The Brauer-Manin obstruction on algebraic stacks
Abstract.
For algebraic stacks over a number field, we define their Brauer-Manin pairings, Brauer-Manin sets, and extend the descent theory of Colliot-Thélène and Sansuc. By extending Sansuc’s exact sequence, we show the torsionness of Brauer groups of stacks that are locally quotients of varieties by connected groups. With mild assumptions, for stacks that are locally quotients or Deligne-Mumford, we show that the Brauer-Manin obstruction coincides with some other cohomological obstructions such as obstructions given by torsors under connected groups or abelian gerbes, generalizing Harari’s original results. For Brauer-Manin sets on these stacks, we show the properties such as descent along a torsor, product preservation are still correct. These results extend classical theories of those on varieties.
Key words and phrases:
Brauer-Manin obstruction, algebraic stacks2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 14F22, 14A20; secondary 14F201. Introduction
Suppose that is a variety over a number field , and is the (cohomological) Brauer-Grothendieck group of [Gro68]. We have the Brauer-Manin pairing (see, for example, [Poo17, 8.2])
where (resp. ) is the adèle (resp. the set of all places) of , is the invariant map at , and is the pullback functor . Under this pairing, the Brauer-Manin set (obstruction) is defined to be the subset orthogonal to the whole , and plays an important role in judging the local-global principle.
As the development of moduli theory, some geometric objects, other than schemes were used to enlarge the category of schemes. Artin [Art70], Deligne and Mumford [DM69] defined algebraic stacks, and used them to explain some moduli problems. The arithmetic of these objects are of their own interest. Given an algebraic stack over , we say violates the local-global principle for integral points if for all , whereas . Counterexamples to local-global principle for integral points are given in [DG95], [BP20], [WL22]. Bhargava and Poonen [BP20] proved that for any stacky curve over of genus less than , it satisfies local-global principle for integral points. Furthermore, Christensen [Chr20] extended the adèlic topology to the set , and proved that for any stacky curve over of genus less than , it satisfies strong approximation. More recently, Santens [San22] showed that the Brauer-Manin obstruction to strong approximation is the only one for every stacky curve over a global field with finite abelian fundamental group.
In this paper, we consider the Brauer-Manin obstruction on algebraic stacks over a number field. In Section 2, we introduce points, cohomological obstructions and torsors on algebraic stacks. In Section 3, by extending Sansuc’s exact sequence, we calculate the Brauer group of stacks that are quotients of varieties by connected groups, which contains almost all geometric objects appearing in moduli spaces. As a consequence, we also show that the Brauer groups of some locally quotient stacks are still torsion, extending the classical results on smooth varieties. In Section 4, for general algebraic stack we establish the descent theory of Colliot-Thélène and Sansuc [CTS87] and define the Brauer-Manin pairing for stacks. In Section 5, we show that with mild assumptions, for stacks that are locally quotients or Deligne-Mumford, the Brauer-Manin obstruction coincides with some other cohomological obstructions such as obstructions given by torsors under connected groups or abelian gerbes, which was originally proved by Harari [Har02] for varieties. In Section 6, we generalize some results on descent for Brauer-Manin set along a torsor under a connected group. In Section 7, we prove that in the same cases as in Section 5, the Brauer-Manin set of product stacks equals the product of the Brauer-Manin sets of stacks. These results extend classical theories of those on varieties. The main technique for extending them is cohomological descent.
2. Points, obstructions and torsors on algebraic stacks
Let us briefly introduce basic notions and facts used in this paper, mainly for cohomological obstructions to local-global principle on algebraic stacks, under the framework [Lv21, Sec. 2] but in a slightly modified way.
For a commutative ring , we also write for . Let be a scheme, an algebraic stack over , in the sense of [Sta22, Tag 026O]. Denote by the -category of algebraic stacks over .
2.1. Points and obstructions
Let be a number field, a commutative -algebra, an algebraic stack over . The -points of is the set of isomorphism classes of objects in the groupoid denoted by . Let (resp. ) be the adèlic points (resp. rational points) of .
Definition 2.1.
Let be a functor from a -category to an ordinary category. We say that is stable if forgets -morphisms, and for any -morphisms and of that is -isomorphic, we have . When is viewed as a -category, this is equivalent to say that, is a -functor.
For a stable functor and , as the classical case for varieties in Poonen [Poo17, 8.1.1], one may also define the obstruction given by to be the subset of whose elements are characterized by
(2.2) |
(which is well-defined by stability of ), and the -set (or -obstruction) to be the subset whose elements are characterized by
Then we have the map induced by ,
Remark 2.3.
If is represented by a scheme, then these definitions coincide with the classical ones. But in general, the map is not necessary injective. For example, let be a linear -group. Then
does not necessarily vanish.
Anyway, by abusing notation we may let be its image in . Thus we may write .
2.2. Cohomology on algebraic stacks and cohomological obstructions
For any where is a scheme, denote by (resp. ) the site with topology inherited from the big étale site (resp. the big fppf site ), cf. [Sta22, Tags 067N and 06TP].
Let and be a -morphism in . Then compositing with gives the functor , which has a right adjoint . Both and send -sheaves to -sheaves, and define a morphism of topoi
which is also a pair of adjoint functors with replaced by (or the category of sheaves of groups) and is compatible with the classical case when and are represented by -schemes, cf. [Sta22, Tags 06TS and 075J].
We have an adjoint pair
(2.4) |
between derived categories of complexes of Cartesian-sheaves, c.f. [Sta22, Tag 073S].
We also have
Then we have the cohomology functors
We will write . For , recovers the -cohomology for schemes over . See [Sta22, Tag 075F].
Now we consider the case where a number field, and fix and let be the pullback of to . Then the functor is stable (c.f. [Lv21, 2.29]). If there is no other confusion, we simply write for . Thus we can take in 2.1 and obtain , the -set.
Example 2.6 (The Brauer-Manin obstruction).
The cohomological Brauer-Grothendieck group is also defined for any algebraic stack over . It is the étale cohomology group , where is the pullback sheaf of to , represented by . When is a scheme, this agrees with the cohomological Brauer-Grothendieck group. The Brauer group of a stack is considered, for example, by Bertolin and Galluzzi [BG19, Thm. 3.4], and Zahnd [Zah03, 4.3]. Let and , we obtain the Brauer-Manin set . If is represented by a scheme, it coincides with the usual Brauer-Manin set.
2.3. Torsors over algebraic stacks
Fix an base scheme . Let and an sheaf of group on , where .
Definition 2.7.
A -torsor over is a sheaf on acted on by , such that
denoted by . A morphisms between -torsors over is a -equivariant morphism of sheaves, which is necessarily an isomorphism.
We call trivial if it has a global section (or equivalently, as -torsor over ).
Denote the groupoid of all -torsor over by . The isomorphism class of torsors makes a pointed set whose neutral element correspondences to the class of trivial torsors.
By [Ols16, Ex. 2.H], we may assume is an object of . Then there is a one-to-one correspondence (c.f. Giraud [Gir71, III.3.6.5 (5)]) of pointed sets
(2.8) |
In the case of , we have a bijection (c.f. [Gir71, IV.3.4.2 (i)])
(2.9) |
which maps the neutral element to and is functorial both in and .
Since in particular a sheaf on is a stack over , one obtain a morphism of stacks over (c.f. [Sta22, Tag 09WX]). If is a morphism of algebraic -stacks, then obviously the pullback is also a -torsor. It is the pullback sheaf of under . This operation corresponds to the cohomological pullback
Lemma 2.10.
Let be an -group scheme (viewed as a sheaf of group on by pullback). Then any is in
In particular, if and only if is the quotient stack.
Proof.
We imitate the proof from a note of M. Olsson. To verify the representability of the diagonal , we first show the representability of . Let be a -morphism from an -scheme. One checks that the fiber product fits into the -Cartesian diagram
Note that has a section (for example, ) as a -torsor over . Thus it is a trivial torsor in and in particular is a scheme. It follows that is in (the category of algebraic -spaces) and is representable. Also is representable since it is a base change of the diagonal . It follows that that the diagonal is representable since it is the composition .
In the following, if not otherwise explained, a -torsor over means a -torsor over .
For an algebraic stack over and a linear -group , contracted products (resp. twists) of -torsors over can also be defined. See [Lv21, 3.24 (resp. 3.30)].
Let be a torsor. Since the functor is also stable by [Lv21, 3.14], we may define to be the obstruction set given by (c.f. (2.2)). It contains and satisfies
where is the twist of by . See [Lv21, 3.20] for a proof.
Again, if is a -scheme, the definitions and facts of this subsection coincide with classical ones.
3. Calculation of Brauer groups
Many important algebraic stacks can be realized as quotients of schemes by group actions. In this section, we calculate their Brauer groups.
Let be a field of characterized zero. Then any algebraic -group is smooth.
3.1. Sansuc’s exact sequence
Sansuc [San81, Prop. 6.10] gave an exact sequence, and now we generalize it to quotient stacks.
Theorem 3.1.
Let be a -variety and a connected -group acting on . Let be the quotient stack, i.e., is a -torosr over an algebraic stack (see Lemma 2.10). Let , where is the constant presheaf. Then we have an exact sequence
(3.2) |
where is the action of and the projection to , respectively.
Proof.
Let be a Čech nerve of . Note that for , is equivalent to the -fold -fibred product , which is a -variety. Then [San81, Lem. 6.12] still works in our case and its assumptions verify for and . Now for any , since is smooth surjective, by a consequence of cohomological descent, there is a spectral sequence
whose -page is
(3.3) |
See (1) of [Sta22, Tag 06XJ]. Taking we obtain the corresponding seven-term exact sequence.
Then the remaining argument is the same as Sansuc’s original one (c.f. [San81, p. 45]). ∎
Remark 3.4.
If in addition is linear, we have as in [San81, Prop. 6.10].
Corollary 3.5.
Let be a connected -group. Then we have , and a splitting short exact sequence .
Proof.
Take in Theorem 3.1 and note that the atlas is a section of the structure morphism . ∎
In general for a torsor where and a smooth -group, let be as in Theorem 3.1, and be the projection to . Following [Cao18, Def. 3.1], we may also define the invariant Brauer subgroup to be
The next statement extends [Cao18, Thm. 3.10].
Corollary 3.6.
3.2. Torsionness of the Brauer group
Lemma 3.7 (Restriction-Corestriction).
Let be a finite étale morphism of degree between algebraic stacks and . Then the composition
(3.8) |
is the map of multiplication by .
Proof.
The first map of (3.8) is induced by adjunction , and the second one is induced by the trace map . The composition of them is the multiplication by map. The result follows by taking cohomology. ∎
Lemma 3.9.
Assume is algebraically closed. Let be a smooth -variety and a linear -group acting on , the quotient stack. Then is torsion.
Proof.
Lemma 3.10.
Let be in . Denote . Then for any .
Proof.
By cohomological descent, we may assume is a scheme. Then it is classical. ∎
Lemma 3.11.
Let be in . If is torsion, then so is .
Proof.
By Lemma 3.10, the spectral sequence
yields exact sequences
where and . Since all Galois cohomology groups are torsion, that is torsion implies is torsion. ∎
Corollary 3.12.
Let be a regular Noetherian Deligne-Mumford stack, or an algebraic stack over which can be covered by finitely many open substacks where is a smooth -variety and a linear -group acting on . Then is torsion.
Proof.
The case that is regular Noetherian Deligne-Mumford stack follows from [AM20, Prop 2.5 (iii)]. We now show the other case. By Mayer-Vietoris sequence for étale cohomology (c.f. [Sta22, Tag 0A50], which is also correct for being an algebraic stack) it suffices to assume that . Also by Lemma 3.11, we may assume is algebraically closed. Then the result follows from Lemma 3.9. ∎
4. Descent theory and the Brauer-Manin pairing
Throughout this section, let be an algebraic stack over a number field . The following results extend the ones of [HS13, Thm. 8.1], which is originally the descent theory of Colliot-Thélène and Sansuc in [CTS87].
4.1. Fundamental exact sequence for groups of multiplicative type
Consider
where is the derived category of complexes of -modules. Let be a -group of multiplicative type. Then its Cartier dual is a finitely generated -module. Let be the cone of in .
Theorem 4.1.
Then we have the fundamental exact sequence
(4.2) |
where the map is the extended type.
Proof.
The proof is the same as that of [HS13, Thm. 8.1], except that we must show that is still valid for being an algebraic stack. But this is standard. By cohomological descent (for example, using spectral sequence (3.3) in both étale and fppf topology for an altas of ), we reduce this to the case where is a scheme, which is clear since is smooth as group scheme. See [Mil80, III, Thm. 3.9]. ∎
4.2. Descent
Let . As shown in the above proof, for being an algebraic stack over , the diagram in [Lv22, Rkm. 2.7 (2)] is still correct. We shall use a part of this diagram
(4.4) |
Let be an -torsor. Define , and
Proposition 4.5.
We have .
4.3. The Brauer-Manin pairing
Suppose that is of finite type over . Then there exists a finite set of places , such that extends to an integral model of over (that is, a -stack such that , and this can be shown by looking at a smooth groupoid presentation of ). Moreover, by [Chr20, Sec. 13], we have
In particular, any can be viewed as for some finite . Then one can imitate the proof of [Poo17, 8.2.1], to show that the Brauer-Manin pairing for
is well-defined, and the Brauer-Manin set coincides with the classical definition using since is an isomorphism.
Define
where . For and , one checks that
does not depend on the choice of . Assuming , we obtain a well-defined map . This notation will be used in Subsection 7.2.
5. Comparison to some other cohomological obstructions
Let be a number field. Harari [Har02] compared the Brauer-Manin obstruction of varieties with some other cohomological obstructions such as obstructions given by torsors under connected groups or abelian gerbes. In this section, we extend them to a class of algebraic stacks.
5.1. Descent and second descent obstruction on algebraic stacks
Since for a (resp. Commutative) group , (resp. ) is stable, the following definitions also make sense.
Definition 5.1.
The descent obstruction is
We also define
and the second descent obstruction (c.f. [Lv21, 4.2], slightly modified here) is
5.2. Comparison of obstructions
Theorem 5.2.
Let be a smooth algebraic -stack of finite type that is either Deligne-Mumford or Zariski-locally quotient of -variety by a linear -group. Then
Proof.
Since is a commutative group, we have We need to prove the other side
Since every commutative group is the product of groups of multiple type and some factors, and for all places we have
For a divisible -group of multiple type, By Corollary 3.12, the group is torsion. Furthermore, for any fixed there exists some positive integer such that lies in the image of Since every group of multiple type is the product of a finite group and a divisible group, we have
We assume that is a finite abelian group over . Let be the dual of , and let Then with integers and . Then We have the following commutative diagram
By the Poitou-Tate exact sequence ([Ser94] or [Mil06, Chapt. I 4.10]), every column of this diagram is exact. By taking a point , we have the following commutative diagram
Combining these two diagrams, we have Hence ∎
Remark 5.3.
The last part of this proof is essentially from [Har02, Prop. 1]. For the convenience of reading, we give the complete details.
Theorem 5.4.
Let be an algebraic -stack. Then
Proof.
The proofs of [Har02, Cor. 1 and Sec. 3] remain valid here and the result follows. ∎
6. Descent for Brauer-Manin set along a torsor
In this section we extend the results on descent for Brauer-Manin set along a torsor of Cao [Cao18, Sec. 5] to allow the base space to be a quotient stack.
Lemma 6.1.
Let where is a -variety and a connected linear -group acting on . Let be the canonic map making a -torosr over , and the pullback. Then we have
Proof.
Choosing an embedding we obtain a canonic surjection . The pushforward of under the map is an -torsor with a canonic map
such that for all , is a twist of , where is the connecting map associated to .
Write . It is obvious that
(6.2) |
Thus to complete the proof, we only need to show that each lifts to for some . For this purpose, we use strong approximation of with respect to Brauer-Manin obstruction, which states that
Claim that
Then for any , by (6.2) there is such that . Then by the claim we have
It follows that with some and . Letting we know that and . Thus there exists lifting and , which is the demanded result.
To justify the claim, we only need two facts:
-
(i)
, which follows from Theorem 3.1 and , and
-
(ii)
factor through , which follows from , i.e., .
The proof is complete. ∎
Lemma 6.3.
Let be as in Lemma 6.1. Assume that . Suppose is a subgroup containing and for each , we are given such that . Then
Proof.
Theorem 6.4.
Let be as in Lemma 6.1. Then
Proof.
By [Cao18, Prop. 5.6], one can find a resolution of
such that and . The pushforward of under the map is an -torsor with a canonic map
Since , applying Lemma 6.3 to we obtain
(6.5) |
Also implies that is surjective. It follows from [Cao18, Prop. 3.13] that is also surjective. The remaining argument is similar as in Lemma 6.1. For each , by (6.5), there is some and such that . We may assume is the neutral element in the sequel. By definition we have . Also [CDX19, Prop. 3.3] gives
It follows that with some and . Letting , we know that and . Thus putting , there exists lifting and . On the other hand, since and is surjective, we also have . This finishes the proof. ∎
7. Brauer-Manin set under a product
Let be a number field. The product preservation property of Brauer-Manin set was first established by Skorobogatov and Zarhin [SZ14] for smooth geometrically integral projective -varieties, and later by the first author [Lv20] for open ones. In this section we extend this result to a class of algebraic stacks over .
Theorem 7.1.
The functor
preserves finite product, where is the full sub--category spanned by smooth algebraic -stacks of finite type admitting separated and geometrically integral atlases such that , and is either Deligne-Mumford or Zariski-locally quotients of -varieties by linear -groups.
7.1. A variant of Künneth formula
Let be a ring killed by some integer. For , let be the full subcategory of such that for every and every atlas .
Lemma 7.2 (Künneth formula).
Let and be smooth algebraic stacks of finite type over a field , and . Then we have
Proof.
The proof is standard. By cohomological descent we may assume that and are in and then in , in which case it is classical (see for example, [Fu11, Cor. 9.3.5]). ∎
Lemma 7.3 (Smooth base change).
Let
be a -Cartesian diagram in where is smooth. Then
is an isomorphism.
7.2. The universal torsor of -torsion
Let . By cohomological descent, the -module is finite as abelian group. Let be the group of multiplicative type dual to it, that is, . Then as in [Cao20, p. 2156], we have a similar commutative diagram of distinguished triangles for . Also we have and . Then one also defines the universal torsor of -torsion of to be an inverse image of under (see (4.2) with ).
Lemma 7.4.
Suppose that admitting an atlas which is a smooth geometrically integral -variety and satisfies . Then
in (4.2) is surjective.
Proof.
We assume first is in . Let be a Čech nerve of and denote by the composed map. Since , by functoriality, we obtain a simplicial set
which is nonempty. It follows from [HS13, Cor. 8.17] that is injective for all . Let be the two projections. Since , the injection factors through so that we obtain a injection
But this is the composition
where the second map is the edge map of the spectral sequence of cohomological descent (3.3) with . It follows that is also injective, i.e., is surjective. Thus we may assume is an smooth geometrically integral variety.
Now let be in , repeating the first reduction step we may then assume is an smooth geometrically integral variety. The result follows from the original result for varieties [HS13, Cor. 8.17]. ∎
By Lemma 7.4, if (resp. ) satisfies the assumptions, then there exists a universal torsor of -torsion of (resp. of ). Then the homomorphism introduced by Skorobogatov and Zarhin (c.f. [Cao23, (1-4)]) can also be defined, that is,
Lemma 7.5.
Let and be algebraic -stacks satisfying the assumptions of Lemma 7.4, Then we have isomorphisms of -modules
(7.6) | |||
(7.7) |
7.3. Proof of the product preserving property
Now we can prove Theorem 7.1. Note is closed under products, we need only to verify that
for any . We go through the proofs in [SZ14, Sec. 5]. Since and are smooth, of finite type, either Deligne-Mumford -stacks or Zariski-locally quotients of -varieties by linear -groups, there Brauer groups are torsion by Corollary 3.12. Also, there exists a universal torsors of -torsion of and of , since both and satisfy the assumptions of Lemma 7.4. Then we use [SZ14, Lemmas 5.2 and 5.3] to finish the proof. The only non-trivial thing is to replace [SZ14, Cor. 2.8 (resp. Thm. 2.8] by (7.6) (resp. (7.7)). The proof is complete.
Corollary 7.8.
If and are stacks quotients of smooth geometrically integral -varieties by connected linear -groups. Then
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank Ye Tian, Weizhe Zheng, Dasheng Wei, Yang Cao, Shizhang Li and Junchao Shentu for helpful discussions. The work was partially done during the authors’ visits to the Morningside Center of Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. They thank the Center for its hospitality.
References
- [AM20] Benjamin Antieau and Lennart Meier, The Brauer group of the moduli stack of elliptic curves, Algebra Number Theory 14 (2020), no. 9, 2295–2333. MR 4172709
- [Art70] M. Artin, Algebraization of formal moduli. II. Existence of modifications, Ann. of Math. (2) 91 (1970), 88–135. MR 260747
- [BG19] Cristiana Bertolin and Federica Galluzzi, Gerbes and Brauer groups over stacks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.01382v4 (2019).
- [BP20] M. Bhargava and B. Poonen, The local-global principle for integral points on stacky curves, Preprint, arXiv:2006.00167 [math.NT] (2020).
- [Cao18] Yang Cao, Approximation forte pour les variétés avec une action d’un groupe linéaire, Compos. Math. 154 (2018), no. 4, 773–819. MR 3778194
- [Cao20] by same author, Sous-groupe de Brauer invariant et obstruction de descente itérée, Algebra Number Theory 14 (2020), no. 8, 2151–2183. MR 4172704
- [Cao23] by same author, Correction à l’article Sous-groupe de Brauer invariant et obstruction de descente itérée, Algebra Number Theory 17 (2023), no. 1, 261–266. MR 4549285
- [CDX19] Yang Cao, Cyril Demarche, and Fei Xu, Comparing descent obstruction and Brauer-Manin obstruction for open varieties, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 371 (2019), no. 12, 8625–8650. MR 3955558
- [Chr20] Atticus Christensen, A topology on points on stacks, arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.10231 (2020).
- [CTS87] Jean-Louis Colliot-Thélène and Jean-Jacques Sansuc, La descente sur les variétés rationnelles. II, Duke Math. J. 54 (1987), no. 2, 375–492. MR 899402
- [Dem11] Cyril Demarche, Le défaut d’approximation forte dans les groupes linéaires connexes, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 102 (2011), no. 3, 563–597. MR 2783137
- [DG95] Henri Darmon and Andrew Granville, On the equations and , Bull. London Math. Soc. 27 (1995), no. 6, 513–543. MR 1348707
- [DM69] P. Deligne and D. Mumford, The irreducibility of the space of curves of given genus, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. (1969), no. 36, 75–109. MR 262240
- [Fu11] Lei Fu, Etale cohomology theory, Nankai Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 13, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2011. MR 2791606
- [Gir71] Jean Giraud, Cohomologie non abélienne, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1971, Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 179. MR 0344253
- [Gro68] Alexander Grothendieck, Le groupe de Brauer. I-III, Dix exposés sur la cohomologie des schémas, Adv. Stud. Pure Math., vol. 3, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1968, pp. 46–66, 67–87, 88–188.
- [Har02] David Harari, Groupes algébriques et points rationnels, Math. Ann. 322 (2002), no. 4, 811–826. MR 1905103
- [HS13] David Harari and Alexei N. Skorobogatov, Descent theory for open varieties, Torsors, étale homotopy and applications to rational points, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 405, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2013, pp. 250–279. MR 3077172
- [Lv20] Chang Lv, A note on the Brauer group and the Brauer-Manin set of a product, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 52 (2020), no. 5, 932–941. MR 4171413
- [Lv21] by same author, The second descent obstruction and gerbes, arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.06915v2 (2021), 1–31.
- [Lv22] by same author, On commutative diagrams consisting of low term exact sequences, arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.14386v2 (2022), 1–9.
- [LZ17] Yifeng Liu and Weizhe Zheng, Enhanced six operations and base change theorem for higher Artin stacks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1211.5948v3 (2017).
- [Mil80] J. S. Milne, Étale cohomology, Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 33, Princeton Univ. Press, 1980.
- [Mil06] James Milne, Arithmetic duality theorems, BookSurge, 2006.
- [Ols16] Martin Olsson, Algebraic spaces and stacks, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, vol. 62, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2016. MR 3495343
- [Poo17] Bjorn Poonen, Rational points on varieties, vol. 186, American Mathematical Soc., 2017.
- [San81] J-J Sansuc, Groupe de Brauer et arithmétique des groupes algébriques linéaires sur un corps de nombres., Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 327 (1981), 12–80.
- [San22] Tim Santens, The Brauer-Manin obstruction for stacky curves, arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.17184 (2022).
- [Ser94] Jean-Pierre Serre, Galois cohomology, tanslated from the french by Patrick Ion, Springer-Verlag, 1994.
- [Sta22] The Stacks project authors, The stacks project, https://stacks.math.columbia.edu, 2022.
- [SZ14] Alexei N. Skorobogatov and Yuri G. Zarhin, The Brauer group and the Brauer-Manin set of products of varieties, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 16 (2014), no. 4, 749–768. MR 3191975
- [WL22] Han Wu and Chang Lv, Genus one half stacky curves violating the local-global principle, arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05810 (2022), 1–5.
- [Zah03] Stéphane Zahnd, Descente de torseurs, gerbes et points rationnels, Ph.D. thesis, Université des Sciences et Technologie de Lille-Lille I, 2003.