This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

The amalgamated free product of semifinite hyperfinite von Neumann algebras over atomic type I subalgebras

Daniel Redelmeier Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3368, USA delredel@alumni.uwaterloo.ca
Abstract.

In this paper we describe the amalgamated free product of finite and semifinite hyperfinite von Neumann algebras over atomic type I subalgebras. To do this we extend the notions of free dimension and standard embeddings used in the related results for finite von Neumann algebras to ones which work better for the semifinite case. We also define classes 3\mathcal{R}_{3} (of finite von Neumann algebras) and 4\mathcal{R}_{4} (of semifinite von Neumann algebras) which are closed under such amalgamated free products.

Key words and phrases:
amalgamated free product, hyperfinite von Neumann algebras
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:
46L54
Research supported in part by NSF grant DMS–0901220

1. Introduction

Voiculescu’s amalgamated free product for C and von Neumann algebras in [12] and [11] have proved to be very useful constructions. Early uses include Popa’s use of the the amalgamated free product of von Neumann algebras in [9] to construct subfactors with arbitrary allowable index.

The standard free product of finite hyperfinite von Neumann algebras was described by Dykema in [2]. He also described the amalgamated free product of multimatrix algebras in [4]. In [6] we described the amalgamated free product of finite hyperfinite von Neumann algebras over finite dimensional subalgebras. Here we will extend this to semifinite hyperfinite von Neumann algebras over atomic type I subalgebras, for which the induced trace is also semifinite.

In [5], Dykema also showed that a certain class of von Neumann algebras (referred to as \mathcal{R} in that paper and 1\mathcal{R}_{1} here) was closed under amalgamated free products over finite dimensional subalgebrass. This was used by Kodiyalam and Sunder in [8] and in the related paper by Guionnet, Jones, and Shlyakhtenko in [7]. This class was extended to a more natural class (which we refer to as 2\mathcal{R}_{2}) in [6]. Here we extend these to classes 3\mathcal{R}_{3} of finite von Neumann algebras and 4\mathcal{R}_{4} of semifinite von Neumann algebras which are each closed under amalgamated free products over type I atomic subalgebras.

2. Basic Theorems and Definitions

2.1. Preliminaries

Throughout this paper we will use finite and semifinite von Neumann algebras, with specified normal faithful semifinite trace. In most cases we will also have a specified atomic type I subalgebra DD. We will in general assume that there is a trace preserving conditional expectation from our main algebras onto DD and that the trace will still be semifinite (or finite) on DD. If we refer to an expectation without specifying which one, this is the one we mean. Unless specified otherwise we will also be assuming homomorphisms are trace preserving.

With these von Neumann algebras in mind, we will use the amalgamated free product for von Neumann algebras. Note it is clear from the definition of the trace on ADBA*_{D}B, τDED\tau_{D}\circ E_{D}, that if the trace on AA, BB and DD is semifinite then it will be on ADBA*_{D}B (for the semifinite case use [10].

We will often use the following notation A1p1A2p2.\overset{p_{1}}{A_{1}}\oplus\overset{p_{2}}{A_{2}}\oplus\dots., where the pip_{i} denote the central support of the AiA_{i} (i.e. the identity in AiA_{i} as part of the larger algebra, also sometimes referred to as the matrix unit). In the case of atomic type I factors, we may also use the notation A𝑡\underset{t}{A}, where tt denotes the trace of a minimal projection in this factor (clearly this doesn’t exist in diffuse algebras, and is not necessarily unique if it is not a factor).

Definition 2.1.

We will be dealing primarily with four classes of von Neumann algebras, defined as follows:

  • Let 1\mathcal{R}_{1} (originally \mathcal{R} in [5]) be the class of finite von Neumann algebras which are the finite direct sum of the following types of algebras:

    1. (1)

      Matrix Algebras

    2. (2)

      MnL([0,1])M_{n}\otimes L^{\infty}([0,1])

    3. (3)

      Hyperfinite II1 factors

    4. (4)

      Interpolated Free Group Factors

  • Let 2\mathcal{R}_{2} be the class of finite von Neumann algebras which are the direct sum of a finite hyperfinite von Neumann algebra and a finite number of interpolated free group factors (as defined in [6]).

  • Let 3\mathcal{R}_{3} be the class of finite von Neumann algebras which are the direct sum of a finite hyperfinite von Neumann algebra and a countable number of interpolated free group factors.

  • Let 4\mathcal{R}_{4} be the class of semifinite von Neumann algebras which are countable direct sums of the following types of algebras:

    1. (1)

      Semifinite hyperfinite von Neumann algebras

    2. (2)

      Interpolated free group factors

    3. (3)

      FB()F\otimes B(\mathcal{H}) where FF is an interpolated free group factor and \mathcal{H} is a separable Hilbert space.

Note each class strictly contains the previous.

On the class 3\mathcal{R}_{3}, Dykema defined the notion of Free Dimension in [2] in the following way.

Definition 2.2.

Let AA be a finite von Neumann algebra with specified normal faithful tracial state which is of the format

A=HiIL(Fri)pijJMnjtj,A=H\oplus\bigoplus_{i\in I}\overset{p_{i}}{L(F_{r_{i}})}\oplus\bigoplus_{j\in J}\underset{t_{j}}{M_{n_{j}}},

where HH is a diffuse hyperfinite algebra, the L(Fri)L(F_{r_{i}}) are interpolated free group factors and the MnjM_{n_{j}} are matrix algebras. The free dimension of AA (denote fdim(A)\text{fdim}(A)) is equal to

1+(iIτ(pi)2(ri1))jJtj2.1+\left(\sum_{i\in I}\tau(p_{i})^{2}(r_{i}-1)\right)-\sum_{j\in J}t_{j}^{2}.

This may not be well defined if the interpolated free group factors turn out to be all isomorphic. The definition can be made rigourous by defining it on a generating set, and this is what we mean when we use it. This is not as big a problem as it seems, as in most cases we use the free dimension to determine which interpolated free groups we have, and this would then not matter.

The standard embedding was introduced by Dykema in [2].

Definition 2.3.

Let A=L(Fr)A=L(F_{r}) and B=L(Fr)B=L(F_{r^{\prime}}) for r<rr<r^{\prime} and let ϕ:AB\phi:A\to B be a unital embedding. We call ϕ\phi a standard embedding if we can find a semicircular system ω={Xt}tT\omega=\{X_{t}\}_{t\in T} and a copy of RR, the hyperfinite II1 factor free from ω\omega, and ptRp_{t}\in R so that BB is generated by RR and {ptXtpt}tT\{p_{t}X_{t}p_{t}\}_{t\in T}, and such that if T={tT|ptXtptϕ(A)}T^{\prime}=\{t\in T|p_{t}X_{t}p_{t}\in\phi(A)\} then ϕ(A)=vN(R{ptXtpt}tT)\phi(A)=vN(R\cup\{p_{t}X_{t}p_{t}\}_{t\in T^{\prime}}).

Standard embeddings have the following properties, proved by Dykema in [2]:

  1. (1)

    For A=L(Fs)A=L(F_{s}) and B=L(Fs)B=L(F_{s^{\prime}}), s<ss<s^{\prime}, then for ϕ:AB\phi:A\to B and projection pAp\in A, ϕ\phi is standard if and only if ϕ|pApϕ(p)Bϕ(p)\phi|_{pAp}\to\phi(p)B\phi(p) is standard.

  2. (2)

    The inclusion AABA\to A*B is standard if AA is an interpolated free group factor and BB is an interpolated free group factor, L()L(\mathbb{Z}), or a finite dimensional algebra other than \mathbb{C}.

  3. (3)

    The composition of standard embeddings is standard.

  4. (4)

    For An=L(Fsn)A_{n}=L(F_{s_{n}}), with sn<sns_{n}<s_{n^{\prime}} if n<nn<n^{\prime}, and ϕn:AnAn+1\phi_{n}:A_{n}\to A_{n+1} a sequence of standard embeddings, then the inductive limit of the AnA_{n} with the inclusions ϕn\phi_{n} is LFsL_{F_{s}} where s=limnsns=\lim_{n\to\infty}s_{n}.

2.2. Previous Results and Lemmas

Dykema proved the following as Lemma 4.3 in [4].

Lemma 2.4.

Let AA and BB be von Neumann algebras with subalgebra DD, and let =ADB\mathcal{M}=A*_{D}B. Let pp be a central projection in AA, and let A¯=pD(1p)A\underline{A}=pD\oplus(1-p)A and ¯=A¯DB\underline{\mathcal{M}}=\underline{A}*_{D}B. Then the central support of pp is the same in \mathcal{M} and ¯\underline{\mathcal{M}}. Furthermore pp=vN(p¯ppA)=p¯ppDpAp\mathcal{M}p=vN(p\underline{\mathcal{M}}p\cup pA)=p\underline{\mathcal{M}}p*_{pD}pA.

Dykema also proved the following, as Lemma 4.2 from [4].

Lemma 2.5.

Let 𝒩=Hr0iIFirijJMnjtjqj\mathcal{N}=\overset{r_{0}}{H}\oplus\bigoplus\limits_{i\in I}\overset{r_{i}}{F_{i}}\oplus\bigoplus\limits_{j\in J}\overset{q_{j}}{\underset{t_{j}}{M_{n_{j}}}}, where HH is a diffuse hyperfinite algebra. Let p𝒩p\in\mathcal{N} be a projection such that τ(p)=12\tau(p)=\frac{1}{2} and so that neither pp nor 1p1-p is minimal and central in 𝒩\mathcal{N}. Let D=1/2𝑝1/21pD=\underset{1/2}{\overset{p}{\mathbb{C}}}\oplus\underset{1/2}{\overset{1-p}{\mathbb{C}}}. Define a matrix algebra M2()M_{2}(\mathbb{C}), where e11=pe_{11}=p and e22=1pe_{22}=1-p, and let v=e12v=e_{12}. Then

=𝒩DM2()=FkKMmktkqk,\mathcal{M}=\mathcal{N}*_{D}M_{2}(\mathbb{C})=F\oplus\bigoplus_{k\in K}\overset{q^{\prime}_{k}}{\underset{t^{\prime}_{k}}{M_{m_{k}}}},

where FF is either an interpolated free group factor or a diffuse hyperfinite algebra, and

K={(j,j)|j,jJ,jp,j1p,tjnj+tjnj>12}.K=\left\{(j,j^{\prime})|j,j^{\prime}\in J,j\leq p,j^{\prime}\leq 1-p,\frac{t_{j}}{n_{j}}+\frac{t_{j^{\prime}}}{n_{j^{\prime}}}>\frac{1}{2}\right\}.

For k=(j,j)Kk=(j,j^{\prime})\in K, nk=2njnjn_{k}=2n_{j}n_{j^{\prime}} and tk=nk2(tjnj+tjnj12)t_{k}^{\prime}=\frac{n_{k}^{\prime}}{2}\left(\frac{t_{j}}{n_{j}}+\frac{t_{j^{\prime}}}{n_{j}}-\frac{1}{2}\right). We also know fdim()=fdim(𝒩)+14\text{fdim}(\mathcal{M})=\text{fdim}(\mathcal{N})+\frac{1}{4}, which then determines FF if it is an interpolated free group factor (FF is only hyperfinite if 𝒩\mathcal{N} is dimension 4). Furthermore, the inclusion of L(Fsi)=ri𝒩ririFriL(F_{s_{i}})=r_{i}\mathcal{N}r_{i}\to r_{i}Fr_{i} is standard. for all iIi\in I (noting if II is not empty, then FF is an interpolated free group factor).

The amalgamated free product of multimatrix algebras were described by Dykema as Theorem 5.1 in [4].

Theorem 2.6.

Let AA and BB be multimatrix algebras with subalgebra DD. Then ADBA*_{D}B is in 3\mathcal{R}_{3}. If DD is finite dimensional it is in 2\mathcal{R}_{2} and the hyperfinite part is type I. Furthermore fdim(ADB)=fdim(A)+fdim(B)fdim(D)\text{fdim}(A*_{D}B)=\text{fdim}(A)+\text{fdim}(B)-\text{fdim}(D).

The following results were proved in [6]

Lemma 2.7.

Let 𝒩=(MmMnB)DC\mathcal{N}=(M_{m}\oplus M_{n}\oplus B)*_{D}C and =(Mn+mB)DC\mathcal{M}=(M_{n+m}\oplus B)*_{D}C, where BB, CC are semifinite von Neumann algebras and D=i=1KpiDD=\bigoplus_{i=1}^{K}\overset{p_{i}^{D}}{\mathbb{C}} with K{}K\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{\infty\}. 𝒩\mathcal{N} is included in \mathcal{M} by including MmM_{m} and MnM_{n} as blocks on the diagonal of Mn+mM_{n+m}, and BB and CC by the identity. Assume there exists a partial isometry in 𝒩\mathcal{N} between minimal projections in MmM_{m} and MnM_{n} (for example if there exists a factor \mathcal{F} with MmMn𝒩M_{m}\oplus M_{n}\subseteq\mathcal{F}\subseteq\mathcal{N}). Then for any minimal projection pMmp\in M_{m} such that ppiDp\leq p_{i}^{D} for some ii, p𝒩pL()ppp\mathcal{N}p*L(\mathbb{Z})\cong p\mathcal{M}p.

Lemma 2.8.

Let =((MnA)B)DC\mathcal{M}=((M_{n}\otimes A)\oplus B)*_{D}C and 𝒩=(MnB)DC\mathcal{N}=(M_{n}\oplus B)*_{D}C for AA is a finite von Neumann algebras and BB and CC are semifinite, and D=i=1KpiDD=\bigoplus_{i=1}^{K}\overset{p_{i}^{D}}{\mathbb{C}},k{}k\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{\infty\}, where C,B,MnC,B,M_{n} have expectations onto DD and where EDMnA=EDMnτAE_{D}^{M_{n}\otimes A}=E_{D}^{M_{n}}\otimes\tau_{A}. Let pp be a minimal projection in MnM_{n}, with ppiDp\leq p_{i}^{D} for some ii. Then p𝒩pAppp\mathcal{N}p*A\cong p\mathcal{M}p.

Theorem 2.9.

Let AA and BB be hyperfinite von Neumann Algebras, with finite dimensional subalgebra DD. Then ADBA*_{D}B is in 2\mathcal{R}_{2}. Furthermore fdim(ADB)=fdim(A)+fdim(B)fdim(D)\text{fdim}(A*_{D}B)=\text{fdim}(A)+\text{fdim}(B)-\text{fdim}(D).

The following was proved for 1\mathcal{R}_{1} in [5] and 2\mathcal{R}_{2} in [6]:

Theorem 2.10.

Both 1\mathcal{R}_{1} and 2\mathcal{R}_{2} are closed under amalgamated free products over finite dimensional subalgebras. In these cases fdim(ADB)=fdim(A)+fdim(B)fdim(D)\text{fdim}(A*_{D}B)=\text{fdim}(A)+\text{fdim}(B)-\text{fdim}(D).

3. Semifinite Hyperfinite von Neumann Algebras

3.1. Regulated Dimension

Unfortunately free dimension is only defined on finite von Neumann algebras, so here we adapt it in a way that generalizes to semifinite algebras.

For algebras in 3\mathcal{R}_{3}, where free dimension is defined, we can define the regulated dimension in a fairly straight forward way, as follows:

rdim(A)=τ(IA)2(fdim(A)1).\text{rdim}(A)=\tau(I_{A})^{2}(\text{fdim}(A)-1).

This means that for an interpolated free group factor L(Ft)L(F_{t}) endowed with a trace normalized to λ\lambda, the regulated dimension is λ2(t1)\lambda^{2}(t-1), which is the contribution the interpolated free group factor summand gives in the free dimension formula. For a matrix algebra whose minimal projections have trace tt, the regulated dimension is t2-t^{2}. Finally for any diffuse hyperfinite algebra, the regulated dimension is zero. Unlike the free dimension, the regulated dimension is additive over direct sums (where the trace is preserved in the embeddings), and so the regulated dimension of any algebra in 3\mathcal{R}_{3} can easily be determined from the above.

Lemma 3.1.

Let AA be an algebra in 3\mathcal{R}_{3} and let pAp\in A be a projection in AA with full central support. Then rdim(A)=rdim(pAp)\text{rdim}(A)=\text{rdim}(pAp).

Proof.

First consider an interpolated free group factor A=L(Ft)A=L(F_{t}), whose identity has trace λ\lambda. Then rdim(A)=λ2(t1)\text{rdim}(A)=\lambda^{2}(t-1). Let γ=τ(p)\gamma=\tau(p), then pAppAp is isomorphic to L(F1+(t1)/(γ/λ)2)L(F_{1+(t-1)/(\gamma/\lambda)^{2}}). Thus rdim(pAp)=γ2(1+(t1)/(γ/λ)21)=λ2(t1)\text{rdim}(pAp)=\gamma^{2}(1+(t-1)/(\gamma/\lambda)^{2}-1)=\lambda^{2}(t-1), as desired.

For a matrix algebra, we see that compression does not change the size of the minimal projection (note it is important that pAp\in A), and thus does not change the regulated dimension. For diffuse hyperfinite algebras the regulated dimension remains zero.

Since the regulated dimension is additive over direct sums, and since pp has full central support (thus all factor summands in AA are represented in pAppAp), the result follows. ∎

Clearly this also means that the regulated dimension is invariant over amplification.

Unfortunately unlike the free dimension, the regulated dimension can be negative and does not match the number of generators in an free group factor. It also may not be well defined in the same way as the free dimension if the interpolated free group factors are isomorphic.

Importantly if fdim(ADB)=fdim(A)+fdim(B)fdim(D)\text{fdim}(A*_{D}B)=\text{fdim}(A)+\text{fdim}(B)-\text{fdim}(D) then rdim(ADB)=rdim(A)+rdim(B)rdim(D)\text{rdim}(A*_{D}B)=\text{rdim}(A)+\text{rdim}(B)-\text{rdim}(D).

We can use the fact that this is invariant under amplification to extend the definition to 4\mathcal{R}_{4}. Since for any nn, rdim(L(Fs)Mn𝑡)=t2(s1)\text{rdim}(L(F_{s})\otimes\underset{t}{M_{n}})=t^{2}(s-1) it is natural define rdim(L(Fs)B()𝑡)=t2(s1)\text{rdim}(L(F_{s})\otimes\underset{t}{B(\mathcal{H})})=t^{2}(s-1). Note that B()𝑡L(Fs)B()tL(F1+t2(s1)/t2)\underset{t}{B(\mathcal{H})}\otimes L(F_{s})\cong\underset{t^{\prime}}{B(\mathcal{H})}\otimes L(F_{1+t^{2}(s-1)/t^{\prime 2}}) with a trace preserving isomorphism, however in both cases rdim is t2(s1)t^{2}(s-1). While it is known that all factors of the form B()L(Fs)B(\mathcal{H})\otimes L(F_{s}) are isomorphic, there is only a trace preserving isomorphism if the interpolated free group factors are isomorphic.

Similarly for B()𝑡\underset{t}{B(\mathcal{H})} we naturally define the regulated dimension to be t2-t^{2}, as it is for any nn with Mn𝑡\underset{t}{M_{n}}. Of course for any diffuse semifinite hyperfinite algebra we set the regulated dimension to zero.

Using the above and the fact that the regulated dimension is additive over direct sums, we can then define it for 4\mathcal{R}_{4}, except when this gives us \infty-\infty.

Definition 3.2.

Let AA be a semifinite von Neumann algebra in 4\mathcal{R}_{4}, written as:

A=HiIL(Fsi)pijJ(L(Fsj)B()tj)kKMnktkLB()t,A=H\oplus\bigoplus_{i\in I}\overset{p_{i}}{L(F_{s_{i}})}\oplus\bigoplus_{j\in J}(L(F_{s_{j}})\otimes\underset{t_{j}}{B(\mathcal{H})})\oplus\bigoplus_{k\in K}\underset{t_{k}}{M_{n_{k}}}\oplus\bigoplus_{\ell\in L}\underset{t_{\ell}}{B(\mathcal{H})},

where HH is a diffuse hyperfinite algebra. Then

rdim(A)=iIτ(pi)2(si1)+jJtj2(sj1)kKtk2Lt2,\text{rdim}(A)=\sum_{i\in I}\tau(p_{i})^{2}(s_{i}-1)+\sum_{j\in J}t_{j}^{2}(s_{j}-1)-\sum_{k\in K}t_{k}^{2}-\sum_{\ell\in L}t_{\ell}^{2},

if this is defined.

Notation 3.3.

To simplify things we use st\mathcal{F}_{s}^{t} to denote L(F1+s/t2)L(F_{1+s/t^{2}}) for 0<t<0<t<\infty equipped with a trace so that τ(Ist)=t\tau(I_{\mathcal{F}_{s}^{t}})=t and B()1L(F1+s)\underset{1}{B(\mathcal{H})}\otimes L(F_{1+s}) if t=t=\infty. We will refer to these in general as semifinite interpolated free group factors.

Using this we can rewrite the definition of regulated dimension in a simpler way. For A=iIsitijJMnjtjA=\bigoplus_{i\in I}\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}}\oplus\bigoplus_{j\in J}\underset{t_{j}}{M_{n_{j}}}, where njn_{j} may be infinity, then rdim(A)=iIsijJtj2\text{rdim}(A)=\sum_{i\in I}s_{i}-\sum_{j\in J}t_{j}^{2}.

Example 3.4.

Consider the algebra in 4\mathcal{R}_{4} as follows i=1(111)\bigoplus\limits_{i=1}^{\infty}\left(\mathcal{F}_{1}^{1}\oplus\underset{1}{\mathbb{C}}\right). If we compute the regulated dimension we see that rdim(A)=\text{rdim}(A)=\infty-\infty and thus it is not well defined.

3.2. Substandard Embeddings

When working with semifinite algebras it makes more sense to extend the concept of the standard embedding, which we do in the following way:

Definition 3.5.

We say that a trace preserving embedding ϕ:stst\phi:\mathcal{F}_{s}^{t}\to\mathcal{F}_{s^{\prime}}^{t^{\prime}} is substandard if for some projection pstp\in\mathcal{F}_{s}^{t} with finite (non-zero) trace, the restriction ϕ|pstp:pstpϕ(p)stϕ(p)\phi|_{p\mathcal{F}_{s}^{t}p}:p\mathcal{F}_{s}^{t}p\to\phi(p)\mathcal{F}_{s^{\prime}}^{t^{\prime}}\phi(p) is a standard embedding or an isomorphism.

Note it is clearly equivalent to say this is true for any finite trace (non-zero) projection. Also note that substandard embeddings give us increasing regulated dimension, but not necessarily increasing free dimension.

The first three properties of the standard embedding listed before follow directly for the substandard embedding. The final is as follows:

Proposition 3.6.

For {siti}i=1\{\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}}\}_{i=1}^{\infty} and substandard embeddings ϕi:sitisi+1ti+1\phi_{i}:\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}}\to\mathcal{F}_{s_{i+1}}^{t_{i+1}} then the inductive limit is st\mathcal{F}_{s}^{t} where s=limisis=\lim_{i\to\infty}s_{i} and t=limitit=\lim_{i\to\infty}t_{i}, and the induced embedding of sitist\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}}\to\mathcal{F}_{s}^{t} is substandard.

Proof.

Let ρi=ϕiϕi1ϕ1\rho_{i}=\phi_{i}\circ\phi_{i-1}\circ\dots\circ\phi_{1}. Choose a projection ps1t1p\in\mathcal{F}_{s_{1}}^{t_{1}} with finite non-zero trace tt^{\prime}.

Then ρi|p\rho_{i}|_{p} considered as map from ps1t1pρi(p)si+1ti+1ρi(p)p\mathcal{F}_{s_{1}}^{t_{1}}p\to\rho_{i}(p)\mathcal{F}_{s_{i+1}}^{t_{i+1}}\rho_{i}(p) is standard or an isomorphism. Furthermore we know ρi(p)si+1ti+1ρi(p)si+1t\rho_{i}(p)\mathcal{F}_{s_{i+1}}^{t_{i+1}}\rho_{i}(p)\cong\mathcal{F}_{s_{i+1}}^{t^{\prime}}. Then we see each ρi1(p)sitiρi1(p)\rho_{i-1}(p)\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}}\rho_{i-1}(p) is generated by RiR_{i} and SiS_{i}, where RiR_{i} is a copy of the hyperfinite II1 factor, and Si={qjXjqj}jJiS_{i}=\{q_{j}X_{j}q_{j}\}_{j\in J_{i}} with jJiτ(qj)2=si\sum_{j\in J_{i}}\tau(q_{j})^{2}=s_{i}, where the XjX_{j} are a semicircular system and qjRiq_{j}\in R_{i}, and so that ϕi(Ri)=Ri+1\phi_{i}(R_{i})=R_{i+1} and ϕi(Si)Si+1\phi_{i}(S_{i})\subseteq S_{i+1}. Thus ρi(p)si+1ti+1ρi(p)si+1t\rho_{i}(p)\mathcal{F}_{s_{i+1}}^{t_{i+1}}\rho_{i}(p)\cong\mathcal{F}_{s_{i+1}}^{t^{\prime}}.

Then for each ii, siti\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}} is generated by SiS_{i} and an amplification of RiR_{i}. The inductive limit is then generated by S=i=1SiS=\cup_{i=1}^{\infty}S_{i} and RR, a hyperfinite II1 (if limiti<\lim_{i}t_{i}<\infty) or II (if limiti=\lim_{i}t_{i}=\infty) factor. If we let J=iJiJ=\cup_{i}J_{i} then we see jJτ(qj)2=limisi\sum_{j\in J}\tau(q_{j})^{2}=\lim_{i}s_{i} Thus the inductive limit is st\mathcal{F}_{s}^{t} as desired.

Finally, for convenience of notation we will further extend the definition of substandard in the following way:

Definition 3.7.

For von Neumann algebras AA and BB in 4\mathcal{R}_{4}, an embedding ϕ:AB\phi:A\to B is said to be substandard if for every semifinite interpolated free group factor summand of AA, st\mathcal{F}_{s}^{t} with central support pp, ϕ:stϕ(p)Bϕ(p)\phi:\mathcal{F}_{s}^{t}\to\phi(p)B\phi(p) is substandard.

3.3. Main Lemmas

The following lemma, based on Lemma 5.2 in [4] will be used for almost all of our results.

Lemma 3.8.

Let \mathcal{R} be a class of von Neumann algebras such that if AA\in\mathcal{R} and pAp\in A then pAppAp\in\mathcal{R}. Let AA and BB be von Neumann algebras in \mathcal{R} with atomic type I subalgebra DD. If for all AA^{\prime} and BB^{\prime} in \mathcal{R} with abelian multimatrix subalgebra DD^{\prime}, ADBA^{\prime}*_{D^{\prime}}B^{\prime} is in 4\mathcal{R}_{4}, then so is ADBA*_{D}B. Furthermore conditions on the number of st\mathcal{F}_{s}^{t} factor summands and type I atomic factor summands are preserved, and if we know rdim(ADB)=rdim(A)+rdim(B)rdim(D)\text{rdim}(A^{\prime}*_{D^{\prime}}B^{\prime})=\text{rdim}(A^{\prime})+\text{rdim}(B^{\prime})-\text{rdim}(D^{\prime}) then the same holds for AA, BB, and DD. Also if AA and BB are finite, then ADBA*_{D}B is too, and we can then make the same statement about 3\mathcal{R}_{3}

Proof.

Let D=kIDMnkDpkDD=\bigoplus_{k\in I_{D}}\overset{p_{k}^{D}}{M_{n_{k}^{D}}} (where we allow nk=n_{k}=\infty, in which case we mean B()B(\mathcal{H})). For each kIDk\in I_{D}, let {ei,j(k)}\{e_{i,j}^{(k)}\} be the standard basis for MnkDM_{n_{k}^{D}}. Let e=kIDe1,1(k)e=\sum_{k\in I_{D}}e_{1,1}^{(k)} (with the sum converging in the SOT). Note that this is a projection in DD with central support II, and eDeeDe is abelian. Let A=eAe,B=eBe,A^{\prime}=eAe,B^{\prime}=eBe, and D=eDeD^{\prime}=eDe. Let =ADB\mathcal{M}=A*_{D}B and let =vN(AB)\mathcal{M}^{\prime}=vN(A^{\prime}\cup B^{\prime}), and since AAA^{\prime}\subseteq A, BBB^{\prime}\subseteq B we see that AA^{\prime} and BB^{\prime} are free with amalgamation over DD^{\prime}, and thus =ADB\mathcal{M}^{\prime}=A^{\prime}*_{D^{\prime}}B^{\prime}. Let V={e1,j(k)|kID,1<jnkD}V=\{e_{1,j}^{(k)}|k\in I_{D},1<j\leq n_{k}^{D}\}. Note then that A=vN(AV)A=vN(A^{\prime}\cup V), B=vN(BV)B=vN(B^{\prime}\cup V), and D=vN(DV)D=vN(D^{\prime}\cup V). Then =vN(V)\mathcal{M}=vN(\mathcal{M}^{\prime}\cup V). Thus =ee\mathcal{M}^{\prime}=e\mathcal{M}e. By our assumption we know AA^{\prime} and BB^{\prime} are in \mathcal{R} and DD^{\prime} is an abelian multimatrix algebra. Thus by assumption \mathcal{M}^{\prime} is of the correct form, which implies \mathcal{M} is of the same form with the same number of factor summands of each kind (where the kinds are: diffuse hyperfinite, type I atomic, and st\mathcal{F}_{s}^{t} as this step may change interpolated free group factors to t\mathcal{F}_{t}^{\infty} or matrix algebras to B()B(\mathcal{H})). Now if rdim(ADB)=rdim(A)+rdim(B)rdim(D)\text{rdim}(A^{\prime}*_{D^{\prime}}B^{\prime})=\text{rdim}(A^{\prime})+\text{rdim}(B^{\prime})-\text{rdim}(D^{\prime}), then since the central support of ee is the identity rdim(ADB)=rdim(A)+rdim(B)rdim(D)\text{rdim}(A*_{D}B)=\text{rdim}(A)+\text{rdim}(B)-\text{rdim}(D).

Lemma 3.9.

Let AA be a semifinite hyperfinite von Neumann algebra with trace preserving conditional expectation onto a subalgebra D=nNtnpnD=\bigoplus\limits_{n\in N}\underset{t_{n}}{\overset{p_{n}}{\mathbb{C}}}, for some countable index set NN, so that the trace is semifinite on DD as well. Then there exists a chain of multimatrix subalgebras AjA_{j}, so that DA1A2D\subseteq A_{1}\subseteq A_{2}\dots and j=1Aj\cup_{j=1}^{\infty}A_{j} is dense in AA.

Proof.

First we assume NN is finite a finite set and begin by dividing it into type I and type II parts and approximating them separately. If AA is type I and finite, and thus of the form B(CL([0,1]))B\oplus(C\otimes L^{\infty}([0,1])), where BB and CC are multimatrix algebras. We can choose a representation so that every pnp_{n}, nNn\in N, is composed of diagonal matrices in BB and CC and characteristic functions in L([0,1])L^{\infty}([0,1]). Let C=kKCkC=\oplus_{k\in K}C_{k} where each CkC_{k} is a matrix algebra. Then for each kk in KK we can choose a partition PkP_{k} of [0,1][0,1] into a countable number of measurable subsets so that for every SPkS\in P_{k} and ej,j(k)Cke_{j,j}^{(k)}\in C_{k}, ej,j(k)χSpne_{j,j}^{(k)}\otimes\chi_{S}\leq p_{n} for some nNn\in N. Then we set A1=BkK(CkL(Pk))A_{1}=B\oplus\bigoplus_{k\in K}\left(C_{k}\otimes L^{\infty}(P_{k})\right), and note DA1D\subseteq A_{1}. We can then define each AjA_{j} by further refining PkP_{k} to get the desired sequence.

Next we do the finite type II case (with finite NN). To make this easier to extend to the infinite NN semifinite case, we will not assume normalised trace, and consider it as a cut-down of a larger algebra. We consider it as the cutdown of an algebra A=L(X,μ)RA^{\prime}=L^{\infty}(X,\mu)\otimes R, with centre-valued trace τZ\tau_{Z} so that τZ(A)\tau_{Z}(A^{\prime}) is the constant function on XX of value 2K2^{K} for some KK. If we let pn=IAIAp_{n^{\prime}}=I_{A^{\prime}}-I_{A}, we can rephrase this as finding an approximating sequence for AA^{\prime} with subalgebra DD^{\prime} spanned by pnnN{n}{p_{n}}_{n\in N\cup\{n^{\prime}\}}, and then cut down the result by IAI_{A}. So without loss of generality we will assume our algebra is L(X,μ)RL^{\infty}(X,\mu)\otimes R (essentially we are back to working in the normalised trace case).

As before we pick subalgebras M2k+KM_{2^{k+K}} of RR so that k=KM2k+K\cup_{k=-K}^{\infty}M_{2^{k+K}} is dense in RR, and denote the standard basis elements of M2k+KM_{2^{k+K}} by ei,j(k)e_{i,j}^{(k)} and the trace of ei,i(k)e_{i,i}^{(k)} is 2k2^{-k}, and use the inclusion M2k+KM2k+1+KM_{2^{k+K}}\to M_{2^{k+1+K}} where ei,j(k)e2i1,2j1(k+1)+e2i,2j(k+1)e_{i,j}^{(k)}\to e_{2i-1,2j-1}^{(k+1)}+e_{2i,2j}^{(k+1)}.

Let fnL(X,μ)f_{n}\in L^{\infty}(X,\mu) be the centre-valued trace of pnp_{n} in AA, for all nNn\in N. Then let Sn,k=fn1(=0)[12k,22k))S_{n,k}=f^{-1}_{n}\left(\cup_{\ell=0}^{\infty})\left[\frac{1}{2^{k}},\frac{2}{2^{k}}\right)\right) for kKk\geq-K. Then note fn=k=K12kχSn,kf_{n}=\sum_{k=-K}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^{k}}\chi_{S_{n,k}}.

Now define P0,kP_{0,k} to be a countable partition of XX so that for every nNn\in N, each Sn,kS_{n,k} with non-zero measure is the union of sets in P0,kP_{0,k}, and so that P0,kP_{0,k} refines P0,k1P_{0,k-1} (note since NN is finite and kk is bounded below, this can be accomplished with a finite set of intersections). For each SP0,kS\in P_{0,k}, let sS,ks_{S,k} be the number of nNn\in N such that SSn,kS\subseteq S_{n,k}. Inductively define rS,k=sS,k+2rS,k1r_{S,k}=s_{S,k}+2r_{S^{\prime},k-1} where SSP0,k1S\subseteq S^{\prime}\in P_{0,k-1}, starting with P0,K={X}P_{0,-K}=\{X\} and rX,K=0r_{X,-K}=0.

Then define A0A_{0} to be the multimatrix algebra spanned by the basis

B0={ei,j(k)χS|kK,SP0,k,2rS,k1<i,jrS,k,SSP0,k1}.B_{0}=\{e_{i,j}^{(k)}\otimes\chi_{S}|k\geq-K,S\in P_{0,k},2r_{S^{\prime},k-1}<i,j\leq r_{S,k},S\subseteq S^{\prime}\in P_{0,k-1}\}.

Now then we can partition the diagonal basis elements, ei,i(k)χSe_{i,i}^{(k)}\otimes\chi_{S}, from B0B_{0} into sets {Fn}nN\{F_{n}\}_{n\in N} by placing one element of the form ei,i(k)χSe_{i,i}^{(k)}\otimes\chi_{S} into each FnF_{n} where SSn,kS\subseteq S_{n,k}, which works because there are exactly sS,ks_{S,k} such elements.

This means for any xXx\in X (except possibly on a set of measure zero an nNn\in N, we see that:

ei,i(k)χSFn,xSτ(ei,iχS)=k=K12kχSn,k=fn(x).\sum\limits_{\begin{subarray}{c}e_{i,i}^{(k)}\otimes\chi_{S}\in F_{n},\\ x\in S\end{subarray}}\tau(e_{i,i}\otimes\chi_{S})=\sum_{k=-K}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^{k}}\chi_{S_{n,k}}=f_{n}(x).

Thus we have a set of orthogonal projections {pn}nN\{p_{n}^{\prime}\}_{n\in N} with centre-valued trace equal to {fn}nN\{f_{n}\}_{n\in N}. These are then equivalent to the pnp_{n} in DD, and thus without loss of generality we can identify them with DD.

To define BmB_{m}, we first define Pm,kP_{m,k} to be a refinement of Pm1,kP_{m-1,k} such for any SPm,kS\in P_{m,k} either 0<μ(S)2m0<\mu(S)\leq 2^{-m} or SS is a single atom. We define rS,kr_{S,k} and sS,ks_{S,k} in the same way (note for SPm,kS\in P_{m,k} if there exists an SPm,kS^{\prime}\in P_{m^{\prime},k} with SSS\subseteq S^{\prime} and m>mm>m^{\prime} then rS,k=rS,kr_{S,k}=r_{S^{\prime},k} and sS,k=sS,ks_{S,k}=s_{S^{\prime},k} so this is well defined, and we do not need to add an index mm).

Then let AmA_{m} be the multimatrix algebra spanned by

Bm={ei,j(k)χS|m<k,SPm,k,2rS,k1<i,jrS,k,SSPm,k1,or if k=m,SPm,k,1i,jrS,m}.B_{m}=\{e_{i,j}^{(k)}\otimes\chi_{S}|m<k,S\in P_{m,k},2r_{S^{\prime},k-1}<i,j\leq r_{S,k},S\subseteq S^{\prime}\in P_{m,k-1},\\ \text{or if }k=m,S\in P_{m,k},1\leq i,j\leq r_{S,m}\}.

Recalling the inclusion of M2m1M_{2^{m-1}} into M2mM_{2^{m}} and that each Pm,kP_{m,k} is a refinement of Pm1,kP_{m-1,k}, we see Am1AmA_{m-1}\subseteq A_{m}.

We have established that for any xXx\in X (except possibly on a set of measure zero) as mm goes to infinity the sum of {τ(ei,i(k))=2k|ei,i(k)χSB0,xS,km}\{\tau(e_{i,i}^{(k)})=2^{-k}|e_{i,i}^{(k)}\otimes\chi_{S}\in B_{0},x\in S,k\leq m\} goes to 2K2^{K}. Since for AmA_{m} there is a set SS containing xx with measure less than max{μ({x}),2m}\max\{\mu(\{x\}),2^{-m}\} and matrix subalgebra MmχSM2mχSM_{m^{\prime}}\otimes\chi_{S}\subseteq M_{2^{m}}\otimes\chi_{S}, whose trace is μ(S)\mu(S) times that sum. Thus this is dense in mM2mL(X,μ)\cup_{m}M_{2^{m}}\otimes L^{\infty}(X,\mu) and thus dense in AA

If NN is only countable (and thus AA may be only semifinite), then let qnq_{n} be the sum of the first nn pjp_{j} in DD. Then use the finite case to construct an approximating chain Ai,1A_{i,1} of q1Aq1q_{1}Aq_{1} which contains q1Dq1q_{1}Dq_{1}. We claim we can use the finite case again to let Ai,nA_{i,n} be an approximating chain of qnAqnq_{n}Aq_{n} containing qnDqnq_{n}Dq_{n} and so that Ai,nAi,n+1A_{i,n}\subseteq A_{i,n+1} for all ii and for n1n\geq 1.

For the type I part, the above construction naturally allows us to do this. For the type II case we have to make some minor modifications to make this work.

For the type II construction we only note that in going from qnAqnq_{n}Aq_{n} to qn+1Aqn+1q_{n+1}Aq_{n+1} we can consider it now as a cutdown of some L(X,μ)RM2KL^{\infty}(X^{\prime},\mu^{\prime})\otimes R\otimes M_{2^{K^{\prime}}} where XX^{\prime} contains XX, and μ\mu^{\prime} restricts to μ\mu on XX. We can then write this as (L(X,μ)RM2K)(L(X\X,μ)RM2K)(L^{\infty}(X,\mu)\otimes R\otimes M_{2^{K^{\prime}}})\oplus(L^{\infty}(X^{\prime}\backslash X,\mu^{\prime})\otimes R\otimes M_{2^{K^{\prime}}}), and approximate the second direct summand separately. The tensor with M2KM_{2^{K^{\prime}}} only changes the value KK, which does not affect the BmB_{m} for m>Km>-K. We are also adding another projection pn+1p_{n+1} (or two if we need a new p(n+1)p_{(n+1)^{\prime}}) , which creates a new partition Sn,KS_{n,K}, but this merely further refines Pm,kP_{m,k}, meaning with this construction each BmB_{m}^{\prime} will contain our original BmB_{m}, thus completing the proving the claim.

Then define our approximating chain to be Ai=Ai,i(1qi)D(1qi)A_{i}=A_{i,i}\oplus(1-q_{i})D(1-q_{i}), completing the proof.

Definition 3.10.

We call an embedding ϕ:𝒩\phi:\mathcal{N}\to\mathcal{M} a simple step if it follows one of the two following patterns:

  1. (1)

    𝒩=A𝑝B𝑞\mathcal{N}=\overset{p}{A}\oplus\overset{q}{B}, =(i=1nApi)B𝑞\mathcal{M}=\left(\bigoplus\limits_{i=1}^{n}\overset{p_{i}}{A}\right)\oplus\overset{q}{B}, with p=i=1npip=\sum_{i=1}^{n}p_{i}, and ϕ(a,b)=(a,,a,b)\phi(a,b)=(a,\dots,a,b). We call this a simple step of the first kind.

  2. (2)

    𝒩=Mn𝑡Mm𝑡B𝑝\mathcal{N}=\underset{t}{M_{n}}\oplus\underset{t}{M_{m}}\oplus\overset{p}{B}, =Mn+m𝑡B𝑝\mathcal{M}=\underset{t}{M_{n+m}}\oplus\overset{p}{B} where ϕ(x,y,b)=([x00y],b)\phi(x,y,b)=\left(\left[\begin{matrix}x&0\\ 0&y\\ \end{matrix}\right],b\right). We call this a simple step of the second kind.

Lemma 3.11.

For two multimatrix algebras 𝒩\mathcal{N} and \mathcal{M} and a trace preserving inclusion ϕ:𝒩\phi:\mathcal{N}\to\mathcal{M}, then ϕ\phi can be written as a composition of a (possibly countably infinite) sequence of simple steps.

Proof.

The proof is identical to Lemma 3.5 in [6], following directly from examining either the Bratteli diagrams or the minimal projections. The only difference is that since we have a countably infinite number of matrix algebras, each of which can be split into a countably infinite number of matrix algebras, we may need a countably infinite number of steps. ∎

3.4. Main Theorem and Examples

Theorem 3.12.

Let AA and BB hyperfinite von Neumann algebras with trace preserving conditional expectations onto a type I atomic subalgebra DD then:

  1. (1)

    If AA and BB are finite then ADBA*_{D}B is in 3\mathcal{R}_{3}

  2. (2)

    If AA and BB are semifinite, and the trace on DD is still semifinite, then ADBA*_{D}B is in 4\mathcal{R}_{4}.

Furthermore rdim(ADB)=rdim(A)+rdim(B)rdim(D)\text{rdim}(A*_{D}B)=\text{rdim}(A)+\text{rdim}(B)-\text{rdim}(D) if this is well defined.

Proof.

By Lemma 3.8 assume without loss of generality that DD is abelian. If DD is finite dimensional we can apply Theorem 2.9 (since if AA and BB were not finite, then the trace on the finite dimensional DD would not be semifinite), so we may also assume D=k=1tkDpkDD=\bigoplus\limits_{k=1}^{\infty}\overset{p_{k}^{D}}{\underset{t_{k}^{D}}{\mathbb{C}}}.

Use Lemma 3.9 to define the sequences AiA_{i} and BjB_{j} to be chains of subalgebras of AA in BB, respectively, containing DD. Let qkD=k=1kpkDq_{k}^{D}=\sum_{k^{\prime}=1}^{k}p_{k^{\prime}}^{D}. Then let

(i,j,k)=(qkDAjqkDqkDDqkDqkDBjqkD),\mathcal{M}(i,j,k)=\left(q_{k}^{D}A_{j}q_{k}^{D}*_{q_{k}^{D}Dq_{k}^{D}}q_{k}^{D}B_{j}q_{k}^{D}\right),

and let 𝒩(i,j,k)\mathcal{N}(i,j,k) be

(qk1DAjqk1Dqk1DDqk1Dqk1DBjqk1D)(pkDAipkDpkDDpkDpkDBjpkD).\left(q_{k-1}^{D}A_{j}q_{k-1}^{D}*_{q_{k-1}^{D}Dq_{k-1}^{D}}q_{k-1}^{D}B_{j}q_{k-1}^{D}\right)\oplus\left(p_{k}^{D}A_{i}p_{k}^{D}*_{p_{k}^{D}Dp_{k}^{D}}p_{k}^{D}B_{j}p_{k}^{D}\right).

Note that in the construction from Lemma 3.9, if A(a)A^{(a)} is the atomic part of AA, then each AiA_{i} contains qkDA(a)qkDq_{k}^{D}A^{(a)}q_{k}^{D} for some kk (and the same is true for BB).

For fixed kk, the sequence (i,j,k)\mathcal{M}(i,j,k), is an approximating sequence for the amalgamated free product of hyperfinite von Neumann algebras over qkDDq_{k}^{D}D (which is finite dimensional), as in Theorem 2.9. Thus we can choose iki_{k} and jkj_{k} sufficiently large to be the start of the sequence in the proof of that theorem. In particular, for any minimal projection pAikp\in A_{i_{k}} (resp BjkB_{j_{k}}) from the diffuse part of AA (resp. BB), if ppkDp\leq p_{k^{\prime}}^{D} with kkk^{\prime}\leq k then τ(p)<tkDτ(p)\tau(p)<t_{k^{\prime}}^{D}-\tau(p^{\prime}) for any minimal projection pBp^{\prime}\in B (resp AA) with ppkDp^{\prime}\leq p_{k^{\prime}}^{D}, unless pkDp_{k^{\prime}}^{D} is minimal in BB (resp. AA), and also if the number of interpolated free group factors in (i,j,k)\mathcal{M}(i,j,k) is stable for all iiki\geq i_{k} and jjkj\geq j_{k}. Furthermore we can assume that if rdim(A)\text{rdim}(A) (resp BB) is finite then rdim(qkAikqk)>rdim(qkAqk)1/k\text{rdim}(q_{k}A_{i_{k}}q_{k})>\text{rdim}(q_{k}Aq_{k})-1/k. We chose iki_{k} and jkj_{k} also sufficiently large so that AiA_{i} contains qkDA(a)qkDq_{k}^{D}A^{(a)}q_{k}^{D} and BjB_{j} contains qkDB(a)qkDq_{k}^{D}B^{(a)}q_{k}^{D} for all i,jik,jki,j\geq i_{k},j_{k}.

Our goal is to show that the the inclusions of the sequence

(i2,j2,1)𝒩(i2,j2,2)(i2,j2,2)(i3,j3,2)𝒩(i3,j3,3)\mathcal{M}(i_{2},j_{2},1)\to\mathcal{N}(i_{2},j_{2},2)\to\mathcal{M}(i_{2},j_{2},2)\to\mathcal{M}(i_{3},j_{3},2)\to\mathcal{N}(i_{3},j_{3},3)\to\dots

are substandard.

First examine the steps of the form (ik,jk,k)(ik+1,jk+1,k)\mathcal{M}(i_{k},j_{k},k)\to\mathcal{M}(i_{k+1},j_{k+1},k). Since kk does not change in this step, it is just like the steps in the proof of Theorem 2.9 (proof from [6]). Using Lemma 3.11, we break this up into a sequence of inclusions induced by simple steps in the subalgebras of AA or BB, so we need only show that this type of inclusion is substandard. Consider the inclusion (i,j,k)(i+1,j,k)\mathcal{M}(i,j,k)\to\mathcal{M}(i+1,j,k) with iki<ik+1i_{k}\leq i<i_{k+1} and jkjjk+1j_{k}\leq j\leq j_{k+1} where AiAi+1A_{i}\to A_{i+1} is a simple step (note this may not work precisely with our original indexing, but this does not affect the proof and eases notation).

If the inclusion AiAi+1A_{i}\to A_{i+1} is a simple step of the first kind, which makes copies of a summand, MnM_{n}, of AiA_{i}, then either MnM_{n} is contained in some interpolated free group factor summand, or it is the corner of some matrix factor summand (as in the proof of Theorem 2.9). In the former case we apply Lemma 2.8 to show this is a standard embedding. In the latter we see the matrix factor is included in another matrix factor or factors.

Alternately, if the inclusion AiAi+1A_{i}\to A_{i+1} is a simple step of the second kind, then we are adding a partial isometry vv connecting two matrix algebras in AiA_{i}. Again we proceed exactly as in Theorem 2.9. If both vvvv^{*} and vvv^{*}v are in an interpolated free group factor we apply Lemma 2.7 to show this is a standard embedding. If only one of vvvv^{*} and vvv^{*}v is in an interpolated free group factor we apply Lemma 2.5 to show that this is a substandard embedding. If neither vvvv^{*} nor vvv^{*}v are in interpolated free group factors, then they are both in matrix algebras, then these are embedded in another matrix algebra.

Thus applying Proposition 3.6 to this sequence of inclusions we see then that any interpolated free group factor summand in (ik1,jk1,k)\mathcal{M}(i_{k-1},j_{k-1},k), is embedded in another in (ik,jk,k)\mathcal{M}(i_{k},j_{k},k) by a substandard embedding, and so this inclusion is substandard.

Next we examine the inclusions of the form 𝒩(ik,jk,k)(ik,jk,k)\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k)\to\mathcal{M}(i_{k},j_{k},k). This is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.6 (from [4]), since iki_{k} and jkj_{k} do not change, and thus we have a fixed pair of multimatrix algebras AikA_{i_{k}} and BjkB_{j_{k}}.

Let qkDAikqkD=IAikMnpq_{k}^{D}A_{i_{k}}q_{k}^{D}=\bigoplus_{\ell\in I_{A_{i_{k}}}}\overset{p_{\ell}}{M_{n_{\ell}}} and qkDBjkqkD=IBikMnpq_{k}^{D}B_{j_{k}}q_{k}^{D}=\bigoplus_{\ell\in I_{B_{i_{k}}}}\overset{p_{\ell}}{M_{n_{\ell}}}. Now for each IAikIBjk\ell\in I_{A_{i_{k}}}\cup I_{B_{j_{k}}}, if pp_{\ell} is not orthogonal to either qk1Dq_{k-1}^{D} or pkDp_{k}^{D}, then choose a vMnv_{\ell}\in M_{n_{\ell}} which is a partial isometry so that vvpkDv_{\ell}v_{\ell}^{*}\leq p_{k}^{D} and vvqk1v_{\ell}^{*}v_{\ell}\leq q_{k-1}, and each is minimal in AikA_{i_{k}} or BjkB_{j_{k}}. Let VV be the set of these vv_{\ell}. Then note that 𝒩(ik,jk,k)V\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k)\cup V generates (ik,jk,k)\mathcal{M}(i_{k},j_{k},k). Let 𝒩(ik,jk,k,V)=vN(𝒩(ik,jk,k)V)\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k,V^{\prime})=vN(\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k)\cup V^{\prime}) for VVV^{\prime}\subseteq V. We show that for vVv\in V and VV\{v}V^{\prime}\subseteq V\backslash\{v\}, the inclusion 𝒩(ik,jk,k,V)𝒩(ik,jk,k,V{v})\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k,V^{\prime})\to\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k,V^{\prime}\cup\{v\}) is substandard.

Let q=vv+vvq=vv^{*}+v^{*}v, and examine q𝒩(ik,jk,k,V)qq\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k,V^{\prime})q, and the algebra M2M_{2} generated by vv. As in the proofs of Theorem 2.6 and Theorem 2.9, we see that

q𝒩(ik,jk,k,V)qvvvvM2=q𝒩(ik,jk,k,V{v})q.q\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k,V^{\prime})q*_{\overset{vv^{*}}{\mathbb{C}}\oplus\overset{v^{*}v}{\mathbb{C}}}M_{2}=q\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k,V^{\prime}\cup\{v\})q.

If either of vvvv^{*} or vvv^{*}v are minimal and central in q𝒩(ik,jk,k,V)qq\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k,V^{\prime})q, (without loss of generality assume vvvv^{*}), then vvvv^{*} is a minimal projection in a matrix algebra summand MnM_{n} in 𝒩(ik,jk,k,V)\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k,V^{\prime}). Any matrix algebra summand MmM_{m^{\prime}} under vvv^{*}v in q𝒩(ik,jk,k,V)qq\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k,V^{\prime})q must be part of a matrix algebra summand MmM_{m} in 𝒩(ik,jk,k,V)\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k,V^{\prime}). Then the inclusion of MmM_{m} in 𝒩(ik,jk,k,V{v})\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k,V^{\prime}\cup\{v\}) maps it to the corner of a matrix summand Mm+nmM_{m+nm^{\prime}}. Any interpolated free group factor under vvv^{*}v, is included into an amplification of itself, which is a substandard embedding. Finally if there is a diffuse hyperfinite algebra under vvv^{*}v then it is included in a diffuse hyperfinite algebra.

If neither vvvv^{*} nor vvv^{*}v is minimal and central, then we can apply Lemma 2.5. This shows us that the inclusion of q𝒩(ik,jk,k,V)qq\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k,V^{\prime})q into q𝒩(ik,jk,k,V{v})qq\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k,V^{\prime}\cup\{v\})q is substandard, and thus so is the inclusion of 𝒩(ik,jk,k,V)\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k,V^{\prime}) into 𝒩(ik,jk,k,V{v})\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k,V^{\prime}\cup\{v\}). Thus, applying Proposition 3.6, so is the inclusion 𝒩(ik,jk,k)(ik,jk,k)\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k)\to\mathcal{M}(i_{k},j_{k},k).

In the final case, (ik,jk,k1)𝒩(ik,jk,k)\mathcal{M}(i_{k},j_{k},k-1)\to\mathcal{N}(i_{k},j_{k},k) is immediate.

Thus the inclusions in the chain,

(i2,j2,1)𝒩(i2,j2,2)(i2,j2,2)(i3,j3,2)𝒩(i3,j3,3),\mathcal{M}(i_{2},j_{2},1)\to\mathcal{N}(i_{2},j_{2},2)\to\mathcal{M}(i_{2},j_{2},2)\to\mathcal{M}(i_{3},j_{3},2)\to\mathcal{N}(i_{3},j_{3},3)\to\dots,

are all substandard. At all stages this is the direct sum of a finite number of interpolated free group factors and a hyperfinite algebra. Note at each stage each interpolated free group factor is mapped into another interpolated free group factor with both trace and regulated dimension at least as large. Thus, applying Proposition 3.6 once more, the inductive limit is a countable direct sum of factors of the form st\mathcal{F}_{s}^{t} and a hyperfinite algebra, and thus in 4\mathcal{R}_{4}. If AA and BB are finite, then clearly ADBA*_{D}B is finite, and thus in 3\mathcal{R}_{3}.

If all the regulated dimensions are defined, as well as the sum then it is clear that rdim(ADB)=limkrdim((ik,jk,k))\text{rdim}(A*_{D}B)=\lim_{k\to\infty}\text{rdim}(\mathcal{M}(i_{k},j_{k},k)). Choose kIDk\in I_{D} and denote Aik=IAMntpA_{i_{k}}=\bigoplus_{\ell\in I_{A}}\overset{p_{\ell}}{\underset{t_{\ell}}{M_{n_{\ell}}}}. Then

rdim(qkAikqk)=IA,pqk0t2\text{rdim}(q_{k}A_{i_{k}}q_{k})=-\sum_{\ell\in I_{A},p_{\ell}q_{k}\neq 0}t_{\ell}^{2}

and

rdim(Aik)=IAt2.\text{rdim}(A_{i_{k}})=-\sum_{\ell\in I_{A}}t_{\ell}^{2}.

For every ID\ell\in I_{D} so that pqk=0p_{\ell}q_{k}=0, there is a minimal projection pMnp_{\ell}^{\prime}\in M_{n_{\ell}} less than some pkDp_{k^{\prime}}^{D} with k>kk^{\prime}>k. This tells us that

ID,pqk=0t2<k>k(tkD)2.\sum_{\ell\in I_{D},p_{\ell}q_{k}=0}t_{\ell}^{2}<\sum_{k^{\prime}>k}(t_{k^{\prime}}^{D})^{2}.

Thus

|rdim(qkAikqk)rdim(Aik)|<|k>k(tkD)2|=rdim((1qk)D(1qk))|.\left|\text{rdim}(q_{k}A_{i_{k}}q_{k})-\text{rdim}(A_{i_{k}})\right|<\left|\sum_{k^{\prime}>k}(t_{k^{\prime}}^{D})^{2}\right|=\text{rdim}((1-q_{k})D(1-q_{k}))|.

Thus if rdim(D)\text{rdim}(D)\neq-\infty then limkrdim(qkAikqk)=rdim(A)\lim_{k\to\infty}\text{rdim}(q_{k}A_{i_{k}}q_{k})=\text{rdim}(A). The same calculation works for BjkB_{j_{k}}. Then note by Theorem 2.9

rdim((ik,jk,k))=rdim(qkAikqk)+rdim(qkBjkqk)rdim(qkDqk).\text{rdim}(\mathcal{M}(i_{k},j_{k},k))=\text{rdim}(q_{k}A_{i_{k}}q_{k})+\text{rdim}(q_{k}B_{j_{k}}q_{k})-\text{rdim}(q_{k}Dq_{k}).

Then if rdim(D)\text{rdim}(D)\neq-\infty then

limkrdim((ik,jk,k))=limkrdim(Aik)+limkrdim(Bik)rdim(D)\lim_{k\to\infty}\text{rdim}(\mathcal{M}(i_{k},j_{k},k))=\lim_{k\to\infty}\text{rdim}(A_{i_{k}})+\lim_{k\to\infty}\text{rdim}(B_{i_{k}})-\text{rdim}(D)
=rdim(A)+rdim(B)rdim(D).=\text{rdim}(A)+\text{rdim}(B)-\text{rdim}(D).

If rdim(D)=\text{rdim}(D)=-\infty then we see that if rdim(A)\text{rdim}(A) and rdim(B)\text{rdim}(B) are not -\infty, so rdim(qkAikqk)+rdim(qkBjkqk)\text{rdim}(q_{k}A_{i_{k}}q_{k})+\text{rdim}(q_{k}B_{j_{k}}q_{k}) is bounded below, while rdim(qkDqk)-\text{rdim}(q_{k}Dq_{k}) goes to \infty, the equation again holds.

Example 3.13.

Let:

D=i=11ipiDD=\bigoplus_{i=1}^{\infty}\underset{\frac{1}{i}}{\overset{p_{i}^{D}}{\mathbb{C}}}
A=i=1RpiA,τ(piA)=12i1+12iA=\bigoplus_{i=1}^{\infty}\overset{p^{A}_{i}}{R},\tau(p^{A}_{i})=\frac{1}{2i-1}+\frac{1}{2i}
B=Rp0Bi=1RpiB,τ(piB)=12i+12i+1,τ(p0B)=1.B=\overset{p^{B}_{0}}{R}\oplus\bigoplus_{i=1}^{\infty}\overset{p^{B}_{i}}{R},\tau(p^{B}_{i})=\frac{1}{2i}+\frac{1}{2i+1},\tau(p_{0}^{B})=1.

Here we set p2i1D+p2iD=piBp_{2i-1}^{D}+p_{2i}^{D}=p_{i}^{B} and p2iD+p2i+1D=piBp_{2i}^{D}+p_{2i+1}^{D}=p_{i}^{B}, with p0B=p1Dp_{0}^{B}=p_{1}^{D}. We can see that r=rdim(A)+rdim(B)rdim(D)=π26r=\text{rdim}(A)+\text{rdim}(B)-\text{rdim}(D)=\frac{\pi^{2}}{6}. From there it is not hard to check that ADB=π26A*_{D}B=\mathcal{F}_{\frac{\pi^{2}}{6}}^{\infty}. This shows that even if all the factor summands of AA and BB are finite, the amalgamated free product may have a non-finite factor summand (unlike the 1\mathcal{R}_{1} and 2\mathcal{R}_{2} cases).

Example 3.14.

Let

D=i=11D=\bigoplus_{i=1}^{\infty}\underset{1}{\mathbb{C}}
A=B=i=11/2.A=B=\bigoplus_{i=1}^{\infty}\underset{1/2}{\mathbb{C}}.

Then computing we see

rdim(A)+rdim(B)rdim(D)=+,\text{rdim}(A)+\text{rdim}(B)-\text{rdim}(D)=-\infty-\infty+\infty,

which is not defined. Computing the product we see that ADB=i=1L()M2A*_{D}B=\bigoplus_{i=1}^{\infty}L(\mathbb{Z})\otimes M_{2}. In this case rdim(ADB)=0\text{rdim}(A*_{D}B)=0, however it would be easy to add a summand so that we could get any value from this.

4. Closedness of 3\mathcal{R}_{3} and 4\mathcal{R}_{4}

The following lemma was proved as Theorem 3.1 in [1].

Lemma 4.1.

Let RR and RR^{\prime} be hyperfinite II1 factors. Let D=iItipiD=\oplus_{i\in I}\overset{p_{i}}{\underset{t_{i}}{\mathbb{C}}} (II countable) be a common subalgebra of RR and RR^{\prime}. Then RDR=L(F1+iIti2)R*_{D}R^{\prime}=L(F_{1+\sum_{i\in I}t_{i}^{2}}), and this is generated by R{qjXjqj}jJR^{\prime}\cup\{q_{j}X_{j}q_{j}\}_{j\in J}, where the XjX_{j} form a semicircular system which is free with RR^{\prime} and jJτ(qj)2=iIτ(pi)2\sum_{j\in J}\tau(q_{j})^{2}=\sum_{i\in I}\tau(p_{i})^{2}, and τ(qj)1\tau(q_{j})\leq 1 for all jJj\in J.

Proof.

The fact that RDRR*_{D}R^{\prime} is the interpolated free group factor mentioned follows from Theorem 3.12, so here we need only check that it is generated correctly.

First assume that II is finite, and proceed by induction on the size of II. In the case |I|=1|I|=1, Corollary 3.6 in [3] establishes that RRR*R^{\prime} is isomorphic to RL()R^{\prime}*L(\mathbb{Z}) with a map preserving RR^{\prime}. If τ(p1)>1\tau(p_{1})>1 then choose some integer NN larger than τ(p1)\tau(p_{1}), and write this as the algebra generated by R{qjXjqj}j=1n2R^{\prime}\cup\{q_{j}X_{j}q_{j}\}_{j=1}^{n^{2}} where the qjq_{j} are of trace 1n\frac{1}{n}. This completes the base case.

Let i0i_{0} be such that ti0t_{i_{0}} is minimal. Using Theorem 2.1 (b) from [5], we define

𝒩1=vN((1pi0)R(1pi0)(1pi0)R(1pi0))\mathcal{N}_{1}=vN\left((1-p_{i_{0}})R(1-p_{i_{0}})\cup(1-p_{i_{0}})R^{\prime}(1-p_{i_{0}})\right)
=(1pi0)R(1pi0)(1pi0)D(1pi0)R(1pi0).=(1-p_{i_{0}})R(1-p_{i_{0}})*_{(1-p_{i_{0}})D}(1-p_{i_{0}})R^{\prime}(1-p_{i_{0}}).

Then by our induction hypothesis, 𝒩1=L(F1+iI,ii0ti2(1ti0)2)\mathcal{N}_{1}=L(F_{1+\sum_{i\in I,i\neq i_{0}}\frac{t_{i}^{2}}{(1-t_{i_{0}})^{2}}}), generated by (1pi0)R(1pi0){qjXjqj}J}(1-p_{i_{0}})R^{\prime}(1-p_{i_{0}})\cup\{q_{j}X_{j}q_{j}\}_{J^{\prime}\}}, where jJτ(qj)2=iI\{i0}τ(pi)2\sum_{j\in J^{\prime}}\tau(q_{j})^{2}=\sum_{i\in I\backslash\{i_{0}\}}\tau(p_{i})^{2}.

Then using part (c) of Theorem 2.1 in [5], we see that r=pi0r=p_{i_{0}}, thus A~=(1pi0)R(1pi0)pi0\tilde{A}=(1-p_{i_{0}})R(1-p_{i_{0}})\oplus\mathbb{C}p_{i_{0}}, and thus pi0A~pi0=p_{i_{0}}\tilde{A}p_{i_{0}}=\mathbb{C}. From this we see directly that for 𝒩2=vN(A~R)\mathcal{N}_{2}=vN(\tilde{A}\cup R^{\prime}), 𝒩1=(1pi0)𝒩2(1pi0)\mathcal{N}_{1}=(1-p_{i_{0}})\mathcal{N}_{2}(1-p_{i_{0}}). Thus we write 𝒩2=vN(R{qjXhqj}jJ)\mathcal{N}_{2}=vN(R^{\prime}\cup\{q_{j}X_{h}q_{j}\}_{j\in J^{\prime}}).

Using part (d) of Theorem 2.1 in [5], we see that pi0(RDR)pi0=pi0𝒩2pi0L()p_{i_{0}}(R*_{D}R^{\prime})p_{i_{0}}=p_{i_{0}}\mathcal{N}_{2}p_{i_{0}}*L(\mathbb{Z}). Then, after splitting up L()L(\mathbb{Z}) if τ(p0)>1\tau(p_{0})>1 as before,we see that RDRR*_{D}R^{\prime} is generated by R{qjXjqj}jJR^{\prime}\cup\{q_{j}X_{j}q_{j}\}_{j\in J}, completing the proof for II finite.

For the infinite case, let I=I=\mathbb{N}, ordered so that titi1t_{i}\leq t_{i-1}, and let rk=i=1kriDr_{k}=\sum_{i=1}^{k}r_{i}^{D}. Let k=rkRrkrkDrkRrk\mathcal{M}_{k}=r_{k}Rr_{k}*_{r_{k}D}r_{k}R^{\prime}r_{k}. The above tells us that each k\mathcal{M}_{k} is generated by rkRrk{qjXjqj}jJkr_{k}R^{\prime}r_{k}\cup\{q_{j}X_{j}q_{j}\}_{j\in J_{k}} and that the embeddings of kk+1\mathcal{M}_{k}\to\mathcal{M}_{k+1} are substandard, thus the generating set in the inductive limit \mathcal{M} is as desired, completing the proof.

Corollary 4.2.

Let AA and BB each be copies of the hyperfinite II factor, with subalgebra D=i=1tipiD=\bigoplus\limits_{i=1}^{\infty}\overset{p_{i}}{\underset{t_{i}}{\mathbb{C}}} and trace preserving conditional expectation onto DD so the trace is semifinite on DD. Then ADB=rdim(D)A*_{D}B=\mathcal{F}_{-\text{rdim}(D)}^{\infty}, and this is generated by A{qjXjqj}i=1A\cup\{q_{j}X_{j}q_{j}\}_{i=1}^{\infty} where the XjX_{j} form a semicircular system which is free with AA and jJτ(qj)2=iIτ(pi)2\sum_{j\in J}\tau(q_{j})^{2}=\sum_{i\in I}\tau(p_{i})^{2}, and τ(qj)1\tau(q_{j})\leq 1 for all jJj\in J.

Proof.

Let rk=i=1kpir_{k}=\sum_{i=1}^{k}p_{i}. Then by Lemma 4.1 any 𝒩k=rkArkrkDrkrkBrk\mathcal{N}_{k}=r_{k}Ar_{k}*_{r_{k}Dr_{k}}r_{k}Br_{k} is generated rkArk{qjXjqj}jJkr_{k}Ar_{k}\cup\{q_{j}X_{j}q_{j}\}_{j\in J_{k}}, and furthermore from the proof of that lemma 𝒩k1𝒩k\mathcal{N}_{k-1}\to\mathcal{N}_{k} is a substandard embedding mapping rk1Ark1r_{k-1}Ar_{k-1} into rkArkr_{k}Ar_{k}. Since each embedding is substandard, the inductive limit of 𝒩k𝒩k+1\mathcal{N}_{k}\to\mathcal{N}_{k+1}\to... is the desired semifinite interpolated free group factor, and AA is preserved. ∎

Lemma 4.3.

Let A=sAtA=\mathcal{F}_{s_{A}}^{t} and B=sBtB=\mathcal{F}_{s_{B}}^{t}, each with subalgebra D=kKtkpkDD=\bigoplus\limits_{k\in K}\overset{p_{k}^{D}}{\underset{t_{k}}{\mathbb{C}}}. Then =ADBsA+sBrdim(D)t\mathcal{M}=A*_{D}B\cong\mathcal{F}_{s_{A}+s_{B}-\text{rdim}(D)}^{t}, and the inclusion of AA\to\mathcal{M} is substandard.

Proof.

Let pp be a minimal projection in DD, and choose representations of AA and BB of the form A=vN(R{piXipi}iI)A=vN(R\cup\{p_{i}X_{i}p_{i}\}_{i\in I}) and B=vN(R{qjXjqj}jJ)B=vN(R^{\prime}\cup\{q_{j}X_{j}q_{j}\}_{j\in J}), where pipp_{i}\leq p and qjpq_{j}\leq p for all iI,jJi\in I,j\in J, and RR and RR^{\prime} are either the hyperfinite II1 factor or the hyperfinite II factor. Then ADBA*_{D}B is generated by RR{piXipi}iI{qjXjqj}jJR\cup R^{\prime}\cup\{p_{i}X_{i}p_{i}\}_{i\in I}\cup\{q_{j}X_{j}q_{j}\}_{j\in J}. From Lemma 4.1 and Corollary 4.2 we know that RDR=fdim(D)tR*_{D}R^{\prime}=\mathcal{F}_{-\text{fdim}(D)}^{t}, with RR embedded correctly and so RDRR*_{D}R^{\prime} is generated by R{pkDXkpkD}kKR\cup\{p_{k}^{D}X_{k}p_{k}^{D}\}_{k\in K}. We can then find qjRq^{\prime}_{j}\in R which are unitary conjugates of qjq_{j} using unitaries in RDRR*_{D}R^{\prime}, thus \mathcal{M} is generated by R{pkDXkpkD}kK{piXipi}iI{qjXjqj}jJR\cup\{p_{k}^{D}X_{k}p_{k}^{D}\}_{k\in K}\cup\{p_{i}X_{i}p_{i}\}_{i\in I}\cup\{q_{j}X_{j}q_{j}\}_{j\in J}. Thus \mathcal{M} is the desired factor, and the inclusion of AA is substandard. ∎

Lemma 4.4.

Let HH be a hyperfinite von Neumann algebra and A=stA=\mathcal{F}_{s}^{t}, with common abelian type I atomic subalgebra DD, then ADH=s+rdim(H)rdim(D)tA*_{D}H=\mathcal{F}_{s+\text{rdim}(H)-\text{rdim}(D)}^{t}, and the inclusion of st\mathcal{F}_{s}^{t} into it is substandard.

Proof.

Using Lemma 3.9 we can find a chain of multimatrix algebras HiH_{i} approximating HH so that DHiD\subseteq H_{i} for all ii, and that so that for each ii there exists a finite projection qiDq_{i}\in D so that (1qi)Hi(1qi)=(1qi)D(1-q_{i})H_{i}(1-q_{i})=(1-q_{i})D. Applying Lemma 3.11 we can assume that this is generated by a sequence of simple steps. Then by Lemma 5.9 of [4], since qiAqiq_{i}Aq_{i} is an interpolated free group factor, qiHiqiqiDqiAqiq_{i}H_{i}q_{i}*_{q_{i}D}q_{i}Aq_{i} is an interpolated free group factor (with regulated dimension as expected), and the inclusion of qiAqiq_{i}Aq_{i} is standard. Then apply Lemma 2.4 to see this implies HiDAH_{i}*_{D}A is s+rdim(Hi)rdim(D)t\mathcal{F}_{s+\text{rdim}(H_{i})-\text{rdim}(D)}^{t}, and the inclusion of AA into it is substandard.

Using Lemma 2.8, and Lemma 2.7 we see that the embedding of HiDAHi+1DAH_{i}*_{D}A\to H_{i+1}*_{D}A is substandard, which completes the proof.

Lemma 4.5.

Let A4A\in\mathcal{R}_{4} and B=stB=\mathcal{F}_{s}^{t}. Let DD be an abelian type I atomic subalgebra of both AA and BB. Then =ADB\mathcal{M}=A*_{D}B is a semifinite interpolated free group factor, and if rdim(A)\text{rdim}(A) is defined and greater than -\infty, then =s+rdim(A)rdim(D)t\mathcal{M}=\mathcal{F}_{s+\text{rdim}(A)-\text{rdim}(D)}^{t}. Furthermore the inclusion BB\to\mathcal{M} is substandard and that of FiF_{i}\to\mathcal{M} is substandard for any summand, FistF_{i}\cong\mathcal{F}_{s^{\prime}}^{t^{\prime}}, of AA.

Proof.

Let A=Hp0i=1KsitipiA=\overset{p_{0}}{H}\oplus\bigoplus\limits_{i=1}^{K}\overset{p_{i}}{\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}}} for K{}K\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{\infty\} and where HH is a hyperfinite algebra. Let A0=Hi=1KpiDA_{0}=H\oplus\bigoplus\limits_{i=1}^{K}p_{i}D and let Ak=Hi=1ksitii=k+1KpiDA_{k}=H\oplus\bigoplus\limits_{i=1}^{k}\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}}\oplus\bigoplus\limits_{i=k+1}^{K}p_{i}D. Let k=AkDB\mathcal{M}_{k}=A_{k}*_{D}B.

Our goal is to show that k=rdim(Ak)+srdim(D)t\mathcal{M}_{k}=\mathcal{F}_{\text{rdim}(A_{k})+s-\text{rdim}(D)}^{t} for all kk, and that the inclusion of kk+1\mathcal{M}_{k}\to\mathcal{M}_{k+1} is substandard.

First, Lemma 4.4 shows that 0=rdim(A0)+srdim(D)t\mathcal{M}_{0}=\mathcal{F}_{\text{rdim}(A_{0})+s-\text{rdim}(D)}^{t}, and the inclusion of B0B\to\mathcal{M}_{0} is standard.

Lemma 2.4 tells us that pkkpk=pkk1pkpkDsktkp_{k}\mathcal{M}_{k}p_{k}=p_{k}\mathcal{M}_{k-1}p_{k}*_{p_{k}D}\mathcal{F}_{s_{k}}^{t_{k}} and that k\mathcal{M}_{k} is a factor. Thus the embedding of sktkpkkpk\mathcal{F}_{s_{k}}^{t_{k}}\to p_{k}\mathcal{M}_{k}p_{k} is substandard. By Lemma 4.3, pkkpk=stkp_{k}\mathcal{M}_{k}p_{k}=\mathcal{F}_{s^{\prime}}^{t_{k}} for some ss^{\prime} and the inclusion of pkk1pkp_{k}\mathcal{M}_{k-1}p_{k} into it is substandard, and thus k=rdim(Ak)+srdim(D)t\mathcal{M}_{k}=\mathcal{F}_{\text{rdim}(A_{k})+s-\text{rdim}(D)}^{t} and the inclusion k1k\mathcal{M}_{k-1}\to\mathcal{M}_{k} is substandard.

Thus the inductive limit of the k\mathcal{M}_{k}, ADB=rdim(A)+srdim(D)tA*_{D}B=\mathcal{F}_{\text{rdim}(A)+s-\text{rdim}(D)}^{t}, the inclusion of BB into it is standard, and the inclusions of siti\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}}\to\mathcal{M} are substandard. ∎

Theorem 4.6.

For A,B4A,B\in\mathcal{R}_{4} (or 3\mathcal{R}_{3}) and DD an atomic type I common subalgebra of AA and BB, ADB4A*_{D}B\in\mathcal{R}_{4} (or 3\mathcal{R}_{3}), and rdim(ADB)=rdim(A)+rdim(B)rdim(D)\text{rdim}(A*_{D}B)=\text{rdim}(A)+\text{rdim}(B)-\text{rdim}(D) if this equation is well defined.

Proof.

As usual we use Lemma 3.8 to assume without loss of generality that DD is abelian. Let A=HAi=1KAsitipiA=H_{A}\oplus\bigoplus\limits_{i=1}^{K_{A}}\overset{p_{i}}{\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}}} where KA{}K_{A}\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{\infty\} similarly let B=HBj=1KBsjtjqjB=H_{B}\oplus\bigoplus\limits_{j=1}^{K_{B}}\overset{q_{j}}{\mathcal{F}_{s_{j}^{\prime}}^{t_{j}^{\prime}}}. Then define Ak=HAi=1ksitji=k+1KApiDA_{k}=H_{A}\oplus\bigoplus\limits_{i=1}^{k}\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{j}}\oplus\bigoplus\limits_{i=k+1}^{K_{A}}p_{i}D and define BkB_{k} similarly.

Let (i,j)=AiDBj\mathcal{M}(i,j)=A_{i}*_{D}B_{j}, then the inductive limit of the (i,j)\mathcal{M}(i,j) is ADBA*_{D}B. We claim that each (i,j)\mathcal{M}(i,j) is in 4\mathcal{R}_{4}, and that the embedding of (i,j)\mathcal{M}(i,j) into (i+1,j)\mathcal{M}(i+1,j) is substandard. We proceed by induction on i,ji,j.

Theorem 3.12 tells us that (0,0)\mathcal{M}(0,0) is in 4\mathcal{R}_{4}, and that rdim((0,0))=rdim(A0)+rdim(B0)rdim(D)\text{rdim}(\mathcal{M}(0,0))=\text{rdim}(A_{0})+\text{rdim}(B_{0})-\text{rdim}(D). By Lemma 2.4, pi(i,j)pi=vN(pi(i1,j)pisiti)=pi(i1,j)pipiDsitip_{i}\mathcal{M}(i,j)p_{i}=vN(p_{i}\mathcal{M}(i-1,j)p_{i}\cup\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}})=p_{i}\mathcal{M}(i-1,j)p_{i}*_{p_{i}D}\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}}. Lemma 4.5 tells us that this is of the form st\mathcal{F}_{s}^{t} for some ss and tt and that the inclusion of any st\mathcal{F}_{s^{\prime}}^{t} factor summand in pi(i1,j)pipi(i,j)pip_{i}\mathcal{M}(i-1,j)p_{i}\to p_{i}\mathcal{M}(i,j)p_{i} is substandard. This also tells us that the inclusion of sitipi(i,j)pi\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}}\to p_{i}\mathcal{M}(i,j)p_{i} is substandard.

Since the central support of pip_{i} in (i1,j)\mathcal{M}(i-1,j) and (i,j)\mathcal{M}(i,j) is the same (again by Lemma 2.4), any FstF_{s}^{t} factor summand of (i1,j)\mathcal{M}(i-1,j) which is orthogonal to pip_{i} is identical in (i,j)\mathcal{M}(i,j). Thus the inclusion of (i1,j)(i,j)\mathcal{M}(i-1,j)\to\mathcal{M}(i,j) is substandard, as is the inclusion of siti(i1,j)\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}}\to\mathcal{M}(i-1,j).

Next note that rdim(q(i,j)q)=rdim(pi(i,j)pi)\text{rdim}(q\mathcal{M}(i,j)q)=\text{rdim}(p_{i}\mathcal{M}(i,j)p_{i}) by Lemma 3.1. Note

rdim(pi(i,j)pi)=rdim(pi(i1,j)pi)+fdim(siti)rdim(piD).\text{rdim}(p_{i}\mathcal{M}(i,j)p_{i})=\text{rdim}(p_{i}\mathcal{M}(i-1,j)p_{i})+\text{fdim}(\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}})-\text{rdim}(p_{i}D).

Since qq is the central support of pip_{i} in both (i,j)\mathcal{M}(i,j) and (i1,j)\mathcal{M}(i-1,j) we know

rdim(pi(i1,j)pi)=rdim(q(i1,j)q).\text{rdim}(p_{i}\mathcal{M}(i-1,j)p_{i})=\text{rdim}(q\mathcal{M}(i-1,j)q).

Thus we see

rdim(q(i,j)q)=rdim(q(i1,j)q)+rdim(siti)rdim(piD).\text{rdim}(q\mathcal{M}(i,j)q)=\text{rdim}(q\mathcal{M}(i-1,j)q)+\text{rdim}(\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}})-\text{rdim}(p_{i}D).

And since (1q)(i,j)(1q)=(1q)(i1,j)(1q)(1-q)\mathcal{M}(i,j)(1-q)=(1-q)\mathcal{M}(i-1,j)(1-q), we see

rdim((i,j))=rdim((i1,j))+rdim(siti)rdim(piD).\text{rdim}(\mathcal{M}(i,j))=\text{rdim}(\mathcal{M}(i-1,j))+\text{rdim}(\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}})-\text{rdim}(p_{i}D).

Note fdim(piAipi)=rdim(siti)\text{fdim}(p_{i}A_{i}p_{i})=\text{rdim}(\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}}), and rdim(piAi1pi)=rdim(piD)\text{rdim}(p_{i}A_{i-1}p_{i})=\text{rdim}(p_{i}D). Thus

rdim(Ai)rdim(Ai1)=rdim(siti)rdim(piD).\text{rdim}(A_{i})-\text{rdim}(A_{i-1})=\text{rdim}(\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}})-\text{rdim}(p_{i}D).

Combining these we get:

rdim((i,j))=rdim(Ai1)+rdim(Bj)rdim(D)+rdim(siti)rdim(piD)\text{rdim}(\mathcal{M}(i,j))\\ =\text{rdim}(A_{i-1})+\text{rdim}(B_{j})-\text{rdim}(D)+\text{rdim}(\mathcal{F}_{s_{i}}^{t_{i}})-\text{rdim}(p_{i}D)
=rdim(Ai)+rdim(Bj)rdim(D).=\text{rdim}(A_{i})+\text{rdim}(B_{j})-\text{rdim}(D).

Thus our claim is proved, and the result follows. Note that if AA and BB are finite, their amalgamated free product is, and thus if they were both in 3\mathcal{R}_{3} then heir amalgamated free product is in 3\mathcal{R}_{3}. ∎

Example 4.7.

Let A=i=12i2iA=\bigoplus_{i=1}^{\infty}\mathcal{F}^{2^{-i}}_{2^{i}} where τ(pi)=12i\tau(p_{i})=\frac{1}{2^{i}} and let B=21B=\mathcal{F}^{1}_{2}, and choose any multimatrix subalgebra DD of these. Checking, we see rdim(A)=i=11=\text{rdim}(A)=\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}1=\infty. By Lemma 4.5 we know ADBA*_{D}B is an interpolated free group factor, and applying the free dimension formula we see that it must be 1\mathcal{F}_{\infty}^{1}.

This shows that unlike in the case of 1\mathcal{R}_{1} and 2\mathcal{R}_{2}, restricting the interpolated free group factor summands in AA and BB to having only finite free dimension does not guarantee this for the product. We could restrict 3\mathcal{R}_{3} to those with finite regulated dimension (or equivalently free dimension) and it would be still closed under these amalgamated free products. Similarly we could restrict 4\mathcal{R}_{4} to those with finite defined regulated dimension, which would then be closed over amalgamated free products of type I atomic algebras with finite regulated dimension.

References

  • [1] Nathanial P. Brown and Kenneth J. Dykema. Popa algebras in free group factors. J. Reine Angew. Math., 573:157–180, 2004.
  • [2] Ken Dykema. Free products of hyperfinite von Neumann algebras and free dimension. Duke Math. J., 69(1):97–119, 1993.
  • [3] Ken Dykema. Interpolated free group factors. Pacific J. Math., 163(1):123–135, 1994.
  • [4] Ken Dykema. Amalgamated free products of multi-matrix algebras and a construction of subfactors of a free group factor. Amer. J. Math., 117(6):1555–1602, 1995.
  • [5] Ken Dykema. A description of amalgamated free products of finite von Neumann algebras over finite-dimensional subalgebras. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 43(1):63–74, 2011.
  • [6] Ken Dykema and Daniel Redelmeier. The amalgamated free product of hyperfinite von neumann algebras over finite dimensional subalgebras, 2011, arXiv:1110.5597.
  • [7] A. Guionnet, V. Jones, and D. Shlyakhtenko. A semi-finite algebra associated to a subfactor planar algebra. J. Funct. Anal., 261(5):1345–1360, 2011.
  • [8] Vijay Kodiyalam and V. S. Sunder. On the Guionnet-Jones-Shlyakhtenko construction for graphs. J. Funct. Anal., 260(9):2635–2673, 2011.
  • [9] Sorin Popa. Markov traces on universal Jones algebras and subfactors of finite index. Invent. Math., 111(2):375–405, 1993.
  • [10] Yoshimichi Ueda. Amalgamated free product over Cartan subalgebra. Pacific J. Math., 191(2):359–392, 1999.
  • [11] Dan Voiculescu. Symmetries of some reduced free product CC^{\ast}-algebras. In Operator algebras and their connections with topology and ergodic theory (Buşteni, 1983), volume 1132 of Lecture Notes in Math., pages 556–588. Springer, Berlin, 1985.
  • [12] Dan Voiculescu. Operations on certain non-commutative operator-valued random variables. Astérisque, (232):243–275, 1995. Recent advances in operator algebras (Orléans, 1992).