This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

thanks: Present address: Center for Quantum Spintronics, Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway

Topological band inversion in HgTe(001): surface and bulk signatures from photoemission

Raphael C. Vidal Experimentelle Physik VII and Würzburg-Dresden Cluster of Excellence ct.qmat, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany, EU    Giovanni Marini Department of Physical and Chemical Sciences & SPIN-CNR, University of L’Aquila, Italy, EU    Lukas Lunczer Experimental physics III, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany, EU    Simon Moser Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA Experimental physics IV and Würzburg-Dresden Cluster of Excellence ct.qmat, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany, EU    Lena Fürst Experimental physics III, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany, EU    Chris Jozwiak Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA    Aaron Bostwick Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA    Eli Rotenberg Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA    Charles Gould Experimental physics III, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany, EU    Hartmut Buhmann Experimental physics III, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany, EU    Wouter Beugeling Experimental physics III, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany, EU    Giorgio Sangiovanni Institut für Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik and Würzburg-Dresden Cluster of Excellence ct.qmat, Universität Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany, EU    Domenico Di Sante Theoretische Physik I, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany, EU Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy, EU Center for Computational Quantum Physics, Flatiron Institute, 162 5th Avenue, New York, New York 10010, USA    Gianni Profeta Department of Physical and Chemical Sciences & SPIN-CNR, University of L’Aquila, Italy, EU    Laurens W. Molenkamp Experimental physics III, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany, EU    Hendrik Bentmann Hendrik.Bentmann@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de Experimentelle Physik VII and Würzburg-Dresden Cluster of Excellence ct.qmat, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany, EU    Friedrich Reinert Experimentelle Physik VII and Würzburg-Dresden Cluster of Excellence ct.qmat, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany, EU
Abstract

HgTe is a versatile topological material and has enabled the realization of a variety of topological states, including two- and three-dimensional (3D) topological insulators and topological semimetals. Nevertheless, a quantitative understanding of its electronic structure remains challenging, in particular due to coupling of the Te 5pp-derived valence electrons to Hg 5dd core states at shallow binding energy. We present a joint experimental and theoretical study of the electronic structure in strained HgTe(001) films in the 3D topological-insulator regime, based on angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy and density functional theory. The results establish detailed agreement in terms of (i) electronic band dispersions and orbital symmetries, (ii) surface and bulk contributions to the electronic structure, and (iii) the importance of Hg 5dd states in the valence-band formation. Supported by theory, our experiments directly image the paradigmatic band inversion in HgTe, underlying its non-trivial band topology.

Topological band theory marks a milestone in condensed matter physics and has established a deeper understanding of electronic structure in crystalline solids [1, 2, 3, 4]. It has led to the discovery of a variety of topologically non-trivial states of matter, including two- and three-dimensional (2D and 3D) topological insulators (TI) [5, 6], topological crystalline insulators [7], magnetic TI [8, 9], as well as Dirac and Weyl semimetals [10]. These topological states form the basis for unusual electron transport phenomena, such as the quantum spin Hall effect in 2D TI [5], the quantum anomalous Hall effect in magnetic TI [8], and the chiral anomaly in Weyl semimetals [10]. Although, according to recent theoretical predictions, one may, in principle, expect an abundance of topological materials in nature [11], the number of systems that allow for the experimental observation and control of these phenomena is still very limited. The compound HgTe constitutes one such paradigmatic topological material. Through growth of epitaxial films, a variety of topological regimes were realized in HgTe in dependence of film thickness and lattice strain. For instance, films of HgTe allowed for the observation of the quantum spin Hall effect [5] as well as, more recently, a chiral-anomaly driven negative magnetoresistance [12], and signatures of topological superconductivity [13] and of Majorana quasi-particles [14].

Despite the aforementioned importance of HgTe in the field of topological materials, a quantitative understanding of its electronic band structure still remains difficult [15, 16, 17]. The origin of the non-trivial topology in HgTe is a band inversion around the Γ\Gamma-point of the Brillouin zone (BZ), where states of Hg 6ss orbital character and states of Te 5pp character acquire an inverted energetic order around the band gap, giving rise to an inverted gap [18]. By now, similar inversions of energy levels have been recognized as a key signature of topologically non-trivial band structures [19]. While the general band-inversion mechanism in HgTe has been known for a long time [20, 21], an accurate description of the band structure from first principles is challenging. A main reason for the difficulties lies in the presence of Hg 5dd semicore states at shallow binding energies that influence the spsp band structure and the inverted band gap via pdp-d interaction [22, 23]. Despite previous photoemission works [24, 25], systematic comparison of experiment and theory has remained largely limited to band positions at the Γ\Gamma-point, as obtained from optical measurements [21, 26, 27], which, however, provide no momentum-dependent and no surface-sensitive information.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (color online) (a) Bulk Brillouin zone with high-symmetry points. The kk-space path for the panels (d)-(f) is indicated in red. (b) kxk_{x}-kzk_{z} ARPES data sets obtained from hνh\nu-dependent measurements. (c) ARPES data set for HgTe(001) around the Γ\Gamma-point (hν=123h\nu=123\,eV) and corresponding calculation of the bulk band structure. (d) ARPES data along high-symmetry directions. For maximal visibility we plot the sum of data sets for pp- and ss-polarized light (cf. Fig. 3). (e)-(f) Calculations of (001)-projected surface and bulk spectral functions.

In the present work, we report on the electronic structure of HgTe(001) films in the 3D TI regime. Employing photon-energy- and polarization-dependent angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy (ARPES) we determine dispersions and orbital symmetries of the spsp-derived valence bands and disentangle bulk and surface states. Our experiments also unveil an itinerant character of the Hg 5dd states, as evidenced by a finite band dispersion and sub-band splittings of the d52d_{\frac{5}{2}} and d32d_{\frac{3}{2}} manifolds. The experimental results are in detailed agreement with calculations based on density functional theory (DFT) performed using the HSE06 hybrid functional on top of local-density approximation for exchange and correlation. For other approximations the agreement is considerably inferior. Our findings establish a benchmark for the investigation of topological phenomena in HgTe-based systems and in related material classes, where analogous topological band inversions have been predicted [28, 29].

The HgTe films were grown by molecular beam epitaxy on CdTe substrates (see Fig. S1 for the detailed layer stacking). The samples were either grown on with a protective amorphous Te/Ti layer or transferred directly with an UHV suitcase to the ARPES measurement setup. We conducted ARPES experiments at the MAESTRO endstation (μ\upmuARPES setup) at beamline 7 of the Advanced Light Source (ALS) and at a high-resolution ARPES setup in the laboratory in Würzburg. Band-structure calculations were performed based on DFT. Experimental and theoretical details are given in the Supplemental material.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (color online) (a) Angle-integrated photoemission data of the Hg 5dd states in comparison to DFT calculations based on different exchange-correlation functionals. (b) Calculated and measured band dispersion of the Hg 5d52d_{\frac{5}{2}} states.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: (color online) (a)-(b) Constant-energy ARPES data sets obtained with pp- and ss-polarized light. The boundaries of the bulk BZ are indicated. (c)-(d) ARPES data along the K-Γ\Gamma-K-direction for pp- and ss-polarized light. (e)-(g) Calculations of the (001)-projected surface spectral function along ΓK\Gamma K projected on different Te 5pp orbitals. (h) Schematic of the experimental geometry. The data sets in all panels were taken with hν=123h\nu=123\,eV.

We collected hνh\nu-dependent ARPES data to identify the high-symmetry planes in the the 3D band structure of HgTe [Fig. 1(a)-(b) and Fig. S6]. The Γ\Gamma-point of the bulk BZ is reached in normal emission at a photon energy of approximately hν=h\nu=\,123 eV, consistent with an inner potential of V0=V_{0}=\,10.3 eV. Fig. 1(c) shows a corresponding ARPES data set together with the calculated bulk band structure along high-symmetry directions. A comparison over a larger energy range is shown in Fig. S5 of the Supplementary material. We identify the Γ8\Gamma_{8}, Γ6\Gamma_{6} and Γ7\Gamma_{7} valence bands. An additional feature, which is not found in the bulk calculation, is attributed to the topological surface state (TSS). As discussed below in more detail (cf. Fig. 4), the TSS disperses linearly from the Fermi level to higher binding energies where it merges with the Γ6\Gamma_{6} bulk band.

To disentangle surface and bulk contributions to the electronic structure, we compare ARPES data to calculations of the (001)-projected spectral functions along a high-symmetry path in the BZ [Fig. 1(d)-(f)]. Considering bulk- and surface-projected spectral weights we identify two main surface features: the TSS near the Γ\Gamma-point and another surface state (SS) at the XX-point, which coincides with the K¯\bar{K}-point of the surface BZ. To our knowledge, the surface state at XX has not been identified before. Both features are confirmed by the experimental data. All other features are attributed primarily to the bulk, consistent with the decent match of experiment and bulk calculation in Fig. 1(c). Another effect of the (001)-projection is the appearance of backfolded bands (BFB) in the first bulk BZ. Along the ΓK\Gamma K direction these BFB cross the primary bands at the boundary of the surface BZ, i.e. at the J¯\bar{J}-point. The BFB are also discerned in the experimental data, albeit with comparably low spectral weight.

The level of agreement between measured and calculated electronic structure, established in Fig. 1, becomes significantly compromised for other approximations of exchange and correlation, as seen from a detailed comparison of the experimental data to calculations based on LDA, LDA+UU, and the MBJ hybrid functional in the Supplementary Figs. S3 and S4. The importance of exchange-correlation effects in HgTe has been attributed to pdp-d interaction of the spsp valence bands with the shallow Hg 5dd states [22, 23], which we address in the following.

Fig. 2(a) compares angle-integrated photoemission data of the Hg 5dd states to calculations based on different exchange-correlation functionals. The best match to the experimental binding energy is obtained with the HSE06 functional which, accounting for a percentage of the exact Fock exchange, partially corrects the self-interaction inherently associated to local DFT functionals. Indeed, LDA and MBJ severely underestimate the 5dd binding energy, while LDA+UU gives rise to strong overestimations for reasonable values of UU. Our experimental data further reveals a splitting of the d52d_{\frac{5}{2}} and d32d_{\frac{3}{2}} peaks into three and two components, respectively. This splitting is again nicely captured by our HSE06-based calculation and thus can be attributed to an initial-state effect in the 5dd levels. As seen in the momentum-dependent calculation in Fig. 2(b), this fine structure arises from a subband-splitting and a finite band dispersion, both evidencing a participation of the 5dd states in the valence-band formation. Angle-resolved measurements confirm the dispersive character of the 5dd states with a total band width of approximately 1 eV for the d52d_{\frac{5}{2}} level [Fig. 2c and Figs. S5-S7]. Supported by theory, our experiments thus establish evidence for significant pdp-d hybridization in HgTe.

Our calculations further show a spin splitting of the Γ8\Gamma_{8}-band along ΓX\Gamma X ([110] direction), which remains unresolved in our measurements. It has been proposed that the linear term of the splitting, close to the Γ\Gamma-point, arises from an admixture of dd orbital character and can be written as Δkx=323Ck\Delta k_{x}=\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{3}Ck, where the coefficient CC is given by [30, 31, 32]:

C=AΔd,cE(Γ8)Ed,c.C=-A\frac{\Delta_{d,c}}{E(\Gamma_{8})-E_{d,c}}. (1)

E(Γ8)E(\Gamma_{8}) is the top of the Γ8\Gamma_{8}-band, and Δd,c\Delta_{d,c} is the spin-orbit splitting and Ed,cE_{d,c} the energy of the Hg 5dd levels. The constant AA has been estimated to 350meVÅ350\,\mathrm{meV}\mathrm{{\AA}} for II-VI compounds [31]. From our direct band calculation we estimate C70meVÅC\sim-70\,\mathrm{meV}\mathrm{{\AA}} (Fig. S7), while using Eq. 1 we obtain C80meVÅC\sim-80\,\mathrm{meV}\mathrm{{\AA}} for experimental values and C87.5meVÅC\sim-87.5\,\mathrm{meV}\mathrm{{\AA}} for theoretical values. The reasonable match supports the validity of Eq. (1) and, therefore, indicates an influence of pdp-d interaction on the spin splitting of the top-most valence band states.

The spin splitting arises from bulk inversion asymmetry (BIA), which quantifies the difference between the monoatomic diamond structure (similar to α\alpha-Sn) and the HgTe zincblende structure and can play a crucial role for transport phenomena in HgTe. For example, in compressively strained HgTe, Weyl points arise as a result of BIA, in contrast to Dirac fermions present without inversion asymmetry [33, 12]. In HgTe quantum wells, an even-odd effect in the length of the Hall conductance plateaus could be explained by BIA [34]. For quantitative analysis of these phenomena, one commonly uses 𝐤𝐩\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{p}-theory [35], but the strength of the BIA couplings of HgTe is poorly known. In order to provide an estimate from our present results, we fit a 4×44\times 4 Luttinger model [33] with a linear BIA term BIA=α[kx{Jx,Jy2Jz2}+c.p.]\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{BIA}}=\alpha[k_{x}\{J_{x},J_{y}^{2}-J_{z}^{2}\}+\text{c.p.}] (analogous to 323Ck\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{3}Ck above) to the band structure obtained from the HSE06 functional. We obtain α=70±20\alpha=70\pm 20 meV Å. More details are provided in Supplementary Section IV.

We proceed by examining the orbital composition of the valence bands, which plays a crucial role for the topological properties. We exploit selection rules imposed by the dipole approximation of the photoemission matrix element. A sketch of the experimental geometry is shown in Fig. 3(g). The plane of light incidence (xzxz plane) is aligned with the mirror-symmetric {110}-plane, implying that, for emission within the plane of light incidence, linearly ss-polarized light couples exclusively to odd orbitals and pp-polarized light to even orbitals. A strong influence of the light polarization on the intensity distributions is directly apparent from the constant-energy maps in Figs. 3(a)-(b).

Focusing on the intensity within the plane of light incidence in Figs. 3(c)-(d), we find that ss-polarized light predominantly excites the Γ8\Gamma_{8}-band. This is in line with our calculations in Figs. 3(e)-(g) assigning a main contribution from odd pyp_{y} orbitals to this band. All other features are largely suppressed for ss-polarization with the exception of minor contributions from the Γ6\Gamma_{6}-band at small but finite kxk_{x}, consistent with the calculations showing a sligthly enhanced pyp_{y} character at similar kxk_{x}. Comparing the momentum dependences of the ARPES spectral weight for pp-polarized light and of the projections on even pxp_{x} and pzp_{z} orbitals, we conclude that the measurement mainly reflects pzp_{z}-derived states, including the TSS as well as parts of the Γ8\Gamma_{8}- and Γ6\Gamma_{6}-bands.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: (color online) (a) ARPES data near the Γ\Gamma-point taken with hν=123h\nu=123\,eV and p-polarized light. The inset shows ARPES data obtained with with He Iα\mathrm{I}_{\alpha}-line (hν=21.2h\nu=21.2\,eV), for which the cross section of the topological surface state is much larger than for the bulk bands. (b) Calculated bulk band structure projected on Te 5pzp_{z} and Hg 6ss orbitals. (c)-(d) ARPES data sets measured at (b) T=40\mathrm{T}=40\,K and (c) 300300\,K (hν=21.2h\nu=21.2\,eV).

A more detailed analysis near the Γ\Gamma-point is shown in Fig. 4. The measured intensity distribution for p-polarized light in Fig. 4(a) displays a similar momentum dependence as the calculated pzp_{z}-projected weight of the bulk bands [Fig. 4(b)]. In particular, drops in pzp_{z} orbital character towards large wave vectors for the Γ8\Gamma_{8}-band and towards small wave vectors for the Γ6\Gamma_{6}-band are reflected in the experimental data, where corresponding reductions of spectral weight are observed. As seen in the calculations in Fig. 4(b), the momentum-dependent change in orbital contribution for the Γ6\Gamma_{6}-band is directly related to the band inversion, which gives rise to a dominating Hg 6ss character near Γ\Gamma at the expense of Te pzp_{z} character. Due to the low cross section for ss orbitals the Γ6\Gamma_{6}-band is suppressed near Γ\Gamma. The inset in Fig. 4(a) shows data of the TSS taken at hν=21.2h\nu=21.2\,eV, for which it is the dominating spectral feature [cf. Figs. 4(c)-(d)]. It is evident that the TSS merges into the Γ6\Gamma_{6}-band near wave vectors where the latter strongly drops in intensity, i.e. where the orbital character changes from Te pzp_{z} to Hg 6ss. These observations provide direct evidence for the correlation between bulk band inversion and non-trivial surface electronic structure.

To obtain information about the conduction band we collected ARPES data at elevated temperature [Figs. 4(c)-(d)]. A pronounced shift in energy is observed when comparing data at 300300\,K and at 4040\,K. At room temperature the bottom of the conduction band lies approximately 50 meV below the Fermi level, while it is not observed up to EFE_{F} at low temperature. According to our calculations, the energy shift arises from the strong density of states asymmetry between the top of the valence and the bottom of the conduction band (Fig.S10). As a result of the increased temperature, the chemical potential is shifted by 55 meV, which is in agreement with the experiment.

In summary, we present a comprehensive experimental and theoretical investigation of the electronic structure of HgTe(001) in the 3D TI regime. The experimental results are captured in detail by calculations based on density functional theory in a hybrid-functional approximation, indicating a crucial role of non-local exchange interactions in HgTe. Our findings provide direct spectroscopic evidence for the band inversion in the bulk electronic structure and for its relation to the existence of a topological surface state. Our results will enable an improved theoretical description of more complex topological phases in HgTe-based systems [12, 13, 14], and may also facilitate the identification of topological states in related material classes. For instance, a variety of half-Heusler compounds were predicted to feature topological band inversions analogous to HgTe [28, 29], but experimental evidence is still scarce [36]. In these compounds pdp-d interactions likely play a similarly important role as demonstrated here for HgTe.

I Acknowledgments

We thank Eeshan Ketkar for critical reading of the manuscript. We acknowledge financial support from the DFG through SFB1170 ’Tocotronics’ (projects A01, A04, C05) and the Würzburg-Dresden Cluster of Excellence on Complexity and Topology in Quantum Matter – ct.qmat (EXC 2147, project-id 390858490). This research used resources of the Advanced Light Source (ALS), which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231. The authors gratefully acknowledge the CINECA Supercomputing Center providing computational time through the ISCRA project. G. P. wishes to acknowledge financial support from the Italian Ministry for Research and Education through PRIN-2017 project “Tuning and understanding quantum phases in 2D materials— Quantum 2D” (IT-MIUR Grant No. 2017Z8TS5B). S.M. acknowledges support by the Swiss National Science Foundation under grant no. P300P2-171221.

References

  • Kane and Mele [2005] C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146802 (2005).
  • Fu et al. [2007] L. Fu, C. L. Kane, and E. J. Mele, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 106803 (2007).
  • Moore and Balents [2007] J. E. Moore and L. Balents, Phys. Rev. B 75, 121306 (2007).
  • Qi and Zhang [2011] X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
  • König et al. [2007] M. König, S. Wiedmann, C. Brüne, A. Roth, H. Buhmann, L. W. Molenkamp, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Science 318, 766 (2007).
  • Hasan and Kane [2010] M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
  • Dziawa et al. [2012] P. Dziawa, B. J. Kowalski, K. Dybko, R. Buczko, A. Szczerbakow, M. Szot, E. Łusakowska, T. Balasubramanian, B. M. Wojek, M. H. Berntsen, et al., Nat. Mater. 11, 1023 (2012).
  • Chang et al. [2013] C.-Z. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, K. Li, Y. Ou, P. Wei, L.-L. Wang, et al., Science 340, 167 (2013).
  • Otrokov et al. [2019] M. M. Otrokov, I. I. Klimovskikh, H. Bentmann, D. Estyunin, A. Zeugner, Z. S. Aliev, S. Gaß, A. U. B. Wolter, A. V. Koroleva, A. M. Shikin, et al., Nature 576, 416 (2019).
  • Armitage et al. [2018] N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018).
  • Vergniory et al. [2019] M. G. Vergniory, L. Elcoro, C. Felser, N. Regnault, B. A. Bernevig, and Z. Wang, Nature 566,480 (2019).
  • Mahler et al. [2019] D. M. Mahler, J.-B. Mayer, P. Leubner, L. Lunczer, D. Di Sante, G. Sangiovanni, R. Thomale, E. M. Hankiewicz, H. Buhmann, C. Gould, et al., Phys. Rev. X 9, 031034 (2019).
  • Bocquillon et al. [2017] E. Bocquillon, R. S. Deacon, J. Wiedenmann, P. Leubner, T. M. Klapwijk, C. Brüne, K. Ishibashi, H. Buhmann, and L. W. Molenkamp, Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 137 (2017).
  • Ren et al. [2019] H. Ren, F. Pientka, S. Hart, A. T. Pierce, M. Kosowsky, L. Lunczer, R. Schlereth, B. Scharf, E. M. Hankiewicz, L. W. Molenkamp, et al., Nature 569, 93–98 (2019).
  • Nicklas and Wilkins [2011] J. W. Nicklas and J. W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. B 84, 121308 (2011).
  • Sakuma et al. [2011] R. Sakuma, C. Friedrich, T. Miyake, S. Blügel, and F. Aryasetiawan, Phys. Rev. B 84, 085144 (2011).
  • Svane et al. [2011] A. Svane, N. E. Christensen, M. Cardona, A. N. Chantis, M. van Schilfgaarde, and T. Kotani, Phys. Rev. B 84, 205205 (2011).
  • Bernevig et al. [2006] B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Science 314, 1757 (2006).
  • Bansil et al. [2016] A. Bansil, H. Lin, and T. Das, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021004 (2016).
  • Groves and Paul [1963] S. Groves and W. Paul, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 194 (1963).
  • Groves et al. [1967] S. H. Groves, R. N. Brown, and C. R. Pidgeon, Phys. Rev. 161, 779 (1967).
  • Wei and Zunger [1988] S.-H. Wei and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 37, 8958 (1988).
  • Fleszar and Hanke [2005] A. Fleszar and W. Hanke, Phys. Rev. B 71, 045207 (2005).
  • Orlowski et al. [2000] N. Orlowski, J. Augustin, Z. Gołacki, C. Janowitz, and R. Manzke, Phys. Rev. B 61, R5058 (2000).
  • Liu et al. [2015] C. Liu, G. Bian, T.-R. Chang, K. Wang, S.-Y. Xu, I. Belopolski, I. Miotkowski, H. Cao, K. Miyamoto, C. Xu, et al., Phys. Rev. B 92, 115436 (2015).
  • Chadi et al. [1972] D. J. Chadi, J. P. Walter, M. L. Cohen, Y. Petroff, and M. Balkanski, Phys. Rev. B 5, 3058 (1972).
  • Moritani et al. [1973] A. Moritani, K. Taniguchi, C. Hamaguchi, and J. Nakai, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 34, 79 (1973).
  • Chadov et al. [2010] S. Chadov, X. Qi, J. Kübler, G. H. Fecher, C. Felser, and S. C. Zhang, Nat. Mater. 9, 541 (2010).
  • Lin et al. [2010] H. Lin, L. A. Wray, Y. Xia, S. Xu, S. Jia, R. J. Cava, A. Bansil, and M. Z. Hasan, Nat. Mater. 9, 546 (2010).
  • Dresselhaus [1955] G. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. 100, 580 (1955).
  • Cardona et al. [1986] M. Cardona, N. Christensen, and G. Fasol, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2831 (1986).
  • Cardona et al. [1988] M. Cardona, N. Christensen, and G. Fasol, Phys. Rev. B 38, 1806 (1988).
  • Ruan et al. [2016] J. Ruan, S.-K. Jian, H. Yao, H. Zhang, S.-C. Zhang, and D. Xing, Nat. Commun. 7, 11136 (2016).
  • Shamim et al. [2020] S. Shamim, W. Beugeling, J. Böttcher, P. Shekhar, A. Budewitz, P. Leubner, L. Lunczer, E. M. Hankiewicz, H. Buhmann, and L. W. Molenkamp, Sci. Adv. 6, eaba4625 (2020).
  • Winkler [2003] R. Winkler, Spin—Orbit Coupling Effects in Two-Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003).
  • Logan et al. [2016] J. A. Logan, S. J. Patel, S. D. Harrington, C. M. Polley, B. D. Schultz, T. Balasubramanian, A. Janotti, A. Mikkelsen, and C. J. Palmstrom, Nat. Commun. 7, 11993 (2016).