Zygmund’s theorem for harmonic quasiregular mappings
Abstract.
Given an analytic function in the unit disk , Zygmund’s theorem gives the minimal growth restriction on which ensures that is in the Hardy space . This need not be true if is a complex-valued harmonic function. However, we prove that Zygmund’s theorem holds if is a harmonic -quasiregular mapping in . Our work makes further progress on the recent Riesz-type theorem of Liu and Zhu (Adv. Math., 2023), and the Kolmogorov-type theorem of Kalaj (J. Math. Anal. Appl., 2025), for harmonic quasiregular mappings. We also obtain a partial converse, thus showing that the proposed growth condition is the best possible. Furthermore, as an application of the classical conjugate function theorems, we establish a harmonic analogue of a well-known result of Hardy and Littlewood.
Key words and phrases:
Hardy space; Harmonic functions; Quasiregular mappings; Zygmund theorem; Riesz theorem2020 Mathematics Subject Classification:
primary: 31A05, 30H10; secondary: 30C621. Introduction
1.1. Notations and preliminaries
Suppose is the open unit disk in the complex plane , and is the unit circle. For a function analytic in , the integral means of are defined as
and
The function is said to be in the Hardy space if
Every function has “nice” boundary behaviour, in the sense that the radial limit
exists in almost every direction, and is of class . Detailed surveys on Hardy spaces can be found, e.g., in the books of Duren [7] and Koosis [11]. Throughout this paper, we follow notations from [7].
A real-valued function , twice continuously differentiable in , is called harmonic if it satisfies the Laplace equation
For a complex-valued function , the complex partial derivatives have the form
where . In view of this, it is easy to see that the Laplacian operator can also be written as
A function is harmonic in , if and are real-valued harmonic functions in . Every such function has a representation , where and are analytic in . This representation is unique up to an additive constant. In this paper we usually assume , unless mentioned otherwise. Similar to the spaces, the harmonic Hardy spaces are defined as the class of functions , harmonic in , such that
We refer to the books of Duren [6] for the theory of planar harmonic mappings and Pavlović [15] for a concise survey on spaces.
Given , a sense-preserving harmonic function is said to be -quasiregular if its complex dilatation satisfies the inequality
where
We say that is -quasiconformal if is -quasiregular and homeomorphic in . One can find the -theory for quasiregular and quasiconformal mappings, for example, in the survey of Astala and Koskela [2] and the paper of Adamowicz and González [1]. Some recent results on the Hardy space of harmonic quasiconformal mappings are obtained in [18].
1.2. Classical results of Riesz, Kolmogorov and Zygmund
Given a real-valued harmonic function in , let be its harmonic conjugate, normalized by the condition . It is a natural question that if has a certain property, whether so does . In the context of boundary behaviour, M. Riesz established this principle in a remarkably precise form:
Theorem A.
[7, Theorem 4.1] If for some , , then its harmonic conjugate is also of class . Furthermore, there is a constant , depending only on , such that
for all .
Curiously, the theorem fails for the cases and , examples are given in [7, p. 56]. Although the harmonic conjugate of an function need not be in , Kolmogorov crucially pointed out that it does belong to for all . The result, in a stronger form, is as follows.
Theorem B.
[7, Theorem 4.2] If , then its harmonic conjugate for all . Furthermore, there is a constant , depending only on , such that
for all .
It follows from the theorems of Riesz and Kolmogorov that the condition is not enough to ensure , but the slightly stronger hypothesis (for some ) is sufficient. Therefore, one naturally asks for the “minimal” growth restriction on which should imply . As established by Zygmund, such a condition is the boundedness of the integrals
where . The class of such harmonic functions in is denoted by . The following is the precise statement of Zygmund’s theorem.
Theorem C.
[7, Theorem 4.3] If , then its conjugate is of class , and
It should be noted that for every , so that Zygmund’s theorem is indeed best possible. We refer the reader to the paper of Pichorides [17] for the sharp constants in the Riesz, Kolmogorov, and Zygmund theorems.
1.3. Recent developments for harmonic quasiregular mappings
Suppose is a harmonic function in . If , , then the imaginary part does not necessarily belong to the space , i.e., Riesz theorem is not true for harmonic functions. The question arises: Under what additional condition(s) does a harmonic analogue of the Riesz theorem hold? Recently, Liu and Zhu established in their breakthrough paper [12] that such a condition is the quasiregularity of .
Theorem D.
[12] Let be a harmonic -quasiregular mapping in such that and . If for some , then also is in . Furthermore, there is a constant , depending only on and , such that
Moreover, if , i.e., is analytic, then coincides with the optimal constant in the Riesz theorem.
It is important to note that the assumption “ is harmonic in ” cannot be removed. There exists a quasiconformal mapping for which the first coordinate function belongs to the Hardy space, but the whole function does not (see [2, p. 36]).
Later, Kalaj [10] refined Theorem D by removing the condition . Furthermore, he proved a Kolmogorov type theorem for harmonic quasiregular mappings in , thereby making considerable progress in this direction.
Theorem E.
[10] Suppose is a harmonic -quasiregular mapping in such that and . Then and for every . Furthermore, they satisfy the inequalities
and
All the constants are asymptotically sharp as .
Kalaj also points out that the second inequality is new even for analytic functions. Several other Riesz type theorems for harmonic functions can be found in the recent works of Kalaj [8, 9], Chen and Hamada [3], Melentijević [13], and Melentijević and Marković [14]. Furthermore, Chen and Huang [4] have proved Riesz theorem for pluriharmonic functions where the assumption is dropped as well.
1.4. Main results
In this paper, we make further advance along this line and establish a Zygmund type theorem for harmonic quasiregular mappings. For a harmonic -quasiregular mapping in , we find out the growth condition on that would imply (and ). The following is the central result of this paper.
Theorem 1.
Let be a harmonic -quasiregular mapping in such that (or ) and . If , then and
(1) |
Consequently, and satisfies inequality (1).
Remark 1.
The conclusion is true under the slightly weaker hypothesis that for some constant , since adding a constant to does not affect or the quasiregularity of , although we do not know if the estimate (1) still holds in this case. However, we suspect that the assumption (or ) may actually be redundant, but a proof remains elusive.
Theorem 1 is the best possible, in the sense that the growth restriction imposed on cannot be weakened. This can be seen from the following partial converse, which surprisingly does not require the quasiregularity hypothesis.
Theorem 2.
Let be a harmonic function in such that for some constant , and is non-vanishing. If , then .
2. Proof of the main theorems
2.1. Proof of Theorem 1
First assume that , so that . Let us write , and let be its complex dilatation. An elementary computation gives
Suppose . Then
so that
This implies
Therefore, we have
as . On the other hand, one finds
Thus, it follows that
These inequalities imply
and therefore,
(2) |
The next step is to apply Green’s theorem in the form
where . Then, it follows from (2) that
Now, integrating from to and recalling that , we get
Therefore
which is the desired inequality.
For the case , let us write . We see that is harmonic -quasiregular in with , and satisfying . Then, from what we have already proved, it follows that
Since and , the proof is complete.∎
The proof of the converse (Theorem 2) relies on the following lemma, which is of some independent interest.
Lemma 1.
Let be a harmonic function in such that is non-vanishing. If , then the analytic function is in .
Proof.
Suppose , and assume that and . Then
and
since . We recall [7, Theorem 1.1] that every real-valued harmonic function in can be expressed as the difference of two positive harmonic functions. Let us write
where and are positive harmonic functions in . Since is continuous and non-vanishing, either or in the whole disk . If , then
which is again the difference of two positive harmonic functions, and hence is in . Similarly, if , we have
In either case,
Therefore, . This completes the proof. ∎
Remark 2.
-
(i)
The usual normalisation implies . However, if we drop the condition , then Lemma 1 is true if either or is non-vanishing, and the proof is essentially the same.
-
(ii)
If , it seems that the corresponding need not be in . In view of this, the hypothesis (or ) seems to be a surprisingly simple assumption that ensures . A similar condition appears in Kalaj’s refinement of the Liu-Zhu result (Theorem 2.2 of [10]), where it is assumed that .
2.2. Proof of Theorem 2
Suppose . Without any loss of generality, we may assume that , as adding a constant to does not affect or the condition . Since is non-vanishing, by Lemma 1 we have . Let us write
where , and . Then
Now, the function is analytic in , with
We apply mean value theorem to this real part to obtain
since . It is to be noted that implies , so that is well-defined. Thus we have
It follows that
which is finite since . Therefore, and the proof is complete.∎
3. An application of the theorems of Riesz and Kolmogorov
Here we discuss how the classical theorems of Riesz and Kolmogorov can be applied to obtain numerous results for planar harmonic Hardy spaces. We give an example of a famous theorem of Hardy and Littlewood, that seems to be unknown for complex-valued harmonic functions.
Let be an analytic function in with . If for some , it is interesting to understand the behaviour of the Taylor coefficients . We should note that it makes sense only to talk about the eventual behaviour as , since any finite number of coefficients can be changed arbitrarily without affecting the fact . The following theorem of Hardy and Littlewood describes the Taylor coefficients of an -function in a precise form.
Theorem F.
The converse of this theorem is false for but holds for the indices , and can be obtained from Theorem F via a duality argument. However, Pavlović [16] showed that if the sequence decreases to , then the converse is indeed true for all .
Theorem G.
[16] Suppose . If as , then the function is in if and only if
Similar problem for planar harmonic functions is not known, but can be easily deduced from the conjugate function theorems. It is worth mentioning that the case is usually difficult to handle for harmonic functions. Nevertheless, we can produce a slightly different result that deals with this case (part (ii) of Theorem 3).
Let be a harmonic function in with
(3) |
We should note that as , but for our forthcoming discussion, it is convenient to write the sum as .
Theorem 3.
If is a harmonic functions in with the series representation (3), then the following statements hold:
-
(i)
If for some , then
Furthermore, suppose and . Then if and only if
-
(ii)
If , then
for every .
-
(iii)
Suppose and , . If , then
Proof.
(i) The main step is to show that . This is contained in Lemma 2.2 of [12], but we give a slightly different proof based on ideas from the more general result [5, Lemma 1]. Let us write , where and are real-valued harmonic functions in . Suppose is the harmonic conjugate of normalised by , while is the harmonic conjugate of with . Assume that and . Then , are analytic in , and
Moreover, the above normalisations suggest that
so that the uniqueness of and implies
As , clearly . In view of Riesz theorem (Theorem A), we have . It follows that , are in , therefore so are and .
Now, we apply Theorem F to the functions and to find
for . Combining these two inequalities, we get the desired result.
The proof for the second part of the theorem is identical, except appealing to Theorem G. The details are omitted.
Remark 4.
Acknowledgements
The first-named author thanks Petar Melentijević for helpful discussions on the space that led to the classical theory of Zygmund. The research was partially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Grant no. 2024A1515010467) and the Li Ka Shing Foundation STU-GTIIT Joint Research Grant (Grant no. 2024LKSFG06).
References
- [1] T. Adamowicz and M. J. González. Hardy spaces for quasiregular mappings and composition operators. J. Geom. Anal., 31(11):11417–11427, 2021.
- [2] K. Astala and P. Koskela. -theory for quasiconformal mappings. Pure Appl. Math. Q., 7(1):19–50, 2011.
- [3] S. Chen and H. Hamada. On (Fejér-)Riesz type inequalities, Hardy-Littlewood type theorems and smooth moduli. Math. Z., 305(4):Paper No. 64, 30, 2023.
- [4] S. Chen and M. Huang. Riesz type theorems for -pluriharmonic mappings, invariant harmonic quasiregular mappings and harmonic quasiregular mappings. arXiv:2310.15452, 2023.
- [5] S. Das and A. Sairam Kaliraj. Growth of harmonic mappings and Baernstein type inequalities. Potential Anal., 60(3):1121–1137, 2024.
- [6] P. Duren. Harmonic mappings in the plane, volume 156 of Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.
- [7] P. L. Duren. Theory of spaces. Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 38. Academic Press, New York-London, 1970.
- [8] D. Kalaj. On Riesz type inequalities for harmonic mappings on the unit disk. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 372(6):4031–4051, 2019.
- [9] D. Kalaj. On M. Riesz conjugate function theorem for harmonic functions. Potential Anal., 2024.
- [10] D. Kalaj. Riesz and Kolmogorov inequality for harmonic quasiregular mappings. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 542(1):Paper No. 128767, 15, 2025.
- [11] P. Koosis. Introduction to spaces, volume 115 of Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition, 1998.
- [12] J. Liu and J.-F. Zhu. Riesz conjugate functions theorem for harmonic quasiconformal mappings. Adv. Math., 434:Paper No. 109321, 27, 2023.
- [13] P. Melentijević. Hollenbeck-Verbitsky conjecture on best constant inequalities for analytic and co-analytic projections. Math. Ann., 388(4):4405–4448, 2024.
- [14] P. Melentijević and M. Marković. Best constants in inequalities involving analytic and co-analytic projections and Riesz’s theorem in various function spaces. Potential Anal., 59(4):1599–1620, 2023.
- [15] M. Pavlović. Introduction to function spaces on the disk, volume 20 of Posebna Izdanja [Special Editions]. Matematički Institut SANU, Belgrade, 2004.
- [16] M. Pavlović. Analytic functions with decreasing coefficients and Hardy and Bloch spaces. Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. (2), 56(2):623–635, 2013.
- [17] S. K. Pichorides. On the best values of the constants in the theorems of M. Riesz, Zygmund and Kolmogorov. Studia Math., 44:165–179, 1972.
- [18] Z.-G. Wang, X.-Y. Wang, A. Rasila, and J.-L. Qiu. On a problem of Pavlović involving harmonic quasiconformal mappings. arXiv:2405.19852, 2024.