This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Suspended and restored activities of A Nearby Super Massive Black Hole

J. Wang Guangxi Key Laboratory for Relativistic Astrophysics, School of Physical Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, People始s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Space Astronomy and Technology, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China D. W. Xu Key Laboratory of Space Astronomy and Technology, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China S. S. Sun Guangxi Key Laboratory for Relativistic Astrophysics, School of Physical Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, People始s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Space Astronomy and Technology, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China Q. C. Feng Key Laboratory of Space Astronomy and Technology, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China T. R. Li Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China P. F. Xiao Key Laboratory of Space Astronomy and Technology, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China J. Y. Wei Key Laboratory of Space Astronomy and Technology, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Abstract

The discovery of spectral type transition of active galactic nuclei (AGNs), the so-called “changing-look” (CL) phenomenon, challenges the widely accepted AGN paradigm, not only in the orientation based Unified Model, but also in the standard disk model. In past decades, only a couple of nearby repeat “changing-look” active galactic nuclei (CL-AGNs) have been identified. Here we report spectroscopic observations of UGC 3223 over the course of 18 years, from 2001 onwards. Combining the spectrum taken in 1987 by Stirpe, we have witnessed its type transitions from 1.52.01.81.5\rightarrow 2.0\rightarrow 1.8 over 32 years, and captured a long-lived (at least 10 years) thorough “turn-off” state with a spectrum typical of a Seyfert 2 galaxy. The long-term thorough “turn-off” state probably suggests a once-dormant and an awakening central engine in UGC3223. We argue the (dis)appearance of the broad Balmer emission lines can be explained by the disk-wind BLR model given the evolution of the calculated Eddington ratio of accretion of the supermassive black hole.

galaxies: nuclei — galaxies: active — quasars: emission lines — quasars: individual (UGC 3223)
journal: ApJfacilities: NAOC 2.16m telescopesoftware: IRAF (Tody 1986, 1993)

1 Introduction

Multi-epoch spectroscopy recently enables us to reveal a batch of the so-called “changing-look” active galactic nuclei (CL-AGNs) that show a spectral type transition between type I, intermediate type and type II within a time scale of an order of years or decades. So far, the CL phenomenon has been identified by spectroscopy in only \sim80 AGNs, including both “turn-on” and “turn-off” transitions (e.g., Shapovalova et al. 2010; Shappee et al. 2014; LaMassa et al. 2015; McElroy et al. 2016; Runnoe et al. 2016; Gezari et al. 2017; Yang et al. 2018; Ruan et al. 2016; MacLeod et al. 2010, 2016; Wang et al. 2018, 2019; Stern et al. 2018; Frederick et al. 2019; Yan et al. 2019; Trakhtenbrot et al. 2019). Based on the Catalina Real-time Transient Survey, Graham et al. (2019) recently identified 111 “changing-state” quasars according to their optical and mid-infrared photometric behavior and spectroscopic change.

The observed CL phenomenon challenges the traditional understanding of AGNs in two points. At first, there is competing evidence in both middle infrared and polarization supporting that the optical CL phenomenon is due to a variation in accretion rate of a supermassive blackhole (SMBH) (e.g., Sheng et al. 2017, Yang et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2018, 2019b; Gezari et al. 2017; Macleod et al. 2019; Rumbaugh et al. 2018; Stern et al. 2018; Hutsemekers et al. 2019), rather than the orientation effect (e.g., Antonucci 1993). Secondly, there is a viscosity crisis, in which the expected viscous timescale of optical emission coming from the outer accretion is larger than the timescale of the observed CL phenomenon by an order of magnitude (e.g., Lawrence 2018 and references therein). This crisis could be theoretically resolved by introducing a local disk thermal instability (e.g., Husemann et al. 2016; Jiang et al. 2016) or a magnetic field (e.g., Ross et al. 2018; Stern et al. 2018; Dexter & Begelamn 2019).

Even though most of the CL-AGNs are identified in the case of two-epochs spectroscopy, repeat type transitions have been identified in only a few nearby Seyfert galaxies and quasars: Mrk 590, Mrk 1018, NGC 1566, NGC 4151, NGC 7603, Fairall 9 and 3C 390.3 (Marin et al. 2019). Among these objects, only Mrk 590 shows a thorough disappearance of its BLR emission (Denney et al. 2014). We here report a discovery of a new nearby CL-AGN, UGC 3223, with repeat type transition and a prolonged thorough “turn-off” of the activity of the SMBH.

The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes our repeat spectroscopic observations and data reductions. The spectral analysis is presented in Section 3. Section 4 presents the results and discussion. A Λ\LambdaCDM cosmology with parameters H0=70kms1Mpc1H_{0}=70\mathrm{km\ s^{-1}\ Mpc^{-1}}, Ωm=0.3\Omega_{m}=0.3, and ΩΛ=0.7\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7 is adopted throughout the paper.

2 Observations and Data Reduction

UGC 3223 (=MCG +01-13-012, R.A.=04h59m09s.4, DEC=+04°58′30″, J2000) is a local AGN at redshift of z=0.015621z=0.015621. It was classified as a Seyfert 1.5 galaxy in the catalog of quasars and active nuclei: 12th edition (Veron-Cetty & Veron 2006), according to the spectroscopy taken in 1987 (Stirpe 1990).

2.1 Spectroscopic observations

The long-slit spectra of UGC 3223 have been taken by us by using the 2.16m telescope (Fan et al. 2016) at Xinglong observatory of National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences (NAOC) in four epochs from 2001 to 2019 (See Column(1) in Table 1). The observations were carried out with the Optomechanics Research Inc. spectrograph equipped with a back-illuminated SPEC 1340×\times400 CCD as detector. A grating of 300 groovesmm1\mathrm{grooves\ mm^{-1}}, and a slit of 22\arcsec oriented in the south-north direction were used in the observations. This setup finally leads to a spectral resolution of 9\sim 9Å as measured from the sky emission lines and comparison arcs. The blazed wavelength was fixed at 6000Å in all the observation runs, which provides a wavelength coverage from 3400-8600Å in the observer frame. In each of the runs, the object was observed twice in succession. The exposure time of each frame ranges from 1500 to 3600 seconds. The wavelength and flux calibrations were carried out by the helium-neon-argon comparison arc taken between the two successive frames, i.e., at the position nearly identical to that of the object, and by the Kitt Peak National Observatory (KPNO) standard stars (Massey et al. 1988), respectively.

2.2 Data reduction

We reduced the two-dimensional spectra by the standard procedures through the IRAF package111IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomical Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.. At first, the bias subtraction and flat-field correction were applied to each observed frame. In each observation run, the two frames were combined prior to the extraction to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio and to eliminate the contamination of cosmic rays easily. Each extracted 1d spectrum was then calibrated in wavelength and flux by the corresponding comparison arc and standard. The two telluric features A and B around λ\lambda7600 and λ\lambda6800 due to the O2\mathrm{O_{2}} molecules were removed from each extracted spectrum by the corresponding standard. The Galactic extinction was then corrected for each extracted spectrum by the extinction magnitude of AV=0.229A_{V}=0.229 (Schlafly & Finkbeiner 2011) taken from the NASA/IAPC Extragalactic Database (NED), assuming the RV=3.1R_{V}=3.1 extinction law of our Galaxy (Cardelli et al. 1989). The spectra were then transformed to the rest frame according to its redshift. The rest-frame spectra taken at the four different epochs are displayed in Figure 1 (the middle curve in each panel).

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The Xinglong spectra of UGC 3223 taken in the four different epochs. In each panel, the starlight-subtracted spectrum, the observed rest-frame spectrum and the modeled starlight component are displayed by the curves from top to bottom.

3 Spectral Analysis

One can see clearly from the figure a lack of broad Hα\alpha emission line in the three Xinglong spectra taken in 2001, 2003 and 2011, which is different from the spectrum shown in Stirpe (1990). It is interesting that the broad Hα\alpha emission and a weak Hβ\beta broad emission return back in the 2019 spectrum. A spectral analysis is performed as follows to quantify the type transition in UGC 3223.

3.1 Removing of The Star Light Component

The starlight component of each of the four spectra is at first modeled by a linear combination of the first seven eigenspectra through a χ2\chi^{2} minimization. The eigenspectra are built from the standard single stellar population spectral library developed by Bruzual & Charlot (2003). An intrinsic extinction due to the host galaxy described by the Galactic extinction curve with RV=3.1R_{V}=3.1 is also involved in our fitting. The minimization is carried out over the rest-frame wavelength range from 3700 to 8000Å, except for the regions with strong emission lines, e.g., Balmer lines (both narrow and potential broad components), [O III]λλ\lambda\lambda4959, 5007, [N II]λλ\lambda\lambda6548, 6583, [S II]λλ\lambda\lambda6716, 6731, [O II]λ\lambda3727, [O III]λ\lambda4363, and [O I]λ\lambda6300. Because the absorption features in the observed spectra are dominated by the instrumental profile, the starlight templates are convolved with a fixed Gaussian profile before the minimization. The starlight component, along with the starlight-subtracted spectrum, are shown in Figure 1.

3.2 Line Profile Modeling

In each starlight-subtracted spectrum, we model the emission line profiles by a linear combination of a set of Gaussian profiles in both Hα\alpha and Hβ\beta regions by the SPECFIT task (Kriss 1994) in the IRAF package. The line flux ratios of the [O III]λλ\lambda\lambda4959, 5007 and the [N II]λλ\lambda\lambda6548, 6583 doublets are fixed to their theoretical values, i.e., 1:3. The line modelings are shown in the left and right panels of Figure 2 for the Hβ\beta and Hα\alpha regions, respectively. In all the spectra except for the one taken in 2019, each Balmer line profile can be well reproduced by a corresponding narrow component. However, a broad component is necessary for fitting the Hα\alpha line profile of the 2019 spectrum. In addition, a weak Hβ\beta broad component is also required to properly reproduce the 2019 observation. The results of the profile modeling, along with the results quoted from Stirpe (1990) for the 1987 spectrum, are listed in Table 1. All the errors reported in the table correspond to the 1σ\sigma significance level, where only the uncertainties caused by the fitting are included.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: An illustration of line profile modelings by a linear combination of a set of Gaussian functions for the Hβ\beta (the left panels) and Hα\alpha (the right panels) regions. In each panel, the modeled continuum has already been removed from the original observed spectrum. The observed and modeled line profiles are plotted by black and red solid lines, respectively. Each Gaussian function is shown by a dashed line. The sub-panel underneath the line spectrum presents the residuals between the observed and modeled profiles.
Table 1: Spectral measurements and analysis.
     Date F(Hβn)F(\mathrm{H\beta_{n}}) F([OIII]λ5007)F(\mathrm{[OIII]\lambda 5007}) F(Hαn)F(\mathrm{H\alpha_{n}}) F(Hβb)F(\mathrm{H\beta_{b}}) FWHM(Hβb\beta_{\mathrm{b}}) F(Hαb)F(\mathrm{H\alpha_{b}}) FWHM(Hαb\alpha_{\mathrm{b}}) MBH/MM_{\mathrm{BH}}/M_{\odot} L/LEddL/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}
1015ergs1cm2\mathrm{10^{-15}\ erg\ s^{-1}\ cm^{-2}} kms1\mathrm{km\ s^{-1}} 1015ergs1cm2\mathrm{10^{-15}\ erg\ s^{-1}\ cm^{-2}} kms1\mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
1987/01/14a 12.0 47.9 33.0 85.1 4740 275.4 3980 2.1×1072.1\times 10^{7} 0.014
2001/11/16 6.5±1.66.5\pm 1.6 46.3±3.546.3\pm 3.5 56.5±6.456.5\pm 6.4
2003/10/25 9.6±1.29.6\pm 1.2 51.1±2.451.1\pm 2.4 47.1±4.447.1\pm 4.4
2010/11/09 9.8±2.09.8\pm 2.0 48.3±5.548.3\pm 5.5 56.1±4.856.1\pm 4.8
2019/09/06 6.7±1.66.7\pm 1.6 30.9±2.530.9\pm 2.5 30.5±3.230.5\pm 3.2 17.6±1.617.6\pm 1.6 7600±26007600\pm 2600 167.5±5.0167.5\pm 5.0 7800±2007800\pm 200 (9.8±2.8)×107(9.8\pm 2.8)\times 10^{7} 0.004±0.0010.004\pm 0.001
aafootnotetext: The data are quoted from Stirpe (1990).

3.3 Blackhole mass and Eddington ratio

We then estimate the SMBH viral mass (MBHM_{\mathrm{BH}}) and Eddington ratio Lbol/LEddL_{\mathrm{bol}}/L_{\mathrm{Edd}} (where LEdd=1.26×1038MBH/Mergs1L_{\mathrm{Edd}}=1.26\times 10^{38}M_{\mathrm{BH}}/M_{\odot}\ \mathrm{erg\ s^{-1}} is the Eddington luminosity) of UGC 3223 from the modeled broad Hα\alpha emission lines, according to several well-established calibrated relationships (e.g., Kaspi et al. 2000, 2005; Marziani & Sulentic 2012; Peterson 2014; Du et al. 2014, 2015).

The calibration given by Green & Ho (2007)

MBH=3.0×106(LHα1042ergs1)0.45(FWHM(Hα)1000kms1)2.06MM_{\mathrm{BH}}=3.0\times 10^{6}\bigg{(}\frac{L_{\mathrm{H\alpha}}}{10^{42}\ \mathrm{erg\ s^{-1}}}\bigg{)}^{0.45}\bigg{(}\frac{\mathrm{FWHM(H\alpha)}}{1000\ \mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}}\bigg{)}^{2.06}M_{\odot} (1)

is used to estimate MBHM_{\mathrm{BH}}. To obtain an estimation of Lbol/LEddL_{\mathrm{bol}}/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}, we derive the bolometric luminosity LbolL_{\mathrm{bol}} from the standard bolometric correction Lbol=9λLλ(5100Å)L_{\mathrm{bol}}=9\lambda L_{\lambda}(5100\AA) (e.g., Kaspi et al. 2000), where Lλ(5100Å)L_{\lambda}(5100\AA) is the AGN’s specific continuum luminosity at 5100Å. This specific luminosity can be inferred from the Hα\alpha broad-line luminosity through the calibration (Greene & Ho 2005)

λLλ(5100Å)=2.4×1043(LHα1042ergs1)0.86\lambda L_{\lambda}(5100\AA)=2.4\times 10^{43}\bigg{(}\frac{L_{\mathrm{H\alpha}}}{10^{42}\ \mathrm{erg\ s^{-1}}}\bigg{)}^{0.86} (2)

The estimated MBHM_{\mathrm{BH}} and Lbol/LEddL_{\mathrm{bol}}/L_{\mathrm{Edd}} are tabulated in Columns (9) and (10) in Table 1, along with the uncertainties, respectively, after taking into account both the proper error propagation and the uncertainties of the used calibrations222The uncertainties can not be determined for the 1987 spectrum because of the lack of errors of the measured parameters in Stirpe (1990).. In the estimation of LHαL_{\mathrm{H\alpha}}, the intrinsic extinction has been corrected from the narrow-line ratio Hα\alpha/Hβ\beta, assuming the Balmer decrement of standard case B recombination and a Galactic extinction curve with RV=3.1R_{V}=3.1.

An extremely low Lbol/LEdd=0.004±0.001L_{\mathrm{bol}}/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}=0.004\pm 0.001 is finally found from the 2019 spectrum.

4 Results and Discussion

The local AGN UGC 3223, which was originally classified as a Seyfert 1.5 galaxy, has been spectroscopically observed by us in four different epochs in past 19 years. Our observations and spectral analysis indicate that the object changes to a Seyfert 2 galaxy without broad Balmer emission lines in the spectra taken in 2001, 2003 and 2011. A reappearance of the broad Hα\alpha emission line (and also of a weak Hβ\beta broad emission) is found in our 2019 spectrum, although the line width of the broad Hα\alpha in 2019 is about twice of the value obtained from the 1987 spectrum (Stirpe 1990).

We argue that the lack of broad Balmer component in the 2001, 2003 and 2010 spectra is not due to their low spectral resolution. First, the Balmer lines in the three spectra have measured line widths close to those of the forbidden narrow emission lines. Second, the average narrow-line ratio of F(Hα+NIIλλ6548,6583)/F(SIIλλ6716,6731)F(\mathrm{H\alpha+NII\lambda\lambda 6548,6583})/F(\mathrm{SII\lambda\lambda 6716,6731}) is 4.21 for the three spectra, which is highly consistent with the value of 4.19 of the 2019 spectrum. This consistency indicates that there is unlikely a potential broad component in the modeled line profiles of the three spectra.

Figure 3 shows the multi-wavelength light curves of UGC 3223. Within the epochs of the last two spectra, its mid-infrared (MIR) brightness detected by the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE and NEOWISE-R, Wright et al. 2010; Mainzer et al. 2014) increases gradually when the object changes from a type-II AGN to a type-1.8 AGN, which supports the scenario that the type transition is likely due to the enhancement of accretion rate rather than the obscuring effect (e.g., (e.g., Sheng et al. 2017; Stern et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2019b).

Even though a breath of broad-line region (BLR) has been previously discovered in a few local AGNs by long term monitoring, a thorough disappearance of the BLR emission is still rare. To our best knowledge, Mrk 590 was the first, and maybe the only repeat CL-AGN that shows “on-off-on” transition sequence with a thorough “turn-off”. The spectrum taken in 2014 indicates that Mrk 590 finally changed to a true Seyfert 2 galaxy from a typical type-I AGN (Denney et al. 2014). After a period of a few years, the object awakes and turns back a type-I AGN (Mathur et al. 2018; Raimundo et al. 2019). Similar to Mrk 590 and UGC 3223, Mrk 1018 changes from type 1.9 to type 1.0 in the spectrum taken in 1980s (Cohen et al. 1986), and changes back type 1.9 in the 2016 spectrum (Husemann et al. 2016; McElory et al. 2016).

Figure 4 compares UGC 3223 to whole AGN population and to a compilation of known CL-AGNs (Wang et al. 2019b) by marking it on the distributions of LbolMBHL_{\mathrm{bol}}-M_{\mathrm{BH}} (the left panel) and LbolL/LEddL_{\mathrm{bol}}-L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}} (the right panel). UGC 3223 marginally stands out of the known CL-AGNs due to the lowest L/LEdd0.004L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}\sim 0.004. SDSS J233602.98+001728.7 at z=0.243z=0.243 is located adjacent to UGC 3223 in both distributions. It is interesting that SDSS J233602.98+001728.7 shows similarity to UGC3223 in type transition from type-1.5 to type-2 (Ruan et al. 2016), although its repeat transition has not yet been discovered.

Two scenarios can potentially account for the discovered repeat type transition with a thorough “turn-off” exhibition. On the one hand, the disappearance and re-appearance of the BLR can be understood in the context of the previously proposed disk-wind BLR models, because the Lbol/LEddL_{\mathrm{bol}}/L_{\mathrm{Edd}} of UGC 3223 is most close to the critical value predicted by the disk-wind models. A critical value of Lbol/LEdd23×103L_{\mathrm{bol}}/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}\approx 2-3\times 10^{-3} is in fact proposed by Nicastro (2000) for a BH mass within a range of 1078M10^{7-8}M_{\odot}. This critical value is resulted from a critical radius of the accretion disk where the power deposited into the vertical outflow is maximum. In the model proposed in Elitzur & Ho (2009), an observable BLR can not be sustained below a certain luminosity L5×1039(MBH/107M)2/3ergs1L\approx 5\times 10^{39}(M_{\mathrm{BH}}/10^{7}M_{\odot})^{2/3}\ \mathrm{ergs^{-1}} because the mass outflow rate scales with LL as L1/4L^{1/4} (Elitzur & Shlosman 2006). A much lower critical value of Lbol/LEdd106L_{\mathrm{bol}}/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}\sim 10^{-6} is therefore predicted for a transition between disappearance and appearance of BLR when the fiducal values of a set of parameters of the disk are adopted. In the case of UGC 3223, the critical values of disappearance of BLR are L2×1040ergs1L\sim 2\times 10^{40}\ \mathrm{erg\ s^{-1}} and Lbol/LEdd2×106L_{\mathrm{bol}}/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}\sim 2\times 10^{-6}. On the other hand, an once-dormant and reactive central engine in UGC 3223 can not be excluded at current stage, although the physical reason of shutting down of fueling of the SMBH is still an open question.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: The multi-wavelength light curves of UGC 3223. For the Wise w1w1 and w2w2 bands, the light curves are binned by averaging the measurements within one day. The vertical dashed lines mark the epochs of spectra, where the blue lines denote a spectrum with broad Balmer lines, and the red ones a spectrum without broad Balmer lines.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: The LbolMBHL_{\mathrm{bol}}-M_{\mathrm{BH}} (the left panel) and LbolL/LEddL_{\mathrm{bol}}-L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}(the right panel) diagrams. UGC3223 is marked by the black open stars. The “turn-on” states of known CL-AGNs and repeat CL-AGNs are denoted by the black and green open squares, respectively. The used comparison samples are described as follows. Red cross: the quasars with z<0.5z<0.5 taken from the value-added SDSS DR7 quasar catalog; blue cross: the SDSS DR3 NLS1 catalog; magenta cross: the SDSS DR7 intermediate-type AGNs. The Swift/BAT AGN sample is shown by the green, yellow and cyan cross for Seyfert 1, 1.2 and 1.5 galaxies, respectively. See Wang et al. (2019b) and references therein for the details of the used comparison samples.

5 Conclusion

Nearby Seyfert galaxy UGC 3223 is identified as a new repeat CL-AGN by our multi-spectroscopy carried out from 2001 to 2019. The object shows a type transition of 1.521.81.5\rightarrow 2\rightarrow 1.8 within a period of about 30 years, and a thorough “turn-off” state for at least 10 years. We argue that the type transition of UGC 3223 not only could be explained by the disk-wind BLR model, but also suggests a once-dormant and reactive central engine. We finally state that our proposed space-based ultraviolet patrol mission (Wang et al. 2019a) is potentially an effective way for selecting CL-AGN candidates and studying the nature of these objects.

The authors thank all the anonymous referees for their careful review and helpful suggestions that improved the manuscript. The study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant 11773036, and by the Strategic Pioneer Program on Space Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, grant Nos. XDA15052600 & XDA15016500. JW is supported by Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (2018GXNSFGA281007), and by Bagui Young Scholars Program. Special thanks go to the staff at Xinglong Observatory as a part of National Astronomical Observatories, China Academy of Sciences for their instrumental and observational help. This study is supported by the Open Project Program of the Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, NAOC, CAS. This study uses the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, and the data collected by Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE), which is a joint project of the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

References

  • Antonucci (1993) Antonucci, R. R. J. 1993, ARA&A, 31, 473
  • Bruzual & Charlot (2003) Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000
  • Cardelli et al. (1989) Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245
  • Cohen et al. (1986) Cohen, R. D., Rudy, R. J., Puetter, R. C., Ake, T. B., & Foltz, C. B. 1986, ApJ, 311, 135
  • Dexter & Begelamn (2019) Dexter, J., & Begelman, M. C. 2019, MNRAS, 483, L17
  • Denney et al. (2014) Denney, K. D., De Rosa, G., Croxall, K., et al. 2014, ApJ, 796, 134
  • Du et al. (2015) Du, P., Hu, C., Lu, K. X., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, 22
  • Du et al. (2014) Du, P., Wang, J. M., Hu, C., Valls-Gabaud, D., Baldwin, J, A., Ge, J. Q., & Xue, S. J. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 2828
  • Elitzur & Ho (2009) Elitzur, M., & Ho, L. C. 2009, ApJ, 701, 91
  • Elitzur & Shlosman (2006) Elitzur, M., & Shlosman, I. 2006, ApJ, 648, 101
  • Fan et al. (2016) Fan, Z., Wang, H. J., Jiang, X. J., et al. 2016, PASP, 128, 115005
  • Frederick et al. (2019) Frederick, S., Gezari, S., Graham, M. J., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 31
  • Gezari et al. (2017) Gezari, S., Hung, T., Cenko, S. B., et al. 2017, ApJ, 835, 144
  • Graham et al. (2019) Graham, M. J., Ross, N. P., Stern, D., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 4925
  • Greene & Ho (2005) Greene, J. E., & Ho, L. C. 2005, ApJ, 630 ,122
  • Greene & Ho (2007) Greene, J. E., & Ho, L. C. 2007, ApJ, 670, 92
  • Husemann et al. (2016) Husemann, B., Urrutia, T., Tremblay, G. R., et al. 2016, A&A, 593, L9
  • Hutsemekers et al. (2019) Hutsemekers D., Agis Gonzalez B., Marin F., Sluse D., Ramos Almeida C., Acosta Pulido J.-A., 2019, A&A, 625, A54
  • Jiang et al. (2016) Jiang, Y. F., Davis, S. W., & Stone, J. M. 2016, ApJ, 827, 10
  • Kaspi et al. (2005) Kaspi, S., Maoz, D., Netzer, H., Peterson, B. M., Vestergaard, M., & Jannuzi, B. T. 2005, ApJ, 629, 61
  • Kaspi et al. (2000) Kaspi, S., Smith, P.S., Netzer, H., Maoz, D., Jannuzi, B.T., & Giveon, U. 2000, ApJ, 533, 631
  • Kriss (1994) Kriss, G. 1994, Adass, 3, 437
  • LaMassa et al. (2015) LaMassa, S. M., Cales, S., Moran, E. C., et al. 2015, ApJ, 800, 144
  • Lawrence (2018) Lawrence, A. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 102
  • MacLeod et al. (2019) MacLeod, C. L., Green, P. J., Anderson, S. F., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, 8
  • MacLeod et al. (2010) MacLeod, C. L., Ivezic, Z., Kochanek, C. S., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 1014
  • MacLeod et al. (2016) MacLeod, C. L., Ross, N. P., Lawrence, A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 389
  • Mainzer et al. (2014) Mainzer, A., Bauer, J., Cutri, R. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 792, 30
  • Marin et al. (2019) Marin, F., Hutsemekers, D., & Agis Gonzalez, B. 2019, proceedings of the 2019’s annual conference of the SF2A , arXiv/astro-ph:1909.02801
  • Marziani & Sulentic (2012) Marziani, P., & Sulentic, J. W. 2012, New A Rev., 56, 49
  • Mathur et al. (2018) Mathur, S., Denney, K. D., Gupta, A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 886, 123
  • Massey et al. (1988) Massey, P., Strobel, K., Barnes, J. V., et al. 1988, ApJ, 328, 315
  • McElroy et al. (2016) McElroy, R. E., Husemann, B., Croom, S. M., et al. 2016, A&A, 593, L8
  • Nicastro (2000) Nicastro, F. 2000, ApJ, 530, 65
  • Peterson (2014) Peterson, B. M. 2014, SSRv, 183, 253
  • Raimundo et al. (2019) Raimundo, S. I., Vestergaard, M., Koay, J. Y., Lawther, D., Casasola, V., & Peterson, B. M. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 123
  • Ross et al. (2018) Ross, N. P., Ford, K. E. S., Graham, M., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4468
  • Ruan et al. (2016) Ruan, J. J., Anderson, S. F., Cales, S. L., et al. 2016, ApJ, 826, 188
  • Rumbaugh et al. (2018) Rumbaugh, N., Shen, Y., Morganson, E., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 160
  • Runnoe et al. (2016) Runnoe, J. C., Cales, S., Ruan, J. J., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 1691
  • Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011) Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103
  • Shapovalova et al. (2010) Shapovalova, A. I., Popovic, L. C., Burenkov, A. N., et al. 2010, A&A, 509, 106
  • Shappee et al. (2014) Shappee, B. J., Prieto, J. L., Grupe, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 48
  • Sheng et al. (2017) Sheng, Z., Wang, T., Jiang, N., et al. 2017, ApJ, 846, 7
  • Stern et al. (2018) Stern, D., McKernan, B., Graham, M. J., et al. 2018, ApJ, 864, 27
  • Stirpe (1990) Stirpe, G. M. 1990, A&AS, 85, 1049
  • Tody (1986) Tody, D. 1986, SPIE, 627, 733
  • Tody (1992) Tody, D. 1992, ASPC, 52, 173
  • Trakhtenbrot et al. (2019) Trakhtenbrot, B., Arcavi, I., MacLeod, C. L., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 94
  • Veron-Cetty & Veron (2006) Veron-Cetty, M. -P., & Veron, P. 2006, A&A, 455, 773
  • Wang et al. (2019a) Wang, J., Liang, E. W., & Wei, J. Y. 2019a, PASP, 131, 095001
  • Wang et al. (2018) Wang, J., Xu, D. W., & Wei, J. Y. 2018, ApJ, 858, 49
  • Wang et al. (2019b) Wang, J., Xu, D. W., Wang, Y., Zhang, J. B., Zheng, J., & Wei, J. Y. 2019b, ApJ, 887, 15
  • Wright et al. (2010) Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868
  • Yan et al. (2019) Yan, L., Wang, T. G., Jiang, N., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, 44
  • Yang et al. (2018) Yang, Q., Wu, X. B., Fan, X. H., et al. 2018, ApJ, 862, 109