This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

11institutetext: Department of Physics, Osaka University, 560-0043, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan 22institutetext: Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, 606-8502, Kyoto, Japan 33institutetext: J-PARC Branch, KEK Theory Center, Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, KEK, 319-1106, Tokai, Ibaraki, Japan

                                                                         YITP-23-163, J-PARC-TH-0301
Electromagnetic probes for critical fluctuations of phase transitions in dense QCD

\firstnameToru \lastnameNishimura \fnsep 1122 nishimura@kern.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp    \firstnameMasakiyo \lastnameKitazawa 2233    \firstnameTeiji \lastnameKunihiro 22
Abstract

We study how the dilepton production rates and electric conductivity are affected by the phase transition to color superconductivity and the QCD critical point. Effects of the soft modes associated with these phase transitions are incorporated through the photon self-energy called the Aslamazov-Larkin, Maki-Thompson, and density-of-states terms, which are responsible for the paraconductivity in metallic superconductors. We show that anomalous enhancements of the production rate in the low energy/momentum region and the conductivity occur around the respective critical points.

1 Introduction

In the high baryon-density region of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), rich phase structures are expected to exist. They will be revealed by various experimental programs of relativistic heavy-ion collisions (HIC) such as the beam-energy scan program at RHIC, HADES and NA61/SHINE, as well as the future experiments at FAIR, NICA and J-PARC-HI. In this proceeding, we discuss the possible observability of the color superconducting phase transition (CSC-PT) and the QCD critical point (QCD-CP) in these experiments through an anomalous enhancement of the dilepton production rate (DPR) caused by the soft modes associated with these phase transitions Nishimura:2022mku ; Nishimura:2023oqn . We also study the electric conductivity that is related to the low-energy limit of the DPR. We calculate them by extending the theory of metallic superconductors Larkin:book . It is shown that the soft modes lead to an anomalous enhancement of the DPR at low energy/momentum region and the conductivity near each phase transition. We argue that these enhancements are used for experimental observables to verify the existence of the second-order phase transition on the QCD phase diagram Nishimura:2023not .

2 Formalism

To study the dense medium around the 2-flavor superconductivity (2SC) and QCD-CP at nonzero temperature (TT) and quark chemical potential (μ\mu), we employ the 2-flavor NJL model

\displaystyle\mathcal{L} =ψ¯i(γμμm)ψ+GS[(ψ¯ψ)2+(ψ¯iγ5τiψ)2]+GD(ψ¯iγ5τ2λAψC)(ψ¯Ciγ5τ2λAψ),\displaystyle=\bar{\psi}i(\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}-m)\psi+\ G_{S}[(\bar{\psi}\psi)^{2}+(\bar{\psi}i\gamma_{5}\tau_{i}\psi)^{2}]+\ G_{D}(\bar{\psi}i\gamma_{5}\tau_{2}\lambda_{A}\psi^{C})(\bar{\psi}^{C}i\gamma_{5}\tau_{2}\lambda_{A}\psi), (1)

where τi=1,2,3\tau_{i=1,2,3} is the Pauli matrix for the flavor SU(2)fSU(2)_{f}, λA=2,5,7\lambda_{A=2,5,7} is the antisymmetric components of the Gell-Mann matrices for the color SU(3)cSU(3)_{c} and ψC(x)iγ2γ0ψ¯T(x)\psi^{C}(x)\equiv i\gamma_{2}\gamma_{0}\bar{\psi}^{T}(x). We use the scalar coupling GS=5.50GeV2G_{S}=5.50\leavevmode\nobreak\ \rm{GeV^{-2}} and three-momentum cutoff Λ=631MeV\Lambda=631\rm{MeV}, which gives the pion mass mπ=138MeVm_{\pi}=138\leavevmode\nobreak\ \rm{MeV} and pion decay constant fπ=93MeVf_{\pi}=93\leavevmode\nobreak\ \rm{MeV} at the current quark mass m=5.5MeVm=5.5\leavevmode\nobreak\ {\rm MeV} Hatsuda:1994pi , while the diquark coupling GDG_{D} is treated as a free parameter.

It is known that the fluctuations of the diquark and chiral condensates form collective modes with significant strength near the 2SC-PT Kitazawa:2005vr and the QCD-CP Fujii:2004jt , respectively. The collective mode associated with the second-order phase transition is called the soft mode. In the random-phase approximation, the propagators of the respective soft modes in the imaginary-time formalism are evaluated as

Ξ~D(k)\displaystyle\tilde{\Xi}_{D}(k) =1GD1+𝒬D(k),𝒬D(k)=[Uncaptioned image]=2Nf(Nc1)pTr[𝒢0(kp)𝒢0(p)],\displaystyle=\frac{1}{{G_{D}}^{-1}+\mathcal{Q}_{D}(k)},\quad\mathcal{Q}_{D}(k)=\begin{minipage}[h]{43.36464pt} \centering\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,scale={0.034}]{qq-corr-crop.pdf} \@add@centering\end{minipage}=-2N_{f}(N_{c}-1)\int_{p}{\rm Tr}[\mathcal{G}_{0}(k-p)\mathcal{G}_{0}(p)], (2)
Ξ~S(k)\displaystyle\tilde{\Xi}_{S}(k) =1GS1+𝒬S(k),𝒬S(k)=[Uncaptioned image]=2NfNcpTr[𝒢0(pk)𝒢0(p)],\displaystyle=\frac{1}{{G_{S}}^{-1}+\mathcal{Q}_{S}(k)},\quad\mathcal{Q}_{S}(k)=\begin{minipage}[h]{43.36464pt} \centering\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,scale={0.034}]{qqbar-corr-crop.pdf} \@add@centering\end{minipage}=2N_{f}N_{c}\int_{p}{\rm Tr}[\mathcal{G}_{0}(p-k)\mathcal{G}_{0}(p)], (3)

where 𝒬D(k)=𝒬D(𝒌,iνn)\mathcal{Q}_{D}(k)=\mathcal{Q}_{D}(\bm{k},i\nu_{n}) and 𝒬S(k)=𝒬S(𝒌,iνn)\mathcal{Q}_{S}(k)=\mathcal{Q}_{S}(\bm{k},i\nu_{n}) are the one-loop qqqq and qq¯q\bar{q} correlation function, respectively, with the free quark propagator 𝒢0(p)=𝒢0(𝒑,iωm)=1/[(iωm+μ)γ0𝒑𝜸M]\mathcal{G}_{0}(p)=\mathcal{G}_{0}(\bm{p},i\omega_{m})=1/[(i\omega_{m}+\mu)\gamma_{0}-\bm{p}\cdot\bm{\gamma}-M], the Matsubara frequency for fermions (bosons) ωm\omega_{m} (νn\nu_{n}), the trace over Dirac indices Tr{\rm Tr}, and p=Tmd3p/(2π)3\smallint_{p}=T\sum_{m}\int d^{3}p/(2\pi)^{3}. The retarded propagator ΞγR(𝒌,ω)\Xi^{R}_{\gamma}(\bm{k},\omega) (γ=D,S\gamma=D,S) is obtained by the analytic continuation iνnω+iηi\nu_{n}\rightarrow\omega+i\eta.

We remark that the propagators (2) and (3) satisfy the Thouless criterion, i.e. ΞγR1(𝟎,0)=0{\Xi^{R}_{\gamma}}^{-1}(\bm{0},0)=0 at the respective critical points. The criterion shows that a pole of the propagator approaches the origin of the complex energy plane as TT and μ\mu goes toward the critical points, and hence the fluctuations of the condensates become soft near the critical points.

The DPR is related to the retarded photon self-energy ΠRμν(k)\Pi^{R\mu\nu}(k) as

d4Γd4k=α12π41k21eω/T1gμνImΠRμν(k),\displaystyle\frac{d^{4}\Gamma}{d^{4}k}=-\frac{\alpha}{12\pi^{4}}\frac{1}{k^{2}}\frac{1}{e^{\omega/T}-1}g_{\mu\nu}{\rm Im}\Pi^{R\mu\nu}(k), (4)

where α\alpha is the fine structure constant. The elecrtric conductivity is given in terms of the spectral density ρ(ω)=iImΠRii(𝟎,ω)\rho(\omega)=-\sum_{i}{\rm Im}\Pi^{Rii}(\bm{0},\omega) as

σ=13ρ(ω)ω|ω=0.\displaystyle\sigma=\frac{1}{3}\frac{\partial\rho(\omega)}{\partial\omega}\bigg{|}_{\omega=0}\leavevmode\nobreak\ . (5)

To construct the photon self-energy Π~μν(k)\tilde{\Pi}^{\mu\nu}(k) that includes the soft modes, we start from the lowest contribution of the soft modes to the thermodynamic potential Ωγ=pln[GγΞ~γ1(p)]\Omega_{\gamma}=\smallint_{p}\ln[G_{\gamma}\tilde{\Xi}_{\gamma}^{-1}(p)], which is the one-loop diagram of Ξ~γ(p)\tilde{\Xi}_{\gamma}(p). The self-energy is then obtained by attaching electromagnetic vertices to two points of quark lines in Ωγ\Omega_{\gamma}. From this procedure, one finds three types of diagrams which are called the Aslamazov-Larkin (AL), Maki-Thompson (MT) and density-of-states (DOS) terms in the theory of metallic superconductivity. Each contribution to the photon self-energy is given by

Π~AL,Dμν(k)\displaystyle\tilde{\Pi}_{{\rm AL},D}^{\mu\nu}(k) =3qΓ~Dμ(q,q+k)Ξ~D(q+k)Γ~Dν(q+k,q)Ξ~D(q),\displaystyle=3\int_{q}\tilde{\Gamma}_{D}^{\mu}(q,q+k)\tilde{\Xi}_{D}(q+k)\tilde{\Gamma}_{D}^{\nu}(q+k,q)\tilde{\Xi}_{D}(q), (6)
Π~MT(DOS),Dμν(k)\displaystyle\tilde{\Pi}_{{\rm MT(DOS)},D}^{\mu\nu}(k) =3qΞ~D(q)MT(DOS),Dμν(q,k),\displaystyle=3\int_{q}\tilde{\Xi}_{D}(q)\mathcal{R}_{{\rm MT(DOS)},D}^{\mu\nu}(q,k), (7)
Π~AL,Sμν(k)\displaystyle\tilde{\Pi}_{{\rm AL},S}^{\mu\nu}(k) =f=u,dqΓ~fμ(q,q+k)Ξ~S(q+k)Γ~fν(q+k,q)Ξ~S(q),\displaystyle=\sum_{f=u,d}\int_{q}\tilde{\Gamma}_{f}^{\mu}(q,q+k)\tilde{\Xi}_{S}(q+k)\tilde{\Gamma}_{f}^{\nu}(q+k,q)\tilde{\Xi}_{S}(q), (8)
Π~MT(DOS),Sμν(k)\displaystyle\tilde{\Pi}_{{\rm MT(DOS)},S}^{\mu\nu}(k) =f=u,dqΞ~S(q)MT(DOS),fμν(q,k),\displaystyle=\sum_{f=u,d}\int_{q}\tilde{\Xi}_{S}(q)\mathcal{R}_{{\rm MT(DOS)},f}^{\mu\nu}(q,k), (9)

where the vertices Γ~Dμ(q,q+k)\tilde{\Gamma}_{D}^{\mu}(q,q+k), Dμν(q,k)=MT,Dμν(q,k)+DOS,Dμν(q,k)\mathcal{R}^{\mu\nu}_{D}(q,k)=\mathcal{R}_{{\rm MT},D}^{\mu\nu}(q,k)+\mathcal{R}_{{\rm DOS},D}^{\mu\nu}(q,k), Γ~fμ(q,q+k)\tilde{\Gamma}_{f}^{\mu}(q,q+k), and fμν(q,k)=MT,fμν(q,k)+DOS,fμν(q,k)\mathcal{R}^{\mu\nu}_{f}(q,k)=\mathcal{R}_{{\rm MT},f}^{\mu\nu}(q,k)+\mathcal{R}_{{\rm DOS},f}^{\mu\nu}(q,k) satisfy the Ward-Takahashi (WT) identities

kμΓ~Dμ(q,q+k)\displaystyle k_{\mu}\tilde{\Gamma}_{D}^{\mu}(q,q+k) =(eu+ed)[𝒬D(q+k)𝒬D(q)],\displaystyle=(e_{u}+e_{d})[\mathcal{Q}_{D}(q+k)-\mathcal{Q}_{D}(q)], (10)
kμDμν(q,k)\displaystyle k_{\mu}\mathcal{R}_{D}^{\mu\nu}(q,k) =(eu+ed)[Γ~Dν(qk,q)Γ~Dν(q,q+k)],\displaystyle=(e_{u}+e_{d})[\tilde{\Gamma}_{D}^{\nu}(q-k,q)-\tilde{\Gamma}_{D}^{\nu}(q,q+k)], (11)
kμΓ~fμ(q,q+k)\displaystyle k_{\mu}\tilde{\Gamma}_{f}^{\mu}(q,q+k) =ef[𝒬S(q+k)𝒬S(q)],\displaystyle=-e_{f}[\mathcal{Q}_{S}(q+k)-\mathcal{Q}_{S}(q)], (12)
kμfμν(q,k)\displaystyle k_{\mu}\mathcal{R}_{f}^{\mu\nu}(q,k) =ef[Γ~fν(qk,q)Γ~fν(q,q+k)],\displaystyle=-e_{f}[\tilde{\Gamma}_{f}^{\nu}(q-k,q)-\tilde{\Gamma}_{f}^{\nu}(q,q+k)], (13)

with eu=2|e|/3e_{u}=2|e|/3 (ed=|e|/3e_{d}=-|e|/3) being the electric charge of the up (down) quark. The total photon self-energy is then given by Π~μν(k)=Π~freeμν(k)+Π~Dμν(k)+Π~Sμν(k)\tilde{\Pi}^{\mu\nu}(k)=\tilde{\Pi}_{\rm free}^{\mu\nu}(k)+\tilde{\Pi}_{D}^{\mu\nu}(k)+\tilde{\Pi}_{S}^{\mu\nu}(k) with

Π~Dμν(k)=\displaystyle\tilde{\Pi}_{D}^{\mu\nu}(k)= Π~AL,Dμν(k)+Π~MT,Dμν(k)+Π~DOS,Dμν(k),\displaystyle\tilde{\Pi}_{{\rm AL},D}^{\mu\nu}(k)+\tilde{\Pi}_{{\rm MT},D}^{\mu\nu}(k)+\tilde{\Pi}_{{\rm DOS},D}^{\mu\nu}(k), (14)
Π~Sμν(k)=\displaystyle\tilde{\Pi}_{S}^{\mu\nu}(k)= Π~AL,Sμν(k)+Π~MT,Sμν(k)+Π~DOS,Sμν(k),\displaystyle\tilde{\Pi}_{{\rm AL},S}^{\mu\nu}(k)+\tilde{\Pi}_{{\rm MT},S}^{\mu\nu}(k)+\tilde{\Pi}_{{\rm DOS},S}^{\mu\nu}(k), (15)

where Π~freeμν(k)\tilde{\Pi}_{\rm free}^{\mu\nu}(k) is the contribution of the massless free quark gases. One can explicitly check that Π~μν(k)\tilde{\Pi}^{\mu\nu}(k) satisfies the WT identity kμΠ~μν(k)=0k_{\mu}\tilde{\Pi}^{\mu\nu}(k)=0 using Eqs. (10)–(13).

3 Numerical results and summary

Refer to caption Refer to caption
Figure 1: Dilepton production rates per unit energy ω\omega and momentum 𝒌\bm{k} above TcT_{c} of the 2SC at μ=350MeV\mu=350\leavevmode\nobreak\ {\rm MeV} (left) Nishimura:2022mku and of the QCD-CP at μ=μCP\mu=\mu_{\rm CP} (right) Nishimura:2023oqn with GD=0.7GSG_{D}=0.7G_{S}. The thick (thin) lines are the contribution of the soft modes (the massless free quark gases).

The left panel of Fig. 1 shows the DPR per unit energy ω\omega and momentum 𝒌\bm{k} near the 2SC-PT for T/Tc=1.01T/T_{c}=1.01, 1.11.1 and 1.51.5 at μ=350MeV\mu=350\leavevmode\nobreak\ {\rm MeV} and GD=0.7GSG_{D}=0.7G_{S} with the critical temperature Tc=42.94MeVT_{c}=42.94\leavevmode\nobreak\ {\rm MeV} Nishimura:2022mku . The thick lines are the contributions from the soft modes, while the thin lines are the ones of the free quark gas. One sees that the DPR from the soft modes is anomalously enhanced at small ω\omega and 𝒌\bm{k} region in comparison with the free quark gas for T1.5TcT\lesssim 1.5T_{c}, and this enhancement is more pronounced as TT approaches TcT_{c}. This result is expected from the properties of the soft modes. Shown in the right panel of Fig. 1 is the DPR near the QCD-CP for T/TCP=1.01T/T_{\rm CP}=1.01, 1.11.1 and 1.21.2 at μ=μCP\mu=\mu_{\rm CP} with the location of the QCD-CP (TCP,μCP)=(46.712,329.34)MeV(T_{\rm CP},\mu_{\rm CP})=(46.712,329.34)\leavevmode\nobreak\ {\rm MeV} Nishimura:2023oqn . One finds that the anomalous enhancement of the DPR is observed similarly to the case of the 2SC.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Contour maps of the electric conductivity σ/T\sigma/T on the TTμ\mu plane around the QCD-CP and 2SC-PT with GD/GS=0.70G_{D}/G_{S}=0.70, 0.650.65 and 0.600.60. The solid (dashed) line is the first-order (second-order) phase transition.

Figure 2 shows the contour maps of the electric conductivity σ/T\sigma/T on the TTμ\mu plane for GD/GS=0.70G_{D}/G_{S}=0.70, 0.650.65 and 0.600.60 obtained from Π~μν(k)\tilde{\Pi}^{\mu\nu}(k) with the effects of the 2SC-PT and QCD-CP. One sees that the conductivity is enhanced around these phase transitions. Since the effect of finite diquark condensate is not considered, our formalism is not applicable to the 2SC phase, i.e. the white region in the figure.

In Fig. 2, it is notable that the electric conductivity is enhanced at two distinct regions on the TTμ\mu plane near the QCD-CP and 2SC-PT, whose separation is controlled by the value of GDG_{D}. Since the electric conductivity is related to the DPR at low-mass region through Eqs. (4) and (5), this result indicates that there are also two hot spots of the dilepton production on the QCD phase diagram. In the beam-energy scan of the HIC where different regions on the TTμ\mu plane can be investigated by varying the collision energy sNN\sqrt{s_{{}_{NN}}}, this behavior would result in two distinct enhancements of the dilepton yield as a function of sNN\sqrt{s_{{}_{NN}}}, as recently demonstrated in Ref. Nishimura:2023not . It is quite interesting to pursue such behavior in the HIC, as it becomes strong collateral evidence for the existence of both the QCD-CP and 2SC-PT.

In this proceeding, we studied how the soft modes of the 2SC-PT and QCD-CP affect the DPR and electric conductivity around the phase transitions. The modifications of the photon self-energy due to the soft modes are incorporated through the Aslamazov-Larkin, Maki-Thompson, and density-of-states terms, in accordance with the WT identity of the photon self-energy. The characteristic structure of the enhancement of the DPR on the QCD phase diagram found in this study would allow us to detect the 2SC-PT and QCD-CP in future HIC experiments.

References

  • (1) T. Nishimura, M. Kitazawa and T. Kunihiro, PTEP 2022, 093D02 (2022).
  • (2) T. Nishimura, M. Kitazawa and T. Kunihiro, PTEP 2023, 053D01 (2023).
  • (3) A. I. Larkin and A. A. Varlamov, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2008).
  • (4) T. Hatsuda andT. Kunihiro, Phys. Rept. 247, 221 (1994).
  • (5) M. Kitazawa, T. Koide, T. Kunihiro and Y. Nemoto, Phys. Rev. D 65, 091504 (2002); ibid., Phys. Rev. D 70, 056003 (2004); ibid., Prog. Theor. Phys. 114, 117 (2005).
  • (6) H. Fujii and M. Ohtani, Phys. Rev. D 70, 014016 (2004).
  • (7) T. Nishimura, Y. Nara, and J. Steinheimer (2023), 2311.14135