Supplementary Material of “Valency, charge-transfer, and orbital-dependent correlation in bilayer nickelates Nd3Ni2O7”
I Scanning transmission electron microscopy of the Nd3Ni2O7 thin film

II Additional experimental spectra

Fig. S2(a) shows the wide survey scan of Nd3Ni2O7. All observed peaks are consistent with the expected composition of the film, except for the C from the adsorbed impurities on the untreated surface of the film. The O , in Fig. S2(b), displays one single sharp peak from the oxide, with only a weak higher energy tail from the surface impurities, indicating that the obtained HAXPES data is representative of the intrinsic Nd3Ni2O7 contributions. The Nd core level multiplet structure is consistent with that of Nd2O3 Kotani and Ogasawara (1992). Figure S2(d) shows the experimental valence band spectra. Overall, the HAXPES spectra is dominated by the O bands through their hybridization with the RE , which are highly enhanced due to the large photoionization cross-sections Takegami et al. (2019). The stronger polarization dependence for the peak at 1.5 eV indicates its dominant Ni character (from the Ni , as discussed below), while the weaker dependence closer to the Fermi energy is the result of the stronger mixing of the states with the O . At the Fermi energy, a finite but suppressed spectral weight is observed.
III Comparison to La3Ni2O7

Figure S3(a) shows a comparison of the experimental HAXPES spectra in the vicinity of the Ni 2 core level binding energy for Nd3Ni2O7 and La3Ni2O7 (from Ref. Takegami et al. (2024)). In the presence of La, two sets of double peaks show up in the region due to the La 3 and La 3 contributions, with the La 3 signal overlapping, and largely dominating the Ni 2 region. As a result, any attempt to estimate the Ni 2 spectral shape in La-containing systems such as La3Ni2O7 requires some form of data treatment method. Such procedures are highly sensitive to the assumptions used for the overlapping La 3 complex spectral lineshape and are thus not as reliable as raw experimental spectra.
Figure S3(b) shows a comparison of the O spectra from the Nd3Ni2O7 in this study and the polycrystalline La3Ni2O7 from Ref. Takegami et al. (2024). Oxygen deficiencies are usually manifested in the form of an asymmetric shape of the O main peak Takegami et al. (2024b). In both cases displayed in Fig. S3(b), the O main peaks are sharp and Guassian-like, with La3Ni2O7 displaying a slightly more asymmetric shape at around eV. This suggests a similar, or lower amount of oxygen deficiency in the measured Nd3Ni2O7 compared to the polycrystalline La3Ni2O7 from Ref. Takegami et al. (2024), reported to have .
IV LDA+DMFT calculations and model-parameter dependence of spectra
We calculate the DFT bands using the local density approximation (LDA) for the exchange-correlation potential with the WIEN2K package Blaha et al. (2001). The DFT calculations are performed for La3Ni2O7 (using its crystal structure at ambient pressure Voronin et al. (2001)), a representative compound of the R3Ni2O7 series. Since the La/Nd 5 states are well-separated above the Fermi level in the R3Ni2O7 compounds, their contributions to the spectra and physical quantities discussed in the main text can be safely neglected. Moreover, the hybridization between Ni 3 and Nd 4 orbitals is expected to be substantially weaker than that between Ni 3 and O 2. As a result, the relationship between the Ni 2 core-level spectrum and Ni valency in Fig. 2 of the main text remains unaffected by the presence of Nd 4 states. The calculated DFT bands are subsequently mapped onto a tight-binding (TB) model explicitly including all Ni 3 and O 2 bands, using the wien2wannier and wannier90 packages Mostofi et al. (2014); Kuneš et al. (2010). The Ni 3 electron self-energy is computed using the auxiliary Anderson impurity model (AIM) in the DMFT self-consistent calculations, employing the continuous-time hybridization expansion Monte Carlo method Werner et al. (2006). Spectral functions and hybridization densities on the real-frequency axis are obtained by analytically continuing the self-energy via the maximum entropy method Jarrell and Gubernatis (1996). The Ni 2 core-level HAXPES spectra are calculated from the AIM, incorporating the DMFT hybridization densities , as detailed in Refs. Hariki et al. (2017); Winder et al. (2020); Ghiasi et al. (2019). In this step, the AIM is extended to include the core orbitals and their interactions () with the valence electrons.
Figure S5 shows the LDA+DMFT valence-band spectral intensities of Nd3Ni2O7 calculated for selected parameters. Besides the Ni (red) and (blue), we find the sizable weights of the O 2 states near the Fermi energy. Note that the spectral intensities of the O 2 states are scaled by a factor of 0.5 in the panels. The bandwidth of the state is wider than that of the state. The center of the Ni band is approximately 1.5 eV, in good agreement with the experimental VB data mentioned above. In Fig. S6, we present the Ni atomic configuration histograms computed for different Hubbard parameters. We observe that the histogram depends strongly on the value, but is rather insensitive to changes in the parameter. This behavior is consistent with the system being of a charge-transfer type system. To further support the choice of the parameter in the main text, Fig. S7 shows the dependence of the Ni 2 core-level XPS spectrum for a range of values in the LDA+DMFT AIM result. We find good agreement with the experimental spectrum for both the Ni 2 main line (ML) and the satellite (Sat.) when eV is used. In the 2 core-level XPS and XAS simulations, we use a core-hole potential value of , a well-established empirical relation for 3 transition metal oxides Hariki et al. (2017).
Figure S4 shows the Ni L2,3 X-ray absorption spectra (XAS) of Nd3Ni2O7 calculated for selected parameters. Both the L3 and L2 edges display two distinct features, with the ratio and their energy separation affected by . The qualitative trends observed are similar to those experimentally observed in the Ndn+1NinO3n+1 series Pan et al. (2022), with a reduction (increase) of the value resulting in a spectra closer to the divalent (trivalent) cases.





References
- Takegami et al. (2019) D. Takegami, L. Nicolaï, T. C. Koethe, D. Kasinathan, C. Y. Kuo, Y. F. Liao, K. D. Tsuei, G. Panaccione, F. Offi, G. Monaco, et al., Phys. Rev. B 99, 165101 (2019).
- Kotani and Ogasawara (1992) A. Kotani and H. Ogasawara, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 60, 257 (1992), ISSN 0368-2048.
- Takegami et al. (2024) D. Takegami, K. Fujinuma, R. Nakamura, M. Yoshimura, K.-D. Tsuei, G. Wang, N. N. Wang, J.-G. Cheng, Y. Uwatoko, and T. Mizokawa, Phys. Rev. B 109, 125119 (2024).
- Takegami et al. (2024b) D. Takegami, M. Nakamura, A. Melendez-Sans, K. Fujinuma, R. Nakamura, M. Yoshimura, K.-D. Tsuei, A. Tanaka, M. Gen, Y. Tokunaga, et al., Phys. Rev. B 109, 235138 (2024).
- Blaha et al. (2001) P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, G. Madsen, D. Kvasnicka, and J. Luitz, WIEN2k, An Augmented Plane Wave + Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Properties (Karlheinz Schwarz, Techn. Universitat Wien, Austria, ISBN 3-9501031-1-2, 2001).
- Voronin et al. (2001) V. Voronin, I. Berger, V. Cherepanov, L. Gavrilova, A. Petrov, A. Ancharov, B. Tolochko, and S. Nikitenko, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 470, 202 (2001), ISSN 0168-9002, proceedings of the 13th National Synchrotron Radiation Conference.
- Mostofi et al. (2014) A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, G. Pizzi, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2309 (2014), ISSN 0010-4655.
- Kuneš et al. (2010) J. Kuneš, R. Arita, P. Wissgott, A. Toschi, H. Ikeda, and K. Held, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 1888 (2010), ISSN 0010-4655.
- Werner et al. (2006) P. Werner, A. Comanac, L. de’ Medici, M. Troyer, and A. J. Millis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 076405 (2006), ISSN 0031-9007.
- Jarrell and Gubernatis (1996) M. Jarrell and J. Gubernatis, Phys. Rep. 269, 133 (1996), ISSN 0370-1573.
- Hariki et al. (2017) A. Hariki, T. Uozumi, and J. Kuneš, Phys. Rev. B 96, 045111 (2017).
- Winder et al. (2020) M. Winder, A. Hariki, and J. Kuneš, Phys. Rev. B 102, 085155 (2020).
- Ghiasi et al. (2019) M. Ghiasi, A. Hariki, M. Winder, J. Kuneš, A. Regoutz, T.-L. Lee, Y. Hu, J.-P. Rueff, and F. M. F. de Groot, Phys. Rev. B 100, 075146 (2019).
- Pan et al. (2022) G. A. Pan, D. Ferenc Segedin, H. LaBollita, Q. Song, E. M. Nica, B. H. Goodge, A. T. Pierce, S. Doyle, S. Novakov, D. Córdova Carrizales, et al., Nat. Mater 21, 160 (2022), ISSN 1476-4660.