Spectral Reciprocity for the product of Rankin-Selberg -functions
Abstract.
We prove a new case of spectral reciprocity formulae for the product of and Rankin-Selberg -functions (), which are first developed by Blomer and Khan in [BK17] for degree 8 -functions ( case, the product of and Rankin-Selberg -functions). Our result can be viewed as a generalization of Blomer and Khan’s work to higher rank case. We will mainly follow the method developed in [Nun20]. We will use the integral representations of Rankin-Selberg -functions generalized by Ichino and Yamana [IY15], spectral theory of space and the language of automorphic representations.
1. Introduction
In the recent five years, people have shown a lot of interests in studying so called automorphic spectral reciprocity formulae (For example, [AK18] [BK17] [BK18] [BML19] [Nel19] [Nun20] [Zac19] [Zac20] etc.), which we mean an identity roughly of the shape as follows:
where and are different families of automorphic representations, and are certain (may different) (products of) -functions corresponding to automorphic representations (see [Mot93]). Moreover, and are some (global) weight functions related to automorphic representation . The map from to is given by an explicit integral transform.
Besides the beauty of spectral reciprocity formulae, these kind of formulae always have powerful applications to non-vanishing and subconvexity problems for the associated -functions, which is very important in analytic number theory. This gives people motivations to understand the intrinsical symmetry behind such kind of identities. In other word, people will ask whether there exists a master formula to cover all these reciprocity formulae related to -functions. Moreover, there are several works on automorphic -functions on which one can find such spectral reciprocity formulae hidden as the key ingredients inside the proof (For example, see [KY21] and [Kha21]).
This kind of spectral reciprocity formula in higher rank (degree 8 -function) first appeared in a paper by Blomer, Miller and Li [BML19]. They established a spectral reciprocity formula for Rankin-Selberg -functions in the archimedean (spectral) aspect. Later, Blomer and Khan’s work in [BK17] shows another kind of interesting and deep spectral reciprocity formula which contain the product of Rankin-Selberg -functions and the standard -functions. This is a degree 8 -function case again. In [BK17], Blomer and Khan used powerful analytic number theory tools to go further. They showed that if the input of automorphic form is an Eisenstein series other than a cusp form, the spectral reciprocity formula is still true. Therefore, they may successfully to apply this kind of spectral reciprocity formula to study the subconvexity problem in level aspect. However, such kind of spectral reciprocity identities appeared at least since Motohashi’s formula [Mot93] which connects the fourth moment of the Riemann zeta-function ( -functions) to the cubic moment of standard -functions of cusp forms on .
Now we briefly describe the main result in Blomer and Khan’s paper. They roughly say the following:
Let be an automorphic form (cusp form or Eisenstein series) for the group . In the following summations, we let be a cusp form for a congruence subgroup of ( is ramifed at some finite places). They proved a spectral reciprocity formula of the following shape
where and are coprime integers and is the corresponding Hecke eigenvalue for the cusp form and
(1.1) |
Furthermore, if is an Eisenstein series, we will also see that
In 2020, Nunes [Nun20] gave a new and nice proof of Blomer-Khan’s result [BK17] and generalized their result to general number field instead of . Instead of tools in the analytic number theory (such as Kuznetsov trace formula, Voronoi Summation formula etc.), his main method is the spectral decomposition formula and the integral representation of Rankin-Selberg -functions. The reciprocity of two coprime ideal and are given by the action of a Weyl element. We will follow Nunes’ method. Applying integral representations of Rankin-Selberg -functions generalized by Ichino and Yamana [IY15], spectral decomposition theory and the language of automorphic representations, we will generalize Blomer-Khan and Nunes’ result to arbitrary higher rank groups. We will establish a spectral reciprocity formula for the product of and () Rankin-Selberg -functions, which is a degree -functions. Note that if , the result has already been established in [Nun20, Theorem 1.1, 1.2]. Roughly speaking, we will prove a spectral reciprocity formula of the shape:
for different unramified prime ideal and , where is the contragredient representation of . Here both and are cuspidal automorphic forms on and which are unramified everywhere and have trivial central character. Note that the automorphic representation on also have trivial central character. Moreover, we have
For the rigorous statement of above spectral reciprocity formula, the readers can see Theorem 3.15.
This kind of spectral reciprocity formula should have some applications on the simultaneous nonvanishing problems of certain Rankin-Selberg -functions [Nun20, Corollary 1.3]. However, this need a careful choice of local vectors and estimations. Moreover, we have to bound all the error terms which contain the moment of higher rank -functions. We hope to go back to this kind of applications in the future.
2. Some notations and preliminaries
2.1. Number Fields and Local Fields
Let be a fixed number field with ring of intergers and discriminant .
For a place of , we let be a local field which is the completion of at the place . If is non-Archimedean, we write for the ring of integers in with maximal ideal and uniformizer . The cardinality of the residue field is . For , we define the local zeta function to be if is a finite place; if is real and if is complex.
The adele ring of is denoted by and its unit group is given by (idele group). We also let , where is the adelic norm map. Note that is exactly the kernel of the adelic norm map. We also call norm one ideles.
We fix be the additive character with the form as where is the trace map and is the standard additive character on . For , we let be the conductor of additive character , which is the smallest non-negative integer such that is trivial on . In this case, we will have . We may also set when is Archimedean.
2.2. Subgroups of and Measure
Now we consider some subgroups of .
Let . If is a field, by definition, is the group of matrices with coefficients in and determinant in . We also define the following standard and also important subgroups
and the Borel subgroup
We let be the Weyl group of . We write
be the longest Weyl element.
Moreover, for any place , we let be the maximal compact subgroup of which is defined by
(2.1) |
We also let . If and , we define the congruence subgroup [JPS81] by (This will be used in the computation of local vectors and is useful in the local new-vector theory)
If is an ideal of with prime decomposition where is the unique prime (also maximal) ideal corresponding to the finite place , then we define
Now we have to normalize the measures we need.
At each place , denotes a self-dual measure on with respect to the standard additive character . If , gives a Haar measure on which gives the volume to the integer ring . If is real, the measure is the standard Lebesgue measure on . If is complex, the measure is the multiplication of two and the standard Lebesgue measure on . We define on . Moreover, we will take as the Haar measure on the multiplicative group and we let be the Haar measure on the idele group .
We equip with the probability Haar measure . In other word, the volume of equals to one.
Using the Iwasawa decomposition on which gives , a Haar measure on can be given by
(2.2) |
where is the modular character defined on . The measure on the adelic points of the subgroups in are just the product of the local measures defined above. We also denote by the quotient measure on the space
with total volume .
2.3. Whittaker functions
We recall some basic background of Whittaker functions.
We start from the generic representations. Let be a global genreic automorphic representation of and let be a generic automorphic form. Let be the Whittaker function of which is given by
(2.3) |
We will give the definition of the additive character later.
Since is generic, the Whittaker function does not vanish. The integral defined above (2.3) is absolute convergent since the integral domain is compact and the integral is moreover uniformly comvergent on any compact subsets in .
By changing variables, we note that for all , where is a nontrivial standard additive character from to . In our paper, we will choose that , where . Here is a standard additive character from to which is defined in Section 2.1.
We also have the following Fourier series expansion (see [Cog07, Theorem 1.1]) when we further assume that is a cusp form. Therefore, a cusp form is automatically generic by the following equation.
(2.4) |
We can also define local Whittaker functions for smooth generic admissible representations of over local fields . We have the following well known decomposition theorem. If is a generic smooth irreducible admissible representation of , then we know that factors as a restricted tensor product by . For each , is a local generic smmoth irreducible admissible representation of . For each local place , we can define local Whittaker functions. For every , if we write , then we have the decomposition
(2.5) |
In fact, we know that the map intertwines the space of and the space
which is called the Whittaker model of . We can similarly define the local Whittaker models .
It is also important to consider Whittaker functions with respect to the character since it will appear in the integral representations for Rankin-Selberg -functions (see Section 3.2). It also has close relation with the Whittaker model of the contragredient representation when the representation is unitarizable (see [FLO12, Appendix A]). Locally, we can define by simply replacing by . Globally, we can define by replacing by . Moreover, we have the following equation
(2.6) |
For , the corresponding Whittaker model for contragredient representation is given by , where is the longest Weyl element in and means the transpose inverse, therefore it is an involution in . The global Whittaker model is defined in the same way. If a local generic smooth irreducible admissible representation is unramified, this is equivalent to say that there exists a vector which is right invariant by the action of the maximal compact subgroup of in the space of . We call such a vector spherical vector and spherical vectors are unique up to multiplication by scalars. We say that a vector is normalized spherical if it is spherical. Moreover, its related Whittaker function satisfies .
2.4. Spectral Decomposition
Now we consider the space which is the Hilbert space of complex valued square integrable functions with the domain . The -norm is defined by
(2.7) |
For any , we have
An important closed subspace of is the closed subspace of cusp forms. We let be the closed subspace of cusp forms. A cusp form is the function with the following additional equation
for almost all .
The group acts by right translations on both spaces and and the corresponding representation is unitary with respect to the norm in (2.7). The decomposition theorem of automorphic representations is well known, which states that each irreducible component factors as a restricted tensor product for all places , where are irreducible and unitary representations of the local groups . The spectral decomposition is established in 1970s by Gelbart, Jacquet and Langlands which gives the following orthogonal decomposition (see [MW95] for more details)
(2.8) |
Here the closed subspace decomposes as a direct sum of irreducible -representations which are called the cuspidal automorphic representations. is called the residue spectrum which is the direct sum of all residue automorphic representations of . Finally, the continuous part is a direct integral of irreducible -representations and it is expressed by the Eisenstein series.
For any ideal of , we let be the closed subspace of level automorphic forms. This is the closed subspace of functions that are invariant under the subgroup .
We now have the following spectral orthogonal decomposition with the level restriction:
(2.9) |
2.5. Automorphic Representations
Now we consider automorphic representations. Let be the isomorphism class of unitary irreducible automorphic representations which will appear in the spectral decomposition of . Since we will later use the integral representation of Rankin-Selberg -functions, we will only focus on the unitary irreducible generic automorphic representations. We will consider be the subset of which is the isomorphism class of generic representations in , which is the unitary irreducible automorphic representation class that have (unique) Whittaker models. We fix an automorphic Plancherel measure on which is compatible with the Haar measure on .
Fortunately, we have the Langlands classification for (see [CPS94] and [MW95]). We take a partition . Let be a unitary cuspidal automorphic representation for (If , we simply take to be a unitary Hecke character). We now consider the unitary induced representation from the Levi subgroup to with the tensor product representation . There exists a unique irreducible constituent of which we denote by the isobaric sum . Then, Langlands classification says that every element in is isomorphic to such an isobaric sum.
Moreover, we know that all residual automorphic representations in is not generic (see [JL13] Proposition 2.1).
Now we note that all the unitary generic Eisenstein series will have the form of the isobaric sum , where . We will write
with parameters ().
3. The product of and () Rankin-Selberg -functions
3.1. Abstract Spectral Decomposition Formula
We have the following abstract spectral decomposition formula in case (see [MV10, Section 2.2]). The discrete part is generated by cusp forms and residue representations. The continuous spectrum part which is expressed by Eisenstein series is complicated. However, we know that it depends on the partition of the positive integer (see Section 2.5).
Proposition 3.1.
Suppose that . Let and of rapid decay, then we have the following equation:
(3.1) | ||||
3.2. Rankin-Selberg -functions
We need to recall integral representations of () -functions.
The theory is quite similar to the adelic Hecke-Jacquet-Langlands’ theory [God18] of twisted -functions for . We let be irreducible automorphic representations of . Let be an automorphic form. Let be irreducible automorphic representations of and let be an automorphic form. We first assume that is a cusp form and is of rapid decay. Therefore, for every , we can consider the following period integral
which defines an entire function of and is bounded on vertical strips.
From the Whittaker-Fourier expansion of cusp forms (2.4) [Cog07, Theorem 1.1], if is a cusp form, we will have (for large enough)
(3.2) |
where the global zeta integral is given by
(3.3) |
The following result can be found in [Cog07] [JPS79] [JPS83] [JS90] [Jac09].
Proposition 3.3.
Let and be factorizable automorphic forms on and . Let and be the corresponding Whittaker functions defined in Section 2.3. Then, for large enough, the global zeta integral converges and we have the following factorization (Euler product)
where the local zeta integral is given by
(3.4) |
Moreover, if both and are unramified and and are normalized spherical vectors, we will have
One of the key ingredients in our paper is the following generalization of integral representation on Rankin-Selberg -functions for given by Ichino and Yamana [IY15].
Proposition 3.4.
Let and be automorphic forms on and . Assume that the following period integral
is absolute convergent, we will still have the following equation for large enough:
(3.5) |
where
(3.6) |
Proof.
This is a combination of Corollary 3.10 and Main Theorem (Theorem 1.1) of Ichino and Yamana’s paper [IY15]. ∎
3.3. Abstract Reciprocity Formula
We can briefly summarize the proof of Theorem 3.7 now. The proof of Theorem 3.7 is a combination of above decomposition formula 3.1 and an identity between two periods. Later, we will relate the period to moments of certain -functions. The proof of an identity between two periods is a rather simple matrix computation and is really important to abstract pre-spectral reciprocity formula.
Suppose that is a cuspidal automorphic form. Therefore, it is of rapid decay.
Then, we can define the projection by
(3.7) |
Since is of rapid decay, the above average projection map over the center is well-defined for every complex number and is again of rapid decay in terms of . Moreover, we may easily check that is invariant under the action of the center .
We also give the following definition of the period
whenever it is converges. Here is an automorphic form defined on and is a fixed everywhere unramified automorphic form for . Moreover, we assume that is invariant under the center , therefore its central character is trivial. If , we see that which is the trivial character. We can now state the abstract spectral reciprocity formula.
Proposition 3.5.
[Abstract Reciprocity Formula]
Let be a cusp form. Then, for every , we have the following abstract reciprocity equation
where , and is given by
(3.8) |
Proof.
From the definition, we may write
(3.9) | ||||
Since is a cusp form, our integral is well-defined for all complex parameters and . Now, since is left invariant by , we see that for every , we have (Note that )
(3.10) | ||||
This gives that
(3.11) | ||||
Applying this to (3.9) and using the change of variables which is given by . We will see that the following equations hold:
and
which gives the result by solving two linear equations.
∎
3.4. Spectral Decomposition and -functions: Pre-spectral Reciprocity Formula
Now we will give a spectral decomposition of the period which we consider in Proposition 3.5.
Let be an automorphic cuspidal representation for with trivial central character and let be a cusp form. Let be an automorphic (everywhere unramified) representation for with trivial central character and let be an automorphic form. We note that since is a cusp form, therefore is of rapid decay. Hence, we can apply the abstract spectral decomposition formula in Proposition 3.1 as follows:
(3.12) | ||||
Here is any finite set of places that contain all the archimedean places and those finite places for which is ramified. Moreover, we let be the collection of cuspidal automorphic representations of which are unramified everywhere outside . We let be the collection of Eisenstein series of which are unramified everywhere outside . And is the collection of residual automorphic representations of that are unramified everywhere outside .
Now we take the integration on both sides of above equation (3.12) against a standard additive character which is defined in Section 2.3 for Whittaker models and over the compact set , we get the following equation for Whittaker functions:
We note that since the residue spectrum for are not generic ([JL13] Proposition 2.1), they do not contribute to the above expression and therefore vanish. We recall that not all Eisenstein series from continuous spectrum are generic (see Section 2.5). They are generic if and only if they are induced from the cuspidal data. For example, in the case of , it only contains two parts, which are minimal and maximal cuspidal Eisenstein series with the corresponding partition and . Now, if we let be large enough, we see that
(3.13) | ||||
Since is a rapid-decay function for , we see that
(3.14) | ||||
by Proposition 3.4 (Note that the period integral is absolute convergent since is of rapid decay). We note that in fact the terms related to inner product and zeta integral and are a product of local (zeta) integrals when is large enough since
Moreover, by changing variables, we note that
(3.15) | ||||
since is invariant under the center .
By the Rankin-Selberg theory for , we can also write as a product of local zeta integrals (see Section 3.2). For large enough , we have
Combining above discussions together, we have the following Proposition:
Proposition 3.6.
Let be a cuspidal automorphic representation with trivial central character and let be a cusp form for over . Let be an automorphic (everywhere unramified) representation for over with trivial central character and let be an automorphic form. Let be the contragredient representation of . Then, we have
(3.16) | ||||
where is the global weight function. We note that depends on the choice of and , and , which is given by
(3.17) |
Here for each (generic) automorphic representation of , we will consider the following completed -functions
They are, the Adjoint -function of , the Rankin-Selberg -function of and , respectively.
Moreover, in the denominator means the non-zero residue of the completed adjoint -functions. If is cuspdial, we know that .
We actually have the following:
Let be a number field, with ring of integers . Let be a cuspidal automorphic representation of over with trivial central character. Let be an automorphic representation of over with trivial central character.
Let be a global weight function which is defined above. We consider the following sums:
which is the cuspidal contribution.
We should also consider the following continuous (Eisenstein) contribution
(3.18) |
where is any finite set of places that contain all the archimedean places and those finite places for which is ramified. Moreover, we let be the collection of cuspidal automorphic representations of which are unramified everywhere outside . We let be the collection of Eisenstein series of which are unramified everywhere outside .
By definition, we may write . We define , where and is defined in the proof of abstract reciprocity formula (Proposition 3.5).
We want to understand the following first moment of generic spectrum which is the summation of the cuspidal contribution and Eisenstein contribution:
We end this subsection with the following result which can be seen as a pre-spectral reciprocity formula.
Theorem 3.7.
Let and define
(3.19) |
Let be a finite set of places which contain all the archimedean places and those finite places for which is ramified. Suppose that the real parts of four parameters are all sufficiently large. Then we have the following identity
3.5. Local Vectors and Computations
Now in order to give the explicit spectral reciprocity formula, we have to pick local vectors. We follow the method in [Nun20, Section 7]. We will show how to choose local vectors on some special non-archmediean places and archmediean places. We also give some very basic local estimations on these places for local weight functions . Our local estmations are incomplete but are enough for us to establish the spectral reciprocity formula.
For simplicity, we further assume that is an automorphic cuspidal (everywhere unramified) representation for with trivial central character from this subsection. Let be a cusp form. Moreover, for every place , we simply fix be the normalized spherical vector in the Whittaker model.
Let be an unramified (everywhere) cuspidal automorphic representation of with trivial central character. For all the place , we let be the normalized spherical vector in the Whittaker model. Let and be two fixed (may not unramified) coprime integral ideals of . We will write be a cusp form. For all , we will simply pick . For , we will pick
(3.20) |
where . Finally, for , we will pick
(3.21) |
with .
The choice for the local vector here for is compatible with the local new-vector computation made in [BKL19].
Remark 3.8.
In order to design a spectral reciprocity formula, we do not have much freedom when choosing the local vectors. For the reciprocal relation of two unramified coprime ideals and , we only have the freedom for one finite place. For example, after we pick the local vector for the place , the local vector for the place is automatically fixed. They are related by the following simple matrix identity:
We let be a finite set with the definition . We have the following local properties for several different cases (The computation will be given later).
-
•
If , we know that is unramified and is spherical. And we also have in this case with only one term survives in the summation of . This is a direct corolloary from the discussion in Section 3.2.
-
•
If , let be as in (3.21) and let . Then we have
(1) vanishes if .
(2) if .
-
•
If which is the Archimedean place, we have the following Proposition
Proposition 3.9.
Let be an Archimedean place of . Let be an irreducible admissible generic representation for , then there exists a Whittaker function such that for every irreducible admissible generic representation for , we have
Some local computations for two fixed finite places
For , we pick
(3.22) |
where .
For , we will pick
(3.23) |
with .
For , we recall that
where
with .
Following the same method line by line in [Nun20, Section 7], we will see that vanishes unless is unramified. By right -invariance of the Haar measure, for any fixed element , we see that
Now we note that given a basis of , we may create a different one by considering the set
for some fixed element . Applying this idea to the element for , we deduce that
where
(3.24) | ||||
Since is a right invariant linear functional, it vanishes if is not unramified. This kind of idea will also be used in the calculation of another local vector when . Moreover, this linear functional is invariant by orthogonal projection into the space of right -invariant vectors of . Since is the maximal open compact subgroup, we know that the space is a one-dimensional space that is spanned by the normalized spherical vector. Therefore, we may restrict the sum defining to a sum over a basis of . Hence, only one term survives in the sum defining over the basis. Now, by the unramified calculation, we have
By above discussion, we see that
if is unramified.
We will write explicitly. From the definition of , we see that
(3.25) | ||||
We need to continuous our local computation by applying Iwasawa decomposition to . We write . Since the valuation for all , we see that for all .
From above discussion, we may have the decomposition:
(3.26) |
where
(3.27) | ||||
Here we use the fact that both the Whittaker function and are unramified. Hence they are invariant under the maximal compact subgroup and we also note that the total mass for is one. Here the local weight function should be related to the local Hecke eigenvalue .
For , we recall that
where
with . This means that
with . Here is the normalized spherical vector in the Whittaker space. By the theory of newvectors [JPS81], we will see that vanishes unless . If , . We expect that in general, , where is a positive constant satisfying towards the Ramanujan-Petersson’s Conjecture.
By definition and some matrix computations, we note that
(3.28) | ||||
We need to continuous our local computation by applying Iwasawa decomposition to . We write . Since the valuation for all , we see that for all . We set and , we can see that this is equivalent to say that belonging to the congruence subgroup (See the definition in Section 2.2). We will simply write this congruence subgroup as . Here we must have . Otherwise, the spherical Whittaker function will vanish. Therefore we have .
Now we may choose an orthonormal basis for . From the local new-vector theory for [JPS81], if we let be the new vector and for each , we define
Therefore, we see that is a basis for . Moreover, we know that for each , is a basis for the -invariant vectors in , where . Applying Gram-Schmidt method to the basis , we obtain an orthonormal basis of with . We choose the basis as and continue to do some computation on .
From above discussion, we have the following decomposition:
(3.29) |
where
(3.30) | ||||
Here we use the fact that Whiitaker function is normalized spherical and is also invariant by the center. Now, if is an element of in our orthonormal basis , then it follows that
(3.31) |
from the orthogonality of the elements in the given orthonormal basis (See the discussion in [Nun20] for more details).
Now applying (3.29) and (3.31) to the definition of the local weight function . We will have the following equation:
(3.32) | ||||
Note that the above equation is actually a finite sum. If , this gives that . We see that . Contradiction! Therefore, vanishes in this case.
If , we see that only one term survive. Moreover, we have , and . We see that in this case.
Note that since , the local weight function is a finite sum in terms of the element in the orthonormal basis.
For two places and , we see that the local weight function is a finite sum with the elements in the orthonormal basis for both two cases.
Remark 3.10.
In order to find applications for the spectral reciprocity formula, we have to find a good estimation for the local weight function .
3.6. Meromorphic Continuation with respect to the complex parameters
Let be a non-archimedean place of . We consider the local weight function . It is known that for all the finite place , we have .
Assume that is a local component of the unitary generic Eisenstein series . We fix the cuspidal data and vary the remaining parameters ().
The following Proposition is a direct Corollary of Proposition 4.1, Proposition 4.2 and Theorem 4.1 in [CPS17].
Proposition 3.11.
The following two ratios
and
for any have no poles and hence define entire rational functions in terms of their complex parameters. In other word, we have
and
Since the local weight function is a finite sum with the elements in the orthonormal basis , we have the following Proposition.
Proposition 3.12.
The local weight function has no poles and hence define entire rational functions in terms of their complex parameters. In other word, we have
From our choice of local vectors in the previous subsection and the definition of global and local weight function, we know that
since if .
Therefore, we have the following proposition:
Proposition 3.13.
The global weight function has no poles and hence define entire rational functions in terms of their complex parameters.
We are going to deduce the meromorphic continuation of the term which is the continuous contribution of Eisenstein series in the spectral decomposition.
Proposition 3.14.
Let and be everywhere unramified cuspidal automorphic representation of and which have trivial central character. Let (3.18) be given previously, defined initially for the absolute convergence domain . It admits a meromorphic continuation to . If , its analytic continuation is given by , where
(3.33) | ||||
Note that the summation over the unitary Hecke character which is only ramified at two finite places and is a finite sum. We write and recall that is the norm one ideles. Here we pick to be the maximal cuspidal Eisenstein series given by , where is the contrigredient representation of . Hence it is a cuspdial representation of with trivial central character. We have the following decomposition of completed -functions:
and
Moreover, for general , we see that , where is a complex constant only depends on the central characters of the cuspidal data and since has trivial central character.
Proof.
The meromorphic continuation part of is given by the meromorphic continuation of Rankin-Selberg -functions and the entireness of the global weight function (see Proposition 3.13). Since has no poles and define entire rational functions in terms of their parameters (Proposition 3.13), by the contour and residue theorem in complex analysis, we see that the term will vanish unless the ratio of completed -functions
have poles. Note that the denominator is always finite and non-zero, by the locations of possible poles of Rankin-Selberg -functions, we must have
where is the contrigredient representation of and is a unitary Hecke character.
Hence we have the decomposition of completed -functions:
and
We note that is entire for all since is a cuspidal automorphic representation for . The completed -function will have a simple pole if and only if . The correponding residue is
Now applying the coutour and residue theorem in complex analysis, the remaining part of the proof is the same as the proof in [Nun20, Proposition 8.1], [BK17, Lemma 16] and [BK18, Lemma 3]. ∎
3.7. Main Result: Spectral Reciprocity Formula
Now we can give the statement of spectral reciprocity formula.
Let and be everywhere unramified cuspidal automorphic representation for and over with trivial central character. Let , and be unramified coprime ideals.
Let be the global weight function with kernel function which we pick in the previous subsection by local new-vectors.
Note that we have
where is given by local Rankin-Selberg integral as follows:
(3.34) |
where is a cusp form and .
We may write
Using the notations in Section 3.4, we have
where
with
which is the cuspidal contribution.
And
which is the continuous (Eisenstein) contribution.
The notation and means that we are restricting to irreducible generic automorphic forms which are unramified at every archimedean place. We can define
From the above discussion in Section 3, we can give the statement of our main theorem finally.
Theorem 3.15.
Let and be everywhere unramified cuspidal automorphic representation for and over with trivial central character. Let be the contragredient representation of . Suppose that and are unramified, coprime ideals. Futhermore, we assume that . Then we will have the following identity
where the complex parameters satisfy the relation
References
- [AK18] N. Anderson and E. M. Kiral, Level reciprocity in the twisted second moment of Rankin-Selberg -functions, arxiv: 1801.06089. Mathematika, (64) 2018, no.3, 770-784.
- [BK17] V. Blomer and R. Khan, Twisted moments of -functions and spectral reciprocity, arxiv: 1706.01245. Duke Math Journal, (168) 2019, no.6, 1109-1177.
- [BK18] V. Blomer and R. Khan, Uniform subconvexity and symmetry breaking reciprocity, arxiv: 1804.01602. Journal of Functional Analysis (276) 2019, no.7, 2315-2358.
- [BKL19] A. Booker, M. Krishnamurthy and M. Lee, Test vectors for Rankin-Selberg -functions, arxiv: 1903.03458. Journal of Number Theory, (209) 2020, 37-48.
- [BML19] V. Blomer, S. Miller and X. Li, A spectral reciprocity formula and non-vanishing for -functions on , arxiv: 1705.04344. Journal of Number Theory Prime (205) 2019, 1-43.
- [Cog07] J. W. Cogdell, -functions and converse theorems for , Automorphic forms and applications, volume 12 of IAS/Park City Math. Ser., page 97-177. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI.
- [CPS94] J. W. Cogdell and I. I. Piatetski-Shapiro, Converse Theorem for , Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci., (79) 1994, 157-214.
- [CPS17] J. W. Cogdell and I. I. Piatetski-Shapiro, Derivatives and -functions for , Representation Theory, Number Theory, and Invariant Theory pp 115-173.
- [FLO12] B. Feigon, E. Lapid and O. Offen, On Representations distinguished by unitary groups, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci., (115) 2012, 185-323.
- [God18] R. Godement, Notes on Jacquet-Langlands’ Theory, CTM 8 Classical Topics in Mathematics, Higher Education Press, 2018.
- [IY15] A. Ichino and S. Yamana, Periods of automorphic forms: the case of , Compositio Math. 151 (2015) 665-712.
- [Jac09] H. Jacquet, Archimedean Rankin-Selberg integrals, Automorphic forms and -functions II: local aspects, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 489 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI. 2009), 57-172.
- [Ja20] S. Jana, Second Moment of Rankin-Selberg -functions, arxiv: 2012.07817.
- [JL13] D. Jiang and B. Liu, On Fourier Coefficients of Automorphic Forms of , International Mathematics Research Notices Vol. 2013, No. 17, 4029-4071.
- [JPS79] H. Jacquet, I. I. Piatetski-Shapiro, and J. Shalika, Automorphic forms on , I, II, Ann. of Math. (2) 109 (1979), 169-258.
- [JPS81] H. Jacquet, I. I. Piatetski-Shapiro, and J. Shalika, Conducteur des representations du groupe lineaire, Math. Ann. 256 (2), 199-214, 1981.
- [JPS83] H. Jacquet, I. I. Piatetski-Shapiro, and J. Shalika, Rankin-Selberg convolutions, Amer. J. Math. 105 (1983), 367-464.
- [JS90] H. Jacquet and J. Shalika, Rankin-Selberg convolutions: Archimedean theory, Festschrift in honor of I. I. Piatetski-Shapiro on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, part I, Israel Mathematical Conference Proceedings, vol. 2 (Weizmann, Jerusalem, 1990), 125-207.
- [Kha12] R. Khan, Simultaneous non-vanishing of and -functions, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., (152) 2012, no.3, 535-553.
- [Kha21] R. Khan, Subconvexity bounds for twisted -functions II, arxiv: 2103.12330.
- [KY21] E. M. Kiral and M. Young, The fifth moment of modular -functions, arxiv: 1701.07507. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 23 (2021), no.1, 237-314.
- [MV10] P. Michel and A. Venketesh, The subconvexity problem for , arxiv: 0903.3591. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci., (111) 2010, 171-271.
- [MW95] C. Moeglin and J. L. Waldspurger, Spectral Decomposition and Eisenstein Series, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 113, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
- [Mot93] Y. Motohashi, An explicit formula for the fourth power mean of the Riemann zeta-function, Acta Math., (170) 1993, no.2, 181-220.
- [Nel19] P. Nelson, Eisenstein series and the cubic moment for , arxiv: 1911.06310v3.
- [Nun20] R. Nunes, Spectral reciprocity via integral representations, arxiv: 2002.01993.
- [Sta01] E. Stade, Mellin transform of Whittaker functions, Amer. J. Math. 123(1), 2001, 121-161.
- [Wong19] T. Wong, On the balanced Voronoi Formula for , arxiv: 1910.12426.
- [Wu14] H. Wu, Burgess-like subconvex bounds for , arxiv: 1209.5950. Geometric and Functional Analysis (24) 2014, no.3, 968-1036.
- [Zac19] R. Zacharias, Periods and Reciprocity I, arxiv: 1809.10593. International Mathematics Research Notices Vol. 2021, No. 3, 2191-2209.
- [Zac20] R. Zacharias, Periods and Reciprocity II, arxiv: 1912.01512v2.