This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Subaru High-zz Exploration of Low-Luminosity Quasars (SHELLQs). X. Discovery of 35 Quasars and Luminous Galaxies at 5.75.7\leq zz 7.0\leq 7.0

Yoshiki Matsuoka Research Center for Space and Cosmic Evolution, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8577, Japan. Kazushi Iwasawa ICREA and Institut de Ciències del Cosmos, Universitat de Barcelona, IEEC-UB, Martí i Franquès, 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain. Masafusa Onoue Max Planck Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, D-69117, Heidelberg, Germany Nobunari Kashikawa Department of Astronomy, School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. Department of Astronomical Science, Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. Michael A. Strauss Princeton University Observatory, Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Chien-Hsiu Lee National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA. Masatoshi Imanishi National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. Department of Astronomical Science, Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. Tohru Nagao Research Center for Space and Cosmic Evolution, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8577, Japan. Masayuki Akiyama Astronomical Institute, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai, 980-8578, Japan. Naoko Asami Seisa University, Hakone-machi, Kanagawa, 250-0631, Japan. James Bosch Princeton University Observatory, Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Hisanori Furusawa National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. Tomotsugu Goto Institute of Astronomy and Department of Physics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan. James E. Gunn Princeton University Observatory, Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Yuichi Harikane Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8582, Japan Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan Hiroyuki Ikeda National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. Takuma Izumi National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. Toshihiro Kawaguchi Department of Economics, Management and Information Science, Onomichi City University, Onomichi, Hiroshima 722-8506, Japan. Nanako Kato Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8577, Japan. Satoshi Kikuta National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. Department of Astronomical Science, Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. Kotaro Kohno Institute of Astronomy, The University of Tokyo, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan. Research Center for the Early Universe, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. Yutaka Komiyama National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. Department of Astronomical Science, Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. Shuhei Koyama Research Center for Space and Cosmic Evolution, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8577, Japan. Robert H. Lupton Princeton University Observatory, Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Takeo Minezaki Institute of Astronomy, The University of Tokyo, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan. Satoshi Miyazaki National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. Department of Astronomical Science, Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. Hitoshi Murayama Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, WPI, The University of Tokyo,Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan. Mana Niida Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8577, Japan. Atsushi J. Nishizawa Institute for Advanced Research, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan. Akatoki Noboriguchi Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8577, Japan. Masamune Oguri Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, WPI, The University of Tokyo,Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan. Research Center for the Early Universe, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. Yoshiaki Ono Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8582, Japan Masami Ouchi Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8582, Japan Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, WPI, The University of Tokyo,Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan. Paul A. Price Princeton University Observatory, Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Hiroaki Sameshima Institute of Astronomy, The University of Tokyo, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan. Andreas Schulze National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. John D. Silverman Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, WPI, The University of Tokyo,Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan. Naoshi Sugiyama Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, WPI, The University of Tokyo,Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan. Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan. Philip J. Tait Subaru Telescope, Hilo, HI 96720, USA. Masahiro Takada Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, WPI, The University of Tokyo,Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan. Tadafumi Takata National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. Department of Astronomical Science, Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. Masayuki Tanaka National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. Department of Astronomical Science, Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. Ji-Jia Tang Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan. Yoshiki Toba Department of Astronomy, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan. Yousuke Utsumi Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, CA 94025, USA. Shiang-Yu Wang Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan. Takuji Yamashita National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan.
Abstract

We report the discovery of 28 quasars and 7 luminous galaxies at 5.7z7.05.7\leq z\leq 7.0. This is the tenth in a series of papers from the Subaru High-zz Exploration of Low-Luminosity Quasars (SHELLQs) project, which exploits the deep multi-band imaging data produced by the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) Subaru Strategic Program survey. The total number of spectroscopically identified objects in SHELLQs has now grown to 93 high-zz quasars, 31 high-zz luminous galaxies, 16 [O III] emitters at z0.8z\sim 0.8, and 65 Galactic cool dwarfs (low-mass stars and brown dwarfs). These objects were found over 900 deg2, surveyed by HSC between 2014 March and 2018 January. The full quasar sample includes 18 objects with very strong and narrow Lyα\alpha emission, whose stacked spectrum is clearly different from that of other quasars or galaxies. While the stacked spectrum shows N V λ\lambda1240 emission and resembles that of lower-zz narrow-line quasars, the small Lyα\alpha width may suggest a significant contribution from the host galaxies. Thus these objects may be composites of quasars and star-forming galaxies.

dark ages, reionization, first stars — galaxies: active — galaxies: high-redshift — intergalactic medium — quasars: general — quasars: supermassive black holes

1 Introduction

Quasars in the high-zz universe111 Throughout this paper, “high-zz” denotes z>5.7z>5.7, where quasars are observed as ii-band dropouts in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) filter system (Fukugita et al., 1996). The term “XX-band dropouts” or “XX-dropouts” refers to objects which are much fainter (and often invisible) in the XX and bluer bands than in the redder bands. have been used as an unique probe into early cosmic history. The progress of cosmic reionization can be measured from H I absorption imprinted on the rest-frame ultraviolet (UV) spectrum of a high-zz quasar; this absorption is very sensitive to the neutral fraction of the foreground intergalactic medium (IGM; Gunn & Peterson, 1965; Fan et al., 2006a). The luminosity and mass functions of quasars reflect the seeding and growth mechanisms of supermassive black holes (SMBHs), which can be studied through comparison with theoretical models (e.g., Volonteri, 2012; Ferrara et al., 2014; Madau et al., 2014). Measurements of quasar host galaxies and surrounding environments tell us about the earliest mass assembly of galaxies, which may happen in the highest-density peaks of the underlying dark matter distribution (e.g., Goto et al., 2009; Decarli et al., 2017).

For the past several years, we have been carrying out a project to search for high-zz quasars, named “Subaru High-zz Exploration of Low-Luminosity Quasars (SHELLQs)”, with the Subaru 8.2-m telescope. Matsuoka et al. (2016, 2018a, 2018b, 2019) have already reported the discovery of 65 high-zz quasars, along with 24 high-zz luminous galaxies, 6 [O III] emitters at z0.8z\sim 0.8, and 43 Galactic cool dwarfs (low-mass stars and brown dwarfs). These objects include many low-luminosity quasars with redshifts up to z=7.07z=7.07, objects that have been difficult to find in past shallower surveys. Combined with samples of luminous quasars from the SDSS (Jiang et al., 2016) and the Canada-France High-zz Quasar Survey (Willott et al., 2010), the SHELLQs sample has allowed us to establish the quasar luminosity function (LF) at z=6z=6 over an unprecedented range of magnitude (22<M1450<30-22<M_{1450}<-30 mag; Matsuoka et al., 2018c). We found that the LF has a break at M145025M_{1450}\sim-25 mag and flattens significantly toward the faint end. With this LF shape, we predict that quasars are responsible for less than 10% of the ionizing photons that are necessary to keep the IGM fully ionized at z=6z=6.

We are also carrying out multi-wavelength follow-up observations of the discovered quasars. Near-infrared (IR) spectra were obtained for 6 quasars, which revealed that the SHELLQs quasars have a wide range of accretion properties, from sub-Eddington accretion onto a massive (MBH>109MM_{\rm BH}>10^{9}M_{\odot}) black hole to Eddington accretion onto a less massive (MBH<108MM_{\rm BH}<10^{8}M_{\odot}) black hole (Onoue et al., 2019). Atacama Large Millimeter / submillimeter Array (ALMA) observations were conducted toward 7 quasars, and we found that the host galaxies are forming stars at a rate below that of luminous quasar hosts (e.g., Decarli et al., 2018), and that the low-luminosity quasars are more or less on the local relation between black hole mass and host mass (Izumi et al., 2018, 2019). We are also exploiting archival Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer data to look for red quasars in the SHELLQs sample, which may represent a younger phase of evolution than normal quasars (N. Kato et al., in prep.).

This paper is the tenth in a series of SHELLQs publications, and reports spectroscopic identification of an additional 67 objects. The paper is structured as follows. We give brief descriptions of the data and methods used for candidate selection in §2. Spectroscopic follow-up observations are presented in §3. Results and discussion appear in §4. We adopt the cosmological parameters H0H_{0} = 70 km s-1 Mpc-1, ΩM\Omega_{\rm M} = 0.3, and ΩΛ\Omega_{\rm\Lambda} = 0.7. All magnitudes in the optical and near-IR bands are presented in the AB system (Oke & Gunn, 1983), and are corrected for Galactic extinction (Schlegel et al., 1998). We use the point spread function (PSF) magnitude (mABm_{\rm AB}) and the CModel magnitude (mCModel,ABm_{\rm CModel,AB}), which are measured by fitting the PSF models and two-component, PSF-convolved galaxy models to the source profile, respectively (Abazajian et al., 2004). In what follows, we refer to zz-band magnitudes with the AB subscript (“zABz_{\rm AB}”), while redshift zz appears without a subscript.

2 Photometric Candidate Selection

The SHELLQs project is based on the multi-band imaging data produced by the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) Subaru Strategic Program (SSP) survey (Aihara et al., 2018). HSC is a wide-field camera on Subaru (Miyazaki et al., 2018). It has a nearly circular field of view of 1.5 diameter, covered by 116 2K ×\times 4K Hamamatsu fully depleted CCDs. The pixel scale is 0″.17. The HSC-SSP survey has three layers with different combinations of area and depth. The Wide layer is observing 1400 deg2 mostly along the celestial equator, with 5σ\sigma point-source depths of (gABg_{\rm AB}, rABr_{\rm AB}, iABi_{\rm AB}, zABz_{\rm AB}, yABy_{\rm AB}) = (26.5, 26.1, 25.9, 25.1, 24.4) mag measured in 2″.0 aperture. The total exposure times range from 10 minutes in the gg- and rr-bands to 20 minutes in the ii-, zz-, and yy-bands, divided into individual exposures of \sim3 minutes each. The Deep and the UltraDeep layers are observing smaller areas (27 and 3.5 deg2) down to deeper limiting magnitudes (rABr_{\rm AB} = 27.1 and 27.7 mag, respectively). The survey data are reduced with the dedicated pipeline hscPipe (Bosch et al., 2018) derived from the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope software pipeline (Jurić et al., 2017).

The procedure of our quasar candidate selection has been described in the previous papers (Matsuoka et al., 2016, 2018a, 2018b), so here we repeat the essence only briefly. The selection starts from the HSC-SSP survey data in the three layers, over the area observed in the ii, zz, and yy bands for ii-dropout selection or in the zz and yy bands for zz-dropout selection. We include data that haven’t yet reached the planned full depth. All sources meeting the following criteria, and that are not flagged as having suspect detection or photometry, are selected:

(zAB<24.5andσz<0.155andiABzAB>1.5\displaystyle(z_{\rm AB}<24.5\ {\rm and}\ \sigma_{z}<0.155\ {\rm and}\ i_{\rm AB}-z_{\rm AB}>1.5
andzABzCModel,AB<0.15)\displaystyle{\rm and}\ z_{\rm AB}-z_{\rm CModel,AB}<0.15) (1)

or

(yAB<25.0andσy<0.217andzAByAB>0.8\displaystyle(y_{\rm AB}<25.0\ {\rm and}\ \sigma_{y}<0.217\ {\rm and}\ z_{\rm AB}-y_{\rm AB}>0.8
andyAByCModel,AB<0.15).\displaystyle{\rm and}\ y_{\rm AB}-y_{\rm CModel,AB}<0.15). (2)

Equations (1) and (2) select ii-dropout and zz-dropout candidates, respectively. Here (σi\sigma_{i}, σz\sigma_{z}, σy\sigma_{y}) refer to the errors of the PSF magnitudes (iABi_{\rm AB}, zABz_{\rm AB}, yABy_{\rm AB}), as measured by hscPipe. The yy-band limiting magnitude in Equation (2) is deeper than the limit used in our previous papers (yAB<24.0y_{\rm AB}<24.0), as we are shifting our focus to establishing the quasar LF at z7z\sim 7. The difference between the PSF and CModel magnitudes (mABmCModel,ABm_{\rm AB}-m_{\rm CModel,AB}) is used to exclude extended sources. Sources with more than 3σ3\sigma detection in the gg or rr band (if these bands are available) are removed as likely low-zz interlopers. We also remove those sources whose images appear to be moving objects, transients, or artifacts, spotted by automatic or eye inspection (see Matsuoka et al., 2016). We always keep ambiguous cases in our sample for spectroscopic follow-up, so that we do not discard any real quasars in the selection.

The candidates selected from the HSC data are matched, within 1″.0 separation, to the public near-IR catalogs from the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS; Lawrence et al., 2007) data release (DR) 10 and 11, the Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA) Kilo-degree Infrared Galaxy survey (VIKING) DR 4 and 5, and the VISTA Deep Extragalactic Observations Survey (Jarvis et al., 2013) DR 5. In practice, only a small fraction of the final quasar candidates have near-IR photometry, due to limited sky coverage and/or depth of the above surveys. Using all available magnitudes in the ii, zz, yy, JJ, HH, and KK bands, we calculate the Bayesian quasar probability (PQBP_{\rm Q}^{\rm B}) for each candidate. The calculation is based on models of spectral energy distributions and surface densities of high-zz quasars and contaminating brown dwarfs, as a function of magnitude; galaxy models are not included in the algorithm at present (see Matsuoka et al., 2016). We keep those sources with PQB>0.1P_{\rm Q}^{\rm B}>0.1 in the sample of candidates, while removing sources with lower quasar probabilities.

We used the latest HSC-SSP (internal) DR, which includes observations carried out between 2014 March and 2018 January. The data cover roughly 900 deg2, when we limit to the fields where at least (1, 2, 2) exposures were taken in the (ii, zz, yy) bands for ii-dropout selection, or at least (1, 2) exposures were taken in the (zz, yy) bands for zz-dropout selection. We found \sim500 final candidates over this area, and put highest priority on (i) all the zz-dropouts and (ii) the ii-band dropouts with iABzAB>2.0i_{\rm AB}-z_{\rm AB}>2.0, zAB<z_{\rm AB}< 24.0 mag, and yy-band detection. We have almost completed follow-up spectroscopy of these \sim200 high-priority candidates, as reported in the past and present papers, and continue to observe the remaining low-priority candidates.

3 Spectroscopy

We carried out follow-up spectroscopy of 67 candidates from 2018 March through 2019 July, using the Optical System for Imaging and low-intermediate-Resolution Integrated Spectroscopy (OSIRIS; Cepa et al., 2000) mounted on the 10.4-m Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC), and the Faint Object Camera and Spectrograph (FOCAS; Kashikawa et al., 2002) mounted on Subaru. We prioritized observations in such a way that the targets with brighter magnitudes and higher PQBP_{\rm Q}^{\rm B} were observed at earlier opportunities. Table 1 is a journal of the spectroscopic observations.

GTC is a 10.4-m telescope located at the Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos in La Palma, Spain. We used OSIRIS with the R2500I grism and 1″.0-wide longslit, which provides spectral coverage from λobs\lambda_{\rm obs} = 0.74 to 1.0 μ\mum with a resolution R1500R\sim 1500. The observations (Program IDs: GTC3-18A, GTC8-18B, and GTC32-19A) were carried out in queue mode on dark and gray nights, under spectroscopic sky conditions and with seeing 0″.6 – 1″.3.

The Subaru observations were carried out as part of two Subaru Intensive Programs (Program IDs: S16B-071I and S18B-011I). We used FOCAS in the multi-object spectrograph (MOS) mode with the VPH900 grism and SO58 order-sorting filter. The widths of the slitlets were set to 1″.0. This configuration provides spectral coverage from λobs\lambda_{\rm obs} = 0.75 to 1.05 μ\mum with a resolution R1200R\sim 1200. All the observations were carried out on gray nights, which were occasionally affected by cirrus, with seeing 0″.4 – 1″.0.

All the data obtained with GTC and Subaru were reduced using the Image Reduction and Analysis Facility (IRAF). Bias correction, flat fielding with dome flats, sky subtraction, and 1d extraction were performed in the standard way. The wavelength was calibrated with reference to sky emission lines. The flux calibration was tied to white dwarfs (Feige 34, Feige 110, G191-B2B, GD 153, Ross 640) or a B-type standard star (HILT 600), observed as standard stars within a few days of the target observations. We corrected for slit losses by scaling the spectra to match the HSC magnitudes in the zz and yy bands for the ii- and zz-band dropouts, respectively.

\startlongtable
Table 1: Journal of Discovery Spectroscopy
Object iABi_{\rm AB} zABz_{\rm AB} yABy_{\rm AB} PQBP_{\rm Q}^{\rm B} texpt_{\rm exp} Date (Inst)
(mag) (mag) (mag) (min)
Quasars
J235646.33+001747.3J235646.33+001747.3 >>26.51 27.20 ±\pm 1.07 22.94 ±\pm 0.05 1.000 120 2018 Nov 7, 8 (O)
J160953.03+532821.0J160953.03+532821.0 >>26.89 >>26.317 24.15 ±\pm 0.09 1.000 180 2019 Jul 4, 24 (O)
J011257.84+011042.4J011257.84+011042.4 >>25.20 >>24.27 23.04 ±\pm 0.06 0.222 180 2018 Nov 8, 30 (O)
J161207.12+555919.2J161207.12+555919.2 >>27.21 >>26.38 24.09 ±\pm 0.07 1.000 180 2019 Jun 25 (O)
J134400.87+012827.8J134400.87+012827.8 26.85 ±\pm 0.44 >>25.25 22.89 ±\pm 0.07 1.000 30 2018 Apr 24 (F)
J000142.54+000057.5J000142.54+000057.5 27.21 ±\pm 0.49 26.56 ±\pm 0.73 22.59 ±\pm 0.03 1.000 45 2018 Oct 13 (O)
J123137.77+005230.3J123137.77+005230.3 27.29 ±\pm 0.42 25.96 ±\pm 0.26 22.76 ±\pm 0.05 1.000 30 2018 Apr 24 (F)
J135012.04002705.2J135012.04-002705.2 26.71 ±\pm 0.29 23.33 ±\pm 0.03 22.89 ±\pm 0.05 1.000 60 2018 Mar 17 (O)
J084456.62+022640.5J084456.62+022640.5 27.75 ±\pm 0.98 23.83 ±\pm 0.06 25.42 ±\pm 0.33 1.000 30 2019 May 11 (F)
J113753.64+004509.7J113753.64+004509.7 26.89 ±\pm 0.42 23.42 ±\pm 0.03 22.30 ±\pm 0.03 0.899 60 2018 Mar 11 (O)
J152555.79+430324.0J152555.79+430324.0 26.53 ±\pm 0.20 23.34 ±\pm 0.03 23.48 ±\pm 0.09 1.000 60 2018 Mar 13 (O)
J151248.71+442217.5J151248.71+442217.5 26.15 ±\pm 0.23 24.63 ±\pm 0.14 24.16 ±\pm 0.17 0.000 30 2018 Apr 24 (F)
J225520.78+050343.3J225520.78+050343.3 26.26 ±\pm 0.39 22.31 ±\pm 0.02 22.40 ±\pm 0.04 1.000 30 2018 Aug 3 (O)
J134733.69015750.6J134733.69-015750.6 25.12 ±\pm 0.10 21.65 ±\pm 0.01 22.12 ±\pm 0.03 1.000 15 2019 Apr 24 (F)
J144823.33+433305.9J144823.33+433305.9 >>24.22 22.33 ±\pm 0.03 22.46 ±\pm 0.04 1.000 30 2018 Aug 11 (O)
J000133.30+000605.4J000133.30+000605.4 26.94 ±\pm 0.34 23.68 ±\pm 0.05 23.57 ±\pm 0.07 1.000 120 2019 Jul 1, 4 (O)
J151657.87+422852.9J151657.87+422852.9 25.85 ±\pm 0.16 22.47 ±\pm 0.01 22.46 ±\pm 0.03 1.000 50 2018 Apr 25 (F)
J125437.08001410.7J125437.08-001410.7 >>25.45 23.89 ±\pm 0.07 25.45 ±\pm 0.75 1.000 30 2019 May 11 (F)
J000445.81004944.3J000445.81-004944.3 25.53 ±\pm 0.12 22.54 ±\pm 0.02 22.81 ±\pm 0.05 1.000 30 2018 Aug 3 (O)
J093543.32011033.3J093543.32-011033.3 26.79 ±\pm 0.33 23.50 ±\pm 0.04 24.79 ±\pm 0.30 1.000 30 2019 May 10 (F)
J010603.68003015.2J010603.68-003015.2 25.89 ±\pm 0.43 22.83 ±\pm 0.04 23.14 ±\pm 0.06 1.000 45 2018 Aug 9 (O)
J142611.33012822.8J142611.33-012822.8 27.38 ±\pm 0.75 23.70 ±\pm 0.06 23.56 ±\pm 0.15 1.000 120 2019 Apr 9 (O)
J121049.13+013426.7J121049.13+013426.7 25.95 ±\pm 0.26 23.90 ±\pm 0.07 23.95 ±\pm 0.24 0.900 30 2019 May 10 (F)
J093000.85+005738.4J093000.85+005738.4 23.51 ±\pm 0.02 21.72 ±\pm 0.01 21.62 ±\pm 0.02 1.000 15 2019 Mar 8 (O)
J161819.77+552654.0J161819.77+552654.0 24.14 ±\pm 0.02 22.43 ±\pm 0.01 22.41 ±\pm 0.02 1.000 40 2018 Apr 25 (F)
J142307.21022519.0J142307.21-022519.0 24.28 ±\pm 0.10 22.49 ±\pm 0.05 22.85 ±\pm 0.22 1.000 15 2018 Aug 11 (O)
J023858.09031845.4J023858.09-031845.4 24.17 ±\pm 0.08 22.64 ±\pm 0.04 22.53 ±\pm 0.08 1.000 30 2018 Sep 3 (O)
J113218.15+003800.1J113218.15+003800.1 25.90 ±\pm 0.29 23.66 ±\pm 0.08 23.73 ±\pm 0.11 1.000 100 2019 Apr 24 (F)
Galaxies
J135348.55001026.5J135348.55-001026.5 27.25 ±\pm 0.44 23.33 ±\pm 0.03 22.65 ±\pm 0.03 1.000 60 2018 Mar 11 (O)
J144216.08+423632.5J144216.08+423632.5 26.14 ±\pm 0.30 23.91 ±\pm 0.07 23.63 ±\pm 0.11 0.232 30 2019 May 10 (F)
J092117.65+030521.5J092117.65+030521.5 26.69 ±\pm 0.26 24.05 ±\pm 0.06 23.84 ±\pm 0.14 1.000 30 2019 May 11 (F)
J115755.51001356.2J115755.51-001356.2 26.53 ±\pm 0.23 23.91 ±\pm 0.05 23.80 ±\pm 0.09 1.000 40 2019 Apr 26 (F)
J123841.97011738.8J123841.97-011738.8 24.99 ±\pm 0.14 23.46 ±\pm 0.03 23.56 ±\pm 0.08 1.000 30 2019 Apr 24 (F)
J162657.22+431133.0J162657.22+431133.0 26.24 ±\pm 0.14 24.02 ±\pm 0.07 24.30 ±\pm 0.16 1.000 50 2019 May 10 (F)
J020649.98020618.2J020649.98-020618.2 25.05 ±\pm 0.13 23.20 ±\pm 0.03 23.11 ±\pm 0.06 1.000 60 2018 Sep 8 (O)
[O III] Emitters
J090017.67014655.6J090017.67-014655.6 24.93 ±\pm 0.09 23.30 ±\pm 0.04 23.61 ±\pm 0.14 1.000 60 2019 Mar 13 (O)
J015519.63005814.7J015519.63-005814.7 >>22.80 23.50 ±\pm 0.07 23.56 ±\pm 0.08 0.907 120 2018 Nov 3 (O)
J144221.95013258.0J144221.95-013258.0 26.06 ±\pm 0.20 23.98 ±\pm 0.07 24.86 ±\pm 0.25 1.000 10 2019 May 10 (F)
J115946.07+014023.7J115946.07+014023.7 22.69 ±\pm 0.01 21.14 ±\pm 0.01 22.94 ±\pm 0.06 1.000 15 2019 Jun 9 (O)
J141332.93+014350.4J141332.93+014350.4 25.79 ±\pm 0.17 23.65 ±\pm 0.08 >>24.39 1.000 10 2019 May 10 (F)
J094209.69020302.1J094209.69-020302.1 23.57 ±\pm 0.02 21.91 ±\pm 0.02 23.34 ±\pm 0.12 1.000 15 2019 Mar 8 (O)
J225124.84010911.0J225124.84-010911.0 24.32 ±\pm 0.05 22.69 ±\pm 0.03 24.53 ±\pm 0.19 1.000 42 2018 Sep 1 (O)
J093831.54002523.4J093831.54-002523.4 25.98 ±\pm 0.15 23.67 ±\pm 0.05 26.12 ±\pm 1.00 1.000 10 2019 May 10 (F)
J135049.56+013726.6J135049.56+013726.6 25.94 ±\pm 0.21 23.94 ±\pm 0.06 >>24.08 1.000 10 2019 May 10 (F)
J150602.11+415317.5J150602.11+415317.5 23.54 ±\pm 0.03 21.82 ±\pm 0.01 24.11 ±\pm 0.22 1.000 20 2018 Sep 1 (O)
Cool Dwarfs
J011152.80+013211.4J011152.80+013211.4 25.86 ±\pm 0.43 23.54 ±\pm 0.14 23.67 ±\pm 0.08 0.218 120 2018 Oct 13, 15 (O)
J015548.62061737.9J015548.62-061737.9 24.66 ±\pm 0.16 23.12 ±\pm 0.05 23.01 ±\pm 0.10 0.242 60 2018 Sep 8 (O)
J020421.81024421.1J020421.81-024421.1 23.07 ±\pm 0.02 20.21 ±\pm 0.01 19.19 ±\pm 0.01 1.000 20 2018 Sep 1 (O)
J022144.40053008.6J022144.40-053008.6 25.94 ±\pm 0.15 22.93 ±\pm 0.02 21.86 ±\pm 0.02 0.410 60 2018 Nov 9 (O)
J085230.35+025410.0J085230.35+025410.0 >>25.31 24.00 ±\pm 0.07 23.86 ±\pm 0.13 0.996 50 2019 Apr 25 (F)
J085818.99+040927.6J085818.99+040927.6 >>25.50 23.54 ±\pm 0.05 22.85 ±\pm 0.08 0.929 120 2018 Nov 3 (O)
J124505.57+010550.2J124505.57+010550.2  \cdots 22.05 ±\pm 0.02 21.20 ±\pm 0.01  \cdots 20 2018 Apr 25 (F)
J135913.21+002740.0J135913.21+002740.0 26.75 ±\pm 0.30 24.04 ±\pm 0.06 22.16 ±\pm 0.02 0.000 40 2019 Apr 25 (F)
J142531.82021606.5J142531.82-021606.5 26.68 ±\pm 0.62 23.50 ±\pm 0.08 22.90 ±\pm 0.17 0.000 120 2019 Apr 9 (O)
J145853.06+015031.8J145853.06+015031.8 24.05 ±\pm 0.03 21.42 ±\pm 0.02 20.40 ±\pm 0.01 0.000 15 2018 Aug 10 (O)
J151812.04+440829.0J151812.04+440829.0 26.30 ±\pm 0.20 23.38 ±\pm 0.02 22.30 ±\pm 0.02 0.062 60 2018 Mar 11 (O)
J153032.76+435615.5J153032.76+435615.5 25.27 ±\pm 0.07 22.49 ±\pm 0.01 21.55 ±\pm 0.01 0.998 30 2018 Aug 11 (O)
J154605.67+425306.1J154605.67+425306.1 28.07 ±\pm 0.83 24.94 ±\pm 0.13 22.64 ±\pm 0.05 0.790 100 2019 Apr 24 (F)
J161042.47+554203.4J161042.47+554203.4 26.88 ±\pm 0.17 24.68 ±\pm 0.05 23.61 ±\pm 0.05 1.000 141 2019 Jun 26 (O)
J164226.30+430749.7J164226.30+430749.7 25.00 ±\pm 0.12 23.35 ±\pm 0.05 23.48 ±\pm 0.20 0.936 66 2019 Mar 8 (O)
J223827.66+053246.5J223827.66+053246.5 24.82 ±\pm 0.13 23.13 ±\pm 0.04 23.08 ±\pm 0.07 1.000 60 2018 Sep 2 (O)
J224157.52+055912.6J224157.52+055912.6 24.52 ±\pm 0.09 22.88 ±\pm 0.04 23.06 ±\pm 0.08 1.000 30 2018 Aug 3 (O)
J225132.39011601.1J225132.39-011601.1 24.46 ±\pm 0.08 22.75 ±\pm 0.07 22.91 ±\pm 0.06 0.994 30 2018 Aug 3 (O)
J225337.55+051440.1J225337.55+051440.1 >>25.32 23.52 ±\pm 0.05 22.77 ±\pm 0.06 0.152 60 2018 Sep 5 (O)
J225513.58+044226.8J225513.58+044226.8  \cdots 22.59 ±\pm 0.03 21.92 ±\pm 0.05  \cdots 30 2018 Aug 3 (O)
J230811.42+023931.3J230811.42+023931.3 24.12 ±\pm 0.05 22.40 ±\pm 0.02 22.08 ±\pm 0.06 0.998 15 2018 Aug 3 (O)
J231344.68003931.3J231344.68-003931.3 24.85 ±\pm 0.06 23.17 ±\pm 0.03 22.94 ±\pm 0.07 1.000 60 2018 Sep 1 (O)

Note. — Coordinates are at J2000.0, and magnitude upper limits are placed at 5σ5\sigma significance. We took magnitudes from the latest HSC-SSP DR, and recalculated PQBP_{\rm Q}^{\rm B} for objects selected from older DRs; this is why a few objects have PQB<0.1P_{\rm Q}^{\rm B}<0.1. No ii-band images are available at the positions of J124505.57+010550.2J124505.57+010550.2 and J225513.58+044226.8J225513.58+044226.8 in the latest DR, due to quality issues, and thus iABi_{\rm AB} and PQBP_{\rm Q}^{\rm B} are not available for these sources. The instrument (Inst) “O” and “F” denote GTC/OSIRIS and Subaru/FOCAS, respectively.

Table 2: Objects detected in the near-IR bands
Name JABJ_{\rm AB} HABH_{\rm AB} KABK_{\rm AB} Survey
(mag) (mag) (mag)
Quasars
J113753.64+004509.7J113753.64+004509.7 21.51 ±\pm 0.20 21.67 ±\pm 0.36  \cdots VIKING
J161819.77+552654.0J161819.77+552654.0 22.45±0.1022.45\pm 0.10  \cdots 21.82±0.0921.82\pm 0.09 UKIDSS (Deep Extragalactic Survey)
J142307.21022519.0J142307.21-022519.0 22.17 ±\pm 0.27  \cdots  \cdots VIKING
Galaxies
J135348.55001026.5J135348.55-001026.5 22.15 ±\pm 0.26  \cdots 20.78 ±\pm 0.16 VIKING
Cool Dwarfs
J142531.82021606.5J142531.82-021606.5 21.54 ±\pm 0.15 20.84 ±\pm 0.16 20.46 ±\pm 0.12 VIKING
J161042.47+554203.4J161042.47+554203.4 23.14 ±\pm 0.19  \cdots 23.25 ±\pm 0.32 UKIDSS (Deep Extragalactic Survey)
J230811.42+023931.3J230811.42+023931.3  \cdots 20.74 ±\pm 0.26  \cdots UKIDSS (Large Area Survey)

4 Results and Discussion

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Discovery spectra of the first set of 11 quasars, displayed in decreasing order of redshift. The object name and the estimated redshift (and the designation “NL” for the possible quasars with narrow Lyα\alpha emission) are indicated at the top left corner of each panel. The blue dotted lines mark the expected positions of the Lyα\alpha and N V λ\lambda1240 emission lines, given the redshifts. The spectra were smoothed using inverse-variance weighted means over 1 – 9 pixels (depending on the signal-to-noise ratio [S/N]), for display purposes. The bottom panel displays a sky spectrum, as a guide to the expected noise.
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Same as Figure 1, but for the second set of 11 quasars.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Same as Figure 1, but for the last set of 6 quasars.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Same as Figure 1, but for the 7 high-zz galaxies. The expected positions of the interstellar absorption lines of Si II λ\lambda1260, Si II λ\lambda1304, and C II λ\lambda1335 are marked by the red dotted lines.
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Same as Figure 1, but for the 10 [O III] emitters at z0.8z\sim 0.8. The expected positions of Hγ\gamma, Hβ\beta, and two [O III] lines (λ\lambda4959 and λ\lambda5007) are marked by the dotted lines.
Refer to caption
Figure 6: Same as Figure 1, but for the first set of 11 cool dwarfs. The red lines represent the best-fit templates, whose spectral types are indicated at the top left corner of each panel. The small-scale (<<100 Å) features seen in the spectra are due to noise in most cases, given the limited S/N.
Refer to caption
Figure 7: Same as Figure 6, but for the second set of 11 cool dwarfs.

We present the reduced spectra in Figures 17. Based on these spectra, we identified 28 high-zz quasars, 7 high-zz galaxies, 10 strong [O III] emitters at z0.8z\sim 0.8, and 22 cool dwarfs, as detailed below. The photometric properties of the observed candidates are listed in Table 1. Table 2 lists the objects detected in the near-IR bands.

Figures 13 present 28 new quasars we identified at 5.7z7.05.7\leq z\leq 7.0. Their spectroscopic properties are presented in the first section of Table 3. The seven quasars at z>6.6z>6.6 are observed as zz-dropouts on the HSC images, while the other objects are ii-dropouts. The quasars have broad Lyα\alpha lines, blue rest-UV continua, and/or sharp continuum breaks just blueward of Lyα\alpha, the properties which are characteristic of high-zz quasars. Following the previous papers, we classified the objects with very luminous (L>1043L>10^{43} erg s-1) and narrow (full width at half maximum [FWHM] << 500 km s-1) Lyα\alpha emission as possible quasars (see the discussion below). These objects tend to be found at the faintest magnitudes of our selection (Matsuoka et al., 2018b), and have been missed in past shallower surveys.

Redshifts of the discovered quasars were determined from the Lyα\alpha lines, assuming that the observed line peaks correspond to the intrinsic Lyα\alpha wavelength (1216 Å in the rest frame). This assumption is not always correct, due to the strong H I absorption by the neutral IGM. More accurate redshifts require observations of other emission lines, such as Mg II λ\lambda2800 observed in the near-IR or [C II] 158 μ\mum accessible with ALMA. When there is no clear Lyα\alpha lines, we obtained rough estimates of redshift from the wavelengths of the onset of the Gunn & Peterson (1965) trough. Therefore the redshifts presented here are only approximate, with the uncertainties up to Δz0.1{\Delta}z\sim 0.1.

Absolute magnitudes (M1450M_{1450}) and Lyα\alpha line properties of the quasars were measured as follows. For every object, we defined a continuum window at wavelengths relatively free from strong sky emission lines, and extrapolated the measured continuum flux to estimate M1450M_{1450}. A power-law continuum model with a slope α=1.5\alpha=-1.5 (FλλαF_{\lambda}\propto\lambda^{\alpha}; e.g., Vanden Berk et al. (2001)) was assumed. Since the continuum windows fall in the range of λrest\lambda_{\rm rest} = 1220 – 1350 Å, which are close to λrest\lambda_{\rm rest} = 1450 Å, these measurements are not sensitive to the exact value of α\alpha. The Lyα\alpha properties (luminosity, FWHM, and rest-frame equivalent width [EW]) of a quasar with relatively weak continuum emission, such as J084456.62+022640.5J084456.62+022640.5, was measured with a local continuum defined on the red side of Lyα\alpha. For the remaining objects with strong continuum, we measured the properties of the broad Lyα\alpha + N V λ\lambda1240 complex, with a local continuum defined by the above power-law model. The resultant line properties are summarized in Table 3.

J235646.33+001747.3J235646.33+001747.3 has a Lyα\alpha line peak at 9740 Å, which corresponds to a redshift z=7.01z=7.01. But this redshift may be an overestimate, as the intrinsic Lyα\alpha peak may be at a shorter wavelength and absorbed by the IGM. The flux spike at \sim9800 Å in the J011257.84+011042.4J011257.84+011042.4 spectrum is likely due to residual of a strong sky emission line. J151248.71+442217.5J151248.71+442217.5 has a relatively red continuum, and indeed the HSC magnitudes from the latest DR (iz=1.5i-z=1.5 and zy=0.5z-y=0.5) indicates a Bayesian quasar probability of PQB=0.000P_{\rm Q}^{\rm B}=0.000 (see Table 1); this object was selected from an older DR, which happened to give a higher PQBP_{\rm Q}^{\rm B}.

Only three quasars are detected in the near-IR bands (see Table 2) and, interestingly, two of them (J113753.64+004509.7J113753.64+004509.7 and J142307.21022519.0J142307.21-022519.0) apparently lack strong Lyα\alpha in emission. We re-examined all the 75 broad-line quasars we discovered so far, and found that out of the eight quasars with near-IR detection, five are such weak-line quasars. This is significantly higher than the average fraction of weak-line quasars among all 75 quasars (\sim20 %; Y. Matsuoka et al., in prep.), or among more luminous quasars in the literature (\sim10 % Diamond-Stanic et al., 2009; Bañados et al., 2016). This may suggest a link between observed Lyα\alpha weakness and the continuum shape at longer wavelength. We defer further analysis of this topic to a future paper.

Figure 4 presents 7 high-zz objects with no or weak Lyα\alpha emission line, which are most likely galaxies at z6z\sim 6. Redshifts of these galaxies were estimated from the observed wavelengths of Lyα\alpha, the interstellar absorption lines of Si II λ\lambda1260, Si II λ\lambda1304, C II λ\lambda1335, and/or the onset of the Gunn & Peterson (1965) trough. Due to the limited S/N of the spectra, the estimated redshifts should be regarded as only approximate (Δz0.1{\Delta}z\lesssim 0.1). The absolute magnitudes and Lyα\alpha properties were measured in the same way as for quasars, except that we assumed a continuum slope of β=2.0\beta=-2.0 (FλλβF_{\lambda}\propto\lambda^{\beta}; Stanway et al., 2005).

Our quasar survey explores the luminosities where quasars and galaxies have comparable number densities (Matsuoka et al., 2018c), and hence contamination of galaxies is inevitable. Given the limited wavelength coverage of our spectra (λrest12001500\lambda_{\rm rest}\sim 1200-1500 Å), high-zz objects without broad Lyα\alpha emission are difficult to classify unambiguously into quasars or galaxies. Therefore the above quasar/galaxy classification is not perfect, and it may change in the future, with new data providing additional S/N or wavelength coverage.

In addition to the above high-zz objects, we found 10 [O III] emitters at z0.8z\sim 0.8, as displayed in Figure 5. Their strong [O III] lines contribute significantly to the HSC zz-band magnitude, and thus mimic colors of z6z\sim 6 quasars. We measured the properties of the Hγ\gamma, Hβ\beta, [O III] λ\lambda4959 and λ\lambda5007 emission lines, as listed in Table 3. Since these galaxies have very weak continuum, we estimated the continuum levels by summing up all available pixels after masking the above emission lines. As we discussed in Matsuoka et al. (2018a), their extremely high [O III] λ\lambda5007/Hβ\beta ratios may indicate that these are galaxies with sub-solar metallicity and high ionization state of the interstellar medium (e.g., Kewley et al., 2016), and/or contribution from an active galactic nucleus (AGN).

The remaining 22 objects presented in Figures 67 were found to be Galactic cool dwarfs (low-mass stars and brown dwarfs). Their rough spectral classes were estimated by fitting the spectral standard templates of M4- to T8-type dwarfs, taken from the SpeX Prism Spectral Library (Burgasser, 2014; Skrzypek et al., 2015), to the observed spectra at λ=750010200\lambda=7500-10200 Å. The results are summarized in Table 4 and plotted in the figures. Due to the low S/N and limited wavelength coverage of the spectra, the classifications presented here are rather uncertain, and should be regarded as only approximate.

Figure 8 presents shape indicators of the HSC objects with spectroscopic identification from our survey. The horizontal axis uses second-order adaptive moments in two image directions (μ11\mu_{11} and μ22\mu_{22}; Hirata & Seljak, 2003), which should be equal to those of PSF (μ11PSF\mu_{11}^{\rm PSF} and μ22PSF\mu_{22}^{\rm PSF}) for ideal point sources. The figure shows that quasars with narrow Lyα\alpha lines are slightly more extended than the other quasars, which indicates contribution of stellar emission (see the discussion further below). We could eliminate some of the galaxy contamination by a stricter cut of point source selection (e.g., mPSFmCModel<0.10m_{\rm PSF}-m_{\rm CModel}<0.10) than currently used, but that would also reject those potentially important population of narrow-line objects. On the other hand, the figure suggests that the adoptive moments (μ11\mu_{11} and μ22\mu_{22}) may be less affected by catastrophic measurement errors, and hence may be a better shape indicator, than the magnitude difference (mPSFmCModelm_{\rm PSF}-m_{\rm CModel}); this option will be considered in future candidate selection.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: Shape indicators of the quasars (blue dots, including previously-known quasars in the HSC survey footprint), narrow-line quasars (blue dots with larger circles), high-zz galaxies (green dots), [O III] emitters (green open circles), and Galactic cool dwarfs (red open circles). For each object, we calculated these quantities in either of the zz or yy band with higher S/N. Ideal point sources meet mPSF=mCModelm_{\rm PSF}=m_{\rm CModel} and μ11/μ11PSF=μ22/μ22PSF=1\mu_{11}/\mu_{11}^{\rm PSF}=\mu_{22}/\mu_{22}^{\rm PSF}=1, which are represented by the two dotted lines. The solid line represents our criterion of point source selection (mPSFmCModel<0.15m_{\rm PSF}-m_{\rm CModel}<0.15).

Figure 9 presents the composite spectra of all 75 broad-line quasars, 18 narrow-line quasars, and 31 galaxies discovered by our survey. These spectra were generated by converting the individual spectra to the rest frame and normalizing to M1450=23M_{1450}=-23 mag, and then median-stacking. Thus the individual objects have equal weights in the stacking, regardless of the brightness or spectral S/N. The overall shape of the quasar spectrum is similar to that of the local quasar composite (Vanden Berk et al., 2001), except for the narrower Lyα\alpha line and the IGM absorption. Our composite spectrum is also similar in shape to a composite spectrum of high-zz luminous quasars from the Panoramic Survey Telescope & Rapid Response System 1 (Pan-STARRS1; Chambers et al., 2016) survey (Bañados et al., 2016), again except for the narrower Lyα\alpha line, which may reflect the Baldwin (1977) effect. While a clear sign of the quasar near-zone effect is visible just blueward of Lyα\alpha, it should be noted that the redshifts of most of our quasars have been determined with Lyα\alpha, and are thus not very accurate. A detailed analysis of emission and absorption profiles around Lyα\alpha, including the effect of IGM damping-wing absorption, must wait for accurate measurements of systemic redshifts via other emission lines.

The composite spectrum of the narrow-line quasars is characterized by the strong and asymmetric Lyα\alpha line. The rest-frame EW of this line is 29 ±\pm 2 Å in the composite, while it ranges up to \sim500 Å in the individual spectra. The spectrum shows a P Cygni-like profile around 1240 Å, which is likely due to N V λ\lambda1240 emission line and an associated mini broad absorption line system. This spectral feature, along with the very luminous Lyα\alpha line usually associated with AGN (LLyα>1043L_{\rm Ly\alpha}>10^{43} erg s-1; Konno et al., 2016) and the absence of interstellar absorption in the continuum, strongly suggest that these objects are narrow-line quasars (see also the discussion in Matsuoka et al., 2018a). Compared with narrow-line quasar candidates in SDSS (Alexandroff et al., 2013), these high-zz objects have apparently narrower Lyα\alpha, indeed many are spectrally unresolved (most of the narrow-line quasars were observed with Subaru/FOCAS, which has a resolving power of \sim250 km s-1 with our observing mode). This may suggest a significant contribution from the host galaxies, thus these objects may be composites of quasars (or AGNs) and star-forming galaxies.

We note that a color selection of high-zz quasars (including a more sophisticated Bayesian selection we used) is generally more sensitive to objects with stronger Lyα\alpha lines. Thus the composite spectra may not represent the whole populations of broad- and narrow-line quasars that reside in the high-zz universe. On the other hand, we confirmed in a previous work (LF paper; Matsuoka et al., 2018c) that our quasar selection is fairly complete, as long as high-zz quasars have a similar distribution of intrinsic spectral shapes to low-zz SDSS quasars.

Finally, the galaxy spectrum in Figure 9 shows strong absorption lines, with rest-frame EWs of 1.7±0.81.7\pm 0.8 Å, 1.8±0.71.8\pm 0.7 Å, and 2.2±1.62.2\pm 1.6 Å for Si II λ\lambda1260, Si II λ\lambda1304, and C II λ\lambda1335, respectively. These are broadly consistent with the values measured in a composite spectrum of z3z\sim 3 Lyman break galaxies (Shapley et al., 2003). The galaxies discovered by our survey are very luminous, with M145022M_{1450}\simeq-22 to 25-25 mag, well above the break magnitude of the galaxy LF at z=6z=6 (M145021M_{1450}\simeq-21 mag; Ono et al., 2018).

We also present a composite spectrum of the 16 [O III] emitters at z0.8z\sim 0.8 in Figure 10. This spectrum was created by converting the individual spectra to the rest frame and normalizing to the continuum flux of 101810^{18} erg s-1 cm-2 Å-1, and then median-stacking. In addition to Hγ\gamma, Hβ\beta, [O III] λ\lambda4959 and λ\lambda5007, we detected [O III] λ\lambda4363 and He I λ\lambda4473 emission; these two lines are weak and undetected in the individual spectra. The rest-frame EWs of the six emission lines are 53 ±\pm 3 Å (Hγ\gamma), 35 ±\pm 3 Å ([O III] λ\lambda4363), 21 ±\pm 3 Å (He I λ\lambda4473), 165 ±\pm 7 Å (Hβ\beta), 264 ±\pm 10 Å ([O III] λ\lambda4959), 1030 ±\pm 40 Å ([O III] λ\lambda5007). All lines are spectrally unresolved.

Refer to caption
Figure 9: Rest-frame composite spectra of all 75 broad-line quasars (top), 18 narrow-line quasars (middle), and 31 galaxies (bottom) discovered by our survey. The median absolute magnitude M1450\langle M_{1450}\rangle of each sample is reported at the top left corner of each panel. The red and green lines in the top panel represent the arbitrarily-scaled composite spectrum of luminous high-zz quasars from Pan-STARRS1 (Bañados et al., 2016) and that of SDSS low-zz quasars (Vanden Berk et al., 2001), respectively, while the red line in the middle panel represent that of narrow-line quasar candidates in the SDSS (Alexandroff et al., 2013). The blue dotted lines mark the wavelengths of Lyα\alpha, N V λ\lambda1240, Si II λ\lambda1260, O I λ\lambda1302, Si II λ\lambda1304, and C II λ\lambda1335.
Refer to caption
Figure 10: Rest-frame composite spectrum of all 16 [O III] emitters at z0.8z\sim 0.8 over the full (top) and lower (bottom) flux scales. The red dotted lines mark the wavelengths of Hγ\gamma, [O III] λ\lambda4364, He I λ\lambda4473, Hβ\beta, [O III] λ\lambda4959 and λ\lambda5007.

The HSC-SSP survey has completed observations on more than 80 % of the planned 300 nights, and we are making steady progress on our high-zz quasar survey. We plan to continue our follow-up spectroscopy in the next few years, and will report new discoveries, along with measurements of the properties of individual objects with multi-wavelength observations. The quasar sample thus established will provide a more accurate quasar LF at z6z\geq 6 than is currently available (e.g., Matsuoka et al., 2018c; Wang et al., 2018). In a few years, we also aim to start a large SSP survey with the Prime Focus Spectrograph, a new wide-field multi-object spectrograph for the Subaru Telescope under development (Takada et al., 2014). This will enable us to take spectra of a significant number of HSC objects, including quasar candidates at all redshifts.

\startlongtable
Table 3: Spectroscopic Properties
Name Redshift M1450M_{1450} Line EWrest FWHM log LlineL_{\rm line}
(mag) (Å) (km s-1) (LlineL_{\rm line} in erg s-1)
Quasars
J235646.33+001747.3J235646.33+001747.3 7.01 25.31±0.04-25.31\pm 0.04  \cdots  \cdots  \cdots  \cdots
J160953.03+532821.0J160953.03+532821.0 6.92 22.75±1.67-22.75\pm 1.67 Lyα\alpha 210 ±\pm 320 3600 ±\pm 1300 44.31 ±\pm 0.07
J011257.84+011042.4J011257.84+011042.4 6.82 24.07±0.35-24.07\pm 0.35 Lyα\alpha 15 ±\pm 7 1500 ±\pm 400 43.71 ±\pm 0.14
J161207.12+555919.2J161207.12+555919.2^{*} 6.78 23.02±0.32-23.02\pm 0.32 Lyα\alpha 12 ±\pm 8 560 ±\pm 270 43.15 ±\pm 0.14
J134400.87+012827.8J134400.87+012827.8 6.72 23.46±0.15-23.46\pm 0.15 Lyα\alpha 73 ±\pm 12 9000 ±\pm 1100 44.13 ±\pm 0.04
J000142.54+000057.5J000142.54+000057.5 6.69 24.49±0.59-24.49\pm 0.59 Lyα\alpha 11 ±\pm 15 1600 ±\pm 1000 43.72 ±\pm 0.59
J123137.77+005230.3J123137.77+005230.3 6.69 24.39±0.09-24.39\pm 0.09 Lyα\alpha 27 ±\pm 3 2400 ±\pm 900 44.09 ±\pm 0.03
J135012.04002705.2J135012.04-002705.2 6.49 24.38±0.19-24.38\pm 0.19 Lyα\alpha 56 ±\pm 11 620 ±\pm 200 44.39 ±\pm 0.04
J084456.62+022640.5J084456.62+022640.5^{*} 6.40 21.57±0.47-21.57\pm 0.47 Lyα\alpha 280 ±\pm 160 << 230 44.05 ±\pm 0.01
J113753.64+004509.7J113753.64+004509.7 6.4 24.20±0.13-24.20\pm 0.13 Lyα\alpha 22 ±\pm 6 11000 ±\pm 3000 43.91 ±\pm 0.11
J152555.79+430324.0J152555.79+430324.0 6.27 23.61±0.06-23.61\pm 0.06 Lyα\alpha 35 ±\pm 4 340 ±\pm 740 43.88 ±\pm 0.04
NV 18 ±\pm 2 2900 ±\pm 1600 43.60 ±\pm 0.04
J151248.71+442217.5J151248.71+442217.5 6.19 22.07±0.04-22.07\pm 0.04 Lyα\alpha 28 ±\pm 2 3700 ±\pm 200 43.18 ±\pm 0.03
NV 11 ±\pm 2 2800 ±\pm 300 42.77 ±\pm 0.07
J225520.78+050343.3J225520.78+050343.3 6.18 24.43±0.02-24.43\pm 0.02 Lyα\alpha 30 ±\pm 1 6200 ±\pm 700 44.14 ±\pm 0.02
J134733.69015750.6J134733.69-015750.6 6.15 24.73±0.02-24.73\pm 0.02 Lyα\alpha 65 ±\pm 2 1480 ±\pm 10 44.59 ±\pm 0.01
J144823.33+433305.9J144823.33+433305.9 6.14 24.36±0.04-24.36\pm 0.04 Lyα\alpha 26 ±\pm 2 7200 ±\pm 1900 44.05 ±\pm 0.03
J000133.30+000605.4J000133.30+000605.4 6.13 23.72±0.06-23.72\pm 0.06 Lyα\alpha 11 ±\pm 1 2500 ±\pm 1100 43.44 ±\pm 0.04
J151657.87+422852.9J151657.87+422852.9 6.13 24.35±0.01-24.35\pm 0.01 Lyα\alpha 17 ±\pm 1 9500 ±\pm 2100 43.85 ±\pm 0.03
J125437.08001410.7J125437.08-001410.7^{*} 6.13 20.91±0.32-20.91\pm 0.32 Lyα\alpha 470 ±\pm 160 310 ±\pm 20 44.03 ±\pm 0.01
J000445.81004944.3J000445.81-004944.3 6.10 23.90±0.06-23.90\pm 0.06 Lyα\alpha 53 ±\pm 4 2400 ±\pm 900 44.18 ±\pm 0.02
J093543.32011033.3J093543.32-011033.3^{*} 6.08 21.97±0.18-21.97\pm 0.18 Lyα\alpha 410 ±\pm 170 << 230 44.12 ±\pm 0.01
J010603.68003015.2J010603.68-003015.2 6.06 23.53±0.05-23.53\pm 0.05 Lyα\alpha 46 ±\pm 3 3300 ±\pm 600 43.97 ±\pm 0.02
J142611.33012822.8J142611.33-012822.8 6.01 23.75±0.10-23.75\pm 0.10 Lyα\alpha 11 ±\pm 4 4100 ±\pm 300 43.45 ±\pm 0.13
J121049.13+013426.7J121049.13+013426.7 5.97 22.60±0.07-22.60\pm 0.07  \cdots  \cdots  \cdots  \cdots
J093000.85+005738.4J093000.85+005738.4 5.92 24.91±0.05-24.91\pm 0.05 Lyα\alpha 24 ±\pm 4 13900 ±\pm 400 44.22 ±\pm 0.07
J161819.77+552654.0J161819.77+552654.0 5.91 24.26±0.09-24.26\pm 0.09 Lyα\alpha 32 ±\pm 5 8100 ±\pm 3300 44.10 ±\pm 0.06
J142307.21022519.0J142307.21-022519.0 5.9 24.26±0.13-24.26\pm 0.13 Lyα\alpha 26 ±\pm 7 7400 ±\pm 3300 44.01 ±\pm 0.10
J023858.09031845.4J023858.09-031845.4 5.83 23.94±0.03-23.94\pm 0.03 Lyα\alpha 45 ±\pm 3 14700 ±\pm 100 44.11 ±\pm 0.02
J113218.15+003800.1J113218.15+003800.1 5.66 23.18±0.05-23.18\pm 0.05 Lyα\alpha 24 ±\pm 4 650 ±\pm 130 43.34 ±\pm 0.05
Galaxies
J135348.55001026.5J135348.55-001026.5 6.2 24.76±0.02-24.76\pm 0.02  \cdots  \cdots  \cdots  \cdots
J144216.08+423632.5J144216.08+423632.5 6.0 22.93±0.07-22.93\pm 0.07  \cdots  \cdots  \cdots  \cdots
J092117.65+030521.5J092117.65+030521.5 6.0 22.76±0.16-22.76\pm 0.16  \cdots  \cdots  \cdots  \cdots
J115755.51001356.2J115755.51-001356.2 5.9 22.98±0.08-22.98\pm 0.08  \cdots  \cdots  \cdots  \cdots
J123841.97011738.8J123841.97-011738.8 5.8 23.37±0.04-23.37\pm 0.04  \cdots  \cdots  \cdots  \cdots
J162657.22+431133.0J162657.22+431133.0 5.8 22.78±0.04-22.78\pm 0.04  \cdots  \cdots  \cdots  \cdots
J020649.98020618.2J020649.98-020618.2 5.72 23.83±0.03-23.83\pm 0.03 Lyα\alpha 1.1 ±\pm 0.2 250 ±\pm 170 42.39 ±\pm 0.08
[O III] Emitters
J090017.67014655.6J090017.67-014655.6 0.921  \cdots Hβ\beta 16 ±\pm 1 << 190 40.99 ±\pm 0.03
 \cdots [O III] λ\lambda4959 8.7 ±\pm 0.6 << 190 40.71 ±\pm 0.03
 \cdots [O III] λ\lambda5007 31 ±\pm 1 << 190 41.26 ±\pm 0.02
J015519.63005814.7J015519.63-005814.7 0.872  \cdots Hγ\gamma 6.5 ±\pm 0.6 << 190 40.37 ±\pm 0.04
 \cdots Hβ\beta 28 ±\pm 1 180 ±\pm 20 41.00 ±\pm 0.02
 \cdots [O III] λ\lambda4959 33 ±\pm 1 150 ±\pm 40 41.07 ±\pm 0.01
 \cdots [O III] λ\lambda5007 71 ±\pm 6 << 190 41.41 ±\pm 0.03
J144221.95013258.0J144221.95-013258.0 0.823  \cdots Hβ\beta 200 ±\pm 80 << 230 40.81 ±\pm 0.06
 \cdots [OIII] λ\lambda4959 290 ±\pm 110 << 230 40.97 ±\pm 0.05
 \cdots [OIII] λ\lambda5007 1600 ±\pm 600 << 230 41.70 ±\pm 0.01
J115946.07+014023.7J115946.07+014023.7 0.790  \cdots Hγ\gamma 33 ±\pm 7 << 190 41.24 ±\pm 0.07
 \cdots Hβ\beta 150 ±\pm 20 << 190 41.89 ±\pm 0.02
 \cdots [OIII] λ\lambda4959 350 ±\pm 40 << 190 42.26 ±\pm 0.01
 \cdots [OIII] λ\lambda5007 1000 ±\pm 100 << 190 42.73 ±\pm 0.01
J141332.93+014350.4J141332.93+014350.4 0.784  \cdots Hβ\beta >> 1500 << 230 40.99 ±\pm 0.05
 \cdots [OIII] λ\lambda4959 >> 2800 << 230 41.28 ±\pm 0.02
 \cdots [OIII] λ\lambda5007 >> 9700 << 230 41.82 ±\pm 0.01
J094209.69020302.1J094209.69-020302.1 0.782  \cdots Hβ\beta 71 ±\pm 5 << 190 41.61 ±\pm 0.02
 \cdots [O III] λ\lambda4959 110 ±\pm 7 << 190 41.79 ±\pm 0.02
 \cdots [O III] λ\lambda5007 380 ±\pm 20 << 190 42.34 ±\pm 0.01
J225124.84010911.0J225124.84-010911.0 0.777  \cdots Hγ\gamma 95 ±\pm 11 << 190 41.00 ±\pm 0.04
 \cdots Hβ\beta 210 ±\pm 20 << 190 41.34 ±\pm 0.02
 \cdots [O III] λ\lambda4959 420 ±\pm 40 << 190 41.65 ±\pm 0.01
 \cdots [O III] λ\lambda5007 1300 ±\pm 100 << 190 42.13 ±\pm 0.01
J093831.54002523.4J093831.54-002523.4 0.777  \cdots Hγ\gamma 390 ±\pm 270 << 230 40.64 ±\pm 0.07
 \cdots Hβ\beta 600 ±\pm 410 << 230 40.83 ±\pm 0.04
 \cdots [OIII] λ\lambda4959 1300 ±\pm 900 << 230 41.18 ±\pm 0.02
 \cdots [OIII] λ\lambda5007 3800 ±\pm 2600 << 230 41.63 ±\pm 0.01
J135049.56+013726.6J135049.56+013726.6 0.770  \cdots Hγ\gamma >> 110 << 230 40.43 ±\pm 0.06
 \cdots Hβ\beta >> 350 << 230 40.93 ±\pm 0.02
 \cdots [OIII] λ\lambda4959 >> 470 << 230 41.06 ±\pm 0.05
 \cdots [OIII] λ\lambda5007 >> 2100 << 230 41.70 ±\pm 0.01
J150602.11+415317.5J150602.11+415317.5 0.764  \cdots Hγ\gamma 103 ±\pm 4 << 190 41.30 ±\pm 0.01
 \cdots Hβ\beta 249 ±\pm 8 << 190 41.68 ±\pm 0.01
 \cdots [O III] λ\lambda4959 540 ±\pm 20 << 190 42.02 ±\pm 0.01
 \cdots [O III] λ\lambda5007 1600 ±\pm 100 << 190 42.50 ±\pm 0.01

Note. — The asterisks after the object names indicate the possible quasars with narrow Lyα\alpha emission. Upper limits of line EWs are placed at 3σ3\sigma significance, for the objects without continuum detection.

Table 4: Spectral classes of the cool dwarfs
Name Class
J011152.80+013211.4J011152.80+013211.4 L4
J015548.62061737.9J015548.62-061737.9 M4
J020421.81024421.1J020421.81-024421.1 L9
J022144.40053008.6J022144.40-053008.6 T2
J085230.35+025410.0J085230.35+025410.0 M6
J085818.99+040927.6J085818.99+040927.6 M7
J124505.57+010550.2J124505.57+010550.2 M9
J135913.21+002740.0J135913.21+002740.0 T8
J142531.82021606.5J142531.82-021606.5 T0
J145853.06+015031.8J145853.06+015031.8 L9
J151812.04+440829.0J151812.04+440829.0 T1
J153032.76+435615.5J153032.76+435615.5 L8
J154605.67+425306.1J154605.67+425306.1 T7
J161042.47+554203.4J161042.47+554203.4 T0
J164226.30+430749.7J164226.30+430749.7 L1
J223827.66+053246.5J223827.66+053246.5 M4
J224157.52+055912.6J224157.52+055912.6 M5
J225132.39011601.1J225132.39-011601.1 M5
J225337.55+051440.1J225337.55+051440.1 M7
J225513.58+044226.8J225513.58+044226.8 M5
J230811.42+023931.3J230811.42+023931.3 M7
J231344.68003931.3J231344.68-003931.3 L1

Note. — These classification should be regarded as only approximate; see the text.

We are grateful to the referee for his/her useful comments to improve this paper.8 We thank Rachael Alexandroff for kindly sharing with us the electronic data of the narrow-line quasar composite spectrum in Figure 9. This work is based on data collected at the Subaru Telescope, which is operated by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ). We appreciate the staff members of the telescope for their support during our FOCAS observations. The data analysis was in part carried out on the open use data analysis computer system at the Astronomy Data Center of NAOJ. This work is also based on observations made with the Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC), installed at the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, on the island of La Palma. We thank Stefan Geier and other support astronomers for their help during preparation and execution of our observing program. Y. M. was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant No. JP17H04830 and the Mitsubishi Foundation grant No. 30140. K. I. acknowledges support by the Spanish MINECO under grant AYA2016-76012-C3-1-P and MDM-2014-0369 of ICCUB (Unidad de Excelencia ’María de Maeztu’) The Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) collaboration includes the astronomical communities of Japan and Taiwan, and Princeton University. The HSC instrumentation and software were developed by NAOJ, the Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (Kavli IPMU), the University of Tokyo, the High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), the Academia Sinica Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics in Taiwan (ASIAA), and Princeton University. Funding was contributed by the FIRST program from Japanese Cabinet Office, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), the Toray Science Foundation, NAOJ, Kavli IPMU, KEK, ASIAA, and Princeton University. This paper makes use of software developed for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST). We thank the LSST Project for making their code available as free software at http://dm.lsst.org. The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys (PS1) have been made possible through contributions of the Institute for Astronomy, the University of Hawaii, the Pan-STARRS Project Office, the Max-Planck Society and its participating institutes, the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg and the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching, The Johns Hopkins University, Durham University, the University of Edinburgh, Queen’s University Belfast, the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, the Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network Incorporated, the National Central University of Taiwan, the Space Telescope Science Institute, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Grant No. NNX08AR22G issued through the Planetary Science Division of the NASA Science Mission Directorate, the National Science Foundation under Grant No. AST-1238877, the University of Maryland, Eötvös Lorand University (ELTE) and the Los Alamos National Laboratory. IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA) under a cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.

References

  • Abazajian et al. (2004) Abazajian, K., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 502
  • Aihara et al. (2018) Aihara, H., Arimoto, N., Armstrong, R., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S4
  • Alexandroff et al. (2013) Alexandroff, R., Strauss, M. A., Greene, J. E., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 3306
  • Baldwin (1977) Baldwin, J. A. 1977, ApJ, 214, 679
  • Bañados et al. (2016) Bañados, E., Venemans, B. P., Decarli, R., et al. 2016, ApJS, 227, 11
  • Bosch et al. (2018) Bosch, J., Armstrong, R., Bickerton, S., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S5
  • Burgasser (2014) Burgasser, A. J. 2014, Astronomical Society of India Conference Series, 11,
  • Cepa et al. (2000) Cepa, J., Aguiar, M., Escalera, V. G., et al. 2000, Proc. SPIE, 4008, 623
  • Chambers et al. (2016) Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, arXiv:1612.05560
  • Decarli et al. (2017) Decarli, R., Walter, F., Venemans, B. P., et al. 2017, Nature, 545, 457
  • Decarli et al. (2018) Decarli, R., Walter, F., Venemans, B. P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 97
  • Diamond-Stanic et al. (2009) Diamond-Stanic, A. M., Fan, X., Brandt, W. N., et al. 2009, ApJ, 699, 782
  • Fan et al. (2006a) Fan, X., Carilli, C. L., & Keating, B. 2006, ARA&A, 44, 415
  • Ferrara et al. (2014) Ferrara, A., Salvadori, S., Yue, B., & Schleicher, D. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 2410
  • Fukugita et al. (1996) Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., et al. 1996, AJ, 111, 1748
  • Goto et al. (2009) Goto, T., Utsumi, Y., Furusawa, H., Miyazaki, S., & Komiyama, Y. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 843
  • Gunn & Peterson (1965) Gunn, J. E., & Peterson, B. A. 1965, ApJ, 142, 1633
  • Hirata & Seljak (2003) Hirata, C., & Seljak, U. 2003, MNRAS, 343, 459
  • Izumi et al. (2019) Izumi, T., Onoue, M., Matsuoka, Y., et al. 2019, arXiv:1904.07345
  • Izumi et al. (2018) Izumi, T., Onoue, M., Shirakata, H., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, 36
  • Jarvis et al. (2013) Jarvis, M. J., Bonfield, D. G., Bruce, V. A., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 428, 1281
  • Jiang et al. (2016) Jiang, L., McGreer, I. D., Fan, X., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 222
  • Jurić et al. (2017) Jurić, M., Kantor, J., Lim, K.-T., et al. 2017, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXV, 512, 279
  • Kashikawa et al. (2002) Kashikawa, N., Aoki, K., Asai, R., et al. 2002, PASJ, 54, 819
  • Kewley et al. (2016) Kewley, L. J., Yuan, T., Nanayakkara, T., et al. 2016, ApJ, 819, 100
  • Konno et al. (2016) Konno, A., Ouchi, M., Nakajima, K., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 20
  • Lawrence et al. (2007) Lawrence, A., Warren, S. J., Almaini, O., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 1599
  • Madau et al. (2014) Madau, P., Haardt, F., & Dotti, M. 2014, ApJ, 784, L38
  • Matsuoka et al. (2018b) Matsuoka, Y., Iwasawa, K., Onoue, M., et al. 2018b, ApJS, 237, 5
  • Matsuoka et al. (2016) Matsuoka, Y., Onoue, M., Kashikawa, N., et al. 2016, ApJ, 828, 26
  • Matsuoka et al. (2018a) Matsuoka, Y., Onoue, M., Kashikawa, N., et al. 2018a, PASJ, 70, S35
  • Matsuoka et al. (2019) Matsuoka, Y., Onoue, M., Kashikawa, N., et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, L2
  • Matsuoka et al. (2018c) Matsuoka, Y., Strauss, M. A., Kashikawa, N., et al. 2018c, ApJ, 869, 150
  • Miyazaki et al. (2018) Miyazaki, S., Komiyama, Y., Kawanomoto, S., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S1
  • Mortlock et al. (2011) Mortlock, D. J., Warren, S. J., Venemans, B. P., et al. 2011, Nature, 474, 616
  • Oke & Gunn (1983) Oke, J. B., & Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713
  • Ono et al. (2018) Ono, Y., Ouchi, M., Harikane, Y., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S10
  • Onoue et al. (2019) Onoue, M., Kashikawa, N., Matsuoka, Y., et al. 2019, arXiv:1904.07278
  • Schlegel et al. (1998) Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
  • Shapley et al. (2003) Shapley, A. E., Steidel, C. C., Pettini, M., & Adelberger, K. L. 2003, ApJ, 588, 65
  • Stanway et al. (2005) Stanway, E. R., McMahon, R. G., & Bunker, A. J. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 1184
  • Skrzypek et al. (2015) Skrzypek, N., Warren, S. J., Faherty, J. K., et al. 2015, A&A, 574, A78
  • Takada et al. (2014) Takada, M., Ellis, R. S., Chiba, M., et al. 2014, PASJ, 66, R1
  • Vanden Berk et al. (2001) Vanden Berk, D. E., Richards, G. T., Bauer, A., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 549
  • Volonteri (2012) Volonteri, M. 2012, Science, 337, 544
  • Wang et al. (2018) Wang, F., Yang, J., Fan, X., et al. 2018, arXiv:1810.11926
  • Willott et al. (2010) Willott, C. J., Delorme, P., Reylé, C., et al. 2010b, AJ, 139, 906