Stability of the centers of group algebras of general affine groups
Abstract.
The general affine group consisting of invertible affine transformations of an affine space of codimension one in the vector space over a finite field , can be viewed as a subgroup of the general linear group over . In the article, we introduce the notion of the type of each matrix in and give an explicit representative for each conjugacy class. Then the center of the integral group algebra is proved to be a filtered algebra via the length function defined via the reflections lying in . We show in the associated graded algebras the structure constants with respect to the basis consisting of the conjugacy class sums are independent of . The structure constants in is further shown to contain the structure constants in the graded algebras introduced by the first author and Wang for as special cases. The stability leads to a universal stable center with positive integer structure constants only depending on which governs the algebras for all .
Key words and phrases:
Finite fields, general affine groups, centers, conjugacy classes2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary: 20G40, 05E151. Introduction
1.1.
In [FH] by Farahat and Higman, a fundamental stability result for the centers of the integral group algebras of the symmetric groups was established. By introducing a conjugation-invariant reflection length for permutations, the center of admits a filtered algebra structure. It is proved in [FH] that in the associated graded algebras the structure constants with respect to the basis of conjugacy class sums are independent of . This stability leads to the construction of a universal stable ring (the Farahat-Higman ring), equipped with a distinguished basis. Remarkably, this ring can be identified with the ring of symmetric functions but endowed with a new basis, see [Ma].
The above stability result has been generalized by Wang [Wa] to wreath products for any finite group and moreover it is shown in [Wa] that when the group is a finite subgroup of , the associated graded algebra of the center of the group algebra of the wreath product is isomorphic to the cohomology ring of Hilbert scheme of points on the minimal resolution of . Recently the first author and Wang [WW] generalized the above stability property to the general linear group over a finite field . More precisely, the group is proved to be generated by the reflections in and hence the center of the integral group algebra admits a filtration with respect to the reflection length. Then the structure constants of the associated graded algebras are shown to be independent of , and this stability leads to a universal stable center with positive integer structure constants which governs the graded algebras for all .
Based on [WW], Özden established the stability property for the family of symplectic groups in [Oz] with respect to length function in terms of reflections in . Later on, Kannan-Ryba [KR] proved that the structure constants of the centers of the integral group algebra of the classical finite groups over are polynomials in , recovering the results in [Me] for the case of .
1.2.
Besides the classical finite groups, the general affine groups over form another rich and sophisticated family of finite groups which has been initially studied by Zelevinsky [Ze]. The main goal of this paper is to formulate and establish a stability result à la Farahat-Higman for the centers of the integral group algebras of .
1.3.
Denote by the set of monic irreducible polynomials in other than . It is well known (cf. [Ma]) that the conjugacy classes of are parametrized by the types (which are the partition-valued functions on of degree ; cf. (2.2)). The general affine group is the subgroup of consisting of matrices of the form with and . The conjugacy classes of turns out to be parametrized by the set of pair , where and satisfying if , where is written as . An element belongs to the conjugacy class corresponding to with of type and uniquely determined by and accordingly is said to be of type . Furthermore, we define the modified type of to be , where is the modified type of introduced in [WW], that is, for and if . he key property is that the modified type remains unchanged for under the embedding of into and it is also clearly conjugation invariant. It follows that the conjugacy classes of are parametrized by the modified types in , see (2.31) for the notation. Let . Denote the class sum of elements in of modified type , and write
with being the structure constants.
1.4.
It is known that the set of reflections (which are the elements with fixed point subspace in having codimension one) in forms a generating set for and the reflection length of a general element is by definition the length of any reduced word of in terms of reflections. It turns out that the affine group is generated by the set of reflections belonging to the affine group . Accordingly, the length of a general element is by definition the length of any reduced word of in terms of reflections in ; two conjugate elements in have the same length. It turns out that if is of modified type , see (3.15) for notations. The center of the integral group algebra of is a filtered algebra with a basis of conjugacy class sums with respect to the reflection length. Denote by the associated graded algebra. Then we have
Our main result concerning the stability of the structure constants is as follows.
Theorem 1.1 (Theorem 3.11).
unless .
If , then is independent of . (In this case, we shall write as .)
The proof of Theorem 3.11 relies on two key observations. One observation is that the series satisfies the so-called strictly increasing property, that is, for any admissible and moreover if then . Another key observation is that coincides with for any and hence when the increasing sequence is bounded by a constant independent of by applying the stability property established in [WW].
Theorem 3.11 can be rephrased as that the associated graded algebra of has structure constants independent of . We introduce a graded -algebra with a basis given by the symbols indexed by , and its multiplication has structure constants as in the theorem above, for ; cf. (3.20).
Theorem 1.2 (Theorem 3.12).
The graded -algebra has the multiplication given by
for . Moreover, we have a surjective homomorphism for each , which maps to for all .
1.5.
We compute some examples of the structure constants in . Our computation turns out to imply two interesting facts. One fact is that we show the structure constant in the center of in the case coincides with . This means the structure constants in the graded algebra for studied in [WW] are special cases of the structure constants in the graded algebra for .
It is known [Be, DL] that in there exists another set of generators consisting of affine reflections and moreover the affine reflection length denoted by satisfies whenever are conjugate. Hence the center of the integral group algebra of admits another filtered structure with respect to the affine reflection length. It turns out that the structure constants of the corresponding graded algebra actually dependents on , which is different from . This difference is an interesting phenomenon which is worthwhile to be further explored to get deeper connection between these two algebras. It also indicate that the algebra defined via the length function is the suitable one for further study.
1.6.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we review basic facts on and in particularly give an explicit representatives for each conjugacy class of . We introduce the notion of modified types for each element in . In Section 3, we recall the stability property for established in [WW] and prove that the center of is a filtered algebra. Then we formulate and establish the stability on the structure constants for the graded algebra and the universal stable center . In Section 4, we compute some examples of the structure constants and prove the structure constants in the situation in the center of coincides with .
Acknowledgements. This project was partially carried out while the first author enjoyed the support and hospitality of University of Virginia. She would like to thank Weiqiang Wang and Arun Kannan for many helpful discussions on the project. Both author are supported by NSFC-12122101 and NSFC-12071026.
2. Conjugacy classes and types of matrices in general affine group
In this section, we shall give an explicit description of the conjugacy classes of the affine group over the finite field and introduce the notion of the modified type for elements in .
2.1. The conjugacy classes in
Let be the set of all partitions. For , we denote its size by , its length by . We will also write , where is the number of parts in equal to . For two partitions , we denote by the partition whose parts are those of and . For a set , let be the set of the partition-valued functions such that only finitely many are nonempty partitions. Given , we define by letting for each .
Denote by the finite field of elements, where is a prime power. We shall regard vectors in the -dimensional vector space as column vectors, that is, for each . Denote by the set of matrices over the finite field . The general linear group , which consists of all invertible matrices in , acts on naturally via left multiplication.
Following [Ma], we recall the description of conjugacy classes in . Let be the set of all monic irreducible polynomial in other than . Then for each , the vector space admits a -module via for any , Since is a PID, there exists a unique such that
(2.1) |
where we write ; moreover, we have
(2.2) |
where denotes the degree of the polynomial . Denote by the set of satisfying (2.2). The partition-valued function is called the type of . Then any two elements of are conjugate if and only if they have the same type, and there is a bijection between the set of conjugacy classes of and the set . For each , denote by the conjugacy class of elements in of type .
For each , let denote the companion matrix for of the form
and for each integer let
with diagonal blocks , where is the identity matrix. Given with , set
(2.3) |
that is, is the diagonal sum of the matrices for all and . Then an element of type is conjugate to the canonical form (cf. [Ma, Chapter IV, §2]). For , set
Then by (2.1), we have as -modules and moreover, we have Set
Suppose and set
for , then we can write
(2.4) |
Lemma 2.1.
Let and . Suppose is a -matrix over satisfying Then .
Recall is the Jordan form of size and eigenvalue . The following elementary lemma can be verified by a direct computation.
Lemma 2.2.
The following lemma will be useful to compute the conjugacy classes in .
Lemma 2.3.
2.2. The general affine Group
We will review some basics on affine spaces and general affine group by following [DL]. Let be a finite dimensional vector space over . An affine space associated to is defined to be a set together with a unique -action satisfies
(2.8) |
for any and moreover for any , there exists a unique vector such that . For , as there exists a unique vector such that , we can define the difference which is a vector in . However, one cannot take sums of elements of . We define . A map is said to be an affine transformation if
(2.9) |
for any satisfying and moreover the induced map is linear, where is a fixed point. We observe that the map is well-defined due to (2.9). Clearly the composition of two affine transformations is still an affine transformation. An affine transformation is called invertible if it is bijective and it is straightforward to check that the inverse of an invertible affine transformation is still an affine transformation. The (general) affine group of is defined to be group consisting of all invertible affine transformations of .
In an affine space, it is possible to fix a point and coordinate axis such that every point in the space can be represented as a -tuple of its coordinates. For example, suppose . By choosing coordinates for , one can identify with the affine hyperplane
(2.10) |
in and is identified with the linear subspace . Then general affine group can be identified with the set of -matrices:
(2.11) |
2.3. The conjugacy classes in
It is known [Ze] that the number of conjugacy classes of is equal to with being the number of conjugacy classes of and a representative of conjugacy classes is also given in [Mu] via a “maximal problem” procedure in the context of maximal parabolic subgroups. In the following, we shall give an explicit description of the type of each matrix in as well as an explicit representative for each conjugacy class.
Recall the general affine group is the subgroup of given by
(2.12) |
Clearly the natural embedding for leads to the following embedding and hence:
(2.13) |
Denote by the corresponding limit group. For simplicity, write for each . The following formula will be useful later for our computation:
(2.14) |
for any .
Lemma 2.4.
Let . Suppose is of the type with . Assume . Then is conjugate in to a matrix of the form
(2.15) |
where in for some with .
Proof.
Since is of type , there exists such that and then
(2.16) |
by (2.4), where . Write with and for . Take with
for and satisfies as is invertible. Then by (2.16), we obtain that
(2.17) |
with
(2.18) |
for and . Set , then by (2.14) and (2.17) we have
(2.19) |
By assumption we obtain that there does not exist such that . Thus by (2.17) there must exist some such that . Now assume
(2.20) |
We claim the matrix in (2.19) is conjugate to the matrix of the form
(2.21) |
where . To prove the claim, as is of the form (2.18), let . Then set
with
Clearly with and for . Let
Then is an invertible -block matrix with each block being of the form (2.5) and
(2.22) |
Furthermore, choose
(2.23) |
In addition, we take
(2.24) |
Then for each , we choose with being an -block matrix and each block matrix is of size with the form (2.5) if and with the form (2.6) if , where
(2.25) |
for . Clearly by (2.23) and (2.25) we have
(2.26) |
Finally choose an invertible such that . Putting together we obtain a matrix is of the form
Then by (2.22)-(2.26) we obtain
and moreover by Lemma 2.3. This together with (2.19) leads to
This proves the claim and hence the lemma follows. ∎
Set
For each , recall
if and while in the case set
For each , set via
(2.27) |
in the case and
(2.28) |
Clearly for each , the type of in is exactly .
Proposition 2.5.
Every element in is conjugate to for some . Moreover is a complete set of representatives in conjugacy classes in .
Proof.
Fix . If there does not exist such that , then Lemma 2.4 implies that is conjugate to for some with being the type of and being a part of the partition . Otherwise if there exists such that , then
This means is conjugate to in and hence is conjugate to with being the type of . This proves the first statement in the proposition.
Regarding the second statement, since the matrix has type as an element in . Hence if is conjugate to in then and moreover by (2.14) we have . This implies and hence . Thus the proposition is proved. ∎
Recall the notion of modified type of an element in [WW]. More precisely, suppoe is the type of . Denote by the partition of the unipotent Jordan blocks, and denote by its length. Define to be the modified type of , that is, satisifes for and . Meanwhile, given with and , we define for all via
(2.29) | ||||
(2.30) |
Clearly elements of type in have a modified type . Denote by the conjugacy class in which consists of elements of modified type . Then is nonempty if and only if and accordingly denote by the conjugacy class sum.
Inspired by [WW], we can also analogously introduce the notion of modified type for each . If an element is conjugate to , we say that has a type . Define the modified type of to be , where is the modified type of defined above in [WW]. Observe that the modified type remains unchanged for under the embedding of into in (2.13) and it is also clearly conjugation invariant by (2.14). The following is immediate.
Lemma 2.6.
Two elements in are conjugate if and only if they have the same modified type.
Let
(2.31) |
Then by Lemma 2.6 the conjugacy classes of are parametrized by . Given , we denote by the conjugacy class in which consists of elements of modified type . For each , if nonempty is a conjugacy class of of type . Hence is nonempty if and only if if and if . Let be the class sum of if when and when , and be 0 otherwise. Clearly if is of modified type , then the type of in is and hence its type as an element in is . Then the modified type denoted by of viewed as an element in is
(2.32) |
Denote by the center of the integral group algebra . We summarize these discussions in the following.
Lemma 2.7.
The set forms the class sum -basis for the center , for each .
3. Stability of the center of
In this section, we first recall the stability property for the center of the integral group algebra obtained in [WW] and then we shall establish the stability for the structure constants of the graded algebra associated to after verifying a key observation.
3.1. Stability in
Let . For , the fixed point subspace by is denoted by
An element in is a reflection if its fixed point subspace has codimension 1. Let be the set of reflections in . That is
Then is a generating set for the group , since all of the elementary matrices used in Gaussian elimination are reflections and every invertible matrix is row equivalent to the identity matrix. The reflection length of an element is defined by
(3.1) |
By [WW], the following holds for the length .
Lemma 3.1.
[WW, Lemma 3.2]
-
(1)
If is of modified type , then
-
(2)
If the modified types of , are and , then .
The combinatorics of partial orders on arising from the reflection lengths has been studied in [HLR]. Recall the codimension . The reflection length has the following simple and useful geometric interpretation.
Lemma 3.2.
[HLR, Propositions 2.9, 2.16]
-
(1)
For , we have .
-
(2)
Suppose . Then .
-
(3)
If , then and .
We recall the stability property concerning the structure constants for center of the integral group algebra established in [WW]. Recall that is the conjugacy class sum corresponding to the conjugacy classes , for . Following [WW] we write the multiplication in the center of the integral group algebra as
(3.2) |
Theorem 3.3.
[WW, Theorem 3.11] Let . If , then is independent of . (In this case, we shall write as .)
3.2. A key observation
In this subsection, we shall formulate a general observation which can be applied to the case and which are expected to hold for other classical finite groups. Suppose for each is a subgroup of , and moreover these subgroups satisfy
which is compatible with the embedding
That is
(3.3) |
for any and . Let be the integral group algebra of over the ring of integers, and denote by the center of for each . For , denote by the conjugacy class containing in and , respectively. Clearly and if is of modified type as an element in then . For convenience, we write
for any . Then are the conjugacy class sums in the center and . Suppose , let and be the structure constant in the center of the group algebra of and , that is,
Clearly for , if being viewed as elements in are of modified types , respectively, then
(3.4) |
Observe that we have
for each and hence
(3.5) |
and moreover
(3.6) |
for any and . Thus, we have the following inequalities:
(3.7) |
Definition 3.4.
The family of groups is said to satisfy the strictly increasing property if the following holds for any :
(3.8) |
Proposition 3.5.
Suppose the family of subgroups satisfies the strictly increasing property. Let . If , then for any .
Proof.
Suppose the modified types of regarding as elements in are , respectively. Then by (3.3) we observe that the modified types of are also for any and then we have by (3.4)
(3.9) |
Now by Lemma 3.1 and hence the assumption that gives rise to . Then by Theorem 3.3 and (3.9) we have
is a constant uniquely determined by . So in such a situation, by (3.7) the increasing sequence is bounded the constant , that is,
(3.10) |
for all . Now assume there exists such that , then the assumption that the family of groups satisfies the strictly increasing property implies that . Hence the subsequence is strictly increasing. This contradicts to (3.10). Therefore for any . ∎
3.3. Length function via reflections in
Denote the set of all reflections in , that is,
Lemma 3.6.
The general affine group is generated by .
Proof.
Fix . Assume for some reflections . Then if we have
Meanwhile if we have
Clearly and in the case . This proves the lemma. ∎
Recall the length of being regarded as an element in via (3.1). Similar by Lemma 3.6 we can define
Clearly if then
(3.11) |
Lemma 3.7.
Suppose . Then
(3.12) |
Proof.
For each , we set
(3.15) |
Proposition 3.8.
If is of modified type , then
Proof.
By Proposition 3.8 the following is straightforward.
Lemma 3.9.
If the modified types of , are and , then .
3.4. Stability in the center of
In this subsection, we shall apply the general observation established in section 3.2 to the case for to prove the stability property for the center center of . To simplify notations, write for any . We also write if is conjugate to in while writing if is conjugate to in . Set
(3.16) |
Then clearly and hence
(3.17) |
Moreover if are of modified types in , then by (2.32) are of modified types in and
Then by (3.17) we obtain
(3.18) |
Lemma 3.10.
The family of general affine groups satisfies the strictly increasing property.
Proof.
Assume there exist for some such that
(3.19) |
for some . Observe that by (3.17)
where
and
Clearly there is an embedding by sending the pair to the pair . Then by (3.19) we obtain that there exists a pair such that it is not of the form with . We write in the block form as , then at least one of is nonzero. Now set . Then . However at least one of is nonzero, clearly the pair does not belong to the image of embedding . This leads to . Hence the lemma is proved. ∎
Recall that for the element is the class sum of elements in of modified type if when and when and otherwise. We write
where is the structure constant. Here we take the convention that is well defined only for these admissible such that all three of are nonzero.
Theorem 3.11.
The following holds for and :
unless .
If , then is independent of . (In this case, we shall write as .)
Proof.
. If , then there exists , such that , then by Lemma 3.1, Proposition 3.4 and Lemma 3.6 we have .
Let be the smallest positive integer such that and . Then is well-defined for . Take such that their modified types are and , respectively. Then by Lemma 3.7 and Proposition 3.8 we have , , and hence by the assumption we obtain . Then for each by Proposition 3.5 and Lemma 3.10 we have
Thus is a constant independent of . ∎
3.5. The stable center
Analogous to [WW, Section 3.4], we can also introduce the so-called stable center for the affine groups . Let be the subspace of spanned by the elements with . Due to Lemma 3.9, the assignment of degree to provides a filtered ring structure with the filtration . Then we can define the associated graded algebra denoted by as follows. As a vector space
where we set and the multiplication satisfies for and . Meanwhile, let be a graded associative -algebra with a basis given by the symbols indexed by , and with multiplication given by
(3.20) |
Note is the unit of . The following summarizes the above discussions.
Theorem 3.12.
The graded -algebra has the multiplication given by
for . Moreover, we have a surjective algebra homomorphism for each , which maps to for all .
We will refer to as the stable center associated to the family of finite general linear groups. This algebra can be viewed as the inverse limit of the projective system of algebras .
4. Computation on structure constants in the center
In this section, we shall compute some examples for the structure constants . For and , we define the single cycles by letting and for . Call a -cycle of degree . Denote by . For convenience, for each we shall denote by the class sum in and denote by the class sum corresponding in corresponding to , respectively.
4.1. Coincidence between and
Lemma 4.1.
Suppose . Let . Then
Proof.
Observe that and moreover if and only if . Hence by Theorem 3.11, the structure constant is independent of for . That means . Therefore we can do the computation in .
Firstly, assume . Then is exactly the coefficient of in with
Equivalently, let . Then . Suppose . Then
A direct calculation gives rise to
Hence we obtain
(4.1) |
This means is of the form
(4.2) |
satisfying (4.1). Conversely, it is straightforward to check by Proposition 2.5 that an matrix of the form (4.2) satisfying (4.1) must belong to . Thus
Secondly, assume . Similarly, is exactly the coefficient of in with
Equivalently, let . Then . Suppose . Then
This means
and hence
(4.3) |
This means is of the form
(4.4) |
Conversely, it is straightforward to check by Proposition 2.5 that an matrix of the form (4.4) satisfying (4.3) must belong to . Thus
∎
We observe that in the above two examples coincide with the structure constant given in [WW, Theorem 4.4]. In fact, this observation holds in general concerning the comparison between the structure constants and in the situation .
Theorem 4.2.
Let . Suppose . Then
Proof.
Let . Since by Theorem 3.3 the structure constant is independent of and hence it can be computed in or via
(4.5) |
while
(4.6) | ||||
(4.7) |
For simplicity, write . Comparing the two sets on the right hand side of (4.6) and (4.7), by (4.5) we obtain that the pair satisfying must be of the form with . This implies and moreover the modified types of are , respectively. That is, . Hence by (3.16). This together with (3.17) and (4.7) leads to
(4.8) |
Meanwhile
and hence by (3.17), (3.18) and (2.32) we obtain
This together with (4.8) leads to
(4.9) |
Meanwhile by the assumption , (3.15) and Theorem 3.11, we have and hence the proposition is proved. ∎
4.2. More examples in the stable center .
Lemma 4.4.
Let with . Then
Proof.
Clearly is exactly the coefficient of in the product in with
(4.10) |
Equivalently, let
Then . Suppose . Then
This together with (2.14) and the proof of Proposition 2.5 leads to
and hence
Thus is of the form
(4.11) |
Conversely, it is straightforward using Proposition 2.5 to check that the matrix of the form (4.11) belongs to . Hence
∎
In general, we have the following.
Proposition 4.5.
Suppose and for . Let . Then
Proof.
Clearly is exactly the coefficient of in the product in with
(4.12) |
Equivalently, let
Then . Suppose
Then
and hence by (2.14) and the proof of Proposition 2.5 we have
and moreover
Thus is of the form
(4.13) |
Conversely, it is straightforward using Proposition 2.5 to check that the matrix of the form (4.13) belongs to . Hence
∎
4.3. Examples depending on .
Proposition 4.7.
Suppose . Let . Then for :
-
(1)
-
(2)
Proof.
To prove (1), let
Then is of modified type with and is of modified type . Analogous to the proof of Lemma 4.1, we obtain with
Suppose
Then by the proof of Proposition 2.5 we obtain that if and olny if
(4.14) |
Meanwhile if and olny if
(4.15) |
Then we have
(4.16) |
(4.17) |
and
(4.18) |
By (4.17) and (4.18), a straightforward calculation gives rise to
This together with (4.14) leads to . Therefore must be of the form
(4.19) |
and moreover one of is nonzero by (4.16). Conversely, clearly a matrix of the form (4.19) satisfies (4.14) and (4.15) and hence it belongs to . Therefore we obtain
Next, we shall compute . Similarly, one can deduce that
with
Analogous to the calculation in part (1), one can obtain that a matrix with belongs to if only if is of the form
∎
Remark 4.8.
It is known from [DL] that the general affine also admits another set of generators consisting of the so-called affine reflections, which gives rise to a new length function denoted by for each . This will define a new filtration in the center of and hence we have a new graded algebra denoted by . In [DL], three types of elements known as elliptic, parabolic and hyperbolic are introduced. Actually one can show that if is elliptic or parabolic while if is hyperbolic by [DL, Theorem 11] and Lemma 3.7 . Moreover, in our notation is hyperbolic if and only if is of modified type by [DL, Definition 10]. The computation in Proposition 4.7 shows that if are of the modified type with , respectively, then the coefficient of in the product is strictly smaller than the coefficient of in the product , where , and even though . This means the structure constants in the graded algebra associated to the new filtration in with respect to the new length function does not admit the stability property.
Remark 4.9.
There are several further directions and problems arising from our work which may be worth pursuing.
Question 1: It is interesting to compare the structure constants and . As mentioned earlier in Remark 4.3 and Remark 4.6, we ask for when they coincide besides the situation in Theorem 4.2.
Question 2: Due to [Ze], the following series
(4.20) |
satisfies the multiplicity-free property concerning the irreducible representations over the field of complex numbers. Then analogous to [Kl, Section 1.2] it is possible to define the notion of Jucys-Murphy elements by studying the centralizers of in the group algebra of as well as the centralizers of in the group algebra of with respect to the embeddings in (4.20). These potential elements is expected to be used to obtain a set of generators for the graded algebra as an analog of [FH, Theorem 1].
Question 3: As mentioned in Remark 4.8 the structure constants in the graded algebra associated to the new filtration in center with respect to the new length function does not have the similar stability phenomena. However, it is still worthwhile to ask which structure constants satisfy the stability property.
Question 4: We expect the general phenomenon in section 3.2 can be applied to obtain the similar stability phenomena for various families of subgroups of such as unitary, symplectic, or orthogonal groups. In fact, one can apply the key observation in section 3.2 to the symplectic group to recover the main result in [Oz] without the lengthy computation on the centralizers. On the other hand, the symplectic group is generated by the set of transvections [Om] and hence the center of the group algebra admits the new filtered structure different from the one introduced in [Oz]. It is worthwhile to study the structure constants of the associated graded algebra and to see whether the stability property holds in this case. We may come to this project in a coming article.
Question 5: We ask whether the graded algebra in this paper afford a geometric interpretation and generalization similar to the case of wreath product for a subgroup of . It is known [Wa] that the associated graded of the center of the complex group algebra of is isomorphic to the cohomology ring of Hilbert scheme of points on the minimal resolution (also cf. [LS, Va, LQW]). It can also be regarded as the Chen-Ruan orbifold cohomology ring of the orbifold .
References
- [Be] M. Berger, Geometry. I. Universitext. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994. Translated from the 1977 French original by M. Cole and S. Levy, Corrected reprint of the 1987 translation.
- [DL] E. Delmas and J.B. Lewis, Reflection length in the general linear and affine groups, arXiv:1803.03070.
- [FH] H. Farahat and G. Higman, The centers of symmetric group rings, Proc. Roy. Soc. (A) 250 (1959), 212–221.
- [HLR] J. Huang, J.B. Lewis and V. Reiner, Absolute order in general linear groups, Journal of London Math. Soc. 95 (2017), 223–247, arXiv:1506.03332.
- [KR] A. Kannan and C. Ryba, Stable Centres II: Finite Classical Groups, arXiv:2112.01467.
- [Kl] A. Kleshchev, Linear and Projective Representations of Symmetric Groups, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
- [LQW] W.-P. Li, Z. Qin and W. Wang, Ideals of the cohomology rings of Hilbert schemes and their applications, Trans. AMS 356 (2004), 245–265.
- [LS] M. Lehn and C. Sorger, Symmetric groups and the cup product on the cohomology of Hilbert schemes, Duke Math. J. 110 (2001), 345–357.
- [Ma] I. Mcdonald, Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials, 2nd Edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995.
- [Me] P.-L. Méliot, Partial isomorphisms over finite fields, J. Algebraic Combin. 40 (2014), no. 1, 83–136, arXiv:1303.4313.
- [Mu] S. Murray, Conjugacy Classes in Maximal Parabolic Subgroups of General Linear Groups, Journal of Algebra 233 (2000), 135–155.
- [Om] O. Ömeara, Symplectic groups, American Mathematical Society (1978), 122 pages.
- [Oz] S. Özden, Stability of the centers of the symplectic group rings , Journal of Algebra 572 (2021), 263–296.
- [Va] E. Vasserot, Sur l’anneau de cohomologie du schéma de Hilbert de , C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sér. I Math. 332 (2001), 7–12.
- [WW] J. Wan, W. Wang, Stability of the centers of group algebras of , Advances in Mathematics 349 (2019), 749–780.
- [Wa] W. Wang, The Farahat-Higman ring of wreath products and Hilbert schemes, Adv. Math. 187 (2004), 417–446.
- [Ze] A. Zelevinsky, Representations of finite classical groups. A Hopf Algebra Approach, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 869, Springer, Berlin, New York, 1981.