This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Testing the strength of the UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) anomaly at the chiral phase transition in two-flavour QCD

, Owe Philipsen
Institute für Theoretische Physik, Goethe Universität, Max-von-Laue-Strasse 1, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
E-mail:
   Marco Cè
Helmholtz-Institut Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Germany
   Anthony Francis
Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
   Tim Harris
Dip. di Fisica G. Occhialini, Università di Milano-Bicocca, and INFN, Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 3, I-20126 Milano, Italy
   Harvey B. Meyer, Hartmut Wittig
PRISMA Cluster of Excellence and Institut für Kernphysik and Helmholtz-Institut Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Germany
Abstract:

We study the thermal transition of QCD with two degenerate light flavours by lattice simulations using 𝒪(a)\mathcal{O}(a)-improved Wilson quarks. Particular emphasis lies on the pattern of chiral symmetry restoration, which we probe via the static screening correlators. On 32332^{3} volumes we observe that the screening masses in transverse iso-vector vector and axial-vector channels become degenerate at the transition temperature. The splitting between the screening masses in iso-vector scalar and pseudoscalar channels is strongly reduced compared to the splitting at zero temperature and is actually consistent with zero within uncertainties. In this proceedings article we extend our studies to matrix elements and iso-singlet correlation functions. Furthermore, we present results on larger volumes, including first results at the physical pion mass.

1 Introduction

One of the peculiar features of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) is the spontaneous and explicit breaking of chiral symmetry. In the case with two massless quark flavours the theory is invariant under global transformations with elements of

SUL(2)×SUR(2)×UA(1)×UV(1).\textnormal{SU}_{L}(2)\times\textnormal{SU}_{R}(2)\times\textnormal{U}_{A}(1)\times\textnormal{U}_{V}(1)\,. (1)

The UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) symmetry, however, is anomalously broken on the quantum level due to the Adler-Bell-Jackiw, or chiral, anomaly. In particular, the conservation equation for the axial vector current reads

μAμj(x)=δj0Nfg0232π2εαβμνTr[Fαβ(x)Fμν(x)]=δj0NfQ(x),\partial_{\mu}A^{j}_{\mu}(x)=-\delta_{j0}\frac{N_{f}\,g_{0}^{2}}{32\pi^{2}}\varepsilon^{\alpha\beta\mu\nu}\textnormal{Tr}\big{[}F_{\alpha\beta}(x)F_{\mu\nu}(x)\big{]}=-\delta_{j0}N_{f}Q(x)\,, (2)

where Q(x)Q(x) denotes the operator associated with the topological charge density and

Aμj(x)=ψ¯(x)γμγ5(τj/2)ψ(x),A^{j}_{\mu}(x)=\bar{\psi}(x)\gamma_{\mu}\gamma_{5}(\tau^{j}/2)\psi(x)\,, (3)

is the axial current, including the Pauli matrices τj\tau^{j} for j=1,2,3j=1,2,3 and τ0=𝟏\tau^{0}=\mathbf{1}. Due to this anomalous breaking, the spontaneous breaking of chiral symmetry leads to three Goldstone bosons only, neutral and charged pions, while the η\eta^{\prime} meson retains a finite mass, even for vanishing light quark masses [1, 2].

The fate of the anomalous breaking of the UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) symmetry at finite temperature plays a key role for the properties of the QCD phase diagram. In particular, the phase transition in the chiral limit of the light (uu and dd) quarks is sensitive to the possible restoration of the UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) symmetry at the critical temperature, which could change the order and/or the universality class of the transition (see Refs. [3, 4, 5]). The two possible scenarios for the QCD phase diagram in dependence of the masses of the three lightest quarks are shown in Fig. 1. In scenario (1), the 2nd order chiral critical line reaches the mud=0m_{ud}=0 axis in a tricritical point at mstricm_{s}^{tric}, rendering the chiral transition 2nd order from this point on. The universality class in this scenario depends on the strength of the breaking of UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) at the chiral transition. If the effect of the breaking is negligible, i.e. the symmetry effectively restored, the transition will be in the U(2)×U(2)U(2)\textnormal{U}(2)\times\textnormal{U}(2)\to\textnormal{U}(2) [4, 5] universality class (alternatively a SU(2)×SU(2)×Z4SU(2)\textnormal{SU}(2)\times\textnormal{SU}(2)\times Z_{4}\to\textnormal{SU}(2) universality class has also been proposed [6]) rather than in the standard O(4)\textnormal{O}(4) universality class [3] for a substantial breaking of UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1). It is also possible that the restoration of the UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) symmetry is sufficient to keep the transition first order for all values of the strange quark mass [3]. This is scenario (2) in Fig. 1. The question which of the two scenarios is realised is the only remaining completely open qualitative question of the phase diagram at vanishing chemical potential. Among the main problems to answer this questions are the inability to simulate directly in the chiral limit and the similarity of the different types of scaling behaviour. Investigating the fate of the UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) symmetry at the chiral phase transition offers a viable alternative to the above methods (see our earlier paper [7] for a more detailed discussion and references).

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The two possible scenarios for the phase structure of QCD at zero chemical potential.

The pattern of chiral symmetry restoration can be investigated using correlation functions of operators connected by the individual symmetries (see also [8]). One particular example are iso-vector correlation functions in vector Vμj(x)=ψ¯(x)γμγ5(τj/2)ψ(x)V^{j}_{\mu}(x)=\bar{\psi}(x)\gamma_{\mu}\gamma_{5}(\tau^{j}/2)\psi(x) and axial vector Aμj(x)A^{j}_{\mu}(x) channels, which are related by the SUA(2)\textnormal{SU}_{A}(2) rotation. Consequently, the restoration of chiral symmetry implies the degeneracy of the associated correlation functions. Of particular relevance for the UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) symmetry are correlation functions in scalar and pseudoscalar channels. Including the iso-singlet operators (opening up new channels for the investigation of the effective symmetry restoration, see Ref. [9], for instance), they are related by SUA(2)\textnormal{SU}_{A}(2) and UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) transformations as shown in Fig. 2. The iso-vector operators PiP^{i} and SiS^{i} are comparably easy to compute on the lattice, due to the absence of disconnected diagrams, so that they have become the standard channels to look at to test for UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) symmetry restoration. Since we are considering an effective restoration of the symmetry, we expect the renormalised correlation functions to become degenerate.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Transformation relations between iso-vector and iso-singlet operators in PP and SS channels.

A number of studies have looked at the effective restoration of the UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) symmetry in lattice QCD, mostly focussing on the low mode spectrum of the Dirac operator or chiral susceptibilities [10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. In contrast, we pursue a complementary approach, using the correlation functions, in particular, the screening masses. Screening masses probe the long distance properties of the correlation functions and are free of contact terms, which contaminate chiral susceptibilities, for instance. Apart from screening masses, the correlation functions include additional information in terms of matrix elements. The details of our strategy are explained in [7], where the iso-vector screening masses obtained from 16×32316\times 32^{3} lattices have been published. Here we extend this study to larger volumes, the matrix elements of the correlation functions and present first results for iso-singlet screening masses, which provide additional information about the symmetry restoration pattern. Earlier accounts of our study have been reported in [15, 16, 17, 18].

2 Simulation Setup

We perform simulations with two flavours of O(a)O(a) improved Wilson fermions [19], with the non-perturbatively estimated clover coefficient from Ref. [20], and Wilson’s gauge action. The simulations employ deflation accelerated versions of the Schwarz [21, 22] and (twisted) mass [23, 24, 25] preconditioned algorithms. We vary the temperature by changing the lattice spacing via the lattice coupling β\beta, keeping the temporal extent fixed at Nt=16N_{t}=16. For more details concerning the simulation algorithms, lines of constant physics and scale setting see [7]. In the approach to the chiral limit we use several quark masses and volumes to control finite size effects. A list of temperature scans with the results for the critical temperatures is given in Tab. 1

scan Volume mudm_{ud} [MeV] mπm_{\pi} [MeV] TcT_{c} [MeV] βc\beta_{c} cfg
B1κ 32332^{3} 41\sim 41 485\sim 485 232(19) 5.465 1000\sim 1000
C1 32332^{3} 17.5\sim 17.5 300 211( 6) 5.405 400\sim 400
C2 48348^{3} 1000\sim 1000
D1 32332^{3} 8.7\sim 8.7 220 190(12) 5.340 750\sim 750
D2 48348^{3} 800\sim 800
E2 48348^{3} 3.6\sim 3.6 135 183\approx 183 5.317 400\sim 400
Table 1: β\beta-scans at Nt=16N_{t}=16. Listed are the lattice volume in lattice units, the quark mass mudm_{ud}, the zero-temperature pion mass mπm_{\pi} (estimated via NNLO χ\chiPT, see [7]), the critical temperature TcT_{c}, the critical lattice coupling βc\beta_{c} and the approximate number of independent configurations per ensemble ‘cfg’ (estimated via the integrated autocorrelation time of the plaquette at TcT_{c}). Scan B1κ has been done with a constant hopping parameter κ\kappa rather than at constant mudm_{ud}. The quoted quark and pion masses correspond to the ones at TcT_{c}. For scan E2 the critical temperature has been estimated from the O(4)\textnormal{O}(4) scaling fit to the 32332^{3} lattices [7].

Our main observables are correlation functions in spatial direction, so called screening correlators [26]. For a particular mesonic operator OO the screening correlation function is given by

CO(xμ)=d3xO(xμ,x)O(0).C_{O}(x_{\mu})=\int d^{3}x_{\perp}\left<O(x_{\mu},\vec{x}_{\perp})O^{\dagger}(0)\right>\,. (4)

Here xμx_{\mu} (we take xμ=zx_{\mu}=z) is the coordinate of the direction in which the correlation function is evaluated and x\vec{x}_{\perp} is the coordinate vector in the orthogonal directions. The equality of the renormalised correlation functions of channels related by a particular symmetry signals its effective restoration. Previously we have focussed on correlation functions with iso-vector operators, i.e. operators including a Pauli matrix τi\tau^{i}, for which only quark connected correlation functions contribute. Here we will also present first results for quark disconnected correlation functions, enabling us to compute correlation functions in iso-singlet channels. The details will be discussed in Sec. 4.

On a periodic lattice of extent LzL_{z}, the leading order of the spectral representation, including only the groundstate contribution, of a correlation function CO(z)C_{O}(z) is given by

CO(z)=|ZO|2MO(eMOz+eMO(Lzz)).C_{O}(z)=\frac{\big{|}Z_{O}\big{|}^{2}}{M_{O}}\Big{(}e^{-M_{O}z}+e^{-M_{O}(L_{z}-z)}\Big{)}\,. (5)

The exponential decay of CO(xμ)C_{O}(x_{\mu}) with xμx_{\mu} defines the ‘screening mass’ MOM_{O} in this channel and the proportionality constant contains the matrix element ZOZ_{O}. Consequently, the equality of the correlation functions not only implies the equivalence of the screening masses, but also of the renormalised matrix elements 𝒵OZO\mathcal{Z}_{O}Z_{O}, where 𝒵O\mathcal{Z}_{O} are the multiplicative renormalisation factors.

3 Anomalous Breaking of UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) from Iso-Vector Correlation Functions

We start with the discussion of the results for correlation functions in the iso-vector channels. In particular, we look at the correlation functions from Eq. (4) in pseudoscalar PiP^{i}, scalar SiS^{i}, vector ViV^{i} and axial vector AiA^{i} channels. In this section we conveniently drop the superscript ii for brevity. Iso-vector correlation functions include a connected part only, which we evaluate using point sources. We typically use 48 point sources per configuration with random starting positions. We first focus on the screening mass differences,

ΔMO1O2=MO1MO2,\Delta M_{O_{1}O_{2}}=M_{O_{1}}-M_{O_{2}}\,, (6)

which are direct measures for the effective restoration of the symmetries. These differences are extracted from plateaus in the effective masses of the ratios of the correlation functions in the individual channels, taking into account the leading order contributions from excited states.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Results for the differences ΔMPS\Delta M_{PS} and ΔMVA\Delta M_{VA}, for scans C1 (left) and D1 (right). The differences are normalised to 2πT2\pi T. The grey area marks the transition region. The results indicated by ΔM¯\overline{\Delta M} are an alternative estimate for the screening mass difference (see [7]).

The results for the screening mass differences on the 32332^{3} volumes, scans C1 and D1, as obtained in [7], are shown in Fig. 3. We observe an approximate degeneracy of MVM_{V} and MAM_{A}, indicating the effective restoration of SUA(2)\textnormal{SU}_{A}(2) at TcT_{c}. The difference ΔMPS\Delta M_{PS} is non-vanishing at TcT_{c}, meaning UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) is still broken for these quark masses. This finding is in qualitative and quantitative agreement with findings from staggered [27], domain wall [10, 28, 29] and overlap [11, 30] fermion formulations. In the approach to the chiral limit the difference decreases. To obtain an estimate in the chiral limit we perform a linear chiral extrapolation of ΔMPS\Delta M_{PS} (averaging over the transition region and using the spread of results as a systematic uncertainty; see Ref. [7]). The results from the averaging procedure for scans B1κ, C1 and D1 versus the quark mass are shown as the grey points in Fig. 5 together with their chiral extrapolation, the grey point at mud=0m_{ud}=0. To enable an assessment whether the breaking is weak or strong in the chiral limit, Fig. 5 also includes a phenomenologically estimate for the mass difference in the chiral limit and at the physical point in full QCD at T=0T=0 [7]. A comparison between the chiral extrapolation and the phenomenological estimate shows that the UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) breaking screening-mass difference is comparably small at TcT_{c}, indicating a weak breaking or even a restoration of the UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) symmetry at mud=0m_{ud}=0.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Results for the differences ΔMPS\Delta M_{PS} and ΔMVA\Delta M_{VA}, for scans C2 (left) and D2 (right).
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Results for ΔMPS\Delta M_{PS} from the temperature scans with a volume of 48348^{3}. The grey points are the results from the 32332^{3} volumes for comparison and the black points are the reference values at T=0T=0 (see text).

For the (L/a)3=323(L/a)^{3}=32^{3} volumes and smaller quark masses, the value for mπLm_{\pi}L, with mπm_{\pi} the T=0T=0 pion mass, becomes smaller than 3. To be able to extend the study to smaller quark masses and to test for finite size effects, we have thus repeated the computations on 48348^{3} lattices. The results for the screening mass differences on these new scans C2 and D2 are shown in Fig. 4. While the results for ΔMVA\Delta M_{VA} look very similar to the ones from the 32332^{3} volumes, ΔMPS\Delta M_{PS} tends to become larger with increasing volume. The result for ΔMPS\Delta M_{PS} at TcT_{c}, once more averaged over the transition region, are shown in Fig. 5. One can see the tendency towards larger screening mass differences with increasing volume. This tendency seems to remain for the chiral limit. To perform a reliable chiral extrapolation, however, we need to extend the simulations to smaller quark masses and increase the statistics for scan D2.

To extend our study to smaller quark masses we have started a temperature scan at the physical pion mass, labelled E2 in Tab. 1. So far only results at T>TcT>T_{c} (TcT_{c} estimated using O(4)\textnormal{O}(4) scaling [7]) are available, for which we have performed measurements with 16 point sources per configuration. The results are shown in Fig. 6. While the results for T/Tc>1.1T/T_{c}>1.1 indicate a smaller

Refer to caption
Figure 6: Results for the differences ΔMPS\Delta M_{PS}, for scans C2, D2 and E2.

value for ΔMPS\Delta M_{PS} the one at T/Tc1.05T/T_{c}\approx 1.05 is further away from zero as for scans C2 and D2 at similar values for T/TcT/T_{c}. The latter, however, lacks statistics and thus can still change considerably. We are currently increasing precision and are extending the runs to TcT_{c} and below.

Refer to caption
Figure 7: Results for the differences ΔZPS\Delta Z_{PS}, for scans C2 and D2.

An alternative observable extracted from correlation functions are the matrix elements ZOZ_{O} from Eq. (5). In contrast to the screening masses, however, these observables demand multiplicative renormalisation. The analogue to ΔMPS\Delta M_{PS} for the matrix elements is the renormalised difference

ΔZPS=𝒵P|ZP|𝒵S|ZS|.\Delta Z_{PS}=\mathcal{Z}_{P}|Z_{P}|-\mathcal{Z}_{S}|Z_{S}|\,. (7)

For the determination of 𝒵P\mathcal{Z}_{P}, we have interpolated the results from [31] as discussed in [7]. The determination of 𝒵S\mathcal{Z}_{S} is a bit more involved and we refer to the renormalisation of the chiral condensate in [7] for the details. The renormalised difference is plotted for scans C1 and D1 in Fig. 7. As the screening mass difference, ΔZPS\Delta Z_{PS} remains non-zero at TcT_{c}. In contrast to ΔMPS\Delta M_{PS}, however, ΔZPS\Delta Z_{PS} shows a tendency to increase when the quark mass is lowered.

4 Iso-Singlet Screening Correlators

Iso-singlet correlation functions open up new channels to investigate the chiral symmetry restoration pattern. In two-flavour QCD with degenerate quark masses, the difference between iso-vector and iso-singlet correlation function is the presence of quark disconnected diagrams for the latter. In this section we will distinguish explicitly between iso-vector OiO^{i} and iso-singlet O0O^{0} operators/correlation functions. Introducing quark connected C𝒪conn(z)C^{\rm conn}_{\mathcal{O}}(z) and quark disconnected C𝒪disc(z)C^{\rm disc}_{\mathcal{O}}(z) correlation functions, defined by traces over quark propagators as depicted in Fig. 8, iso-vector and iso-singlet correlation functions of an operator OO are given by,

COi(z)=12C𝒪conn(z)andCO0(z)=12C𝒪conn(z)+C𝒪disc(z).C_{O^{i}}(z)=-\frac{1}{2}C^{\rm conn}_{\mathcal{O}}(z)\quad\textnormal{and}\quad C_{O^{0}}(z)=-\frac{1}{2}C^{\rm conn}_{\mathcal{O}}(z)+C^{\rm disc}_{\mathcal{O}}(z)\,. (8)
Refer to caption
Figure 8: Graphical representation of quark connected (left) and disconnected (right) diagrams in lattice QCD.

Here 𝒪\mathcal{O} refers to the operator in Dirac and colour space only, excluding the flavour matrices from the operator OO, and the correlation functions include only a single fermion propagator (since uu and dd propagators are indistinguishable in QCD when quark masses are degenerate). Note, that the iso-singlet correlation function might include a constant contribution, which is a finite size effect resulting from imperfect sampling of topological sectors [32]. The constant piece is absent in the shifted correlator C~(z)=C(z)C(z+1)\tilde{C}(z)=C(z)-C(z+1) [33], which we use to fit the correlation function in the P0P^{0} channel.

We will focus on correlation functions in PP and SS channels at TcT_{c}. The transformation relations between iso-vector and iso-singlet channels are shown in Fig. 2. We see that the inclusion of the disconnected diagrams enables to test the effective restoration of both symmetries using PP and SS correlation functions. In particular, in the case that SUA(2)\textnormal{SU}_{A}(2) is restored, for which we have seen indications above, we expect a degeneracy of P0P^{0} and SiS^{i}, as well as PiP^{i} and S0S^{0} correlation functions. If, the UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) symmetry remains broken, correlation functions in PiP^{i} and SiS^{i} channels and P0P^{0} and S0S^{0} channels remain non-degenerate.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 9: Screening correlation functions (left) and masses (right) for the different channels at the critical temperature of scan C2.

We will first compare the connected and disconnected parts of the correlation functions, shown in the left panel of Fig. 9. The disconnected correlation functions have been computed with 32 Hadamard probing vectors for hierarchical probing [34]. While the magnitude of connected and disconnected correlation functions in the PP channel is similar, the disconnected correlator is negative, leading to a large cancellation. At T=0T=0 this cancellation results in the exponential decay of the iso-singlet correlator with the η\eta^{\prime} mass. In the SS channel, both correlation functions are positive, but the disconnected correlation function has a slower exponential decay and thus governs the iso-singlet correlator. To investigate the pattern of chiral symmetry restoration, we have extracted the iso-singlet screening masses from the correlators, which we compare to the iso-vector screening masses in the right panel of Fig. 9. Both, the screening masses in PiP^{i} and S0S^{0} channels, as well as in P0P^{0} and SiS^{i} channels agree within (their large) uncertainties, confirming the effective restoration of SUA(2)\textnormal{SU}_{A}(2). At the same time, also the screening masses in P0P^{0} and S0S^{0} channels are non-degenerate, indicating a residual breaking of UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1), as seen in the previous section.

Note, that the results are preliminary in the sense that currently the statistics is not sufficient to extract the iso-singlet screening masses reliably. In particular, the screening masses in Fig. 9 (except for MPiM_{P^{i}}) have been extracted without taking excited states into account. This is problematic since the signals become lost in noise already at comparably small values of zz. The obvious next task is to increase statistics and to confirm the results presented in this section.

5 Conclusions

In this proceedings article we have updated our initial study [7] to larger volumes, showed first results for a scan at physical light quark masses, extended our set of observables and presented first results for the extension to iso-singlet correlation functions. Larger volumes show the tendency to strengthen the effect of the anomalous breaking of the UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) symmetry. However, a chiral extrapolation of the screening mass difference at TcT_{c} is currently not possible for the larger volumes, lacking a third quark mass. We are currently extending our simulations to the physical quark mass, for which we have shown first results. Additional observables are renormalised matrix elements of the screening correlators. Evaluated on the 32332^{3} volumes, they tend to show an increase in the strength of the breaking of UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) for smaller quark masses. A first look at screening masses in iso-singlet channels at TcT_{c} for scan C2 shows that the breaking of UA(1)\textnormal{U}_{A}(1) is also present in P0P^{0} and S0S^{0} channels, while invariance under SUA(2)\textnormal{SU}_{A}(2) transformations appears to be restored. To be able to reliably extract information from the iso-singlet correlators, however, a substantial increase in precision is mandatory.

Acknowledgements:
B.B. would like to thank J. Ruiz de Elvira and Y. Aoki for stimulating discussions and the conveners of the GB Dynamics session for the invitation to present the results. We acknowledge computer time for the generation of the gauge configurations on the JUROPA, JURECA and JUQUEEN computers of the Gauss Centre for Supercomputing at FZ Jülich, allocated through the John von Neumann Institute for Computing (NIC) within project HMZ21. Parts of the simulations have been done on “Wilson” at the Institute for Nuclear Physics, University of Mainz, “Clover” at the Helmholtz-Institut Mainz and the FUCHS cluster at the Centre for Scientific Computing, University of Frankfurt. This work has been supported by the Cluster of Excellence PRISMA+ (EXC 2118/1), funded by DFG within the German Excellence Strategy (Project ID 39083149), the Center for Computational Sciences in Mainz as part of the Rhineland-Palatine Research Initiative and by DFG grant ME 3622/2-2 QCD at finite temperature with Wilson fermions on fine lattices. B.B. has also received funding by the DFG via SFB/TRR 55 and the Emmy Noether Programme EN 1064/2-1.

References

  • [1] E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 156 (1979) 269.
  • [2] G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B 159 (1979) 213.
  • [3] R. D. Pisarski and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D 29 (1984) 338.
  • [4] A. Butti, A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, JHEP 0308 (2003) 029 [hep-ph/0307036].
  • [5] A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) no.10, 105018 [arXiv:1309.5446].
  • [6] S. Aoki [JLQCD Collaboration], PoS CD 15 (2016) 045 [arXiv:1603.00997].
  • [7] B. B. Brandt et al, JHEP 1612 (2016) 158 [arXiv:1608.06882].
  • [8] A. Gomez Nicola and J. Ruiz de Elvira, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) no.7, 074016 [arXiv:1704.05036].
  • [9] A. Gomez Nicola and J. Ruiz De Elvira, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) no.1, 014020 [arXiv:1803.08517].
  • [10] A. Bazavov et al. [HotQCD Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 094503 [arXiv:1205.3535].
  • [11] G. Cossu et al, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) no.11, 114514 [arXiv:1304.6145].
  • [12] T. W. Chiu et al. [TWQCD Collaboration], PoS LATTICE 2013 (2014) 165 [arXiv:1311.6220].
  • [13] V. Dick et al, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) no.9, 094504 [arXiv:1502.06190].
  • [14] A. Tomiya et al, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) no.3, 034509 [arXiv:1612.01908].
  • [15] B. B. Brandt et al, PoS LATTICE 2010 (2010) 172 [arXiv:1008.2143].
  • [16] B. B. Brandt et al, AIP Conf. Proc.  1343 (2011) 516 [arXiv:1011.6172].
  • [17] B. B. Brandt et al, PoS LATTICE 2012 (2012) 073 [arXiv:1210.6972].
  • [18] B. B. Brandt et al, PoS LATTICE 2013 (2014) 162 [arXiv:1310.8326].
  • [19] B. Sheikholeslami and R. Wohlert, Nucl. Phys. B 259 (1985) 572.
  • [20] K. Jansen et al. [ALPHA Collaboration], Nucl. Phys. B 530 (1998) 185 [hep-lat/9803017].
  • [21] M. Lüscher, Comput. Phys. Commun.  165 (2005) 199 [hep-lat/0409106].
  • [22] M. Lüscher, JHEP 0712 (2007) 011 [arXiv:0710.5417].
  • [23] M. Hasenbusch, Phys. Lett. B 519 (2001) 177 [hep-lat/0107019].
  • [24] M. Marinkovic and S. Schaefer, PoS LATTICE 2010 (2010) 031 [arXiv:1011.0911].
  • [25] M. Lüscher and S. Schaefer, Comput. Phys. Commun.  184 (2013) 519 [arXiv:1206.2809].
  • [26] C. E. Detar and J. B. Kogut, Phys. Rev. Lett.  59 (1987) 399.
  • [27] M. Cheng et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1564 [arXiv:1010.1216].
  • [28] T. Bhattacharya et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.  113 (2014) no.8, 082001 [arXiv:1402.5175].
  • [29] G. Cossu et al. [JLQCD Collaboration], PoS LATTICE 2014 (2015) 210 [arXiv:1412.5703].
  • [30] A. Tomiya et al, PoS LATTICE 2014 (2015) 211 [arXiv:1412.7306].
  • [31] P. Fritzsch et al, Nucl. Phys. B 865 (2012) 397 [arXiv:1205.5380].
  • [32] S. Aoki et al, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 054508 [arXiv:0707.0396].
  • [33] K. Ottnad et al. [ETM Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) no.5, 054508 [arXiv:1710.07986].
  • [34] A. Stathopoulos et al, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 35 (2013), 299 [arXiv:1302.4018].