures [17, 18, 19]. However, room-temperature superconductors discovered under high pressures will not have a wide-range practical applications. Therefore, in the last decade, new attempts were made to synthesize the promising ceramic cuprate superconductors with the onset temperature of the superconducting transition, Tconset150180T_{c}^{onset}\gtrsim 150-180 K at ambient (atmospheric) pressure, by using more advanced technology [20, 21]. Prominent among high-TcT_{c} cuprate superconductors are the so-called Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based ceramic cuprate compounds, such as Bi1.7Pb0.3Sr2Can1CunOy\rm{Bi_{1.7}Pb_{0.3}Sr_{2}Ca_{n-1}Cu_{n}O_{y}} (with n=230n=2-30), which may present an alternative path to realizing room-temperature superconductivity at atmospheric pressure.

For many decades, there has been speculation (see, e.g., Refs.[14, 18]) that Little’s model of high-TcT_{c} superconductivity in one-dimensional organic polymers with polarizable side chains [22] and Ginzbur’s model of two-dimensional (2D) alternating conducting/insulating sandwich layers [23] may be possible routes to room-temperature superconductivity. Such early theoretical predictions are based on the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS)-like theory of Fermi-liquid superconductivity. Still, most researchers trying to find the new high-TcT_{c} superconductors make predictions on the basis of the BCS-like and Migdal-Eliashberg theories of Fermi-liquid superconductivity regarding the possibility of increasing the critical temperature TcT_{c} up to room temperature (see Refs.[15, 16, 17]). However, the high-TcT_{c} cuprates undergoing a λ\lambda- superconducting transition at TcT_{c} [24, 25] just like λ\lambda-transition in liquid 4He can be in the regime of Bose-liquid superconductivity [26, 27] and the BCS-like theories are incapable of predicting the actual TcT_{c} in such unconventional superconductors.

In this work, we present theoretical and experimental results of room-temperature superconductivity emerging in different 2D domains within the newly derived Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based ceramic cuprate superconductors containing many grain boundaries, interfaces and mutiplate blocks. We show that, in these ceramic high-TcT_{c} materials, besides bulk 3D superconductivity there is also strongly enhanced 2D superconductivity occurring well above the bulk TcT_{c} in the 3D-2D crossover region. We argue that the unconventional Cooper pairs in high-TcT_{c} cuprates behave like bosons and condense below certain critical temperatures into 3D and 2D Bose superfluids in 3D and 2D domains. We examine the possibility of the existence of 3D and 2D superconducting phases in ceramic cuprate superconductors predicted by the theory of 3D and 2D Bose superfluids. We find that superconducting transition temperature in 2D domains is much higher than that in 3D domains and the highest critical temperature TcT_{c} for some high-TcT_{c} cuprates, e.g., Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based ceramic cuprate superconductors can reach up to room temperature in 2D domains. We report experimental signatures of room-temperature superconductivity emerging at different grain boundaries and interfaces and in multiplate blocks within the ceramic cuprate superconductors Bi1.7Pb0.3Sr2Can1CunOy\rm{Bi_{1.7}Pb_{0.3}Sr_{2}Ca_{n-1}Cu_{n}O_{y}} (with n=230n=2-30), synthesized by using the new melt technology under the influence of concentrated solar energy. We claim that the occurrence of such a room-temperature superconductivity in these high-TcT_{c} materials is evidenced by the observations of a sharp drop in the resistance and a pronounced partial Meissner effect at around 300 K and ambient pressure.

2 Theoretical blackground

The cuprate compounds are typical polar materials and charge-transfer-type Mott-Hubbard insulators [28]. Therefore, in these materials the charge carriers (holes or electrons) introduced by doping in a polar crystal strongly interact with optical phonons [29] and their self-trapping is favorable just like the self-trapping of holes in ionic crystal of alkali halides [30, 31]. In doped high-TcT_{c} cuprates, the Cooper pairing of self-trapped carriers (polarons) results in the formation of tightly-bound (bosonic) Cooer pairs [32]. These unconventional Cooper pairs in 3D high-TcT_{c} cuprates condense into a 3D Bose superfluid below the bulk TcT_{c} [32, 33]. We now consider the ceramic cuprate superconductors consisting of 3D and 2D domains. Then the actual TcT_{c} in 3D domains is determined from the self-consisting solutions of the integral equations of a 3D Bose superfluid [34]

1γB=0ξBAε/ξBAcoth[(ε+μ~B)2ΔB2/2kBT](ε+μ~B)2ΔB2𝑑ε,\displaystyle\frac{1}{\gamma_{B}}=\int^{\xi_{BA}}_{0}\sqrt{\varepsilon/\xi_{BA}}\frac{coth\left[\sqrt{(\varepsilon+\tilde{\mu}_{B})^{2}-\Delta^{2}_{B}}/2k_{B}T\right]}{\sqrt{(\varepsilon+\tilde{\mu}_{B})^{2}-\Delta^{2}_{B}}}d\varepsilon, (1)
2ρBDB=0ε×\displaystyle\frac{2\rho_{B}}{D_{B}}=\int^{\infty}_{0}\sqrt{\varepsilon}\times
×{ε+μ~B(ε+μ~B)2ΔB2coth[(ε+μ~B)2ΔB22kBT]1}dε,\displaystyle\times\left\{\frac{\varepsilon+\tilde{\mu}_{B}}{\sqrt{(\varepsilon+\tilde{\mu}_{B})^{2}-\Delta^{2}_{B}}}coth\left[\frac{\sqrt{(\varepsilon+\tilde{\mu}_{B})^{2}-\Delta^{2}_{B}}}{2k_{B}T}\right]-1\right\}d\varepsilon, (2)

where γB=DBV~BξBA\gamma_{B}=D_{B}\tilde{V}_{B}\sqrt{\xi_{BA}} is the interboson coupling constant in a 3D Bose superfluid, ρB\rho_{B} is the density of attracting (superfluid) bosons, DB=mB3/2/2π23D_{B}=m_{B}^{3/2}/\sqrt{2}\pi^{2}\hbar^{3} is the density of states, mBm_{B} is the mass of free bosons, μ~B\tilde{\mu}_{B} is the renormalized chemical potential of an interacting Bose gas, V~B=VBAVBR/[1+DBVBR(ξBRξBA)]\tilde{V}_{B}=V_{BA}-V_{BR}/[1+D_{B}V_{BR}(\sqrt{\xi_{BR}}-\sqrt{\xi_{BA}})] is the effective interaction potential between bosons, ξBA\xi_{BA} and ξBR\xi_{BR} are the cutoff parameters for the attractive VBAV_{BA} and repulsive VBRV_{BR} parts of the interboson interaction potential, ΔB\Delta_{B} is the coherence parameter (i.e. superfluid order parameter) of condensed bosons.

The critical temperature Tc2DT_{c}^{2D} of the superconducting transition in 2D domains is determined from the self-consistent solutions of the integral equations of a 2D Bose superfluid [34]

1γB=0ξBAcoth[(ε+μ~B)2ΔB2/2kBT](ε+μ~B)2ΔB2𝑑ε,\displaystyle\frac{1}{\gamma_{B}}=\int^{\xi_{BA}}_{0}\frac{coth\left[\sqrt{(\varepsilon+\tilde{\mu}_{B})^{2}-\Delta^{2}_{B}}/2k_{B}T\right]}{\sqrt{(\varepsilon+\tilde{\mu}_{B})^{2}-\Delta^{2}_{B}}}d\varepsilon, (3)
2ρBDB=0×\displaystyle\frac{2\rho_{B}}{D_{B}}=\int^{\infty}_{0}\times
×{ε+μ~B(ε+μ~B)2ΔB2coth[(ε+μ~B)2ΔB22kBT]1}dε,\displaystyle\times\left\{\frac{\varepsilon+\tilde{\mu}_{B}}{\sqrt{(\varepsilon+\tilde{\mu}_{B})^{2}-\Delta^{2}_{B}}}coth\left[\frac{\sqrt{(\varepsilon+\tilde{\mu}_{B})^{2}-\Delta^{2}_{B}}}{2k_{B}T}\right]-1\right\}d\varepsilon, (4)

where γB=DBV~B\gamma_{B}=D_{B}\tilde{V}_{B} is the interboson coupling constant in a 2D Bose superfluid, ρB\rho_{B} is the density of 2D superfluid bosons, DB=mB/2π2D_{B}=m_{B}/2\pi\hbar^{2}.

Numerical solutions of Eqs. (1) and (2) determining the bulk Tc=Tc3DT_{c}=T^{3D}_{c} in 3D superconducting domains can be obtained for arbitrary γB\gamma_{B}. While the approximate analytical solutions of these equations are obtained for γB<1\gamma_{B}<1 [34]. In particular, the bulk TcT_{c} at γB>0.3\gamma_{B}>0.3 can be determined approximately from the expression

Tc=TBEC[1+cγB2kBTBEC/ξBA],\displaystyle T_{c}=T^{*}_{BEC}[1+c\gamma_{B}\sqrt{\sqrt{2}k_{B}T^{*}_{BEC}/\xi_{BA}}], (5)

where TBEC=3.312ρB2/3/kBmBT^{*}_{BEC}=3.31\hbar^{2}\rho^{2/3}_{B}/k_{B}m^{*}_{B} is the renormalized Bose-Einstein condensation temperature in a 3D Bose-liquid, in which mBm_{B} is replaced by the renormalized mass mBm^{*}_{B} of interacting bosons defined similarly in Ref.[35], c=π3/2/3.918c=\pi^{3/2}/3.918.

The solutions of Eqs. (3) and (4) determining the critical temperature Tc2DT^{2D}_{c} in 2D superconducting domains are obtained analytically [34] and the superconducting transition temperature at grain boundaries and interfaces and in multiplate blocks within the ceramic high-TcT_{c} cuprate materials for arbitrary γB\gamma_{B} is determined from the following relation:

Tc2D=T0ln[1exp(2γB/(γB+2))],\displaystyle T_{c}^{2D}=-\frac{T_{0}^{*}}{ln[1-exp(-2\gamma_{B}/(\gamma_{B}+2))]}, (6)

where T0=2π2ρB/kBmBT^{*}_{0}=2\pi\hbar^{2}\rho_{B}/k_{B}m^{*}_{B}.

We use the analytical expressions (5) and (6) to examine the possibility of the existence of distinct 3D and 2D superconducting phases in ceramic high-TcT_{c} materials and to predict the existence of two distinctly different regimes of high-TcT_{c} superconductivity in them and the possible route to room-temperature superconductivity. In order to determine the characteristic superconducting transition temperatures in the bulk and the 3D-2D crossover region of high-TcT_{c} cuprates, we estimate TcT_{c} and Tc2DT^{2D}_{c} by assuming that the mass mpm_{p} of polaronic carriers in 3D domains is of the order of 2me2m_{e} [36] (where mem_{e} is the mass of free electrons) and in 2D domains is somewhat larger than 2me2m_{e}. It is natural to assume that, in high-TcT_{c} cuprates, the preformed bosonic (polaronic) Cooper pairs have the mass mB=2mpm_{B}=2m_{p} and only the interacting bosons with the renormalized mass mB>mBm^{*}_{B}>m_{B} can condense into Bose superfluids at TTcT\lesssim T_{c} (in 3D domains) and TTc2DT\lesssim T^{2D}_{c} (in 2D domains). By taking mp2mem_{p}\simeq 2m_{e}, mB=2mpm_{B}=2m_{p}, mB=1.05mBm^{*}_{B}=1.05m_{B} and ρB41019\rho_{B}\simeq 4\cdot 10^{19} cm3cm^{-3} for 3D superconducting domains in ceramic cuprate materials, we find TBEC81.7T^{*}_{BEC}\simeq 81.7 K. Using Eq.(5) we further estimate the bulk TcT_{c} by assuming that two bosonic Cooper pairs interact with each other by means of exchange optical phonons having relatively low energy ω00.03\hbar\omega_{0}\simeq 0.03 eV and the cutoff energy ξBA\xi_{BA} for the attractive part of the interboson interaction potential can be replaced by ω0\hbar\omega_{0}. Then, at γB=0.7\gamma_{B}=0.7 the analytical expression (5) for the bulk TcT_{c} predicts the value of Tc1.508TBEC123T_{c}\simeq 1.508T^{*}_{BEC}\simeq 123 K. We can now estimate the superconducting transition temperature in 2D domains by assuming that mp3mem_{p}\simeq 3m_{e}, mB=2mpm_{B}=2m_{p}, mB=1.05mBm^{*}_{B}=1.05m_{B} and ρB21013\rho_{B}\simeq 2\cdot 10^{13} cm2cm^{-2}. Under these assumptions, we obtain T0176T^{*}_{0}\simeq 176 K. If we take the same value of γB=0.7\gamma_{B}=0.7 for a 2D Bose superfluid in the analytical expression (6), we find Tc2D1.105T0195T^{2D}_{c}\simeq 1.105T^{*}_{0}\simeq 195 K. The above predictions of the theory of Bose-liquid superconductivity in high-TcT_{c} cuprates indicate that the expected value of Tc2DT^{2D}_{c} in the 3D-2D crossover region will be much higher than the expected value of TcT_{c} in the bulk. Therefore, the 3D domains in ceramic high-TcT_{c} cuprates become non-superconducting above the bulk Tc(=Tc3D)T_{c}(=T^{3D}_{c}), but high-TcT_{c} superconductivity is still maintained in 2D domains in a wide temperature range above TcT_{c}. Such a remnant 2D superconductivity persisting at grain boundaries and interfaces and in multiplate blocks within the ceramic high-TcT_{c} cuprate materials might be encouraging in achieving room-temperature superconductivity at atmospheric pressure. In order to make this argument more quantitative, the results of our numerical calculations of the critical superconducting transition temperature Tc2DT^{2D}_{c} as a function of γB\gamma_{B} are presented in Fig.1. As may be seen in Fig.1, at some values of ρB\rho_{B} and mBm_{B}, the critical temperature Tc2DT^{2D}_{c} strongly depending on γB\gamma_{B} eventually reaches to room-temperature at a certain value of γB0.8\gamma_{B}\gtrsim 0.8.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The calculated critical temperature Tc2DT^{2D}_{c} of the superconducting transition in 2D systems as a function of interboson coupling constant γB\gamma_{B}. The parameters used are ρB2.81013cm2\rho_{B}\simeq 2.8\cdot 10^{13}cm^{-2}, mp=3mem_{p}=3m_{e}, mB=2mpm_{B}=2m_{p} and mB1.05mBm^{*}_{B}\simeq 1.05m_{B}.
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Alternating 3D non-superconducting/2D superconducting sandwich layers in ceramic cuprate superconductors above the bulk TcT_{c}. Bold-type arrows indicate a crossover from 3D non-superconducting (metallic) state to 2D superconducting state in these sytems.

Here we point out a possibility that many grain boundaries parallel to each other, interfaces and parallel multiplate blocks in specially grown ceramic cuprate superconductors (see, e.g., experimental results presented in Sec.3) will be involved in alternating 3D non-superconducting/2D superconducting sandwich layers above the bulk TcT_{c}. As can be seen in Fig.2, the crossover from the bulk 3D regime to surface 2D regime of superconductivity in these alternating 3D/2D sandwich layers might be possible path to realizing room-temperature superconductivity in such distinctive ceramic high-TcT_{c} materials. Apparently, there is some experimental evidence for the signatures of superconducting transition well above the bulk TcT_{c} in different families of high-TcT_{c} cuprates. In particular, experimental results on the anomalous resistive transitions between 125 and 260 K in the cuprate superconductors Y3Ba4Cu7Ox\rm{Y_{3}Ba_{4}Cu_{7}O_{x}} (with the bulk Tc90T_{c}\simeq 90 K) [12] indicate that superconductivity above the bulk TcT_{c} emerges at grain boundaries in accordance with the prediction of the above expression (6) for Tc2DT^{2D}_{c}. Further, there is also experimental evidence for the signatures of superconductivity at temperatures much higher than the bulk TcT_{c} in other high-TcT_{c} cuprates, where resistive transitions were also observed at a temperature of about 260 K [13]. Concurrently, the possibility of traces of superconductivity at temperatures T>>TcT>>T_{c} in the systems HgBa2Can1CunO2n+2+δ\rm{HgBa_{2}Ca_{n-1}Cu_{n}O_{2n+2+\delta}} and Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8\rm{Bi_{2}Sr_{2}CaCu_{2}O_{8}} was reported [13]. Thus, the above key experimental findings provided the confirmation of the predictions of the theory of 3D and 2D Bose superfluids regarding the possibility of superconductivity well above the bulk TcT_{c} in Y\rm{Y}-, Bi\rm{Bi}-and Hg\rm{Hg}-based cuprate superconductors. Among these high-TcT_{c} materials, some Bi\rm{Bi}-based ceramic cuprate superconductors may be the promising systems to investigate the 3D-2D crossover regime of superconductivity, which might be relevant to room-temperature superconductivity. In the following, we report experimental evidence of 2D room-temperature superconductivity occurring in the 3D-2D crossover region within the newly derived Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based ceramic cuprate superconductors, which contain many grain boundaries, interfaces and multiplate blocks.

3 New melt technology for synthesizing of Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based ceramic cuprate superconductors under the influence of solar energy

The possibility of producing superconducting materials with the highest critical temperature to a considerable extent depends on the methods of their synthesizing. The solid-state reaction method is often used to synthesize the samples of high-TcT_{c} cuprate superconductors. However, this method has the following shortcomings: the synthesis of samples is the multi-stage process and the preparation of well-textured samples is difficult. In this regard, the melt technologies of sample synthesis are promising in obtaining high-TcT_{c} cuprate superconductors with higher critical temperature and have certain advantages over other method of synthesizing high-TcT_{c} superconducting samples. For the synthesis of the samples of high-TcT_{c} cuprate superconductors, the resistance and induction furnaces, optical furnace, laser and other energy sources were used for melting a mixture of starting materials. In the last years, the new melt technology for synthesizing Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based ceramic cuprate superconductors were developed by using the concentrated solar energy for melting a mixture of source materials [37]. The advantages of this method in the synthesis of the samples of high-TcT_{c} ceramic materials have been described elsewhere [20, 21]. The new melting technology based on the use of solar energy allows us to obtain the well-textured ceramic cuprate superconductors Bi1.7Pb0.3Sr2Can1CunOy\rm{Bi_{1.7}Pb_{0.3}Sr_{2}Ca_{n-1}Cu_{n}O_{y}} (with n=230n=2-30), in which the onset of superconductivity occurs at critical temperatures close to room temperature. The samples of these ceramic cuprate superconductors were prepared by a melt process in a large solar furnace (in Parkent).

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Melting process of a mixture of source materials and synthesis of ceramic cuprate superconductors Bi1.7Pb0.3Sr2Can1CunOyBi_{1.7}Pb_{0.3}Sr_{2}Ca_{n-1}Cu_{n}O_{y} in a large solar furnace.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Microstructures of ceramic cuprate superconductors (a) Bi/PbBi/Pb (2.2. 29.30 ) and (b) Bi/PbBi/Pb (2.2.19.20) [21] obtained by using the electron microscopy and the microscopy Solver Next and SEM.

Nominal compositions, Bi1.7Pb0.3Sr2Can1CunOy\rm{Bi_{1.7}Pb_{0.3}Sr_{2}Ca_{n-1}Cu_{n}O_{y}} were prepared from adequate mixtures of precursors Bi2O3\rm{Bi_{2}O_{3}}, PbO\rm{PbO}, SrSO3\rm{SrSO_{3}}, CaO\rm{CaO} and CuO\rm{CuO}. Mixtures of these starting source materials were then put in a solar furnace and melted by concentrated solar radiation with a radiant flux of about 420-480 W/cm2W/cm^{2} in this furnace, which is shown in Fig.3. The appropriate temperature gradient in the melt process is of order 1480 0C. The samples were prepared in the form of bars or plates with the size 5×5×45mm5\times 5\times 45mm and in the form of disks with a diameter of 1426mm14-26mm and a thickness of 2.35.4mm2.3-5.4mm. The microstructure of the prepared samples were studied using the microscopy solver Next, SEM and electron microscopy Zeiss. Phase analysis of the samples was performed by XX-ray diffraction (DRON UM-1) technique (using CuKα\rm{CuK_{\alpha}} radiation and Ni\rm{Ni} filler). Samples of the new Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based cuprate superconductors contain many grain boundaries parallel to each other, twin boundaries, interfaces and multiplate blocks (see Fig.4).

4 Experimental evidence of room-temperature superconductivity in Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based ceramic cuprate superconductors

According to the XX-ray diffraction data and observed resistive transitions, the synthesized samples of Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based cuprate superconductors are multiphase materials, where different superconducting phases are formed at different critical temperatures. In particular, 3D superconducting phases with different bulk TcT_{c} values are observed in the temperature range 100KTc130K100K\lesssim T_{c}\lesssim 130K. Analyses of the microstructure of ceramic samples using electron microscopies showed that the new superconducting systems Bi1.7Pb0.3Sr2Can1CunOy\rm{Bi_{1.7}Pb_{0.3}Sr_{2}Ca_{n-1}Cu_{n}O_{y}} consist of many small and large grains (i.e. nanocrystals), twin domains and closely packed parallel multiplate blocks, as shown in Fig.4. The microstructure of the chip of ceramic samples obtained from glass-crystalline plates and annealed at temperatures T843850T\simeq 843-850 0C for 3-94 h represent closely packed multilamellar blocks, which contain coupled stacks of many quasi-2D parallel layers with nano-sized thickness.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Temperature dependence of the resistance for the sample of Bi/Pb2245\rm{Bi/Pb}-2245.

The samples of Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based ceramic cuprate superconductors were used to study the superconducting properties in a wide temperature range from 77 to 300 K. The critical temperatures of the superconducting transitions were determined by the resistance-temperature measurements carried out using the standard four-probe technique with silver past contacts. The contact resistance was far less than 1Ω1\Omega in each case. The superconducting transition temperature in a series of the studied samples is defined by the maximum slope of the resistive transition in the resistance-temperature curves. Fig.5 shows the resistance-temperature dependence of the synthesized sample of Bi1.7Pb0.3Sr2Can1CunOy\rm{Bi_{1.7}Pb_{0.3}Sr_{2}Ca_{n-1}Cu_{n}O_{y}} (Bi/Pb2245\rm{Bi/Pb}-2245), where the onset of superconductivity in 2D domains seemingly occurs at the temperature Tconset210T^{onset}_{c}\simeq 210 K well above the bulk Tc120T_{c}\simeq 120 K. In Fig.6, we show the resistance-temperature dependence for the synthesized sample of Bi/Pb2267\rm{Bi/Pb}-2267. For this sample, the onset of superconductivity is observed at room temperature Tconset395T^{onset}_{c}\simeq 395 K and a sharp step-like drop in the resistance is observed at around this temperature. The onset of superconductivity in the studied sample of Bi1.7Pb0.3Sr2Can1CunOy\rm{Bi_{1.7}Pb_{0.3}Sr_{2}Ca_{n-1}Cu_{n}O_{y}} (Bi/Pb221920\rm{Bi/Pb}-221920)occurs at Tconset310T^{onset}_{c}\simeq 310 and a sharp drop of the resistance is observed at around this temperature (see Fig.7). Fig.8 shows the resistance-temperature curve for the synthesized sample of Bi1.7Pb0.3Sr2Can1CunOy\rm{Bi_{1.7}Pb_{0.3}Sr_{2}Ca_{n-1}Cu_{n}O_{y}} (Bi/Pb222930\rm{Bi/Pb}-222930). First, the resistance of this sample increases slightly from 350 K down to 295 K and then a sharp drop in the resistance is observed around the temperature Tconset295T^{onset}_{c}\simeq 295. The superconducting transition exhibits a step at about 295 K.

Upon lowering the temperature, other superconducting transitions in the studied samples of Bi/Pb2245\rm{Bi/Pb}-2245, Bi/Pb2267\rm{Bi/Pb}-2267, Bi/Pb221920\rm{Bi/Pb}-221920 and Bi/Pb222930\rm{Bi/Pb}-222930 are observed at Tc100130T_{c}\simeq 100-130 K. Our experimental results indicate that the bulk 3D superconductivity in these Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based ceramic cuprate materials occurs only at more lower temperature than the onset temperature of 2D superconductivity emerging at different grain boundaries and 3D/2D interfaces and in multiplate blocks. The superconducting transition in the multiphase superconductors Bi1.7Pb0.3Sr2Can1CunOy\rm{Bi_{1.7}Pb_{0.3}Sr_{2}Ca_{n-1}Cu_{n}O_{y}} occurs first at about room temperature and is manifested as a step-like resistive transition in the resistance-temperature curve. Such a resistive transition is indicative of the presence of more than one superconducting phase and the persistence of remnant 2D superconducting phase in these ceramic materials above the bulk TcT_{c} up to room temperature. Here we notify that the 3D and 2D superconducting phases coexist below the bulk TcT_{c} and the ceramic samples of the Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based cuprate superconductors below this critical temperature predominantly consist of 3D superconducting phase.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: The resistance-temperature dependence for the sample of Bi/Pb2267\rm{Bi/Pb}-2267 .
Refer to caption
Figure 7: The resistance-temperature dependence for the sample of Bi/Pb221920\rm{Bi/Pb}-221920.

Another key criterion for emerging of room-temperature superconductivity in the synthesized samples of Bi1.7Pb0.3Sr2Can1CunOy\rm{Bi_{1.7}Pb_{0.3}Sr_{2}Ca_{n-1}Cu_{n}O_{y}} is the detection of the presence of a pronounced Meissner effect below a characteristic temperature of the step-like resistive transition occurring at around 300 K. We detected an incomplete Meissner effect in the most samples of these ceramic superconducting materials at room temperature.

In Fig.9, we illustrate the detection of such a well-defined Meissner effect, that is, the expulsion of magnetic flux from the Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based ceramic cuprate superconductors at room temperature. Upon lowering the temperature, fractional Meissner effect in these materials increases gradually and remained always smaller than 100% even below the bulk TcT_{c}, very likely due to the presence of the insulating phase in underdoped and even in optimally doped high-TcT_{c} cuprates [38, 39, 40]. In insulating domains, the Cooper pairs do not exist in kk-space any longer and become localized pairs (i.e. bipolarons) in real space [41], as observed in Bi2212\rm{Bi}-2212 [42]. The variations of the Meissner effect in ceramic high-TcT_{c} cuprate superconductors reflect variations of the insulating volume and superconducting volumes of 3D and 2D domains. One can assume that a partial superconducting volume of 2D domains in the studied samples of Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based cuprate superconductors and related partial Meissner effect detected at room temperature varies from 5% to 25%.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: The resistance-temperature dependence for the sample of Bi/Pb222930\rm{Bi/Pb}-222930.
Refer to caption
Figure 9: The partial Meissner effect detected in the Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based ceramic cuprate superconductor Bi1.7Pb0.3Sr2Can1CunOy\rm{Bi_{1.7}Pb_{0.3}Sr_{2}Ca_{n-1}Cu_{n}O_{y}} (n=30) at room temperature.

5 Conclusion

We have presented the theoretical and experimental results concerning the possibility of the existence of 3D and 2D superconducting states in specially synthesized multiphase ceramic cuprate superconductors Bi1.7Pb0.3Sr2Can1CunOy\rm{Bi_{1.7}Pb_{0.3}Sr_{2}Ca_{n-1}Cu_{n}O_{y}} (with n=230n=2-30). These newly derived high-TcT_{c} materials consist of 3D and 2D superconducting domains and are particularly interesting from the viewpoint of novel superconducting properties and room-temperature superconductivity of such systems. We have argued that the high-TcT_{c} cuprates are unconventional (bosonic) superconductors, in which the tightly-bound (poloronic) Cooper pairs behave like bosons and condense into 3D and 2D Bose superfluids in 3D and 2D domains. We have shown that, in ceramic high-TcT_{c} cuprate superconductors, besides bulk 3D superconductivity there is also strongly enhanced 2D superconductivity emerging in the 3D-2D crossover region and persisting well above the bulk TcT_{c}. We have examined the possibility of the existence of distinctly different 3D and 2D superconducting phases in these materials predicted by the theory of Bose-liquid superconductivity. We have determined the critical superconducting transition temperatures in 3D and 2D systems, which depend on the effective mass of interacting bosons, the density of superfluid bosons and the interboson coupling constant. We have found that the superconducting transition temperatures in bosonic cuprate superconductors is much higher in 2D domains than in 3D domains and the bulk superconductivity is destroyed above Tc(=Tc3D)T_{c}(=T^{3D}_{c}), but 2D superconductivity persists up to the onset temperature Tconset=Tc2D>>Tc3DT^{onset}_{c}=T^{2D}_{c}>>T^{3D}_{c}. We have predicted the possibility of realizing room-temperature superconductivity at different grain boundaries and 3D/2D interfaces and in multiplate blocks within the new ceramic cuprate superconductors. Apparently, some families of such cuprate superconductors synthesized by using advanced technologies might be particularly promising in the experimental search for room-temperature superconductivity at ambient pressure. We have used the new technology for synthesizing the ceramic cuprate superconductors with very high critical temperatures, ever observed previously, and finally discovered room-temperature superconductivity in the Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based ceramic high-TcT_{c} materials Bi1.7Pb0.3Sr2Can1CunOy\rm{Bi_{1.7}Pb_{0.3}Sr_{2}Ca_{n-1}Cu_{n}O_{y}}, synthesized by using the new melt technology in a large solar furnace, with the highest critical temperatures Tconset295310T^{onset}_{c}\simeq 295-310 K at ambient pressure. The samples of Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based cuprate superconductors contain grain boundaries parallel to each other, twin boundaries and interfaces and multilamellar blocks represening the alternating 3D non-superconducting/2D superconducting sandwich layers above the bulk TcT_{c}, which are favorable for realizing room-temperature superconductivity. The remnant 2D superconductivity persisting at different grain boundaries and 3D/2D interfaces and in multilamellar blocks up to high temperatures T=Tconset295310T=T^{onset}_{c}\simeq 295-310 K and the onset of room-temperature superconductivity in the synthesized samples of Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based ceramic cuprate materials are evidenced by the observations of a sharp step-like drop in the resistance and a pronounced partial Meissner effect at around 300 K. Thus, by the use of the series of Bi/Pb\rm{Bi/Pb}-based ceramic cuprate materials, we have succeeded in finding the new class of room-temperature superconductors at ambient pressure.

Acknowledgments

We would first like to thank B.S. Yuldashev for his attention and encouragement in the process of carrying-out this work. We would also like to thank our colleagues I. Khidirov, B.L. Oksengendler, U.T. Kurbanov and E.Kh. Karimbaev for valuable discussions and suggestions. This work was support by the Foundation of the Fundamental Research, Grant No Φ\Phi-Φ\PhiA-2021-433.

References

  • [1] J.G. Bednorz and and K.A. Müller, Z.Phys.B64,189 (1986).
  • [2] R.J. Cava,R.B. van Dover, B. Batlogg, and E.A. Rietmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 408 (1987).
  • [3] S. Uchida, H. Takagi, K. Kitazarva, and S. Tanaka, Jpn. J.Appl.Phys. 26, L151 (1987).
  • [4] M.K. Wu et al. Phys.Rev.Lett. 58, 908 (187).
  • [5] R.M. Hasen et.al., Phys.Rev.Lett.60, 1174 (1988).
  • [6] A. Schilling et.al., Nature 363, 56(1993).
  • [7] H. Takagi, S. Uchida, K.Kitazawa, and S. Tanaka, Jpn.J.Appl.Phys. 26, L123, L218 (1987).
  • [8] F.M. Araujo-Moreira, P.N. Lisboa-Filho, A.J.C. Lanfredi, W.A. Ortiz, S.M. Zanetti, E. R. Leite, A.W. Mombr, L.Ghivelder, Y.G. Zhao, and V. Venkatesar, Physica C341, 413 (2000).
  • [9] C.W. Chu, L.Gao, F. Chen et al., Nature 365, 323 (1993).
  • [10] L. Gao, Y.Y. Xue, F. Chen et al., Phys.Rev. B50, 4260 (1994).
  • [11] N. Takeshiza, A. Yamamoto, A. Iyo, and H. Eisaki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82, 023711 (2013).
  • [12] A. Ulug, B. Ulug and R. Yagbasan, Physica C 235-240, 879(1994).
  • [13] J.L. Tholence, L. Puech, A. Sulpice et al., Physica C 235-240, 1545 (1994).
  • [14] P.J. Ford and G.A. Sounders, Contemp. Phys. 38, 63 (1997).
  • [15] V.Z. Kresin and S.A. Wolf, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 481 (2009).
  • [16] I. Borovic, J. Wu, X. He, and A.T. Bollinger, Quantum stud.: Math. Found. DOI10.1007/s40509-017-0126-x.
  • [17] A.P. Drozdov, P.P. Kong, V.S.Minkov et al, Nature 569, 528 (2019).
  • [18] E. Snider, N. Dasenbrock-Gammon, R.Mcbride et al, Nature 586, 373 (2020).
  • [19] N. Dasenbrock-Gammon, E.Snider, R.Mcbride et al, Nature 615, 244 (2023).
  • [20] D.D. Gulamova, A.V. Karimov, J.G. Chigvinadze et al., Zh. Techn. Fiz. 89, 583 (2019).
  • [21] J.G. Chigvinadze, S.M. Ashimov, J.V. Acrivos, and D.D. Gulamova Low Temp. Phys.45, 386 (2019).
  • [22] w.A. Little, Phys. Rev. A134, 1416 (1964).
  • [23] V.L. Ginzburg, Phys. Lett. 13, 101 (1964).
  • [24] S.E. Inderhees, M.B. Salamon, N. Goldfeld, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1178 (1988).
  • [25] T. Matsuzaki, M. Ido, N. Momono, at al., J.Phys. Chem. Solids, 62, 29 (2001).
  • [26] S. Dzhumanov, P.J. Baimatov, A.A. Baratov, and N.I. Rahmatov, Physica C235-240, 2339 (1994).
  • [27] S. Dzhumanov, Physica A517, 197 (2019).
  • [28] M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Takura, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1039 (1998).
  • [29] S. Dzhumanov, P.J. Baimatov, A.A. Baratov, and P.K. Khabibullaev, Physica C254, 311 (1995).
  • [30] Ch.B. Lushchik and A.Ch. Lushchik, Decay of Elektronic Excitations With Defect Formation in Solids (Nauka, Moscow, 1989).
  • [31] S. Dzhumanov and P.K. Khabibullaev, Phys. Stat. Sol. B152, 395 (1989).
  • [32] S. Dzhumanov and P.K. Khabibullaev, Pramana-J.Phys. 45, 385 (1995).
  • [33] S. Dzhumanov, Superlattices and Microstructures 21, 363 (1997).
  • [34] S. Dzhumanov, Arxiv 1912. 12407.
  • [35] M. Luban, Phys. Rev. 128. 965 (1962).
  • [36] M.A. Kastner, R.J. Birgeneau, G. Shirane, and Y. Endoh,Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 897 (1998).
  • [37] J. Chigvinadze, J. Acrivos, S.M. Ashimov, D.D. Gulamova, and G.J. Donadze, arxiv 1710. 10430.
  • [38] G.S. Boebinger, Y. Ando, at al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 5417 (1996).
  • [39] Y. Ando, S. Ono, X.F. Sun, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92. 247004 (2004).
  • [40] S. Dzhumanov and U.T. Kurbanov, Superlattices and Microstructures. 84, 66 (2015).
  • [41] S. Dzhumanov, E.X. Karimboev, and Sh.S. Djumanov, Phys.Latt.A380, 2173 (2016).
  • [42] Y. Kohsaka, et al., Nature 454, 1072 (2008).