This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Tunneling Under the Influence of Quantum Gravity in Black Rings

Riasat Ali riasatyasin@gmail.com Department of Mathematics, GC University Faisalabad Layyah Campus, Layyah-31200, Pakistan    Kazuharu Bamba bamba@sss.fukushima-u.ac.jp Division of Human Support System, Faculty of Symbiotic Systems Science, Fukushima University, Fukushima 960-1296, Japan    Muhammad Asgher m.asgher145@gmail.com Department of Mathematics, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur-63100, Pakistan    Syed Asif Ali Shah asifalishah695@gmail.com Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Lahore 1-Km Raiwind Road, Sultan Town Lahore 54000, Pakistan
Abstract

We explore the Lagrangian equation in the background of generalized uncertainty principle. The tunneling radiation through the black ring horizon is observed. We investigated the tunneling radiation through the Hamilton-Jacobi method for solutions of Einstein-Maxwell-dilation gravity theory. The radiation of black ring without back reaction and self interaction of particles are studied. Furthermore, we consider the quantum gravity effect on the stability of black ring.

Neutral black ring; Dipole black ring; Spin-1 particles; Lagrangian gravity equation; Hawking radiation; Stability of rings

I Introduction

The five dimensions rotating black ring solution has been analyzed in 1 . It is observed that the angular momentum and mass of black ring is same as a black hole. Many researchers have analyzed the metric information for the well-known black rings 2 ; 3 ; 4 and studied that the black ring with S2×S1S^{2}\times S^{1} horizon. The nature of the black ring space-time for the nonlinear σ\sigma-model and the normal horizon should be studied in 5 .

The black ring evaporation as a result of tunneling radiation is one of the significant phenomenon. The tunneling method for Dirac spin up/down particles for neutral black ring (NBR) five dimension spaces have been studied 6 . The investigation is established on tunneling to study the complex mathematical object for particle to go across with the black ring. The NBR has horizon of the topology S1×S2S^{1}\times S^{2}. The solution is describing a NBR, which takes necessity conic singularity at that region, there is no centrifugal force exist to develop equilibrium of NBR due to self gravity. The tunneling radiation method by applying the Hamilton-Jacobi process and the WKB approximation of different types of particle of the black rings in five dimensions have been investigated 7 . It is suggested that to study the quantum method of tunneling radiation from the black rings. Different phenomena are usually applied to study the particle action by computing its imaginary component. The tunneling radiation of the particles and their the corresponding Hawking temperature of the black rings have been obtained.

The tunneling radiation from the different spin boson particle emission by applying the Hamilton Jacobi method to the Lagrangian field equation and evaluated the tunneling probability for the well-knows black holes 8 ; 9 ; 10 ; 11 . Also, WKB approximation is used to a general black hole and computed the corresponding temperature.

The generalized uncertainty principle (GUP) plays a very significant purpose to analyze the gravitational effects. To take the gravity effects of tunneling radiation and the Lagrangian equation will be modified by taking GUP effects. The black hole and rotating black ring thermodynamics have furthermore been studied within the GUP effects 12 ; 13 ; 14 ; 15 ; 16 ; 16b .

The paper is sketched as: In Sec. II, we analyzed metric of the NBR and also studied the tunneling radiation from the NBR. Section III provides tunneling radiation of dipole black ring (DBR) by using the same method in section II. In Sec. IV, it contains the graphical behavior of temperature and analyze the GUP effect on temperature. In Sec. V we have expressed the discussion and conclusions.

II Neutral Black Ring

The quantum gravity caused by different spin particles which gets important at really high densities and keeps singularities in black rings. The particle production is due to quantum gravity, every black ring may produce a new radiation on the inner and outer of its horizon. Liu 17 analyzed the black ring for first thermodynamic law and the emission probability is associated with the black ring entropy.

In this chapter, we discuss boson tunneling radiation for NBR five dimension spaces. We study the Lagrangian equation with GUP by applying WKB approximation. The study of black ring thermodynamics has implication in gravitational physics. The metric of NBR 6 is given by

ds2\displaystyle ds^{2} =\displaystyle= G(y)G(x)[dtC(λ,ν)R1+yG(y)dψ]2+R2(yx)2G(x)\displaystyle-\frac{G(y)}{G(x)}[dt-C(\lambda,\nu)R\frac{1+y}{G(y)}d\psi]^{2}+\frac{R^{2}}{(y-x)^{2}}G(x) (1)
[F(y)G(y)dψ21F(y)dy2+1F(x)dx2+F(x)G(x)dϕ2],\displaystyle\left[-\frac{F(y)}{G(y)}d\psi^{2}-\frac{1}{F(y)}dy^{2}+\frac{1}{F(x)}dx^{2}+\frac{F(x)}{G(x)}d\phi^{2}\right],

and

G(ξ)\displaystyle G(\xi) =\displaystyle= λξ+1,F(ξ)=(1+νξ)(1ξ2),\displaystyle\lambda\xi+1,~{}~{}~{}F(\xi)=(1+\nu\xi)(1-\xi^{2}),
C(λ,ν)\displaystyle C(\lambda,\nu) =\displaystyle= (λν)λ1+λ1λ.\displaystyle\sqrt{(\lambda-\nu)\lambda\frac{1+\lambda}{1-\lambda}}.

The ν\nu and λ\lambda are dimensionless parameters and takes values in the range (1>λν>0)(1>\lambda\geq\nu>0) and to expect the singularity of conical at x=1x=1, λ\lambda and ν\nu to be associated with each other, such that λ=2νν2+1.\lambda=\frac{2\nu}{\nu^{2}+1}. The component ψ\psi and ϕ\phi are two BR cycles, xx and yy takes the values 1x11\geq x\geq-1 and 1y-1\geq y\geq-\infty. The horizon is around at y=1ν=yhy=-\frac{1}{\nu}=y_{h}. The RR has the dimension with fixed length. The BR mass is M=3πλR22(1ν)2M=\frac{3\pi\lambda R^{2}}{2(1-\nu)^{2}}. In addition, there are three space-time coordinates tt, ϕ\phi and ψ\psi associated with Killing vectors and 5D space-time coordinates are taken as xμ=(t,ϕ,y,x,ψ)x^{\mu}=(t,\phi,y,x,\psi). Next, we will analyze boson particles tunneling from the NBR. The metric from Eq. (1) can be rewritten as

ds2=Udt2+Vdϕ2+Wdy2+Xdx2+Ydψ2+2Zdtdψ,ds^{2}=Udt^{2}+Vd\phi^{2}+Wdy^{2}+Xdx^{2}+Yd\psi^{2}+2Zdtd\psi, (2)

where

U\displaystyle U =\displaystyle= G(y)G(x),W=G(x)R2(yx)2F(y),V=F(x)R2(xy)2,\displaystyle-\frac{G(y)}{G(x)},~{}~{}~{}~{}W=\frac{G(x)R^{2}}{(y-x)^{2}F(y)},~{}~{}~{}V=\frac{F(x)R^{2}}{(x-y)^{2}},
Y\displaystyle Y =\displaystyle= C2(λ,ν)(1+y)2R2G(x)G(y)F(y)G(x)R2(yx)2G(y),\displaystyle-\frac{C^{2}(\lambda,\nu)(1+y)^{2}R^{2}}{G(x)G(y)}-\frac{F(y)G(x)R^{2}}{(y-x)^{2}G(y)},
X\displaystyle X =\displaystyle= G(x)R2(yx)2F(x),Z=C(λ,ν)(1+y)RG(x).\displaystyle\frac{G(x)R^{2}}{(y-x)^{2}F(x)},~{}~{}~{}Z=\frac{C(\lambda,\nu)(1+y)R}{G(x)}.

Now we focus on analyzing boson particles tunneling from the NBR. In curved space-time, boson particles should be satisfied with the following Lagrangian gravity equation without charge 12 ; 13

μ(gχνμ)+gm22χν+β2000(gg00χ0ν)\displaystyle\partial_{\mu}(\sqrt{-g}\chi^{\nu\mu})+\sqrt{-g}\frac{m^{2}}{\hbar^{2}}\chi^{\nu}+\beta\hbar^{2}\partial_{0}\partial_{0}\partial_{0}(\sqrt{-g}g^{00}\chi^{0\nu}) (3)
\displaystyle- β2iii(ggiiχiν)=0,\displaystyle\beta\hbar^{2}\partial_{i}\partial_{i}\partial_{i}(\sqrt{-g}g^{ii}\chi^{i\nu})=0,

and

χνμ\displaystyle\chi_{\nu\mu} =\displaystyle= (1β2ν2)νχμ(1β2μ2)μχν.\displaystyle(1-\beta{\hbar^{2}\partial_{\nu}^{2}})\partial_{\nu}\chi_{\mu}-(1-\beta{\hbar^{2}\partial_{\mu}^{2}})\partial_{\mu}\chi_{\nu}.

Here β\beta, mm and χ\chi are the quantum gravity parameter, particle mass and anti-symmetric tensor and 0\partial_{0} and i\partial_{i} denotes the partial derivative with respect to tt and i=(ϕ,y,x,ψ)i=(\phi,y,x,\psi), respectively. The χ\chi components are calculated as

χ0=VUVZ2χ0ZUVZ2χ1,χ1=ZUVZ2χ0UUVZ2χ1,\displaystyle\chi^{0}=\frac{V}{UV-Z^{2}}\chi_{0}-\frac{Z}{UV-Z^{2}}\chi_{1},~{}~{}\chi^{1}=\frac{-Z}{UV-Z^{2}}\chi_{0}-\frac{U}{UV-Z^{2}}\chi_{1},
χ2=1Wχ2,χ3=1Xχ3,χ4=1Yχ4,χ01=Z2χ10+UVχ01(UVZ2)2,\displaystyle\chi^{2}=\frac{1}{W}\chi_{2},~{}~{}\chi^{3}=\frac{1}{X}\chi_{3},~{}~{}\chi^{4}=\frac{1}{Y}\chi_{4},~{}~{}\chi^{01}=\frac{Z^{2}\chi_{10}+UV\chi_{01}}{(UV-Z^{2})^{2}},
χ02=Vχ02Zχ12W(UVZ2),χ03=Zχ03+Uχ13X(UVZ2),χ04=Z2χ04+Uχ14Y(UVZ2),\displaystyle\chi^{02}=\frac{V\chi_{02}-Z\chi_{12}}{W(UV-Z^{2})},~{}~{}\chi^{03}=\frac{-Z\chi_{03}+U\chi_{13}}{X(UV-Z^{2})},~{}~{}\chi^{04}=\frac{-Z^{2}\chi_{04}+U\chi_{14}}{Y(UV-Z^{2})},
χ12=Zχ02+Uχ12W(UVZ2),χ13=Zχ03+Uχ13X(UVZ2),χ14=Zχ04+Uχ14Y(UVZ2),\displaystyle\chi^{12}=-\frac{Z\chi_{02}+U\chi_{12}}{W(UV-Z^{2})},~{}~{}\chi^{13}=\frac{-Z\chi_{03}+U\chi_{13}}{X(UV-Z^{2})},~{}~{}\chi^{14}=\frac{-Z\chi_{04}+U\chi_{14}}{Y(UV-Z^{2})},
χ23=1WXχ23,χ24=1WYχ24,χ34=1XYχ34.\displaystyle\chi^{23}=\frac{1}{WX}\chi_{23},~{}~{}\chi^{24}=\frac{1}{WY}\chi_{24},~{}~{}\chi^{34}=\frac{1}{XY}\chi_{34}.

The WKB approximation is 18

χν=cνexp[iΘ0(t,ϕ,y,x,ψ)+ΣnΘn(t,ϕ,y,x,ψ)].\chi_{\nu}=c_{\nu}\exp[\frac{i}{\hbar}\Theta_{0}(t,\phi,y,x,\psi)+\Sigma\hbar^{n}\Theta_{n}(t,\phi,y,x,\psi)].

Here,(Θ0,Θn)(\Theta_{0},~{}~{}\Theta_{n}) and cνc_{\nu} are arbitrary functions and constant. By neglecting the higher order terms for n=1,2,3,n=1,2,3,... and applying Eq. (3), we obtain the field equations and applying variables separation technique 6 , we can take

Θ0=Et+jϕ+I(x,y)+Lψ+K.\Theta_{0}=-Et+j\phi+I(x,y)+L\psi+K. (4)

Here, EE and KK are the particle energy and complex constant, jj and LL are denoting the angular momentum of particles and also associating to the directions ϕ\phi and ψ\psi respectively. From a set of field equations, we obtain a 5×55\times 5 equation of a matrix G(c0,c1,c2,c3,c4)T=0,G(c_{0},c_{1},c_{2},c_{3},c_{4})^{T}=0, the matrix elements should be expressed as

G(c0,c1,c2,c3,c4)T=0.G(c_{0},c_{1},c_{2},c_{3},c_{4})^{T}=0.

Which gives a 5×55\times 5 matrix presented as ”GG”, whose elements are given as follows:

G00\displaystyle G_{00} =\displaystyle= Z2U~[J12+βJ14]UVU~[J12+βJ14]VW[I12+βI14]+ZX[I22+βI24]\displaystyle Z^{2}\tilde{U}[J_{1}^{2}+\beta J_{1}^{4}]-UV\tilde{U}[J_{1}^{2}+\beta J_{1}^{4}]-\frac{V}{W}[I_{1}^{2}+\beta I_{1}^{4}]+\frac{Z}{X}[I_{2}^{2}+\beta I_{2}^{4}]
+\displaystyle+ ZY[L12+βL14]m2V,\displaystyle\frac{Z}{Y}[L_{1}^{2}+\beta L_{1}^{4}]-m^{2}V,
G01\displaystyle G_{01} =\displaystyle= Z2U~[J1+βJ13]EUVU~[J1+βJ13]E+ZW[I12+βI14]+UX[I22+βI24]\displaystyle Z^{2}\tilde{U}[J_{1}+\beta J_{1}^{3}]E-UV\tilde{U}[J_{1}+\beta J_{1}^{3}]E+\frac{Z}{W}[I_{1}^{2}+\beta I_{1}^{4}]+\frac{U}{X}[I_{2}^{2}+\beta I_{2}^{4}]
\displaystyle- UY[L12+βL14]m2Z,\displaystyle\frac{U}{Y}[L_{1}^{2}+\beta L_{1}^{4}]-m^{2}Z,
G02\displaystyle G_{02} =\displaystyle= VW[E+βE3]I1ZU~W[J1+βJ13]I1,\displaystyle-\frac{V}{W}[E+\beta E^{3}]I_{1}-\frac{Z\tilde{U}}{W}[J_{1}+\beta J_{1}^{3}]I_{1},
G03\displaystyle G_{03} =\displaystyle= VX[E+βE3]I2+UU~X[J1+βJ13]I2,\displaystyle\frac{V}{X}[E+\beta E^{3}]I_{2}+\frac{U\tilde{U}}{X}[J_{1}+\beta J_{1}^{3}]I_{2},
G04\displaystyle G_{04} =\displaystyle= ZY[E+βE3]L1+UU~Y[J1+βJ13]L1,\displaystyle\frac{Z}{Y}[E+\beta E^{3}]L_{1}+\frac{U\tilde{U}}{Y}[J_{1}+\beta J_{1}^{3}]L_{1},
G10\displaystyle G_{10} =\displaystyle= Z2U~[J1+βJ13]EUVU~[J1+βJ13]E+ZW[I12+βI14]+ZX[I22+βI24]\displaystyle Z^{2}\tilde{U}[J_{1}+\beta J_{1}^{3}]E-UV\tilde{U}[J_{1}+\beta J_{1}^{3}]E+\frac{Z}{W}[I_{1}^{2}+\beta I_{1}^{4}]+\frac{Z}{X}[I_{2}^{2}+\beta I_{2}^{4}]
+\displaystyle+ ZY[L12+βL14]+m2Z,\displaystyle\frac{Z}{Y}[L_{1}^{2}+\beta L_{1}^{4}]+m^{2}Z,
G11\displaystyle G_{11} =\displaystyle= Z2U~[E2+βE4]UVU~[E2+βE4]UW[I12+βI14]UX[I22+βI24]I2\displaystyle Z^{2}\tilde{U}[E^{2}+\beta E^{4}]-UV\tilde{U}[E^{2}+\beta E^{4}]-\frac{U}{W}[I_{1}^{2}+\beta I_{1}^{4}]-\frac{U}{X}[I_{2}^{2}+\beta I_{2}^{4}]I_{2}
\displaystyle- UY[L12+βL14]+m2U,\displaystyle\frac{U}{Y}[L_{1}^{2}+\beta L_{1}^{4}]+m^{2}U,
G12\displaystyle G_{12} =\displaystyle= ZW[E+βE3]I1+UU~W[J1+βJ13]I1,\displaystyle\frac{Z}{W}[E+\beta E^{3}]I_{1}+\frac{U\tilde{U}}{W}[J_{1}+\beta J_{1}^{3}]I_{1},
G13\displaystyle G_{13} =\displaystyle= ZX[E+βE3]I1+UU~X[J1+βJ13]I2,\displaystyle\frac{Z}{X}[E+\beta E^{3}]I_{1}+\frac{U\tilde{U}}{X}[J_{1}+\beta J_{1}^{3}]I_{2},
G14\displaystyle G_{14} =\displaystyle= ZY[E+βE3]L1+UU~Y[J1+βJ13]L1,\displaystyle\frac{Z}{Y}[E+\beta E^{3}]L_{1}+\frac{U\tilde{U}}{Y}[J_{1}+\beta J_{1}^{3}]L_{1},
G20\displaystyle G_{20} =\displaystyle= VU~[I1+βI13]EZU~[I1+βI13]J1,\displaystyle-V\tilde{U}[I_{1}+\beta I_{1}^{3}]E-Z\tilde{U}[I_{1}+\beta I_{1}^{3}]J_{1},
G21\displaystyle G_{21} =\displaystyle= ZU~[I1+βI13]E+UU~[I1+βI13]J1,\displaystyle Z\tilde{U}[I_{1}+\beta I_{1}^{3}]E+U\tilde{U}[I_{1}+\beta I_{1}^{3}]J_{1},
G22\displaystyle G_{22} =\displaystyle= VU2~[E2+βE4]ZU2~[J1+βJ13]EUU~[J12+βJ14]m2\displaystyle-V\tilde{U^{2}}[E^{2}+\beta E^{4}]-Z\tilde{U^{2}}[J_{1}+\beta J_{1}^{3}]E-U\tilde{U}[J_{1}^{2}+\beta J_{1}^{4}]-m^{2}
\displaystyle- 1X[I22+βI24]1Y[L12+βL14],\displaystyle\frac{1}{X}[I_{2}^{2}+\beta I_{2}^{4}]-\frac{1}{Y}[L_{1}^{2}+\beta L_{1}^{4}],
G23\displaystyle G_{23} =\displaystyle= 1X[I1+βI13]I2,G24=1Y[I1+βI13]L1,\displaystyle\frac{1}{X}[I_{1}+\beta I_{1}^{3}]I_{2},~{}~{}G_{24}=\frac{1}{Y}[I_{1}+\beta I_{1}^{3}]L_{1},
G30\displaystyle G_{30} =\displaystyle= VU~[I2+βI23]EZU~[I2+βI23]J1,\displaystyle-V\tilde{U}[I_{2}+\beta I_{2}^{3}]E-Z\tilde{U}[I_{2}+\beta I_{2}^{3}]J_{1},
G31\displaystyle G_{31} =\displaystyle= ZU~[I2+βI23]E+UU~[I2+βI23]J1,\displaystyle Z\tilde{U}[I_{2}+\beta I_{2}^{3}]E+U\tilde{U}[I_{2}+\beta I_{2}^{3}]J_{1},
G32\displaystyle G_{32} =\displaystyle= 1W[I2+βI23]I1,\displaystyle\frac{1}{W}[I_{2}+\beta I_{2}^{3}]I_{1},
G33\displaystyle G_{33} =\displaystyle= VU~[E2+βE4]ZU~[J2+βJ14]1W[I12+βI14]1Y[L12+βL14]m2,\displaystyle-V\tilde{U}[E^{2}+\beta E^{4}]-Z\tilde{U}[J_{2}+\beta J_{1}^{4}]-\frac{1}{W}[I_{1}^{2}+\beta I_{1}^{4}]-\frac{1}{Y}[L_{1}^{2}+\beta L_{1}^{4}]-m^{2},
G34\displaystyle G_{34} =\displaystyle= 1Y[I2+βI23]L1,\displaystyle\frac{1}{Y}[I_{2}+\beta I_{2}^{3}]L_{1},
G40\displaystyle G_{40} =\displaystyle= VU~[L1+βL13]EZU~[L1+βL13]J1,\displaystyle-V\tilde{U}[L_{1}+\beta L_{1}^{3}]E-Z\tilde{U}[L_{1}+\beta L_{1}^{3}]J_{1},
G41\displaystyle G_{41} =\displaystyle= ZU~[L1+βL13]E+UU~[L1+βL13]J1,\displaystyle Z\tilde{U}[L_{1}+\beta L_{1}^{3}]E+U\tilde{U}[L_{1}+\beta L_{1}^{3}]J_{1},
G42\displaystyle G_{42} =\displaystyle= 1W[L1+βL13]I1,G43=1X[L1+βL13]I2,\displaystyle\frac{1}{W}[L_{1}+\beta L_{1}^{3}]I_{1},~{}~{}G_{43}=\frac{1}{X}[L_{1}+\beta L_{1}^{3}]I_{2},
G44\displaystyle G_{44} =\displaystyle= VU~[E2+βE4]ZU~[J1+βJ13]ZU~[E+βE3]J1UU~[J12+βJ14]\displaystyle-V\tilde{U}[E^{2}+\beta E^{4}]-Z\tilde{U}[J_{1}+\beta J_{1}^{3}]-Z\tilde{U}[E+\beta E^{3}]J_{1}-U\tilde{U}[J_{1}^{2}+\beta J_{1}^{4}]
1W[I12+βI14]1X[I22+βI24]m2,\displaystyle-\frac{1}{W}[I_{1}^{2}+\beta I_{1}^{4}]-\frac{1}{X}[I_{2}^{2}+\beta I_{2}^{4}]-m^{2},

where U~=1UVZ2,J1=ϕΘ0\tilde{U}=\frac{1}{UV-Z^{2}},~{}J_{1}=\partial_{\phi}\Theta_{0}, I1=xΘ0I_{1}=\partial_{x}\Theta_{0}, I2=yΘ0I_{2}=\partial_{y}\Theta_{0} and L1=ψΘ0L_{1}=\partial_{\psi}\Theta_{0}. For the non-trivial result, the determinant G is zero and we get

ImI±=±E2+X1[1+βX2X1]UVZ2VX𝑑y,ImI_{\pm}=\pm\int\sqrt{\frac{E^{2}+X_{1}[1+\beta\frac{X_{2}}{X_{1}}]}{-\frac{UV-Z^{2}}{VX}}}dy, (5)

where, positive and negative sign denotes the radical functions of outgoing and ingoing boson particles respectively, while X1X_{1} and X2X_{2} functions can be defined as

X1\displaystyle X_{1} =\displaystyle= ZXEU~J1UU~XJ12XYL12m2X\displaystyle-ZXE\tilde{U}J_{1}-U\tilde{U}XJ_{1}^{2}-\frac{X}{Y}L_{1}^{2}-m^{2}X
X2\displaystyle X_{2} =\displaystyle= VXE4U~ZXEU~J13UU~XJ14I24XYL14\displaystyle-VXE^{4}\tilde{U}-ZXE\tilde{U}J_{1}^{3}-U\tilde{U}XJ_{1}^{4}-I_{2}^{4}-\frac{X}{Y}L_{1}^{4}

Extending the A(y) and B(y) functions in Taylor’s series near the NBR horizon, we get

A(y+)A´(y+)(yy+),B(y+)B´(y+)(yy+).A(y_{+})\simeq\acute{A}(y_{+})(y-y_{+}),~{}~{}~{}~{}B(y_{+})\simeq\acute{B}(y_{+})(y-y_{+}). (6)

Applying the Eq. (6) in Eq. (5), one can take that the resulting solution has pole at y=y+y=y_{+}. For the computation of the temperature by applying tunneling phenomenon, it is assumed that to take the singularity by particular contour around the pole. In our investigation, the coordinates of the NBR metric, the tunnel of outgoing boson particles can be found by assuming an infinitesimal semi-circle under the pole y=y+y=y_{+}, as the incoming boson particles this contour is assumed over the pole. Since applying Eqs. (5) and (6), integrating the lead field equation around the NBR pole, we have

ImI±=±iπE2κ(y+)[1+Ξβ].ImI_{\pm}=\pm\frac{i\pi E}{2\kappa(y_{+})}[1+\Xi\beta]. (7)

The surface gravity of NBR is given as

κ(y+)=R(λx+1)λ[a2(2y+ν3y2)+2ab]2(λy+1)a2b.\kappa(y_{+})=\frac{R(\lambda x+1)\sqrt{\lambda[a^{2}(-2y+\nu-3y^{2})+2ab]}}{2(\lambda y+1)a^{2}b}. (8)

Here, a=xya=x-y and b=y2νy+νy31b=y^{2}-\nu y+\nu y^{3}-1, as boson particles taking spin-1, when yy direction measuring spin and there would be two kinds, one is spin up kind and which exist the like yy direction, the other spin down kind take the opposite direction
(I+(y)=I(y))(I_{+}(y)=-I_{-}(y)).

The tunneling probability of NBR is given as

Γ\displaystyle\Gamma =\displaystyle= ΓemissionΓabsorption=exp(2ImI+(x)2ImI+(y)2ImΘ)exp(2ImI(x)2ImI(y)2ImΘ)=exp(4ImI+(y))\displaystyle\frac{\Gamma_{emission}}{\Gamma_{absorption}}=\frac{\exp(-2ImI_{+}(x)-2ImI_{+}(y)-2Im\Theta)}{\exp(-2ImI_{-}(x)-2ImI_{-}(y)-2Im\Theta)}=\exp{\left(-4ImI_{+}(y)\right)} (9)
=\displaystyle= exp(4π(λy+1)a2bE[1+Ξβ]R(λx+1)λ[a2(2y+ν3y2)+2ab]).\displaystyle\exp\left(-\frac{4\pi(\lambda y+1)a^{2}bE[1+\Xi\beta]}{R(\lambda x+1)\sqrt{\lambda[a^{2}(-2y+\nu-3y^{2})+2ab]}}\right).

It should be calculated that Eq. (7) gives near the horizon of the NBR along yy direction.

By equating Eq.(9) formulation with the factor of Boltzmann exp[β1E]\exp[-\beta_{1}E], one can deduce the temperature which is TH=1β1T_{H}=\frac{1}{\beta_{1}} at the outer NBR horizon yy. For this result, we can obtain the NBR temperature as

TH=R(λx+1)λ[a2(2y+ν3y2)+2ab]π(λy+1)a2b[1+βΞ]1.T_{H}=\frac{R(\lambda x+1)\sqrt{\lambda[a^{2}(-2y+\nu-3y^{2})+2ab]}}{\pi(\lambda y+1)a^{2}b}[1+\beta\Xi]^{-1}. (10)

The Hawking of NBR depends upon these parameters ν\nu, RR, β\beta and λ\lambda. The resulting temperature at which boson particle tunnel by the horizon is different to the temperature of a charge boson particle at which they tunnel through the NBR horizon. It is observed that the resulting Hawking temperature (10) is just for spin up boson particles. For spin up case, assuming a way fully corresponds to the spin down case solution, but in the opposite direction which means both spin down and spin up boson particles are radiated at the like rate.

III Dipole Black Ring

In this section, we will analyze Hawking temperature of boson particles through the tunneling process from the DBR. The DBR contribution the like action as NBR, since they physically obtain more similar behavior. We have analyzed that, there is an important physical object DBR from the gravity theory. The five dimensions DBR was constructed in 6 and its metric assumes in the form as

ds2\displaystyle ds^{2} =\displaystyle= G(y)G(x)(K(x)K(y))N3[dtC(λ,ν)Ry+1G(y)dψ]2\displaystyle-\frac{G(y)}{G(x)}\left(\frac{K(x)}{K(y)}\right)^{\frac{N}{3}}\left[dt-C(\lambda,\nu)R\frac{y+1}{G(y)}d\psi\right]^{2} (11)
+R2(xy)2G(x)(K(x)K2(y))N3\displaystyle+\frac{R^{2}}{(x-y)^{2}}G(x)\left(K(x)K^{2}(y)\right)^{\frac{N}{3}}
×[F(y)G(y)KN(y)dψ2dy2F(y)+dx2F(x)+F(x)G(x)KN(x)dϕ2],\displaystyle\times\left[\frac{F(y)}{G(y)K^{N}(y)}d\psi^{2}-\frac{dy^{2}}{F(y)}+\frac{dx^{2}}{F(x)}+\frac{F(x)}{G(x)K^{N}(x)}d\phi^{2}\right],

where, C(λ,ν)C(\lambda,\nu), F(ξ)F(\xi) and G(ξ)G(\xi) are the similar for NBR and K(ξ)=1ξμK(\xi)=1-\xi\mu
(1>μ0).(1>\mu\geq 0). The constant of dilation coupling is associated with the dimensionless constant as α2=(4N43)(3N>0).\alpha^{2}=(\frac{4}{N}-\frac{4}{3})(3\geq N>0). The event horizon of DBR is located at y=1ν=yKy=-\frac{1}{\nu}=yK. We analyze the tunneling and temperature for boson particles in the horizon of DBR.

The tunneling rate of boson particle in DBR horizon is given as

Γ´\displaystyle\acute{\Gamma} =\displaystyle= exp(4πE[1+Ξβ]fd(g+h)(e+4ab2al)).\displaystyle\exp\left(-4\pi\frac{E[1+\Xi\beta]}{\sqrt{fd(g+h)(e+4ab-2al)}}\right). (12)

Here, a=xya=x-y,   b=y2νy+νy31b=y^{2}-\nu y+\nu y^{3}-1,  d=R2(λx+1)[(1νx)(1νy)]N3d=R^{2}(\lambda x+1)[(1-\nu x)(1-\nu y)]^{\frac{N}{3}},   e=2Nν3(1νy)e=\frac{-2N\nu}{3(1-\nu y)},  f=(1νx1νy)N3,f=(\frac{1-\nu x}{1-\nu y})^{\frac{N}{3}},   g=Nν(λy+1)3(λx+1)(1νy)g=\frac{N\nu(\lambda y+1)}{3(\lambda x+1)(1-\nu y)} and h=λλx+1.h=\frac{\lambda}{\lambda x+1}.


Now we compute the Hawking temperature,

T´H\displaystyle\acute{T}_{H} =\displaystyle= fd(g+h)(e+4ab2al)π[1+Ξβ]1.\displaystyle\frac{\sqrt{fd(g+h)(e+4ab-2al)}}{\pi}[1+\Xi\beta]^{-1}. (13)

This solution has been computed by above applies Hamilton-Jacobi phenomenon and boson particles out the horizon of DBR are only for vector cases. We are only assuming the case of boson particles with spin up. In our investigation, assuming a same method and we will compute the like solution for boson particles with spin down but opposite direction.

IV Gravitational Effect on Temperature

In this section, we study the physical importance of quantum gravity and also analyze the impact of quantum gravity parameter on the instability and stability of NBR and DBR.

IV.1 THT_{H} versus yy

In this subsection, we can take quantum gravity value in the range of 100β300100\leq\beta\leq 300.

  • Figure 1 indicates the graph between T and y for varying quantum gravity and fixed values for other parameters.
    (i). We analyzed that the gravity parameter decreases for a small variance of Hawking temperature.
    (ii). We examined that the quantum gravity gradually decreasing and then finally goes to a large change of β\beta which is the unstable condition of NBR.
    So, we observed that for small values of β\beta the NBR is stable but as β\beta increases it indicates the unstable behavior of NBR.

  • Figure 2, shows the behavior of temperature by varying gravity parameter.
    (i). We observed that the Hawking temperature decreasing constantly for small range values of β\beta.
    (ii). As gravity increases the Hawking temperature gradually increases and then approximation goes to infinity. So, it is observed that in the range of 0y2.70\leq y\leq 2.7, the DBR is stable and Hawking temperature remains constant and the range of 2.7<y<2.7<y<\infty the DBR is unstable.

We observed that the graphical behavior of decrease and increase Hawking temperature when β<100\beta<100 and β>100\beta>100, respectively. As, for β=100\beta=100 the temperature remains constant in a particular range of yy.





Refer to caption
Figure 1: THT_{H} versus yy for R=1,λ=0.9,ν=0.75,x=0.5R=1,~{}~{}\lambda=0.9,~{}~{}\nu=0.75,~{}~{}x=-0.5 and Ξ=1.\Xi=1.
Refer to caption
Figure 2: THT^{\prime}_{H} versus yy for R=1,N=3,λ=0.9,ν=0.75,x=0.5R=1,~{}~{}N=3,~{}~{}\lambda=0.9,~{}~{}\nu=0.75,~{}~{}x=-0.5 and Ξ=1.\Xi=1.

V Conclusions

The tunneling spectrum of the Dirac and boson particles for black ring space-time have been evaluated in different coordinate system 6 ; 7 . The coordinate system in the rotating frame does not affect the value of THT_{H}. We evaluated boson particulate tunneling from the black rings to the Lagrangian gravity equation using the WKB approximation to the Hamilton-Jacobi phenomenon.

The WKB approximation tells us the tunneling probability for the classical forbidden trajectory from inner to outer horizon is associated with imaginary part of the emitted boson particles action across the black rings horizon. Firstly, we analyze the imaginary part of the action, as we know that the tunneling rate is proportional to the imaginary part of the particle action. Moreover, we examine the comparison of Hawking temperature values by assuming Boltzmann factor in both cases and analysis of the spectra in general. We consider both the cases of boson particles with spin-up and spin-down in the yy-direction. Tunneling of radiation by assuming conservation of energy-charge and quantum gravity is studied.

For 5D black ring, the THT_{H} given by equation (10) related to the λ\lambda, xx, yy, aa, bb, RR, ν\nu and β\beta, which is similar to the T´H\acute{T}_{H} as given in Eq. (13) when N=3N=3 and μ=0\mu=0. The modified temperatures are associated with the quantum gravity and geometry of the black ring. In the absence of quantum gravity, the normal tunneling and normal temperature are obtained. The Hawking temperature rises with the lowering of the horizon in Fig. (1) (which is physical) has been analyzed. Moreover, we have studied the Hawking temperature increases as the horizon increases in Fig. (2) (which is non physical).

Acknowledgments

The work of KB was supported in part by the JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 25800136 and Competitive Research Funds for Fukushima University Faculty (19RI017).

References

  • (1) R. Emparan, H. S. Reall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(2002)101101.
  • (2) H. Elvang, Phy. Rev. D 68(2003)124016.
  • (3) H. Elvang, JHEP 11(2003)035.
  • (4) Y. Morisawa, S. Tomizawa, Y. Yasui, Phy. Rev. D 77(2008)064019.
  • (5) M. Rogatko, Phy. Rev. D 77(2008)124037.
  • (6) Q. Q. Jiang, Phys. Rev. D 78(2008)044009.
  • (7) W. Javed, R. Ali, G. Abbas, Can. J. Phys. 97(2019)176.
  • (8) X. Q. Li and G. R. Chen, Phys. Lett. B 751(2015)34.
  • (9) W. Javed, G. Abbas, R. Ali, Eur. Phys. J. C 77(2017)296.
  • (10) A. Övgün, W. Javed, R. Ali, Advances in High Energy Physics 2018(2018)11.
  • (11) W. Javed, R, Ali, R. Babar, A. Övgün, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134(2019)511.
  • (12) R. Ali, K. Bamba, S. A. A. Shah, Symmetry 631(2019)11.
  • (13) W. Javed, R. Ali, R. Babar, A. Övgün, Chinese Physics C 44, No. 1(2020)015104.
  • (14) W. Javed, R. Babar, A. Övgün, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 34(2019)1950057.
  • (15) R. Babar, W. Javed, A. Övgün, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35, No. 13(2020)2050104.
  • (16) R. Ali, K. Bamba, M. Asgher, M. F. Malik, S. A. A. Shah, Symmetry 1165(2020)12.
  • (17) R. Ali, M. Asgher and M. F. Malik, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35, No. 27(2020)2050225.
  • (18) Z. Liu, Commun. Theor. Phys. 47(2007)835.
  • (19) T. Shivalingaswamy, B. A. Kagali, European J. Physics Education 2(2011)1309.