Tate Conjecture and Higher Brauer Groups of Abelian Varieties in Characteristic Zero
Abstract.
Let be an abelian variety over a field finitely generated over . We show that the finiteness of the -primary torsion subgroup of the higher Brauer group is a sufficient criterion for the Tate conjecture to hold. Furthermore, we extend methods for computations of transcendental Brauer groups to higher Brauer groups.
Key words and phrases:
Tate conjecture, higher Brauer groups, Lichtenbaum cohomology2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
14C25, 14G25, 14F22, 11G051. Introduction
Let be a smooth projective variety over a field . The cohomological Brauer groups appears in several different settings in algebraic geometry. For example it obstructs the Hasse principle on (see [5]) and it appears in a formula describing Zeta functions (see [10, Conjecture C]).
The list of applications also includes obstructions to the Tate conjecture: Let be finitely generated over its prime field and let be a smooth projective -variety. The Tate conjecture in codimension at a prime is the statement that the canonical cycle map is surjective [11]. Here denotes the base change to a separable closure of and is the absolute Galois group. For a surface over a finite field Tate has shown that holds if and only if the -primary torsion subgroup of the cohomological Brauer group is finite [10, Theorem 5.2].
This has been generalised using higher Brauer groups which are defined using Lichtenbaum cohomology. The Lichtenbaum cohomology groups are defined to be the hyper-cohomology groups of the (unbounded) complex of étale sheaves given by Bloch’s cycle complex [1] on the small étale site . The higher Brauer groups considered in this note are ; as there exists a quasi-isomorphism , we retrieve the Brauer group . For any smooth projective, geometrically integral variety over a finite field and any prime , the Tate conjecture holds precisely when the -primary subgroup of is finite [7, Theorem 1.4].
We give a partial answer to the question whether higher Brauer groups provide a similar obstruction to the Tate conjecture when is finitely generated over in Section 3 where we prove the following
Theorem.
Let be an abelian variety over a field finitely generated over . Fix an integer and a prime . If the group is finite, then the Tate conjecture for in codimension holds at the prime .
For any smooth projective variety over a field there exists a natural homomorphism where again denotes the base change to a separable closure of . The kernel is referred to as algebraic Brauer group while the quotient is called transcendental Brauer group.
We remark that if the characteristic if is zero and is geometrically integral, the cokernel of is finite [2, Théorème 2.1]. The question whether this is also true for is open.
If furthermore is an abelian variety, Skorobogatov and Zarhin have proven (in the classical case, i.e. ) the formula
for any odd integer [8, Corollary 2.3], relating the transcendental Brauer group of with étale cohomology and the Chow group of the base change . This formula allows some computations of transcendental Brauer groups, see for example [8].
While we cannot say anything about itself, we prove an analogue of the above formula for higher Brauer groups and discuss how some of the computations of transcendental Brauer groups carry over to higher Brauer groups.
Notations and Conventions.
For a field we fix a separable closure and denote by its absolute Galois group. For each -variety we denote by the base change to the closure.
For an abelian group we denote by the kernel of the multiplication by . Let be a prime; the subgroup is referred to as the -primary torsion subgroup. Taking the projective limit instead gives us the Tate module which is a torsion free -module.
Similarly, for an abelian variety over we denote by the kernel of the multiplication by in .
For a group and a -module we define to be the maximal subgroup of being invariant under the action of .
2. Lichtenbaum cohomology
We start with the definitions of Lichtenbaum cohomology, higher Brauer groups and Chow-L groups as used in this paper.
For the entire section let be an equi-dimensional smooth quasi-projective variety over a field and denote by the cycle complex of abelian groups defined by Bloch [1]. As the assertion
defines a complex of sheaves on the flat site of , it also defines complexes resp. of sheaves on the étale resp. Zariski site of . We remark, that these complexes are unbounded on the left. For an abelian group , we set and define the Lichtenbaum respectively motivic cohomology groups with coefficients in by letting
The definition of the hypercohomology of an unbounded complex was given in [9, p. 121].
For Chow groups we have the isomorphisms which motivates the definition of Chow-L groups. With rational coefficients motivic cohomology and Lichtenbaum cohomology agree and therefore .
We define higher Brauer groups as . The term ‘higher Brauer groups’ is justified by the fact that in weight we have a quasi-isomorphism which implies that and are isomorphic.
We remark that with rational coefficients Lichtenbaum cohomology groups and motivic cohomology groups coincide and therefore is trivial. This implies that the higher Brauer groups is a quotient of and thus a torsion group.
For each prime multiplication by gives us the exact sequence
For primes different from the characteristic of this sequence together with the quasi-isomorphism constructed by Geisser and Levine [4, Theorem 1.5] furnishes us with short exact universal coefficient sequences
In particular, in bidegree this sequence reads
(1) |
and generalises the exact sequence for the classical Brauer group induced by the Kummer sequence.
3. Tate Conjecture for Abelian Varieties
Let be a field finitely generated over . Fix a separable closure of and denote by the absolute Galois group. For a smooth projective geometrically integral -variety we consider the composition of canonical homomorphisms
(2) |
which induces a bunch of homomorphisms
where . The map induces a map
and the image of agrees with the image of . Moreover, the homomorphism agrees the cycle map .
Theorem 3.1.
Let be an abelian variety over a finite field extension of . Fix an integer and a prime . If the group is finite, then the Tate conjecture for in codimension holds at the prime .
Proof.
We have the following commutative diagram with exact rows.
Skorobogatov and Zarhin have shown [8, Proposition 2.2] that with our assumptions the canonical homomorphism admits a section and hence is surjective. This implies that for each integer the group is quotient of .
Since is finite, there exists an integer such that . Since for all the cardinality of the cokernels is bounded by , it follows that the limit is a finite group.
This implies that the cokernel of and hence the cokernel of is finite. But this means that and thus are surjective. ∎
Remark 3.2.
With similar arguments Rosenschon and Srinivas [7, Theorem 1.4] have proven that for any smooth projective, geometrically connected variety over a finite field and a prime the Tate conjecture for at in codimension holds precisely when the group is finite. Moreover, they constructed an integral cycle map
and showed that is equivalent to the surjectivity of . Note that the latter is not true when the Chow-L group is replaced by the Chow group. More precisely, there exists examples where the cycle map is not surjective; see [3, Section 2].
So far the author is not aware of an answer to the question whether the converse of the above theorem holds. We also do not know whether in the situation of the Theorem the Tate conjecture implies surjectivity of an integral cycle map such as .
Let is a field finitely generated over and let be a smooth projective geometrically integral -variety. In that case Rosenschon and Srinivas [7, Theorem 1.2] have shown that the Tate conjecture for in codimension at prime is equivalent to the surjectivity of the integral cycle map
4. Computing Higher Brauer Groups
In view of the previous section it is desirable being able to compute higher Brauer groups, at least for abelian varieties. The objective of this section is to extend efforts of computing transcendental Brauer groups of abelian varieties in characteristic zero to higher Brauer groups.
The main result of this section is the following theorem which for was shown by Skorobogatov and Zarhin [8, Corollary 2.3].
Theorem 4.1.
Let be a field finitely generated over and let be an abelian variety over . For any integers such that we have an isomorphism
Proof.
Restricting the exact sequence (1) with to the Galois invariants and using the exact sequence (1) with we get the following commutative diagram with exact rows
(7) |
By [8, Proposition 2.2] the homomorphism is split surjective. In that case the commutativity of the diagram implies that the images of and coincide which implies that the groups and are isomorphic. ∎
For products of elliptic curves we can prove even more precise formulae. Let be elliptic curves and set . Our aim is to obtain a better understanding of the higher Brauer group . For this we need some results concerning the Chow-L group and the étale cohomology groups .
The map induced by the cycle map factors through the map which is induced by the composition of caninical homomorphisms (2).
The isomorphisms and the perfect Weil pairings furnish us with canonical isomorphisms (see [8, Section 3])
Using these isomorphisms and the Künneth formula [6, VI. §8] we obtain an isomorphism of -modules
Deeper investigation of the above isomorphism shows that each of the three -copies is generated by a fundamental class coming from one of the elliptic curves .
Lemma 4.2.
The group contains a direct summand generated by the classes coming from the elliptic curves.
Proof.
The group has the direct summand which is generated by the classes of the elliptic curves. The composition
where the first map is and the last map is the obvious projection to a direct summand, is the identity map. Since the involved cycle map and thus the whole composition factors through , this implies that has a direct summand generated by classes coming from the elliptic curves. ∎
In the case the following theorem and its applications presented below were shown by Skorobogatov and Zarhin [8].
Theorem 4.3.
Let be the quotient and let be the -module . Then:
-
(i)
For each integer there exists an isomorphism
-
(ii)
For each integer not divisible by primes we get an isomorphism
Proof.
The exact sequence (1) with and stays exact when we remove the summands in the first two terms, i.e. we have an exact sequence proving (i).
For (ii) consider the commutative diagram with exact rows
(12) |
where the vertical arrow is the composition of the canonical maps and . If is not divisible by a prime less or equal , the first arrow is split surjective by [8, Proposition 2.2] and composing the section of the second with the section of the first arrow we get a section for . With the arguments of the proof of Theorem 4.1 we get that is isomorphic to the group . ∎
We now consider the special case of a triple product of a elliptic curve and . The groups and are defined as in Theorem 4.3.
Proposition 4.4.
Let be an elliptic curve such that for each prime the image of in is . Then .
Proof.
First note, that as is not solvable for , the elliptic curve of the proposition is without complex multiplication, i.e. , c.f. an argument given in [8, Proposition 4.1].
In view of Theorem 4.3 it suffices to prove that is trivial. Application of [8, Lemma 4.4] to yields that (generated by the identity endomorphisms in the copies of in ). It therefore suffices to prove that .
Consider the composition of canonical maps
where is given by
The two outer groups are (generated by the identity maps) and one easily checks that this composition is the identity. This implies that is injective and, as its image is contained in , that contains . ∎
For our second application let be an elliptic curve over with complex multiplication. For an odd prime the curve has no rational isogeny of degree , if and only if does not contain a Galois invariant subgroup of order .
Proposition 4.5.
Let be an odd prime such that has no rational isogeny of degree . Then the group is trivial.
Proof.
The -module is semisimple since is semisimple. This implies that the exact sequence (1) yields an isomorphism .
Denote by the image of in . It is known that the centraliser of in is isomorphic to [8, Theorem 4.6]. On the other hand, the centraliser equals the subgroup of Galois invariant endomorphisms and contains all the multiples of the identity endomorphism which come from the multiples of the three diagonals in . Thus, we have the inclusion proving the triviality of . ∎
Acknowledgement
The author thanks Andreas Rosenschon for sugesting to work on these questions. Parts of this paper were written while the author was member of DFG Sonderforschungsbereich 701 at Bielefeld University.
References
- [1] Spencer Bloch, Algebraic Cycles and Higher K-Theory, Adv. in Math 61 (1986), no. 3, 267–304.
- [2] Jean-Louis Colliot-Thélène and Alexei N. Skorobogatov, Descente galoisienne sur le groupe de Brauer, J. Reine Angew. Math. 682 (2013), 141–165. MR 3181502
- [3] Jean-Louis Colliot-Thélène and Tamás Szamuely, Autour de la conjecture de Tate à coefficients pour les variétés sur les corps finis, The geometry of algebraic cycles, Clay Math. Proc., vol. 9, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2010, pp. 83–98.
- [4] Thomas Geisser and Marc Levine, The Bloch-Kato conjecture and a theorem of Suslin-Voevodsky, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 530 (2001), 55–103.
- [5] Y. I. Manin, Le groupe de Brauer-Grothendieck en géométrie diophantienne, Actes du Congrès International des Mathématiciens (Nice, 1970), Tome 1, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1971, pp. 401–411. MR 0427322
- [6] James S Milne, Etale Cohomology (pms-33), vol. 33, Princeton university press, 1980.
- [7] Andreas Rosenschon and V. Srinivas, Étale motivic cohomology and algebraic cycles, J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 15 (2016), no. 3, 511–537.
- [8] Alexei N. Skorobogatov and Yuri G. Zarhin, The Brauer group of Kummer surfaces and torsion of elliptic curves, J. Reine Angew. Math. 666 (2012), 115–140. MR 2920883
- [9] Andrei Suslin and Vladimir Voevodsky, Bloch-Kato Conjecture and Motivic Cohomology with Finite Coefficients, The Arithmetic and Geometry of Algebraic Cycles, NATO Science Series, vol. 548, Springer Netherlands, 2000, pp. 117–189.
- [10] John Tate, On the conjectures of Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer and a geometric analogon, Séminaire Bourbaki 18 (1965/66), no. 306, 415–440.
- [11] John Tate, Conjectures on algebraic cycles in l-adic cohomology, Motives (Seattle, WA, 1991) 55 (1994), 71–83.