This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Statistical Production of BcB_{c} Mesons in Heavy-Ion Collisions at the LHC Energy

Shouxing Zhao Min He Department of Applied Physics, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
Abstract

The recombination production of BcB_{c} mesons in heavy-ion collisions at the LHC energy is facilitated by the abundant and highly thermalized charm (cc) quarks transported in the deconfined medium created. We study the production of BcB_{c} mesons via cc and bottom (bb) quark recombination in a statistical fashion by placing BcB_{c} in the position of a member of the family of open bb hadrons, which allows us to make quantitative predictions for the modifications of the production fraction (fcf_{c}) of BcB_{c} mesons and its relative production to BB mesons in sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02 TeV Pb-Pb collisions with respect to proton-proton (pppp) collisions at the same energy. The statistical production yield of BcB_{c} mesons is converted into the transverse momentum (pTp_{T}) distribution with the shape computed from resonance recombination using the cc- and bb-quark phase space distributions that have been simulated via Langevin diffusion and constrained by open cc- and bb-hadron observables. Supplemented with the component fragmented from bb-quark spectrum that dominates at high pTp_{T}, the total pTp_{T} spectrum of BcB_{c} mesons is obtained and converted into the pTp_{T} dependent nuclear modification factor (RAAR_{\rm AA}). Both fcf_{c} and the integrated RAAR_{\rm AA} exhibit a 5\sim 5-fold enhancement in central Pb-Pb collisions relative to the pppp reference. Comparison with data measured by the CMS experiment shows decent agreement within theoretical and experimental uncertainties.

keywords:
Heavy quark , BcB_{c} mesons , Statistical hadronization , Quark-Gluon Plasma

1 Introduction

The BcB_{c} mesons as bound states of a bottom (bb) quark with an anticharm (c¯\bar{c}) quark, or vice versa, provide a unique avenue to the understanding of heavy quark dynamics. They are intermediate between charmonium (cc¯c\bar{c}) and bottomonium (bb¯b\bar{b}) states in terms of mass, size and binding energy [1, 2, 3, 4]. Being composed of two different heavy flavors, BcB_{c} mesons cannot annihilate into gluons; consequently excited BcB_{c} states lying below the open BDBD threshold can only undergo radiative or hadronic transitions into the pseudoscalar (S01{}^{1}S_{0}) ground state BcB_{c} that decays weakly, leading to total widths less than a few hundred keV [1, 2], significantly smaller than their charmonia and bottomnia counterparts [5].

The production of BcB_{c} mesons in hadronic (e.g. proton-proton, pppp) collisions entails the simultaneous creation of a cc¯c\bar{c} and a bb¯b\bar{b} pair in a single collision, rendering it much rarer than that of other mesons containing a single bb quark. In pppp collisions at the LHC energy, the LHCb experiment has measured the production fraction of the ground state BcB_{c}^{-} to be 0.26\sim 0.26% (with significant uncertainty due to the one from the branching fraction of the decay BcJ/ψμν¯B_{c}^{-}\rightarrow J/\psi\mu^{-}\bar{\nu} used in the measurement) relative to the total bb¯b\bar{b} cross section [6], which is negligibly small compared to the fractions of BB mesons and Λb\Lambda_{b} baryons [7, 8].

However, in relativistic heavy-ion collisions where a deconfined medium (Quark-Gluon Plasma, QGP) is created, abundant heavy quarks are produced through primordial hard processes and then transported in the QGP [9, 10, 11, 12, 13], leading to a new production mechanism for BcB_{c} mesons, namely the recombination of bb and cc quarks from different primordial nucleon-nucleon collisions that could significantly enhance the BcB_{c} yield [14]. For example, in the most central 0-10% Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC energies, dNcc¯/dy20dN_{c\bar{c}}/dy\sim 20 [15] charm and dNbb¯/dy0.9dN_{b\bar{b}}/dy\sim 0.9 [8] bottom quarks per unit rapidity can be produced at mid-rapidity, respectively. In events in which there is a single bb¯b\bar{b} pair along with a number of cc¯c\bar{c} pairs, the bb quark can find any of the cc quarks near in phase space to recombine and produce a BcB_{c} bound state. This recombination process is particularly strengthened given the high degree of thermalization of cc quarks in the QGP [13, 15, 16] as primarily evidenced by the large elliptic flow of DD mesons [17] measured in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC energy.

This novel production mechanism makes BcB_{c} an attractive part of the endeavor of using heavy quarkonia as a probe of the QGP properties [18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24]. In this context, the recombination production of BcB_{c} mesons, since it was first proposed [14], has been studied in various transport [25, 26, 27] and instantaneous coalescence [28] models. The static in-medium properties of BcB_{c} mesons such as binding energy and radius used as inputs of these models are sensitive to the employed heavy quark potential that is currently under hot debate [29, 30]. On the experimental side, pioneering measurement by the CMS experiment in sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02 TeV Pb-Pb collisions, although restricted to relatively large transverse momenta (pT>6p_{T}>6 GeV), indeed gives a first hint that the BcB_{c} production in the presence of QGP is enhanced relative to pppp collisions, as indicated by the nuclear modification factor well above unity in the lower pTp_{T} bin accessed in the measurement [31]. One notes that, although the recombination of BcB_{c} depends linearly on the cc quark densities, weaker than the quadratic dependence in the case of charmonia regeneration [32], the nuclear modification factor of BcB_{c} is likely to to be significantly larger than that of J/ψJ/\psi mesons [33], owing to the too small production of the former in pppp collisions as the reference.

In this work, we treat BcB_{c} as a member of the family of bb-hadrons that contain a single bb quark and study its production in sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02 TeV Pb-Pb collisions in the statistical hadronization model (SHM) following the spirit of the statistical production of charmonia and cc-hadrons [34, 35, 36, 37]. For heavy quarkonia that feature deep binding, statistical coalescence (recombination) does not apply to their production in elementary collisions, in contrast to the case of heavy-light hadrons where SHM empirically works well [8, 38]. However, the high degree of thermalization for cc quarks facilitates the statistical description of not only charmonia [34, 39] but also BcB_{c} mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC energy. For the latter, one can envisage that a single bb quark is surrounded by a number of highly thermalized diffusing cc quarks and stochastic (statistical) recombination satisfying phase space conditions occurs efficiently, which is reminiscent of the case of statistical cc-light quark recombination to form open cc-hadrons [36]. Given the small number of heavy quark production, it turns out important to adopt the canonical ensemble version of SHM to exactly conserve the bb and cc numbers for predicting the absolute yield of BcB_{c} mesons. This statistical production description in particular allows us to make quantitative predictions for the production fraction of BcB_{c} mesons relative to the total bb¯b\bar{b} multiplicity and the enhancement of its relative production to BB mesons in the presence of QGP with respect to pppp collisions.

This article is organized as follows. In Sec. 2, we fix BcB_{c}’s pTp_{T} differential cross section in s=5.02\sqrt{s}=5.02 TeV pppp collisions by making use of the previously computed BB^{-}’s differential cross section in combination with the pTp_{T} dependent Bc/BB_{c}^{-}/B^{-} ratio measured by LHCb experiment. This will be used as the reference for the ensuing calculation of BcB_{c}’s nuclear modification factors and also enables us to make an estimate of its integrated cross section. In Sec. 3, we elaborate on the SHM calculation of BcB_{c} production in sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02 TeV Pb-Pb collisions, putting it in the context of the statistical production of the whole family of bb-hadrons such that the bb-number conservation through hadronization is taken into full account and serves as an constraint for the prediction of the production fraction of BcB_{c} mesons. In Sec. 4, we compute the BcB_{c}’s pTp_{T} distribution by normalizing its pTp_{T} spectrum from resonance recombination of realistically transported cc and bb quarks to its statistical production yield, which is then supplemented by the component from fragmentation of bb quarks that dominates at high pTp_{T}. The total pTp_{T} spectrum is converted into the pTp_{T} dependent nuclear modification factors and compared to CMS data. We conclude in Sec. 5.

2 BcB_{c}’s pTp_{T} differential cross section in pppp collisions

In this section, we construct the pTp_{T} differential cross section dσ/dpTdyd\sigma/dp_{T}dy for the ground state BcB_{c}^{-} in s=5.02\sqrt{s}=5.02 TeV pppp collisions at mid-rapidity as the reference to measure its pTp_{T} spectral modifications in Pb-Pb collisions. The production fraction of the ground state pseudoscalar BcB_{c}^{-} mesons relative to the sum of those of BB^{-} and B¯0\bar{B}^{0} (fc/(fu+fd)f_{c}/(f_{u}+f_{d})) has been measured by the LHCb experiment in s=7\sqrt{s}=7 and 13 TeV pppp collisions in the kinematic regions of transverse momentum 4<pT<254<p_{T}<25 GeV and pseudo-rapidity 2.5<η<4.52.5<\eta<4.5, showing almost the same results between these two energies [6]. The measured ratio shows no rapidity dependence and its rather weak pTp_{T} dependence has been linearly fitted [6], which is converted into Bc/BB_{c}^{-}/B^{-} assuming isospin symmetry (fu=fdf_{u}=f_{d}) and plotted in Fig. 2(b) (blue band), where the significant spread is due to the uncertainty from the branching fraction of (BcJ/ψμν¯)=1.95%±0.46%\mathcal{B}(B_{c}^{-}\rightarrow J/\psi\mu^{-}\bar{\nu})=1.95\%\pm 0.46\% [6] used in the measurement.

Assuming the pTp_{T}-dependent Bc/BB_{c}^{-}/B^{-} to remain unchanged, we construct BcB_{c}^{-}’s dσ/dpTdyd\sigma/dp_{T}dy at mid-rapidity in s=5.02\sqrt{s}=5.02 TeV pppp collisions by multiplying the Bc/BB_{c}^{-}/B^{-} with BB^{-}’s dσ/dpTdyd\sigma/dp_{T}dy that has been determined in [8]. The resulting dσ/dpTdyd\sigma/dp_{T}dy for BcB_{c}^{-} and that for BB^{-} quoted from [8] (in comparison with CMS measurement [40]) are displayed in Fig. 1(a). As a byproduct, we’ve estimated the BcB_{c}’s integrated cross section to be dσBc/dy=0.104±0.0245μbd\sigma^{B_{c}^{-}}/dy=0.104\pm 0.0245~{}\mu b at mid-rapidity and its relative ratio to dσB/dy=13.16μbd\sigma^{B^{-}}/dy=13.16~{}\mu b for BB^{-} to be Bc/B=0.00790±0.00186B_{c}^{-}/B^{-}=0.00790\pm 0.00186. Based on this ratio, the production fraction of BcB_{c}^{-} was also estimated to be fc=0.00258±0.00062f_{c}=0.00258\pm 0.00062 [6] (only the dominant uncertainty from (BcJ/ψμν¯)\mathcal{B}(B_{c}^{-}\rightarrow J/\psi\mu^{-}\bar{\nu}) is quoted).

The CMS experiment has measured the dσ/dpTdyd\sigma/dp_{T}dy for Bc+Bc+B_{c}^{-}+B_{c}^{+} multiplied by the pertinent branching fractions through a two-step decay process Bc(J/ψμμ)μνB_{c}\rightarrow(J/\psi\rightarrow\mu\mu)\mu\nu in two bins of the three-muons’ transverse momentum 6<pTμμμ<116<p_{T}^{\mu\mu\mu}<11 GeV at 1.3<|yμμμ|<2.31.3<|y^{\mu\mu\mu}|<2.3 and 11<pTμμμ<3511<p_{T}^{\mu\mu\mu}<35 GeV at |yμμμ|<2.3|y^{\mu\mu\mu}|<2.3 [31]. To compare to the CMS data, we multiply the BcB_{c}^{-}’s dσ/dpTdyd\sigma/dp_{T}dy constructed above by (BcJ/ψμν¯)=1.95%±0.46%\mathcal{B}(B_{c}^{-}\rightarrow J/\psi\mu^{-}\bar{\nu})=1.95\%\pm 0.46\% [6] and (J/ψμμ)=5.96%\mathcal{B}(J/\psi\rightarrow\mu\mu)=5.96\% (with negligible uncertainty) [5]. Taking into account the average pTp_{T} shift of pTμμμ=0.85pTBcp_{T}^{\mu\mu\mu}=0.85\cdot p_{T}^{B_{c}} [31], the result (the factor 22 is to account for the sum of Bc+Bc+B_{c}^{-}+B_{c}^{+}) is plotted in Fig. 1(b) in comparison with the CMS data [31]. The central values of CMS data in two rather wide pTp_{T} bins are better described by using the lower bound of (BcJ/ψμν¯)\mathcal{B}(B_{c}^{-}\rightarrow J/\psi\mu^{-}\bar{\nu}).

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a) The constructed pTp_{T} differential cross section for the ground state BcB_{c}^{-} and that for BB^{-} quoted from [8] in comparison with CMS data [40] at mid-rapidity in s=5.02\sqrt{s}=5.02 TeV pppp collisions. (b) The computed Bc+Bc+B_{c}^{-}+B_{c}^{+} differential cross section multiplied by pertinent branching fractions (BF) as a function of pTμμμp_{T}^{\mu\mu\mu} in comparison with CMS data [31]. See text for more details.

3 Statistical production of BcB_{c} mesons in Pb-Pb collisions

In this section, we compute the absolute production yields of BcB_{c}^{-} in different centralities of sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02 TeV Pb-Pb collisions from the SHM. For large systems like heavy-ion collisions, quantum charges such as electric charge (QQ), baryon number (NN) and strangeness (SS) can be treated grand-canonically in the statistical description. In contrast, the small number of cc-hadrons (CC) and bb-hadrons (BB) renders their exact conservation through the canonical ensemble description essential, such that the partition function reads [38, 41]

Z(C,B)=λQλNλS1(2π)202π𝑑ϕC𝑑ϕBei(CϕC+BϕB)\displaystyle Z(C,B)=\lambda_{Q}\lambda_{N}\lambda_{S}\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{2}}\int_{0}^{2\pi}d\phi_{C}d\phi_{B}e^{i(C\phi_{C}+B\phi_{B})}
×exp[jγsNsjγcNcjγbNbjei(CjϕC+BjϕB)zj],\displaystyle\times{\rm exp}[\sum_{j}\gamma_{s}^{N_{sj}}\gamma_{c}^{N_{cj}}\gamma_{b}^{N_{bj}}e^{-i(C_{j}\phi_{C}+B_{j}\phi_{B})}z_{j}], (1)

where λQ\lambda_{Q}, λN\lambda_{N} and λS\lambda_{S} are fugacities associated with QQ, NN and SS, respectively; CjC_{j} and BjB_{j} are the charm and bottom number of the jj-th particle, respectively; γs\gamma_{s}, γc\gamma_{c} and γb\gamma_{b} are fugacities that account for the deviation from chemical equilibrium for hadrons containing NsjN_{sj}, NcjN_{cj} and NbjN_{bj} strange, cc and bb quarks plus antiquarks, respectively. In Eq. (3), zjz_{j} denotes the one-particle partition function

zj=(2Jj+1)VTH2π2mj2K2(mjTH),\displaystyle z_{j}=(2J_{j}+1)\frac{VT_{H}}{2\pi^{2}}m_{j}^{2}K_{2}(\frac{m_{j}}{T_{H}}), (2)

which also specifies the chemical equilibrium multiplicity of the jj-th hadron of mass mjm_{j} and spin JjJ_{j} in a fireball of volume VV under the Boltzmann approximation at hadronization temperature THT_{H}, with K2K_{2} being the modified Bessel function of the second kind. The primary multiplicity of a heavy hadron produced from the SHM is then given by

Nj=γsNsjγcNcjγbNbjzjZ(CCj,BBj)Z(C,B),\displaystyle\langle N_{j}\rangle=\gamma_{s}^{N_{sj}}\gamma_{c}^{N_{cj}}\gamma_{b}^{N_{bj}}z_{j}\frac{Z(C-C_{j},B-B_{j})}{Z(C,B)}, (3)

where Z(CCj,BBj)/Z(C,B)Z(C-C_{j},B-B_{j})/Z(C,B) (known as chemical factor less than unity for cc or bb hadrons in a neutral system with C=B=0C=B=0 [38]) characterizes the canonical suppression relative to the grand-canonical statistical production as a result of the exact conservation of CC and BB.

To evaluate the partition function, hadrons to be summed over in the exponential of Eq. (3) are divided into five categories: light hadrons made of up, down and strange quarks with Cj=Bj=0C_{j}=B_{j}=0, Ncj=Nbj=0N_{cj}=N_{bj}=0 and Nsj=0,1,2,3N_{sj}=0,1,2,3; open cc hadrons with Cj=±1C_{j}=\pm 1, Ncj=1N_{cj}=1, Bj=0B_{j}=0, Nbj=0N_{bj}=0 and Nsj=0,1,2N_{sj}=0,1,2; charmonia with Cj=0C_{j}=0, Ncj=2N_{cj}=2, Bj=0B_{j}=0, Nbj=0N_{bj}=0 and Nsj=0N_{sj}=0; open bb hadrons with Cj=0C_{j}=0, Ncj=0N_{cj}=0, Bj=±1B_{j}=\pm 1, Nbj=1N_{bj}=1 and Nsj=0,1,2N_{sj}=0,1,2; BcB_{c} mesons with Cj=±1C_{j}=\pm 1, Ncj=1N_{cj}=1, Bj=±1B_{j}=\pm 1, Nbj=1N_{bj}=1 and Nsj=0N_{sj}=0; bottomonia with Cj=0C_{j}=0, Ncj=0N_{cj}=0, Bj=0B_{j}=0, Nbj=2N_{bj}=2 and Nsj=0N_{sj}=0. We have safely neglected heavy baryons that contain two cc or bb quarks since their masses are much larger than other open cc or bb hadrons. Clearly the summations over light hadrons, charmonia and bottomonia factorize out of the exponential and for the purpose of computing the heavy hadrons’ multiplicity, the evaluation of the partition function reduces to

Z(C,B)02π𝑑ϕC𝑑ϕBcos(CϕC+BϕB)\displaystyle Z(C,B)\propto\int_{0}^{2\pi}d\phi_{C}d\phi_{B}\cos(C\phi_{C}+B\phi_{B})
×exp[2jH+γsNsjγcNcjγbNbjcos(CjϕC+BjϕB)zj].\displaystyle\times{\rm exp}[2\sum_{j\in H^{+}}\gamma_{s}^{N_{sj}}\gamma_{c}^{N_{cj}}\gamma_{b}^{N_{bj}}\cos(C_{j}\phi_{C}+B_{j}\phi_{B})z_{j}]. (4)

Now the summation in the exponential of Eq. (3) is restricted to be over positively charged cc and bb hadrons, such as D0D^{0}, Ds+D_{s}^{+}, Λc+\Lambda_{c}^{+}, B0B^{0}, Bs0B_{s}^{0}, Λ¯b0\bar{\Lambda}_{b}^{0} and Bc+B_{c}^{+}. In Eqs. (3) and (3), the strangeness fugacity is taken to be γs=1\gamma_{s}=1 (i.e., strangeness chemical equilibrium is reached down to the hadronization in Pb-Pb collisions). But the cc and bb fugacities γc\gamma_{c} and γb\gamma_{b} should be self-consistently determined from the balance equations that stipulate cc and bb conservation through hadronization:

dNcc¯dy=joc+Nj+jhcNj+jBc+Nj,\displaystyle\frac{dN_{c\bar{c}}}{dy}=\sum_{j\in oc^{+}}\langle N_{j}\rangle+\sum_{j\in hc}\langle N_{j}\rangle+\sum_{j\in B_{c}^{+}}\langle N_{j}\rangle, (5)
dNbb¯dy=job+Nj+jhbNj+jBc+Nj,\displaystyle\frac{dN_{b\bar{b}}}{dy}=\sum_{j\in ob^{+}}\langle N_{j}\rangle+\sum_{j\in hb}\langle N_{j}\rangle+\sum_{j\in B_{c}^{+}}\langle N_{j}\rangle, (6)

where the summations run over the primary multiplicities Nj\langle N_{j}\rangle (cf. Eq. (3)) of positively charged open cc/bb hadrons (oc+oc^{+} and ob+ob^{+}, respectively), charmonia/bottomonia (hchc and hbhb, respectively) and Bc+B_{c}^{+} mesons. Since the majority (99\sim 99%) of cc content is carried by open cc hadrons, the cc fugacity γc\gamma_{c} is essentially governed by the first term on the right hand side of Eq. (5); the same is true for γb\gamma_{b}.

0-20% 20-40% 40-60% 60-80%
VΔy=1(fm3)V_{\Delta y=1}({\rm fm^{3}}) 4170 1849 709 200
dNcc¯/dydN_{c\bar{c}}/dy 17.2 6.46 2.15 0.44
dNbb¯/dydN_{b\bar{b}}/dy 0.74 0.272 0.0806 0.0165
γc\gamma_{c} 13.35 11.58 10.87 11.84
γb\gamma_{b} 6.271076.27\cdot 10^{7} 7.591077.59\cdot 10^{7} 1.031081.03\cdot 10^{8} 1.621081.62\cdot 10^{8}
Table 1: Volume of the fireball, cc- and bb-quark multiplicities per unit rapidity at mid-rapidity and their fugacities in different centralities of sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02 TeV Pb-Pb collisions. For 0-20% and 20-40% centrality, 20% reduction is applied to the cc-quark multiplicity owing to shadowing effect. For the other two centralities, 10% shadowing is applied.
dN/dydN/dy 0-20% 20-40% 40-60% 60-80%
B(=B¯0)B^{-}(=\bar{B}^{0}) 0.23234 0.085594 0.025373 0.0051834
B¯s0\bar{B}_{s}^{0} 0.097318 0.035851 0.010628 0.0021711
Λb0\Lambda_{b}^{0} 0.11664 0.042969 0.012738 0.0026021
Ξb0,\Xi_{b}^{0,-} 0.061520 0.022664 0.0067183 0.0013725
Ωb\Omega_{b}^{-} 0.0031317 0.0011537 0.00034199 0.000069866
BcB_{c}^{-} 0.010001 0.0031222 0.00080467 0.00012052
Bc/BB_{c}^{-}/B^{-} 0.043056 0.036489 0.031724 0.02326
Bc/bb¯B_{c}^{-}/b\bar{b} 0.013276 0.011275 0.009817 0.00722
Table 2: The statistical production yields per unit rapidity at mid-rapidity (higher part) of ground state open bb hadrons and BcB_{c}^{-} mesons, alongside the production yield ratios (lower part) of BcB_{c}^{-} to BB^{-} and to the total bb¯b\bar{b} multiplicity (i.e. BcB_{c}^{-}’s production fraction fcf_{c}) in different centralities of sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02 TeV Pb-Pb collisions.

To perform realistic calculations for sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02 TeV Pb-Pb collisions, we focus on a fireball corresponding to a rapidity slice of one unit at mid-rapidity with vanishing net cc and bb number (C=B=0C=B=0). We first determine the input cc- and bb-quark multiplicities dNcc¯/dydN_{c\bar{c}}/dy and dNbb¯/dydN_{b\bar{b}}/dy using the cross section dσcc¯/dy=1.165mbd\sigma_{c\bar{c}}/dy=1.165~{}{\rm mb} [42] and dσbb¯/dy=39.3μbd\sigma_{b\bar{b}}/dy=39.3~{}{\rm\mu b} [8, 43] in s=5.02\sqrt{s}=5.02 TeV pppp collisions at mid-rapidity and the thickness functions (TAA\langle T_{\rm AA}\rangle) for different centralities [44]. We have also applied 10-20% reduction to cc quark multiplicity because of nuclear shadowing effect [33, 45]. For the input open cc- and bb-hadron spectrum, we use the listings by the particle data group (PDG) [5], augmented by additional states that have been predicted by relativistic quark models (RQM) [46, 47] but not yet measured. The RQM predictions in particular feature many additional cc and bb baryons that are “missing” in the current PDG listings [47]. The inclusion of these “missing” states has proved pivotal for the successful reproduction of cc and bb baryon-to-meson ratios in pppp collisions via SHM calculations [8, 38, 48] that demonstrate significant enhancements relative to e+ee^{+}e^{-} collisions. For BcB_{c} mesons, we have included all 14 states below the open BDBD threshold [4]. The fireball volume is obtained by scaling the one VΔy=1=4997fm3V_{\Delta y=1}=4997~{}{\rm fm^{3}} determined from SHM for light hadrons in the most central 0-10% centrality [36] to other centralities using the measured charged-particle multiplicities [49]. Finally, the hadronization temperature is taken to be TH=170T_{H}=170 TeV, which is higher than the pseudocritical chiral transition temperature (Tχ155T_{\chi}\sim 155 MeV [50, 51]) but seems more appropriate for the hadronization (confinement) transition of heavy hadrons [8, 48, 52, 53]. We’ve also checked that lowering down the hadronization temperature by 10\sim 10 MeV does not cause significant change for the bb-hadron production fractions [8].

The computed cc and bb fugacities for different centralities, alongside the corresponding fireball volumes and cc- and bb-quark multiplicities, are summarized in Table 1. The γc\gamma_{c} exhibits a mild decrease from central to semicentral collisions, which then turns into an increase toward peripheral collisions, similar to the system size dependence of γc\gamma_{c} found in [36]. In contrast, the γb\gamma_{b} increases monotonously from central to peripheral centrality bins. Once the primary multiplicities from statistical production are computed, the total production yields of ground state open bb hadrons and BcB_{c}^{-} mesons are obtained from the sum of the direct one and the feeddown contributions from excited states

Nαtot=Nα+jNj(jα),\displaystyle\langle N_{\alpha}^{\rm tot}\rangle=\langle N_{\alpha}\rangle+\sum_{j}\langle N_{j}\rangle\cdot\mathcal{B}(j\rightarrow\alpha), (7)

where the branching fractions \mathcal{B} for the strong decays of excited open bb hadrons have been estimated from a P03{}^{3}P_{0} model [8] and those for the strong or radiative decays of excited BcB_{c} mesons to the ground state BcB_{c}^{-} are all taken to be 100% [1]. The resulting yields per unit rapidity of ground state BB^{-}, BcB_{c}^{-} and other open bb mesons and baryons, alongside the production yield ratios of BcB_{c}^{-} to BB^{-} and to the total bb¯b\bar{b} multiplicity (i.e. BcB_{c}^{-}’s production fraction fcf_{c}) in different centralities, are displayed in Table 2. While the production ratios between open bb hadrons (e.g., Λb0/B0.5\Lambda_{b}^{0}/B^{-}\sim 0.5) previously computed from grand-canonical SHM [8] are well reproduced (all open bb hadrons containing a single bb-quark suffer from the common canonical suppression not affecting their ratios), the Bc/BB_{c}^{-}/B^{-} reaches 0.043\sim 0.043 in central Pb-Pb collisions, amounting to a factor of 5\sim 5 enhancement with respect to the value in pppp collisions (cf. Sec. 2). Accordingly the BcB_{c}^{-}’s production fraction fc0.013f_{c}\sim 0.013 in central collisions also represents a significant enhancement of the similar magnitude relative to pppp collisions, which is the prominent consequence of recombination production (implemented in a statistical fashion here) of BcB_{c} mesons from abundant and highly thermalized cc and bb quarks in the QGP.

We also note that, while in central and semicentral collisions the exact conservation of cc number does not add to the canonical suppression for the production of BcB_{c} mesons, strict conservation of cc number becomes important toward peripheral (especially 60-80%) collisions where the dNcc¯/dydN_{c\bar{c}}/dy reduces to the order of unity (canonical limit). We’ve numerical checked that, should only the bb number conservation be implemented in the statistical partition function (cf. Eq. (3)), the BcB_{c}^{-} yield in the 60-80% centrality would be 70%\sim 70\% greater than the one shown in Table 2. This mechanism of canonical suppression owing to strict conservation of the cc number largely explains the decrease of BcB_{c}^{-}’s production fraction toward peripheral collisions as indicated in Table 2.

4 BcB_{c} pTp_{T} spectrum & nuclear modification factor in Pb-Pb collisions

We now convert the computed BcB_{c}^{-}’s statistical production yield into a pTp_{T} distribution. Our strategy is to distribute the SHM yield according to the shape of the pTp_{T} spectrum of BcB_{c}^{-} calculated from the resonance recombination [15, 33, 54] of realistically transported cc and bb quarks. As an illustration, we focus on the 20-40% centrality which is used as a proxy for the minimum bias (0-90%) Pb-Pb collisions for which the CMS analysis was performed [31].

While recombination as a hadronization mechanism for cc or bb quarks in the QGP dominates at low pTp_{T}, it yields to vacuum-like fragmentation at high pTp_{T} [8, 15]. It has been determined that more than 90% of bb quarks diffusing in the QGP in central and semicentral Pb-Pb collisions undergo recombination at hadronization [8]. Therefore, the absolute pTp_{T} differential yield for the BcB_{c}^{-}’s recombination component is obtained by normalizing the pTp_{T} spectrum of BcB_{c}^{-} calculated from the resonance recombination of cc and bb quarks to its SHM yield corrected for the bb-quark integrated recombination probability which is 92%\sim 92\% for the 20-40% centrality [8]. The resonance recombination model (RRM) [15, 33, 54] adopted here conserves 4-momentum and satisfies correct equilibrium limit [15]. The momentum distribution given by RRM for the recombination BcB_{c}^{-} reads

fBc(x,p)\displaystyle f_{B_{c}}(\vec{x},\vec{p}) =CBcEBc(p)mBcΓBcd3p1d3p2(2π)3fb(x,p1)fc¯(x,p2)\displaystyle=C_{B_{c}}\frac{E_{B_{c}}(\vec{p})}{m_{B_{c}}\Gamma_{B_{c}}}\int\frac{d^{3}\vec{p}_{1}d^{3}\vec{p}_{2}}{(2\pi)^{3}}f_{b}(\vec{x},\vec{p}_{1})f_{\bar{c}}(\vec{x},\vec{p}_{2})
×σBc(s)vrel(p1,p2)δ3(pp1p2)\displaystyle\times\sigma_{B_{c}}(s)v_{\rm rel}(\vec{p}_{1},\vec{p}_{2})\delta^{3}(\vec{p}-\vec{p}_{1}-\vec{p}_{2})\, (8)

where fbf_{b} and fc¯f_{\bar{c}} are the transported phase space distributions of bb and c¯\bar{c} quarks, and vrelv_{\rm rel} is their relative velocity. In the current 212\rightarrow 1 formulation, recombination proceeds via a resonance cross section σBc(s)\sigma_{B_{c}}(s) for b+c¯Bcb+\bar{c}\rightarrow B_{c}^{-}, taken to be of the Breit-Wigner form with the vacuum BcB_{c}^{-} mass and a width ΓBc100\Gamma_{B_{c}}\simeq 100 MeV (variations by a factor of 2\sim 2 have practically no effect on the shape of the BcB_{c}^{-}’s pTp_{T} spectrum), while the CBcC_{B_{c}} ensures normalization to the statistical production yield. The phase space distributions fbf_{b} and fc¯f_{\bar{c}} are constructed on the hadronization hypersurface from Langevin simulations of bb- and cc-quark diffusion in the QGP down to TH=170T_{H}=170 MeV and have been constrained by open bb and cc hadrons’ observables [8, 15]. Since the RRM has been carried out here with the full quark phase space distributions, space-momentum correlations between bb and c¯\bar{c} quarks built up from Langevin simulations have been incorporated, which help produce a significantly harder meson spectrum compared to recombination only in the momentum space [15, 33].

The high pTp_{T} BcB_{c} mesons are dominantly produced from fragmentation of bb quarks (the fragmentation probabilities for c¯Bc\bar{c}\rightarrow B_{c}^{-} is two orders of magnitude smaller than those for bBcb\rightarrow B_{c}^{-} [55]). To calculate the absolute pTp_{T} differential yield for the BcB_{c}^{-}’s fragmentation component, we take the fragmenting bb-quark spectrum after Langevin diffusion (i.e., the bb quarks left over from recombination, whose integrated number accounts for 8%\sim 8\% of total bb quarks [8]), and simulate its fragmentation into BcB_{c}^{-} using the fragmentation function [55]

DbBc(z)=Nrz(1z)2[1(1r)z]6[618(12r)z\displaystyle D_{b\to B_{c}^{-}}(z)=N\frac{rz(1-z)^{2}}{[1-(1-r)z]^{6}}[6-18(1-2r)z
+(2174r+68r2)z22(1r)(619r+18r2)z3\displaystyle+(21-74r+68r^{2})z^{2}-2(1-r)(6-19r+18r^{2})z^{3}
+3(1r)2(12r+2r2)z4],\displaystyle+3(1-r)^{2}(1-2r+2r^{2})z^{4}], (9)

where z=pT/ptz=p_{T}/p_{t} is the fraction of BcB_{c}^{-}’s pTp_{T} relative to the parent bb-quark’s transverse momentum ptp_{t}. In Eq. (4), the parameter rr controlling the slope of the resulting spectrum is tuned such that the latter resembles the BcB_{c}^{-}’s pTp_{T} spectrum in pppp collisions as much as possible especially at high pTp_{T}, while the normalization constant NN is tuned to ensure that the resulting BcB_{c}^{-}’s integrated yield should account for the same fraction (fc=0.00258±0.00062f_{c}=0.00258\pm 0.00062, cf. Sec. 2) of the total fragmenting bb quarks as in pppp collisions.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: (a) The absolute pTp_{T} differential yield for the recombination (green) and fragmentation (cyan) components of BcB_{c}^{-}, alongside those for the total BcB_{c}^{-} (red) and BB^{-} (quoted from [8], blue) in the 20-40% centrality of sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02 TeV Pb-Pb collisions. (b) Bc/BB_{c}^{-}/B^{-} as a function of pTp_{T} in Pb-Pb (red) and pppp ([6], blue) collisions. (c) The nuclear modification factor of BcB_{c}^{-} (red) and that of BB^{-} (quoted from [8], blue) in comparison with CMS data [40]. See text for the meaning of the widths of uncertainty bands.

The resulting pTp_{T} differential yield dN/dpTdydN/dp_{T}dy for the recombination and fragmentation components, alongside their sum (i.e., the total one), are shown in Fig. 2(a). The widths of bands indicate uncertainties from the spread in fcf_{c} (or equivalently (BcJ/ψμν¯)\mathcal{B}(B_{c}^{-}\rightarrow J/\psi\mu^{-}\bar{\nu}), cf. Sec. 2) in pppp collisions (for the fragmentation component) or from the 10-20% reduction of cc-quark multiplicity due to the shadowing effect (for the recombination component, cf. Sec. 3). An immediate observation is that the momentum reach of BcB_{c}^{-}’s recombination extends to rather high pT18p_{T}\sim 18 GeV, beyond which the fragmentation takes over. In Fig. 2(a), we have also plotted the BB^{-}’s pTp_{T} differential yield for comparison which was previously computed from the bb-quark transport approach [8] and is reproduced here; the integrated BB^{-} yield agrees with the value shown in Table 2. The total pTp_{T} differential yields for BcB_{c}^{-} and BB^{-} shown in Fig. 2(a) are converted into their pTp_{T} dependent ratio Bc/BB_{c}^{-}/B^{-} which is shown in Fig. 2(b) and compared to its counterpart in pppp collisions [6] (cf. Sec. 2). The Bc/BB_{c}^{-}/B^{-} is enhanced by a factor of 5\sim 5 at low pTp_{T} relative to pppp collisions, but tends to the value in the latter at very high pTp_{T} within uncertainties. Accordingly, the BcB_{c}^{-}’s nuclear modification factor defined as

RAA(pT)=dNPbPb/dpTdyTAAdσpp/dpTdy\displaystyle R_{\rm AA}(p_{T})=\frac{dN^{\rm PbPb}/dp_{T}dy}{\langle T_{\rm AA}\rangle d\sigma^{pp}/dp_{T}dy} (10)

reaches the value of 5\sim 5-6 at pT<5p_{T}<5 GeV, in contrast to the BB^{-}’s RAAR_{\rm AA} (quoted from [8]) around unity in the same pTp_{T} range, as shown in Fig. 2(c). The enhancement of BcB_{c}^{-}’s production in Pb-Pb collisions as characterized by its RAAR_{\rm AA} above unity persists till pT10p_{T}\sim 10 GeV, at which the BB^{-}’s production is already suppressed by a factor of 2\sim 2 (RAA0.48R_{\rm AA}\simeq 0.48) relative to pppp collisions. The width of the band for BcB_{c}^{-}’s RAAR_{\rm AA} at low pTp_{T} indicates uncertainties due to shadowing of cc’s participating in the statistical recombination as well as the spread of the pppp reference spectrum, but is dominated by the latter. At high pTp_{T} where the fragmentation component dominates, the uncertainties from the spread in fcf_{c} (or (BcJ/ψμν¯)\mathcal{B}(B_{c}^{-}\rightarrow J/\psi\mu^{-}\bar{\nu})) in the numerator spectrum and the denominator reference cancel, making the band become narrower.

Same as for the pTp_{T} differential cross section of BcB_{c} mesons in pppp collisions (cf. Fig. 1(b)), the CMS data [31] for their pTp_{T} differential yield in minimum bias (0-90%) Pb-Pb collisions were presented for Bc+Bc+B_{c}^{-}+B_{c}^{+}, multiplied by the pertinent branching fractions of the two-step decay process Bc(J/ψμμ)μνB_{c}\rightarrow(J/\psi\rightarrow\mu\mu)\mu\nu and normalized by the thickness function, in two bins of the three-muons’ transverse momentum pTμμμp_{T}^{\mu\mu\mu}. To compare to the CMS data, the dN/dpTdydN/dp_{T}dy for BcB_{c}^{-} shown in Fig. 2(a) is first doubled, then multiplied by (BcJ/ψμν¯)=1.95%±0.46%\mathcal{B}(B_{c}^{-}\rightarrow J/\psi\mu^{-}\bar{\nu})=1.95\%\pm 0.46\% [6] and (J/ψμμ)=5.96%\mathcal{B}(J/\psi\rightarrow\mu\mu)=5.96\% [5], divided by the corresponding TAA\langle T_{\rm AA}\rangle [44], and re-plotted as a function of pTμμμ=0.85pTBcp_{T}^{\mu\mu\mu}=0.85\cdot p_{T}^{B_{c}} [31] (cf. Sec. 2) in Fig. 3(a). The two data points measured by CMS are fairly described within uncertainties. This normalized pTp_{T} differential yield is then divided by the pTp_{T} differential cross section in pppp collisions shown in Fig. 1(b) to obtain the BcB_{c}’s RAAR_{\rm AA} as a function of pTμμμp_{T}^{\mu\mu\mu}, which is shown in Fig. 3(b) and compared to the corresponding CMS data. While the data point in the lower pTp_{T} bin is fairly reproduced within theoretical and experimental uncertainties, the suppression indicated in the higher pTp_{T} bin is somewhat overestimated by our calculation.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 3: The BcB_{c}^{-}’s (a) normalized pTp_{T} differential yield and (b) nuclear modification factor as a function of three-muon’s transverse momentum pTμμμp_{T}^{\mu\mu\mu}, compared to CMS data [31]. The widths of the uncertainty bands have the same meaning as for Fig. 2.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: The BcB_{c}^{-}’s integrated nuclear modification factor in the full pTp_{T} range vs. in the 7<pT<137<p_{T}<13 GeV interval. The latter corresponds to 6<pTμμμ<116<p_{T}^{\mu\mu\mu}<11 GeV in CMS data [31].

Finally we calculate BcB_{c}’s integrated RAAR_{\rm AA} in the full pTp_{T} range and in the 7<pT<137<p_{T}<13 GeV interval (corresponding to 6<pTμμμ<116<p_{T}^{\mu\mu\mu}<11 GeV in the CMS data [31]) as a function of participant numbers. As shown in Fig. 4, the integrated RAAR_{\rm AA} in the full pTp_{T} range reaches 5\sim 5 in central and semicentral collisions but gradually drops off toward peripheral collisions, in line with the centrality dependence of BcB_{c}^{-}’s statistical production fraction shown in Table 2. The enhancement embodied in the calculated integrated RAAR_{\rm AA} in the higher pTp_{T} interval is much milder, amounting to a factor of 50%\sim 50\% in central collisions and vanishing in peripheral collisions, fully consistent with the CMS data points in two centrality bins within uncertainties.

5 Sumary

In this work, we have investigated the recombination production of BcB_{c} mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC energy using a statistical hadronization approach. By treating BcB_{c}^{-} as a member of the family of open bb hadrons that contain a single bb-quark and implementing the strict conservation of bb and cc numbers, we were able to make quantitative predictions for BcB_{c}^{-}’s production fraction relative to the total bb¯b{\bar{b}} multiplicity and its relative production to BB^{-} mesons in the presence of QGP, both demonstrating a factor of 5\sim 5 (3) enhancement in central (peripheral) Pb-Pb collisions with respect to pppp collisions. The statistical production yield of BcB_{c}^{-} mesons is converted into a pTp_{T} differential distribution according to the shape of BcB_{c}^{-}’s pTp_{T} spectrum computed from resonance recombination of realistically transported bb and c¯\bar{c} quarks in the QGP. This was supplemented with the fragmentation of high pTp_{T} bb quarks and enabled us to compute the pTp_{T} dependent nuclear modification factors for BcB_{c}^{-} mesons that reach \sim5-6 at low pTp_{T} in central collisions, with the reference spectrum carefully constructed from previously determined differential cross section of BB^{-} mesons and the experimentally measured Bc/BB_{c}^{-}/B^{-} ratio. Pertinent data measured by the CMS experiment, including BcB_{c}^{-}’s normalized pTp_{T} differential yield, nuclear modification factors in two pTp_{T} intervals in the minimum bias collisions and the integrated ones in two centrality bins, can all be fairly described in our approach within theoretical and experimental uncertainties. Our study provides strong support for the formation of BcB_{c} mesons through (statistical) recombination of abundant and highly thermalized cc and bb quarks in the deconfined QGP created in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC energy.

Acknowledgments: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant No.12075122.

References

  • [1] E. J. Eichten and C. Quigg, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994), 5845-5856.
  • [2] D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003), 014027.
  • [3] S. Godfrey, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004), 054017.
  • [4] E. J. Eichten and C. Quigg, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) no.5, 054025.
  • [5] R. L. Workman et al. [Particle Data Group], PTEP 2022 (2022), 083C01.
  • [6] R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) no.11, 112006.
  • [7] Y. S. Amhis et al. [HFLAV], Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) no.3, 226.
  • [8] M. He and R. Rapp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) no.1, 1.
  • [9] R. Rapp, P. B. Gossiaux, A. Andronic, R. Averbeck, S. Masciocchi, A. Beraudo, E. Bratkovskaya, P. Braun-Munzinger, S. Cao and A. Dainese, et al. Nucl. Phys. A 979 (2018), 21-86.
  • [10] X. Dong, Y. J. Lee and R. Rapp, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69 (2019), 417-445.
  • [11] X. Dong and V. Greco, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 104 (2019), 97-141.
  • [12] L. Apolinário, Y. J. Lee and M. Winn, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 127 (2022), 103990.
  • [13] M. He, H. van Hees and R. Rapp, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 130 (2023), 104020.
  • [14] M. Schroedter, R. L. Thews and J. Rafelski, Phys. Rev. C 62 (2000), 024905.
  • [15] M. He and R. Rapp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) no.4, 042301.
  • [16] M. He, R. J. Fries and R. Rapp, Phys. Lett. B 701 (2011), 445-450.
  • [17] S. Acharya et al. [ALICE], JHEP 01 (2022), 174.
  • [18] R. Rapp, D. Blaschke and P. Crochet, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 65 (2010), 209-266.
  • [19] P. Braun-Munzinger and J. Stachel, Landolt-Bornstein 23 (2010), 424.
  • [20] A. Rothkopf, Phys. Rept. 858 (2020), 1-117.
  • [21] E. Chapon, D. d’Enterria, B. Ducloue, M. G. Echevarria, P. B. Gossiaux, V. Kartvelishvili, T. Kasemets, J. P. Lansberg, R. McNulty and D. D. Price, et al. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 122 (2022), 103906.
  • [22] X. Yao, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36 (2021) no.20, 2130010.
  • [23] J. Zhao, K. Zhou, S. Chen and P. Zhuang, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 114 (2020), 103801.
  • [24] A. Andronic, P. B. Gossiaux, P. Petreczky, R. Rapp, M. Strickland, J. P. Blaizot, N. Brambilla, P. Braun-Munzinger, B. Chen and S. Delorme, et al. arXiv:2402.04366 [nucl-th].
  • [25] Y. Liu, C. Greiner and A. Kostyuk, Phys. Rev. C 87 (2013) no.1, 014910.
  • [26] J. Zhao and P. Zhuang, [arXiv:2209.13475 [hep-ph]].
  • [27] B. Wu, Z. Tang, M. He and R. Rapp, Phys. Rev. C 109 (2024) no.1, 014906.
  • [28] B. Chen, L. Wen and Y. Liu, Phys. Lett. B 834 (2022), 137448.
  • [29] S. Y. F. Liu and R. Rapp, Nucl. Phys. A 941 (2015), 179-187.
  • [30] A. Bazavov et al. [HotQCD], Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) no.7, 074504.
  • [31] A. Tumasyan et al. [CMS], Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) no.25, 252301.
  • [32] B. Wu and R. Rapp, [arXiv:2404.09881 [nucl-th]].
  • [33] M. He, B. Wu and R. Rapp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) no.16, 162301.
  • [34] P. Braun-Munzinger and J. Stachel, Phys. Lett. B 490 (2000), 196-202.
  • [35] A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich and J. Stachel, Nucl. Phys. A 789 (2007), 334-356.
  • [36] A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, M. K. Köhler, A. Mazeliauskas, K. Redlich, J. Stachel and V. Vislavicius, JHEP 07 (2021), 035.
  • [37] A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, H. Brunßen, J. Crkovská, J. Stachel, V. Vislavicius and M. Völkl, [arXiv:2308.14821 [hep-ph]].
  • [38] Y. Dai, S. Zhao and M. He, [arXiv:2402.03692 [hep-ph]].
  • [39] M. I. Gorenstein, A. P. Kostyuk, H. Stoecker and W. Greiner, Phys. Lett. B 509 (2001), 277-282.
  • [40] A. M. Sirunyan et al. [CMS], Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) no.15, 152301.
  • [41] F. Becattini, [arXiv:0901.3643 [hep-ph]].
  • [42] S. Acharya et al. [ALICE], Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) no.1, L011103.
  • [43] S. Acharya et al. [ALICE], JHEP 05 (2021), 220.
  • [44] [ALICE], ALICE-PUBLIC-2018-011.
  • [45] J. Adam et al. [ALICE], JHEP 06 (2015), 055.
  • [46] D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, Eur. Phys. J. C 66 (2010), 197-206.
  • [47] D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011), 014025.
  • [48] M. He and R. Rapp, Phys. Lett. B 795 (2019), 117-121.
  • [49] J. Adam et al. [ALICE], Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) no.22, 222302.
  • [50] S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg and K. K. Szabo, Phys. Lett. B 730 (2014), 99-104.
  • [51] A. Bazavov et al. [HotQCD], Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014), 094503.
  • [52] F. Becattini, P. Castorina, A. Milov and H. Satz, Eur. Phys. J. C 66 (2010), 377-386.
  • [53] R. Bellwied, S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz and C. Ratti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013), 202302.
  • [54] L. Ravagli and R. Rapp, Phys. Lett. B 655 (2007), 126-131.
  • [55] E. Braaten, K. M. Cheung and T. C. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) no.11, R5049.